Bendamustine as part of conditioning of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive lymphoma: a phase 2 study from the GELTAMO group
Summary We conducted a phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bendamustine instead of BCNU (carmustine) in the BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan) regimen (BendaEAM) as conditioning for autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with aggressive lymphomas. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of haematology 2019-03, Vol.184 (5), p.797-807 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 807 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 797 |
container_title | British journal of haematology |
container_volume | 184 |
creator | Redondo, Alba M. Valcárcel, David González‐Rodríguez, Ana P. Suárez‐Lledó, María Bello, José L. Canales, Miguel Gayoso, Jorge Colorado, Mercedes Jarque, Isidro Campo, Raquel Arranz, Reyes Terol, María J. Rifón, José J. Rodríguez, María J. Ramírez, María J Castro, Nerea Sánchez, Andrés López‐Jiménez, Javier Montes‐Moreno, Santiago Briones, Javier López, Aurelio Palomera, Luis López‐Guillermo, Armando Caballero, Dolores Martín, Alejandro |
description | Summary
We conducted a phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bendamustine instead of BCNU (carmustine) in the BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan) regimen (BendaEAM) as conditioning for autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with aggressive lymphomas. The primary endpoint was 3‐year progression‐free survival (PFS). Sixty patients (median age 55 [28–71] years) were included. All patients (except one who died early) engrafted after a median of 11 (9–72) and 14 (4–53) days to achieve neutrophil and platelet counts of >0.5 × 109/l and >20 × 109/l, respectively. Non‐relapse mortality at 100 days and 1 year were 3.3% and 6.7%, respectively. With a median follow‐up of 67 (40–77) months, the estimated 3‐year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 58% and 75%, respectively. Patients in partial response at study entry had significantly worse PFS and OS than patients who underwent ASCT in complete metabolic remission, and this was the only prognostic factor associated with both PFS (Relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI} [0.12–0.56]) and OS (RR, 0.40 [95% CI 0.17–0.97]) in the multivariate analysis. BendaEAM conditioning is therefore a feasible and effective regimen in patients with aggressive lymphomas. However, patients not in complete metabolic remission at the time of transplant had poorer survival and so should be considered for alternative treatment strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bjh.15713 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2157645343</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2157645343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-bbf2565571053e15b024796c321264aeac920a4ae18e94988db938e4c307c5d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EokNhwQsgS2zoIq1_E4ddW5WWalA3ZR05yU3iUWIH22k1j8Lb1mEKC6R6c23p-MifP4Q-UnJK0zqrd8MplQXlr9CG8lxmjAr6Gm0IIUVGiVBH6F0IO0IoJ5K-RUdpCCUV36DfF2BbPS0hGgtYBzxrH7HrcONsa6Jx1th-PeslutH1bgk4RJhwA-OIo9c2zKO2Ua8oNjbdjwZsDPjRxAHrvvcQgnkAPO6neXCT_oo1ngcdALNkWto97rybcBwAX19t789_3OHeu2V-j950egzw4Xkeo5_fru4vb7Lt3fX3y_Nt1nCleFbXHZO5TOmJ5EBlTZgoyrzhjLJcaNBNyYhOG6qgFKVSbV1yBaLhpGhkK_kx-nLwzt79WiDEajJhTactpLQVSz-bC8kFT-jn_9CdW7xNr0uUYoLlRbFSJweq8S4ED101ezNpv68oqda-qtRX9aevxH56Ni71BO0_8m9BCTg7AI9mhP3Lpuri9uagfALLhZ-O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2182426773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bendamustine as part of conditioning of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive lymphoma: a phase 2 study from the GELTAMO group</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Redondo, Alba M. ; Valcárcel, David ; González‐Rodríguez, Ana P. ; Suárez‐Lledó, María ; Bello, José L. ; Canales, Miguel ; Gayoso, Jorge ; Colorado, Mercedes ; Jarque, Isidro ; Campo, Raquel ; Arranz, Reyes ; Terol, María J. ; Rifón, José J. ; Rodríguez, María J. ; Ramírez, María J ; Castro, Nerea ; Sánchez, Andrés ; López‐Jiménez, Javier ; Montes‐Moreno, Santiago ; Briones, Javier ; López, Aurelio ; Palomera, Luis ; López‐Guillermo, Armando ; Caballero, Dolores ; Martín, Alejandro</creator><creatorcontrib>Redondo, Alba M. ; Valcárcel, David ; González‐Rodríguez, Ana P. ; Suárez‐Lledó, María ; Bello, José L. ; Canales, Miguel ; Gayoso, Jorge ; Colorado, Mercedes ; Jarque, Isidro ; Campo, Raquel ; Arranz, Reyes ; Terol, María J. ; Rifón, José J. ; Rodríguez, María J. ; Ramírez, María J ; Castro, Nerea ; Sánchez, Andrés ; López‐Jiménez, Javier ; Montes‐Moreno, Santiago ; Briones, Javier ; López, Aurelio ; Palomera, Luis ; López‐Guillermo, Armando ; Caballero, Dolores ; Martín, Alejandro ; Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO) ; the Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO)</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
