Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making
Over the past four decades, the promise of public participation to improve decisions, obtain legitimacy, and build capacity for risk decision making and management has had a mixed record. In this article, we offer a narrative of how public participation has evolved in the United States and we examin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Risk analysis 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.503-518 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 518 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 503 |
container_title | Risk analysis |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Webler, Thomas Tuler, Seth |
description | Over the past four decades, the promise of public participation to improve decisions, obtain legitimacy, and build capacity for risk decision making and management has had a mixed record. In this article, we offer a narrative of how public participation has evolved in the United States and we examine prospects for its future. We trace three forces that have had significant impact on practice: an emergent emphasis on democratic deliberation, a transition from dichotomous thinking about science versus politics to an integrated perspective, and the recognition that different parties to the decision‐making process bring valid epistemological contributions. The promise of public participation in risk decision making is challenged by loss of trust in institutions and individuals and by broad socio‐political dynamics that are weakening democratic values and processes. These include the scarcity of attitudes and aptitudes supportive of public participation among both individuals and institutions; an anti‐democratic political atmosphere that promotes disrespect; pursuit of private interests over the common good; failure to appreciate the limitations of dialogue and learning; underutilization of existing knowledge; and insufficient knowledge of how context matters. We end by offering several suggestions for focusing further research and improving practice. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/risa.13250 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2157651805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2157651805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-5e2a4f9a6b95a917da2d2622de99e73381cf1c3b5349fb022fe0c003a19ed59f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6Hzzr13Ay5hOBxPH1HNI00Syde1MVmTf3s5ODx7M5YXw4-F9H4TOMfRx8268C6qPKeFwgLqYUxEngrBD1AWSkphRSjroJIQFAAbg6THqUOBMMD7oottxVfvozmiVmxBVNprVWeF0NFN-47Rbq42rysiV0dyF5c65sPt4UktXvp-iI6uKYM72s4fexvevo8d4-vwwGQ2nsaY8hZgbopgVKskEVwKnuSI5SQjJjRAmpXSAtcWaZpwyYTMgxBrQAFRhYXIuLO2hqzZ37auP2oSNXLmgTVGo0lR1kATzNOF4ALyhl3_oojmwbLaThImUJgyYaNR1q7SvQvDGyrV3K-W3EoPcdSp3ncrvTht8sY-ss5XJf-lPiQ3ALfh0hdn-EyXnk5dhG_oFnux--w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2497364049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Webler, Thomas ; Tuler, Seth</creator><creatorcontrib>Webler, Thomas ; Tuler, Seth</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past four decades, the promise of public participation to improve decisions, obtain legitimacy, and build capacity for risk decision making and management has had a mixed record. In this article, we offer a narrative of how public participation has evolved in the United States and we examine prospects for its future. We trace three forces that have had significant impact on practice: an emergent emphasis on democratic deliberation, a transition from dichotomous thinking about science versus politics to an integrated perspective, and the recognition that different parties to the decision‐making process bring valid epistemological contributions. The promise of public participation in risk decision making is challenged by loss of trust in institutions and individuals and by broad socio‐political dynamics that are weakening democratic values and processes. These include the scarcity of attitudes and aptitudes supportive of public participation among both individuals and institutions; an anti‐democratic political atmosphere that promotes disrespect; pursuit of private interests over the common good; failure to appreciate the limitations of dialogue and learning; underutilization of existing knowledge; and insufficient knowledge of how context matters. We end by offering several suggestions for focusing further research and improving practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/risa.13250</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30549458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Analytic‐deliberation ; Aptitudes ; Capacity building approach ; Citizen participation ; Common good ; Decision making ; Dichotomous thinking ; Epistemology ; Legitimacy ; Participation ; Political attitudes ; Politics ; Prospects ; Public participation ; Risk ; Risk assessment ; risk decision making ; Risk management ; Scarcity ; stakeholder engagement</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.503-518</ispartof><rights>2018 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><rights>2018 Society for Risk Analysis.