Welfare assessment in rabbits raised for meat and laboratory purposes in enclosures with two floor types: Perforated plastic with holes versus slats

Due to welfare concerns and legal restrictions in certain countries, alternatives to wire net floors must be developed in rabbit husbandries. Also, there is a difference in regulations in Europe for laboratory rabbits vs. rabbits bred and kept for meat production. While there are regulations concern...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Research in veterinary science 2019-02, Vol.122, p.200-209
Hauptverfasser: Tillmann, K., Windschnurer, I., Gamper, J., Hinney, B., Rülicke, T., Podesser, B.K., Troxler, J., Plasenzotti, R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 209
container_issue
container_start_page 200
container_title Research in veterinary science
container_volume 122
creator Tillmann, K.
Windschnurer, I.
Gamper, J.
Hinney, B.
Rülicke, T.
Podesser, B.K.
Troxler, J.
Plasenzotti, R.
description Due to welfare concerns and legal restrictions in certain countries, alternatives to wire net floors must be developed in rabbit husbandries. Also, there is a difference in regulations in Europe for laboratory rabbits vs. rabbits bred and kept for meat production. While there are regulations concerning floor design of enclosures for rabbits bred for meat production in many European countries, the European Directive 2010/63 lacks regulations for rabbits used for scientific purposes. This study compares two floors, which meet the Austrian legal requirements for growing rabbits intended for consumption as well as the requirements for laboratory rabbits. The dual use of rabbits bred for meat production and applicable for scientific purposes would avoid the problem of surplus animals of specialized producers for laboratory rabbits. A noryl floor with 12 mm circular holes was compared to a 10 mm slatted plastic floor. Parameters were soiling of cages and animals, parasitic burden, clinical health, and losses using objective scoring. Soiling of cages and animals and coccidial oocytes were significantly higher on the floors with circular holes. Obvious signs of disease showed a non-significant trend to be more frequent in the group with circular holes. This was linked with significantly higher losses. In conclusion, our study clearly shows that the floor with circular hole design cannot be endorsed, although it meets legal requirements. The slatted floor type can be cautiously recommended; however, to assure animal welfare in laboratory rabbits, legal authorities in Europe should take on the responsibility of regulating floor design in this sector. •A floor for rabbits with circular 12 mm holes has been tested for the first time.•A plastic floor with 10 mm slats was very clean and promising.•The floor design with 12 mm holes is not recommendable.•Study design was highly comparable since the floor design was the only difference.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.11.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2158242155</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0034528818300316</els_id><sourcerecordid>2166741557</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fd331abbfbcc4b9ac1008123ba1c919b4afe8876ec193acac35dedbe7c0b72a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-KFDEQh4Mo7uzqC3iQgBcv3aY6_W_Eiyy6Cgt6UDyGJF3NZkh32lR6lnkPH9g0s3rw4CVFiu_7UVQx9gJECQLaN4cyHsmWlYC-BChz6xHbQSOrompbeMx2Qsi6aKq-v2CXRAchRA3QPWUXUjRN13Vyx379QD_qiFwTIdGEc-Ju5lEb4xLl6ggHPobIJ9SJ63ngXpsQdQrxxJc1LiF7m4Kz9YHWmH_3Lt3xdB_46EM202lBesu_Yhw3MectXlNy9gzeBZ-dI0ZaiZPXiZ6xJ6P2hM8f6hX7_vHDt-tPxe2Xm8_X728LK_s6FeMgJeRBR2NtbfbaghA9VNJosHvYm1qP2Pddixb2UlttZTPgYLCzwnSV7uQVe33OXWL4uSIlNTmy6L2eMaykKmj6qs5vk9FX_6CHsMY5T5eptu3qDG2B1ZmyMRBFHNUS3aTjSYFQ283UQW03U9vNFIDKrSy9fIhezYTDX-XPkTLw7gxg3sXRYVRkXV43Di6iTWoI7n_5vwHbEKyT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2166741557</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Welfare assessment in rabbits raised for meat and laboratory purposes in enclosures with two floor types: Perforated plastic with holes versus slats</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Tillmann, K. ; Windschnurer, I. ; Gamper, J. ; Hinney, B. ; Rülicke, T. ; Podesser, B.K. ; Troxler, J. ; Plasenzotti, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tillmann, K. ; Windschnurer, I. ; Gamper, J. ; Hinney, B. ; Rülicke, T. ; Podesser, B.K. ; Troxler, J. ; Plasenzotti, R.</creatorcontrib><description>Due to welfare concerns and legal restrictions in certain countries, alternatives to wire net floors must be developed in rabbit husbandries. Also, there is a difference in regulations in Europe for laboratory rabbits vs. rabbits bred and kept for meat production. While there are regulations concerning floor design of enclosures for rabbits bred for meat production in many European countries, the European Directive 2010/63 lacks regulations for rabbits used for scientific purposes. This study compares two floors, which meet the Austrian legal requirements for growing rabbits intended for consumption as well as the requirements for laboratory rabbits. The dual use of rabbits bred for meat production and applicable for scientific purposes would avoid the problem of surplus animals of specialized producers for laboratory rabbits. A noryl floor with 12 mm circular holes was compared to a 10 mm slatted plastic floor. Parameters were soiling of cages and animals, parasitic burden, clinical health, and losses using objective scoring. Soiling of cages and animals and coccidial oocytes were significantly higher on the floors with circular holes. Obvious signs of disease showed a non-significant trend to be more frequent in the group with circular holes. This was linked with significantly higher losses. In conclusion, our study clearly shows that the floor with circular hole design cannot be endorsed, although it meets legal requirements. The slatted floor type can be cautiously recommended; however, to assure animal welfare in laboratory rabbits, legal authorities in Europe should take on the responsibility of regulating floor design in this sector. •A floor for rabbits with circular 12 mm holes has been tested for the first time.