We conducted a phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bendamustine instead of BCNU (carmustine) in the BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan) regimen (BendaEAM) as conditioning for autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with aggressive lymphomas. The primary endpoint was 3‐year progression‐free survival (PFS). Sixty patients (median age 55 [28–71] years) were included. All patients (except one who died early) engrafted after a median of 11 (9–72) and 14 (4–53) days to achieve neutrophil and platelet counts of >0.5 × 109/l and >20 × 109/l, respectively. Non‐relapse mortality at 100 days and 1 year were 3.3% and 6.7%, respectively. With a median follow‐up of 67 (40–77) months, the estimated 3‐year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 58% and 75%, respectively. Patients in partial response at study entry had significantly worse PFS and OS than patients who underwent ASCT in complete metabolic remission, and this was the only prognostic factor associated with both PFS (Relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI} [0.12–0.56]) and OS (RR, 0.40 [95% CI 0.17–0.97]) in the multivariate analysis. BendaEAM conditioning is therefore a feasible and effective regimen in patients with aggressive lymphomas. However, patients not in complete metabolic remission at the time of transplant had poorer survival and so should be considered for alternative treatment strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-1048</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2141</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15713</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30548583</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Adult ; Aged ; aggressive lymphomas ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects ; Autografts ; autologous stem‐cell transplantation ; BEAM ; bendamustine ; Bendamustine Hydrochloride - administration & dosage ; Bendamustine Hydrochloride - adverse effects ; Carmustine - administration & dosage ; Carmustine - adverse effects ; clinical trial ; Conditioning ; Cytarabine ; Cytarabine - administration & dosage ; Cytarabine - adverse effects ; Disease-Free Survival ; Etoposide ; Female ; Hematology ; Humans ; Lymphoma ; Lymphoma - mortality ; Lymphoma - therapy ; Male ; Melphalan ; Melphalan - administration & dosage ; Melphalan - adverse effects ; Metabolism ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Patients ; Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation ; Podophyllotoxin - administration & dosage ; Podophyllotoxin - adverse effects ; Remission ; Stem cell transplantation ; Survival Rate ; Transplantation ; Transplantation Conditioning ; Transplants & implants]]></subject><ispartof>British journal of haematology, 2019-03, Vol.184 (5), p.797-807</ispartof><rights>2018 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-bbf2565571053e15b024796c321264aeac920a4ae18e94988db938e4c307c5d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-bbf2565571053e15b024796c321264aeac920a4ae18e94988db938e4c307c5d53</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6330-1028</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbjh.15713$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbjh.15713$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30548583$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Redondo, Alba M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valcárcel, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González‐Rodríguez, Ana P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Lledó, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bello, José L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canales, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayoso, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colorado, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarque, Isidro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campo, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arranz, Reyes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terol, María J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rifón, José J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, María J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, María J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Nerea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Jiménez, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes‐Moreno, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briones, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Aurelio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomera, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Guillermo, Armando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caballero, Dolores</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO)</creatorcontrib><title>Bendamustine as part of conditioning of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive lymphoma: a phase 2 study from the GELTAMO group</title><title>British journal of haematology</title><addtitle>Br J Haematol</addtitle><description>Summary