</rights><rights>2021 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-5e2a4f9a6b95a917da2d2622de99e73381cf1c3b5349fb022fe0c003a19ed59f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-5e2a4f9a6b95a917da2d2622de99e73381cf1c3b5349fb022fe0c003a19ed59f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frisa.13250$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frisa.13250$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30549458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Webler, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuler, Seth</creatorcontrib><title>Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><description>Over the past four decades, the promise of public participation to improve decisions, obtain legitimacy, and build capacity for risk decision making and management has had a mixed record. In this article, we offer a narrative of how public participation has evolved in the United States and we examine prospects for its future. We trace three forces that have had significant impact on practice: an emergent emphasis on democratic deliberation, a transition from dichotomous thinking about science versus politics to an integrated perspective, and the recognition that different parties to the decision‐making process bring valid epistemological contributions. The promise of public participation in risk decision making is challenged by loss of trust in institutions and individuals and by broad socio‐political dynamics that are weakening democratic values and processes. These include the scarcity of attitudes and aptitudes supportive of public participation among both individuals and institutions; an anti‐democratic political atmosphere that promotes disrespect; pursuit of private interests over the common good; failure to appreciate the limitations of dialogue and learning; underutilization of existing knowledge; and insufficient knowledge of how context matters. We end by offering several suggestions for focusing further research and improving practice.</description><subject>Analytic‐deliberation</subject><subject>Aptitudes</subject><subject>Capacity building approach</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Common good</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dichotomous thinking</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prospects</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>risk decision making</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Scarcity</subject><subject>stakeholder engagement</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6Hzzr13Ay5hOBxPH1HNI00Syde1MVmTf3s5ODx7M5YXw4-F9H4TOMfRx8268C6qPKeFwgLqYUxEngrBD1AWSkphRSjroJIQFAAbg6THqUOBMMD7oottxVfvozmiVmxBVNprVWeF0NFN-47Rbq42rysiV0dyF5c65sPt4UktXvp-iI6uKYM72s4fexvevo8d4-vwwGQ2nsaY8hZgbopgVKskEVwKnuSI5SQjJjRAmpXSAtcWaZpwyYTMgxBrQAFRhYXIuLO2hqzZ37auP2oSNXLmgTVGo0lR1kATzNOF4ALyhl3_oojmwbLaThImUJgyYaNR1q7SvQvDGyrV3K-W3EoPcdSp3ncrvTht8sY-ss5XJf-lPiQ3ALfh0hdn-EyXnk5dhG_oFnux--w</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Webler, Thomas</creator><creator>Tuler, Seth</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making</title><author>Webler, Thomas ; Tuler, Seth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-5e2a4f9a6b95a917da2d2622de99e73381cf1c3b5349fb022fe0c003a19ed59f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analytic‐deliberation</topic><topic>Aptitudes</topic><topic>Capacity building approach</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Common good</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dichotomous thinking</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prospects</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>risk decision making</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Scarcity</topic><topic>stakeholder engagement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Webler, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuler, Seth</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Webler, Thomas</au><au>Tuler, Seth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>503-518</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><abstract>Over the past four decades, the promise of public participation to improve decisions, obtain legitimacy, and build capacity for risk decision making and management has had a mixed record. In this article, we offer a narrative of how public participation has evolved in the United States and we examine prospects for its future. We trace three forces that have had significant impact on practice: an emergent emphasis on democratic deliberation, a transition from dichotomous thinking about science versus politics to an integrated perspective, and the recognition that different parties to the decision‐making process bring valid epistemological contributions. The promise of public participation in risk decision making is challenged by loss of trust in institutions and individuals and by broad socio‐political dynamics that are weakening democratic values and processes. These include the scarcity of attitudes and aptitudes supportive of public participation among both individuals and institutions; an anti‐democratic political atmosphere that promotes disrespect; pursuit of private interests over the common good; failure to appreciate the limitations of dialogue and learning; underutilization of existing knowledge; and insufficient knowledge of how context matters. We end by offering several suggestions for focusing further research and improving practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>30549458</pmid><doi>10.1111/risa.13250</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-4332 |
ispartof | Risk analysis, 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.503-518 |
issn | 0272-4332 1539-6924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2157651805 |
source | Wiley Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Analytic‐deliberation Aptitudes Capacity building approach Citizen participation Common good Decision making Dichotomous thinking Epistemology Legitimacy Participation Political attitudes Politics Prospects Public participation Risk Risk assessment risk decision making Risk management Scarcity stakeholder engagement |
title | Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A13%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Four%20Decades%20of%20Public%20Participation%20in%20Risk%20Decision%20Making&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=Webler,%20Thomas&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=503-518&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/risa.13250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157651805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2497364049&rft_id=info:pmid/30549458&rfr_iscdi=true |