•A plastic floor with 10 mm slats was very clean and promising.•The floor design with 12 mm holes is not recommendable.•Study design was highly comparable since the floor design was the only difference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-5288</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.11.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30557773</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal welfare ; Animals ; Cages ; Circularity ; Design ; Enclosures ; Floor design ; Flooring ; Floors ; Food safety ; Growing rabbits ; Housing ; Laboratories ; Legal regulations ; Meat ; Meat production ; Meat quality ; Oocytes ; Parasitic diseases ; Rabbit husbandry ; Rabbits ; Regulations ; Slats ; Veterinary medicine</subject><ispartof>Research in veterinary science, 2019-02, Vol.122, p.200-209</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fd331abbfbcc4b9ac1008123ba1c919b4afe8876ec193acac35dedbe7c0b72a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fd331abbfbcc4b9ac1008123ba1c919b4afe8876ec193acac35dedbe7c0b72a73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034528818300316$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30557773$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tillmann, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windschnurer, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamper, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinney, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rülicke, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podesser, B.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troxler, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plasenzotti, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Welfare assessment in rabbits raised for meat and laboratory purposes in enclosures with two floor types: Perforated plastic with holes versus slats</title><title>Research in veterinary science</title><addtitle>Res Vet Sci</addtitle><description>Due to welfare concerns and legal restrictions in certain countries, alternatives to wire net floors must be developed in rabbit husbandries. Also, there is a difference in regulations in Europe for laboratory rabbits vs. rabbits bred and kept for meat production. While there are regulations concerning floor design of enclosures for rabbits bred for meat production in many European countries, the European Directive 2010/63 lacks regulations for rabbits used for scientific purposes. This study compares two floors, which meet the Austrian legal requirements for growing rabbits intended for consumption as well as the requirements for laboratory rabbits. The dual use of rabbits bred for meat production and applicable for scientific purposes would avoid the problem of surplus animals of specialized producers for laboratory rabbits. A noryl floor with 12 mm circular holes was compared to a 10 mm slatted plastic floor. Parameters were soiling of cages and animals, parasitic burden, clinical health, and losses using objective scoring. Soiling of cages and animals and coccidial oocytes were significantly higher on the floors with circular holes. Obvious signs of disease showed a non-significant trend to be more frequent in the group with circular holes. This was linked with significantly higher losses. In conclusion, our study clearly shows that the floor with circular hole design cannot be endorsed, although it meets legal requirements. The slatted floor type can be cautiously recommended; however, to assure animal welfare in laboratory rabbits, legal authorities in Europe should take on the responsibility of regulating floor design in this sector. •A floor for rabbits with circular 12 mm holes has been tested for the first time.•A plastic floor with 10 mm slats was very clean and promising.•The floor design with 12 mm holes is not recommendable.•Study design was highly comparable since the floor design was the only difference.</description><subject>Animal welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cages</subject><subject>Circularity</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Enclosures</subject><subject>Floor design</subject><subject>Flooring</subject><subject>Floors</subject><subject>Food safety</subject><subject>Growing rabbits</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Legal regulations</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat production</subject><subject>Meat quality</subject><subject>Oocytes</subject><subject>Parasitic diseases</subject><subject>Rabbit husbandry</subject><subject>Rabbits</subject><subject>Regulations</subject><subject>Slats</subject><subject>Veterinary medicine</subject><issn>0034-5288</issn><issn>1532-2661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc-KFDEQh4Mo7uzqC3iQgBcv3aY6_W_Eiyy6Cgt6UDyGJF3NZkh32lR6lnkPH9g0s3rw4CVFiu_7UVQx9gJECQLaN4cyHsmWlYC-BChz6xHbQSOrompbeMx2Qsi6aKq-v2CXRAchRA3QPWUXUjRN13Vyx379QD_qiFwTIdGEc-Ju5lEb4xLl6ggHPobIJ9SJ63ngXpsQdQrxxJc1LiF7m4Kz9YHWmH_3Lt3xdB_46EM202lBesu_Yhw3MectXlNy9gzeBZ-dI0ZaiZPXiZ6xJ6P2hM8f6hX7_vHDt-tPxe2Xm8_X728LK_s6FeMgJeRBR2NtbfbaghA9VNJosHvYm1qP2Pddixb2UlttZTPgYLCzwnSV7uQVe33OXWL4uSIlNTmy6L2eMaykKmj6qs5vk9FX_6CHsMY5T5eptu3qDG2B1ZmyMRBFHNUS3aTjSYFQ283UQW03U9vNFIDKrSy9fIhezYTDX-XPkTLw7gxg3sXRYVRkXV43Di6iTWoI7n_5vwHbEKyT</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Tillmann, K.</creator><creator>Windschnurer, I.</creator><creator>Gamper, J.</creator><creator>Hinney, B.</creator><creator>Rülicke, T.</creator><creator>Podesser, B.K.</creator><creator>Troxler, J.