Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making

Over the past four decades, the promise of public participation to improve decisions, obtain legitimacy, and build capacity for risk decision making and management has had a mixed record. In this article, we offer a narrative of how public participation has evolved in the United States and we examin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Risk analysis 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.503-518
Hauptverfasser: Webler, Thomas, Tuler, Seth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 518
container_issue 3
container_start_page 503
container_title Risk analysis
container_volume 41
creator Webler, Thomas
Tuler, Seth
description Over the past four decades, the promise of public participation to improve decisions, obtain legitimacy, and build capacity for risk decision making and management has had a mixed record. In this article, we offer a narrative of how public participation has evolved in the United States and we examine prospects for its future. We trace three forces that have had significant impact on practice: an emergent emphasis on democratic deliberation, a transition from dichotomous thinking about science versus politics to an integrated perspective, and the recognition that different parties to the decision‐making process bring valid epistemological contributions. The promise of public participation in risk decision making is challenged by loss of trust in institutions and individuals and by broad socio‐political dynamics that are weakening democratic values and processes. These include the scarcity of attitudes and aptitudes supportive of public participation among both individuals and institutions; an anti‐democratic political atmosphere that promotes disrespect; pursuit of private interests over the common good; failure to appreciate the limitations of dialogue and learning; underutilization of existing knowledge; and insufficient knowledge of how context matters. We end by offering several suggestions for focusing further research and improving practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/risa.13250
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2157651805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2157651805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-5e2a4f9a6b95a917da2d2622de99e73381cf1c3b5349fb022fe0c003a19ed59f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6Hzzr13Ay5hOBxPH1HNI00Syde1MVmTf3s5ODx7M5YXw4-F9H4TOMfRx8268C6qPKeFwgLqYUxEngrBD1AWSkphRSjroJIQFAAbg6THqUOBMMD7oottxVfvozmiVmxBVNprVWeF0NFN-47Rbq42rysiV0dyF5c65sPt4UktXvp-iI6uKYM72s4fexvevo8d4-vwwGQ2nsaY8hZgbopgVKskEVwKnuSI5SQjJjRAmpXSAtcWaZpwyYTMgxBrQAFRhYXIuLO2hqzZ37auP2oSNXLmgTVGo0lR1kATzNOF4ALyhl3_oojmwbLaThImUJgyYaNR1q7SvQvDGyrV3K-W3EoPcdSp3ncrvTht8sY-ss5XJf-lPiQ3ALfh0hdn-EyXnk5dhG_oFnux--w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2497364049</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Webler, Thomas ; Tuler, Seth</creator><creatorcontrib>Webler, Thomas ; Tuler, Seth</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past four decades, the promise of public participation to improve decisions, obtain legitimacy, and build capacity for risk decision making and management has had a mixed record. In this article, we offer a narrative of how public participation has evolved in the United States and we examine prospects for its future. We trace three forces that have had significant impact on practice: an emergent emphasis on democratic deliberation, a transition from dichotomous thinking about science versus politics to an integrated perspective, and the recognition that different parties to the decision‐making process bring valid epistemological contributions. The promise of public participation in risk decision making is challenged by loss of trust in institutions and individuals and by broad socio‐political dynamics that are weakening democratic values and processes. These include the scarcity of attitudes and aptitudes supportive of public participation among both individuals and institutions; an anti‐democratic political atmosphere that promotes disrespect; pursuit of private interests over the common good; failure to appreciate the limitations of dialogue and learning; underutilization of existing knowledge; and insufficient knowledge of how context matters. We end by offering several suggestions for focusing further research and improving practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/risa.13250</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30549458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Analytic‐deliberation ; Aptitudes ; Capacity building approach ; Citizen participation ; Common good ; Decision making ; Dichotomous thinking ; Epistemology ; Legitimacy ; Participation ; Political attitudes ; Politics ; Prospects ; Public participation ; Risk ; Risk assessment ; risk decision making ; Risk management ; Scarcity ; stakeholder engagement</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.503-518</ispartof><rights>2018 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><rights>2018 Society for Risk Analysis.</rights><rights>2021 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-5e2a4f9a6b95a917da2d2622de99e73381cf1c3b5349fb022fe0c003a19ed59f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-5e2a4f9a6b95a917da2d2622de99e73381cf1c3b5349fb022fe0c003a19ed59f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Frisa.13250$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Frisa.13250$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30549458$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Webler, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuler, Seth</creatorcontrib><title>Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><description>Over the past four decades, the promise of public participation to improve decisions, obtain legitimacy, and build capacity for risk decision making and management has had a mixed record. In this article, we offer a narrative of how public participation has evolved in the United States and we examine prospects for its future. We trace three forces that have had significant impact on practice: an emergent emphasis