Reason and Timing for Conversion to Sternotomy in Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Patient Outcomes
Objective Conversion to sternotomy is a primary bailout method for robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. The aims of this study were to identify the primary reasons for conversion from robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting to sternotomy and to evaluate the i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2018-11, Vol.13 (6), p.423-427 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 427 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 423 |
container_title | Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Christidis, Nickolas K. Fox, Stephanie A. Swinamer, Stuart A. Bagur, Rodrigo Sridhar, Kumar Lavi, Shahar Iglesias, Ivan Bainbridge, Daniel Jones, Philip M. Harle, Christopher C. Chu, Michael W. A. Teefy, Patrick Kiaii, Bob B. |
description | Objective
Conversion to sternotomy is a primary bailout method for robotically assisted
coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. The aims of this study were to
identify the primary reasons for conversion from robotically assisted
coronary artery bypass grafting to sternotomy and to evaluate the
in-hospital outcomes in such patients.
Methods
Prospectively collected data from February 2004 to April 2017 were reviewed
for 72 patients (56 men; mean age = 63.8 years) who required conversion to
sternotomy during a robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting
procedure with planned endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvest and
anastomosis to the left anterior descending on the beating heart.
Results
The overall rate of conversion was 12.4% (72/581). Conversions occurred
either during attempted endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvest
(31.9%), during endoscopic left anterior descending isolation (40.3%),
during manual isolation and anastomosis of the left anterior descending
(19.4%), or after anastomosis due to unsatisfactory flow (8.3%). Overall,
the most common reason for conversion was an intramyocardial left anterior
descending (43.1%). The median stay in the intensive care unit was 1 day
(range = 0–20) and the median hospital length of stay was 5 days (range =
3–43). In-hospital complications included new atrial fibrillation (16.7%),
need for blood transfusion (20.8%), mediastinitis (4.2%), postoperative
myocardial infarction (2.8%), exploration for bleeding (2.8%), and 1
in-hospital death.
Conclusions
The reasons for conversion were primarily related to anatomical factors that
created difficulties for endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvesting
and left anterior descending identification. Patients who required
conversion to sternotomy from robotically assisted coronary artery bypass
grafting demonstrated acceptable outcomes and low complication rates. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000566 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155900344</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1097_IMI.0000000000000566</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2155900344</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-40ef67c10253e2129d60d2209488d2a7728709c49c09ec2146c5a1ab690f6d7d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhi3UqkDgH6DKx14Wxl6vd31MoxYigVLxcV45Xm9klLVTj5cq_74OSVHFAV_G0jzzjuYh5ILBJQNVX83v5pfw_6ukPCInrKpUAU2tPr3-ZaEaUR2TU8RnAFFKIb6Q4xIqAZViJ-TPvdUYPNW-o49ucH5F-xDpLPgXG9HlTgr0IdnoQwrDljpP78MyJGeKKaLDZLsMx-B13NJpzOCWft9uNCK9jrpPu8Bd9i-dnPWJLsZkwmDxjHzu9Rrt-aFOyNPPH4-zm-J2cT2fTW8LUwqVCgG2l7VhwKvScsZVJ6HjHJRomo7ruuZNDcoIZUBZw5mQptJML6WCXnZ1V07It33uJobfo8XUDg6NXa-1t2HElu98AZRCZFTsURMDYrR9u4luyHe1DNqd8jYrb98rz2NfDxvG5WC7t6F_jjPA9gDqlW2fwxh9vvjj0L-3ZIqU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2155900344</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reason and Timing for Conversion to Sternotomy in Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Patient Outcomes</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><creator>Christidis, Nickolas K. ; Fox, Stephanie A. ; Swinamer, Stuart A. ; Bagur, Rodrigo ; Sridhar, Kumar ; Lavi, Shahar ; Iglesias, Ivan ; Bainbridge, Daniel ; Jones, Philip M. ; Harle, Christopher C. ; Chu, Michael W. A. ; Teefy, Patrick ; Kiaii, Bob B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Christidis, Nickolas K. ; Fox, Stephanie A. ; Swinamer, Stuart A. ; Bagur, Rodrigo ; Sridhar, Kumar ; Lavi, Shahar ; Iglesias, Ivan ; Bainbridge, Daniel ; Jones, Philip M. ; Harle, Christopher C. ; Chu, Michael W. A. ; Teefy, Patrick ; Kiaii, Bob B.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Conversion to sternotomy is a primary bailout method for robotically assisted
coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. The aims of this study were to
identify the primary reasons for conversion from robotically assisted
coronary artery bypass grafting to sternotomy and to evaluate the
in-hospital outcomes in such patients.