</creator><creator>Plasenzotti, R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Welfare assessment in rabbits raised for meat and laboratory purposes in enclosures with two floor types: Perforated plastic with holes versus slats</title><author>Tillmann, K. ; Windschnurer, I. ; Gamper, J. ; Hinney, B. ; Rülicke, T. ; Podesser, B.K. ; Troxler, J. ; Plasenzotti, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-fd331abbfbcc4b9ac1008123ba1c919b4afe8876ec193acac35dedbe7c0b72a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cages</topic><topic>Circularity</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Enclosures</topic><topic>Floor design</topic><topic>Flooring</topic><topic>Floors</topic><topic>Food safety</topic><topic>Growing rabbits</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Legal regulations</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat production</topic><topic>Meat quality</topic><topic>Oocytes</topic><topic>Parasitic diseases</topic><topic>Rabbit husbandry</topic><topic>Rabbits</topic><topic>Regulations</topic><topic>Slats</topic><topic>Veterinary medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tillmann, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windschnurer, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gamper, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinney, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rülicke, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Podesser, B.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troxler, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plasenzotti, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Research in veterinary science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tillmann, K.</au><au>Windschnurer, I.</au><au>Gamper, J.</au><au>Hinney, B.</au><au>Rülicke, T.</au><au>Podesser, B.K.</au><au>Troxler, J.</au><au>Plasenzotti, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Welfare assessment in rabbits raised for meat and laboratory purposes in enclosures with two floor types: Perforated plastic with holes versus slats</atitle><jtitle>Research in veterinary science</jtitle><addtitle>Res Vet Sci</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>122</volume><spage>200</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>200-209</pages><issn>0034-5288</issn><eissn>1532-2661</eissn><abstract>Due to welfare concerns and legal restrictions in certain countries, alternatives to wire net floors must be developed in rabbit husbandries. Also, there is a difference in regulations in Europe for laboratory rabbits vs. rabbits bred and kept for meat production. While there are regulations concerning floor design of enclosures for rabbits bred for meat production in many European countries, the European Directive 2010/63 lacks regulations for rabbits used for scientific purposes. This study compares two floors, which meet the Austrian legal requirements for growing rabbits intended for consumption as well as the requirements for laboratory rabbits. The dual use of rabbits bred for meat production and applicable for scientific purposes would avoid the problem of surplus animals of specialized producers for laboratory rabbits. A noryl floor with 12 mm circular holes was compared to a 10 mm slatted plastic floor. Parameters were soiling of cages and animals, parasitic burden, clinical health, and losses using objective scoring. Soiling of cages and animals and coccidial oocytes were significantly higher on the floors with circular holes. Obvious signs of disease showed a non-significant trend to be more frequent in the group with circular holes. This was linked with significantly higher losses. In conclusion, our study clearly shows that the floor with circular hole design cannot be endorsed, although it meets legal requirements. The slatted floor type can be cautiously recommended; however, to assure animal welfare in laboratory rabbits, legal authorities in Europe should take on the responsibility of regulating floor design in this sector. •A floor for rabbits with circular 12 mm holes has been tested for the first time.•A plastic floor with 10 mm slats was very clean and promising.•The floor design with 12 mm holes is not recommendable.•Study design was highly comparable since the floor design was the only difference.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30557773</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.11.016</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-5288
ispartof Research in veterinary science, 2019-02, Vol.122, p.200-209
issn 0034-5288
1532-2661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2158242155
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Animal welfare
Animals
Cages
Circularity
Design
Enclosures
Floor design
Flooring
Floors
Food safety
Growing rabbits
Housing
Laboratories
Legal regulations
Meat
Meat production
Meat quality
Oocytes
Parasitic diseases
Rabbit husbandry
Rabbits
Regulations
Slats
Veterinary medicine
title Welfare assessment in rabbits raised for meat and laboratory purposes in enclosures with two floor types: Perforated plastic with holes versus slats
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A36%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Welfare%20assessment%20in%20rabbits%20raised%20for%20meat%20and%20laboratory%20purposes%20in%20enclosures%20with%20two%20floor%20types:%20Perforated%20plastic%20with%20holes%20versus%20slats&rft.jtitle=Research%20in%20veterinary%20science&rft.au=Tillmann,%20K.&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=122&rft.spage=200&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=200-209&rft.issn=0034-5288&rft.eissn=1532-2661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.11.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2166741557%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2166741557&rft_id=info:pmid/30557773&rft_els_id=S0034528818300316&rfr_iscdi=true