We conducted a phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bendamustine instead of BCNU (carmustine) in the BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan) regimen (BendaEAM) as conditioning for autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with aggressive lymphomas. The primary endpoint was 3‐year progression‐free survival (PFS). Sixty patients (median age 55 [28–71] years) were included. All patients (except one who died early) engrafted after a median of 11 (9–72) and 14 (4–53) days to achieve neutrophil and platelet counts of >0.5 × 109/l and >20 × 109/l, respectively. Non‐relapse mortality at 100 days and 1 year were 3.3% and 6.7%, respectively. With a median follow‐up of 67 (40–77) months, the estimated 3‐year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 58% and 75%, respectively. Patients in partial response at study entry had significantly worse PFS and OS than patients who underwent ASCT in complete metabolic remission, and this was the only prognostic factor associated with both PFS (Relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI} [0.12–0.56]) and OS (RR, 0.40 [95% CI 0.17–0.97]) in the multivariate analysis. BendaEAM conditioning is therefore a feasible and effective regimen in patients with aggressive lymphomas. However, patients not in complete metabolic remission at the time of transplant had poorer survival and so should be considered for alternative treatment strategies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>aggressive lymphomas</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</subject><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>autologous stem‐cell transplantation</subject><subject>BEAM</subject><subject>bendamustine</subject><subject>Bendamustine Hydrochloride - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Bendamustine Hydrochloride - adverse effects</subject><subject>Carmustine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Carmustine - adverse effects</subject><subject>clinical trial</subject><subject>Conditioning</subject><subject>Cytarabine</subject><subject>Cytarabine - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cytarabine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Disease-Free Survival</subject><subject>Etoposide</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymphoma</subject><subject>Lymphoma - mortality</subject><subject>Lymphoma - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Melphalan</subject><subject>Melphalan - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Melphalan - adverse effects</subject><subject>Metabolism</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>Podophyllotoxin - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Podophyllotoxin - adverse effects</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Stem cell transplantation</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Transplantation</subject><subject>Transplantation Conditioning</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><issn>0007-1048</issn><issn>1365-2141</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi0EokNhwQsgS2zoIq1_E4ddW5WWalA3ZR05yU3iUWIH22k1j8Lb1mEKC6R6c23p-MifP4Q-UnJK0zqrd8MplQXlr9CG8lxmjAr6Gm0IIUVGiVBH6F0IO0IoJ5K-RUdpCCUV36DfF2BbPS0hGgtYBzxrH7HrcONsa6Jx1th-PeslutH1bgk4RJhwA-OIo9c2zKO2Ua8oNjbdjwZsDPjRxAHrvvcQgnkAPO6neXCT_oo1ngcdALNkWto97rybcBwAX19t789_3OHeu2V-j950egzw4Xkeo5_fru4vb7Lt3fX3y_Nt1nCleFbXHZO5TOmJ5EBlTZgoyrzhjLJcaNBNyYhOG6qgFKVSbV1yBaLhpGhkK_kx-nLwzt79WiDEajJhTactpLQVSz-bC8kFT-jn_9CdW7xNr0uUYoLlRbFSJweq8S4ED101ezNpv68oqda-qtRX9aevxH56Ni71BO0_8m9BCTg7AI9mhP3Lpuri9uagfALLhZ-O</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Redondo, Alba M.</creator><creator>Valcárcel, David</creator><creator>González‐Rodríguez, Ana P.</creator><creator>Suárez‐Lledó, María</creator><creator>Bello, José L.</creator><creator>Canales, Miguel</creator><creator>Gayoso, Jorge</creator><creator>Colorado, Mercedes</creator><creator>Jarque, Isidro</creator><creator>Campo, Raquel</creator><creator>Arranz, Reyes</creator><creator>Terol, María J.</creator><creator>Rifón, José J.</creator><creator>Rodríguez, María J.