on democratic deliberation, a transition from dichotomous thinking about science versus politics to an integrated perspective, and the recognition that different parties to the decision‐making process bring valid epistemological contributions. The promise of public participation in risk decision making is challenged by loss of trust in institutions and individuals and by broad socio‐political dynamics that are weakening democratic values and processes. These include the scarcity of attitudes and aptitudes supportive of public participation among both individuals and institutions; an anti‐democratic political atmosphere that promotes disrespect; pursuit of private interests over the common good; failure to appreciate the limitations of dialogue and learning; underutilization of existing knowledge; and insufficient knowledge of how context matters. We end by offering several suggestions for focusing further research and improving practice.</description><subject>Analytic‐deliberation</subject><subject>Aptitudes</subject><subject>Capacity building approach</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Common good</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Dichotomous thinking</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Legitimacy</subject><subject>Participation</subject><subject>Political attitudes</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Prospects</subject><subject>Public participation</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>risk decision making</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Scarcity</subject><subject>stakeholder engagement</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6Hzzr13Ay5hOBxPH1HNI00Syde1MVmTf3s5ODx7M5YXw4-F9H4TOMfRx8268C6qPKeFwgLqYUxEngrBD1AWSkphRSjroJIQFAAbg6THqUOBMMD7oottxVfvozmiVmxBVNprVWeF0NFN-47Rbq42rysiV0dyF5c65sPt4UktXvp-iI6uKYM72s4fexvevo8d4-vwwGQ2nsaY8hZgbopgVKskEVwKnuSI5SQjJjRAmpXSAtcWaZpwyYTMgxBrQAFRhYXIuLO2hqzZ37auP2oSNXLmgTVGo0lR1kATzNOF4ALyhl3_oojmwbLaThImUJgyYaNR1q7SvQvDGyrV3K-W3EoPcdSp3ncrvTht8sY-ss5XJf-lPiQ3ALfh0hdn-EyXnk5dhG_oFnux--w</recordid><startdate>202103</startdate><enddate>202103</enddate><creator>Webler, Thomas</creator><creator>Tuler, Seth</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202103</creationdate><title>Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making</title><author>Webler, Thomas ; Tuler, Seth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3570-5e2a4f9a6b95a917da2d2622de99e73381cf1c3b5349fb022fe0c003a19ed59f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analytic‐deliberation</topic><topic>Aptitudes</topic><topic>Capacity building approach</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Common good</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Dichotomous thinking</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Legitimacy</topic><topic>Participation</topic><topic>Political attitudes</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Prospects</topic><topic>Public participation</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>risk decision making</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Scarcity</topic><topic>stakeholder engagement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Webler, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuler, Seth</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Webler, Thomas</au><au>Tuler, Seth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><date>2021-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>518</epage><pages>503-518</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><abstract>Over the past four decades, the promise of public participation to improve decisions, obtain legitimacy, and build capacity for risk decision making and management has had a mixed record. In this article, we offer a narrative of how public participation has evolved in the United States and we examine prospects for its future. We trace three forces that have had significant impact on practice: an emergent emphasis on democratic deliberation, a transition from dichotomous thinking about science versus politics to an integrated perspective, and the recognition that different parties to the decision‐making process bring valid epistemological contributions. The promise of public participation in risk decision making is challenged by loss of trust in institutions and individuals and by broad socio‐political dynamics that are weakening democratic values and processes. These include the scarcity of attitudes and aptitudes supportive of public participation among both individuals and institutions; an anti‐democratic political atmosphere that promotes disrespect; pursuit of private interests over the common good; failure to appreciate the limitations of dialogue and learning; underutilization of existing knowledge; and insufficient knowledge of how context matters. We end by offering several suggestions for focusing further research and improving practice.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>30549458</pmid><doi>10.1111/risa.13250</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-4332
ispartof Risk analysis, 2021-03, Vol.41 (3), p.503-518
issn 0272-4332
1539-6924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2157651805
source Wiley Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete
subjects Analytic‐deliberation
Aptitudes
Capacity building approach
Citizen participation
Common good
Decision making
Dichotomous thinking
Epistemology
Legitimacy
Participation
Political attitudes
Politics
Prospects
Public participation
Risk
Risk assessment
risk decision making
Risk management
Scarcity
stakeholder engagement
title Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T15%3A13%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Four%20Decades%20of%20Public%20Participation%20in%20Risk%20Decision%20Making&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=Webler,%20Thomas&rft.date=2021-03&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=518&rft.pages=503-518&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/risa.13250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157651805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2497364049&rft_id=info:pmid/30549458&rfr_iscdi=true