</creator><creator>Ramírez, María J</creator><creator>Castro, Nerea</creator><creator>Sánchez, Andrés</creator><creator>López‐Jiménez, Javier</creator><creator>Montes‐Moreno, Santiago</creator><creator>Briones, Javier</creator><creator>López, Aurelio</creator><creator>Palomera, Luis</creator><creator>López‐Guillermo, Armando</creator><creator>Caballero, Dolores</creator><creator>Martín, Alejandro</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-1028</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Bendamustine as part of conditioning of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive lymphoma: a phase 2 study from the GELTAMO group</title><author>Redondo, Alba M. ; Valcárcel, David ; González‐Rodríguez, Ana P. ; Suárez‐Lledó, María ; Bello, José L. ; Canales, Miguel ; Gayoso, Jorge ; Colorado, Mercedes ; Jarque, Isidro ; Campo, Raquel ; Arranz, Reyes ; Terol, María J. ; Rifón, José J. ; Rodríguez, María J. ; Ramírez, María J ; Castro, Nerea ; Sánchez, Andrés ; López‐Jiménez, Javier ; Montes‐Moreno, Santiago ; Briones, Javier ; López, Aurelio ; Palomera, Luis ; López‐Guillermo, Armando ; Caballero, Dolores ; Martín, Alejandro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3883-bbf2565571053e15b024796c321264aeac920a4ae18e94988db938e4c307c5d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>aggressive lymphomas</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects</topic><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>autologous stem‐cell transplantation</topic><topic>BEAM</topic><topic>bendamustine</topic><topic>Bendamustine Hydrochloride - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Bendamustine Hydrochloride - adverse effects</topic><topic>Carmustine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Carmustine - adverse effects</topic><topic>clinical trial</topic><topic>Conditioning</topic><topic>Cytarabine</topic><topic>Cytarabine - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cytarabine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Disease-Free Survival</topic><topic>Etoposide</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymphoma</topic><topic>Lymphoma - mortality</topic><topic>Lymphoma - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Melphalan</topic><topic>Melphalan - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Melphalan - adverse effects</topic><topic>Metabolism</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>Podophyllotoxin - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Podophyllotoxin - adverse effects</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Stem cell transplantation</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Transplantation</topic><topic>Transplantation Conditioning</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Redondo, Alba M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valcárcel, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González‐Rodríguez, Ana P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suárez‐Lledó, María</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bello, José L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canales, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gayoso, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colorado, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jarque, Isidro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campo, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arranz, Reyes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terol, María J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rifón, José J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, María J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramírez, María J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Nerea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez, Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Jiménez, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes‐Moreno, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briones, Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Aurelio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palomera, Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López‐Guillermo, Armando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caballero, Dolores</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martín, Alejandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>the Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO)</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British journal of haematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Redondo, Alba M.</au><au>Valcárcel, David</au><au>González‐Rodríguez, Ana P.</au><au>Suárez‐Lledó, María</au><au>Bello, José L.</au><au>Canales, Miguel</au><au>Gayoso, Jorge</au><au>Colorado, Mercedes</au><au>Jarque, Isidro</au><au>Campo, Raquel</au><au>Arranz, Reyes</au><au>Terol, María J.</au><au>Rifón, José J.</au><au>Rodríguez, María J.</au><au>Ramírez, María J</au><au>Castro, Nerea</au><au>Sánchez, Andrés</au><au>López‐Jiménez, Javier</au><au>Montes‐Moreno, Santiago</au><au>Briones, Javier</au><au>López, Aurelio</au><au>Palomera, Luis</au><au>López‐Guillermo, Armando</au><au>Caballero, Dolores</au><au>Martín, Alejandro</au><aucorp>Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO)</aucorp><aucorp>the Grupo Español de Linfomas y Trasplante Autólogo de Médula Ósea (GELTAMO)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bendamustine as part of conditioning of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive lymphoma: a phase 2 study from the GELTAMO group</atitle><jtitle>British journal of haematology</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Haematol</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>184</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>797</spage><epage>807</epage><pages>797-807</pages><issn>0007-1048</issn><eissn>1365-2141</eissn><abstract>Summary
We conducted a phase 2 trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bendamustine instead of BCNU (carmustine) in the BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine and melphalan) regimen (BendaEAM) as conditioning for autologous stem‐cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with aggressive lymphomas. The primary endpoint was 3‐year progression‐free survival (PFS). Sixty patients (median age 55 [28–71] years) were included. All patients (except one who died early) engrafted after a median of 11 (9–72) and 14 (4–53) days to achieve neutrophil and platelet counts of >0.5 × 109/l and >20 × 109/l, respectively. Non‐relapse mortality at 100 days and 1 year were 3.3% and 6.7%, respectively. With a median follow‐up of 67 (40–77) months, the estimated 3‐year PFS and overall survival (OS) were 58% and 75%, respectively. Patients in partial response at study entry had significantly worse PFS and OS than patients who underwent ASCT in complete metabolic remission, and this was the only prognostic factor associated with both PFS (Relative risk [RR], 0.27 [95% confidence interval {CI} [0.12–0.56]) and OS (RR, 0.40 [95% CI 0.17–0.97]) in the multivariate analysis. BendaEAM conditioning is therefore a feasible and effective regimen in patients with aggressive lymphomas. However, patients not in complete metabolic remission at the time of transplant had poorer survival and so should be considered for alternative treatment strategies.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>30548583</pmid><doi>10.1111/bjh.15713</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-1028</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-1048 |
ispartof | British journal of haematology, 2019-03, Vol.184 (5), p.797-807 |
issn | 0007-1048 1365-2141 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2157645343 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content |
subjects | Adult Aged aggressive lymphomas Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - adverse effects Autografts autologous stem‐cell transplantation BEAM bendamustine Bendamustine Hydrochloride - administration & dosage Bendamustine Hydrochloride - adverse effects Carmustine - administration & dosage Carmustine - adverse effects clinical trial Conditioning Cytarabine Cytarabine - administration & dosage Cytarabine - adverse effects Disease-Free Survival Etoposide Female Hematology Humans Lymphoma Lymphoma - mortality Lymphoma - therapy Male Melphalan Melphalan - administration & dosage Melphalan - adverse effects Metabolism Middle Aged Multivariate analysis Patients Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation Podophyllotoxin - administration & dosage Podophyllotoxin - adverse effects Remission Stem cell transplantation Survival Rate Transplantation Transplantation Conditioning Transplants & implants |
title | Bendamustine as part of conditioning of autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive lymphoma: a phase 2 study from the GELTAMO group |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T05%3A21%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bendamustine%20as%20part%20of%20conditioning%20of%20autologous%20stem%20cell%20transplantation%20in%20patients%20with%20aggressive%20lymphoma:%20a%20phase%202%20study%20from%20the%20GELTAMO%20group&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20haematology&rft.au=Redondo,%20Alba%20M.&rft.aucorp=Grupo%20Espa%C3%B1ol%20de%20Linfomas%20y%20Trasplante%20Aut%C3%B3logo%20de%20M%C3%A9dula%20%C3%93sea%20(GELTAMO)&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=184&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=797&rft.epage=807&rft.pages=797-807&rft.issn=0007-1048&rft.eissn=1365-2141&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bjh.15713&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157645343%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2182426773&rft_id=info:pmid/30548583&rfr_iscdi=true |