Methods
Prospectively collected data from February 2004 to April 2017 were reviewed
for 72 patients (56 men; mean age = 63.8 years) who required conversion to
sternotomy during a robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting
procedure with planned endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvest and
anastomosis to the left anterior descending on the beating heart.
Results
The overall rate of conversion was 12.4% (72/581). Conversions occurred
either during attempted endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvest
(31.9%), during endoscopic left anterior descending isolation (40.3%),
during manual isolation and anastomosis of the left anterior descending
(19.4%), or after anastomosis due to unsatisfactory flow (8.3%). Overall,
the most common reason for conversion was an intramyocardial left anterior
descending (43.1%). The median stay in the intensive care unit was 1 day
(range = 0–20) and the median hospital length of stay was 5 days (range =
3–43). In-hospital complications included new atrial fibrillation (16.7%),
need for blood transfusion (20.8%), mediastinitis (4.2%), postoperative
myocardial infarction (2.8%), exploration for bleeding (2.8%), and 1
in-hospital death.
Conclusions
The reasons for conversion were primarily related to anatomical factors that
created difficulties for endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvesting
and left anterior descending identification. Patients who required
conversion to sternotomy from robotically assisted coronary artery bypass
grafting demonstrated acceptable outcomes and low complication rates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-9845</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-0879</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000566</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30540591</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2018-11, Vol.13 (6), p.423-427</ispartof><rights>2018 International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-40ef67c10253e2129d60d2209488d2a7728709c49c09ec2146c5a1ab690f6d7d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-40ef67c10253e2129d60d2209488d2a7728709c49c09ec2146c5a1ab690f6d7d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000566$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000566$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30540591$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christidis, Nickolas K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swinamer, Stuart A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagur, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sridhar, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavi, Shahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iglesias, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bainbridge, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Philip M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harle, Christopher C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Michael W. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teefy, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiaii, Bob B.</creatorcontrib><title>Reason and Timing for Conversion to Sternotomy in Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Patient Outcomes</title><title>Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><addtitle>Innovations (Phila)</addtitle><description>Objective
Conversion to sternotomy is a primary bailout method for robotically assisted
coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. The aims of this study were to
identify the primary reasons for conversion from robotically assisted
coronary artery bypass grafting to sternotomy and to evaluate the
in-hospital outcomes in such patients.
Methods
Prospectively collected data from February 2004 to April 2017 were reviewed
for 72 patients (56 men; mean age = 63.8 years) who required conversion to
sternotomy during a robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting
procedure with planned endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvest and
anastomosis to the left anterior descending on the beating heart.
Results
The overall rate of conversion was 12.4% (72/581). Conversions occurred
either during attempted endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvest
(31.9%), during endoscopic left anterior descending isolation (40.3%),
during manual isolation and anastomosis of the left anterior descending
(19.4%), or after anastomosis due to unsatisfactory flow (8.3%). Overall,
the most common reason for conversion was an intramyocardial left anterior
descending (43.1%). The median stay in the intensive care unit was 1 day
(range = 0–20) and the median hospital length of stay was 5 days (range =
3–43). In-hospital complications included new atrial fibrillation (16.7%),
need for blood transfusion (20.8%), mediastinitis (4.2%), postoperative
myocardial infarction (2.8%), exploration for bleeding (2.8%), and 1
in-hospital death.
Conclusions
The reasons for conversion were primarily related to anatomical factors that
created difficulties for endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvesting
and left anterior descending identification. Patients who required
conversion to sternotomy from robotically assisted coronary artery bypass
grafting demonstrated acceptable outcomes and low complication rates.</description><issn>1556-9845</issn><issn>1559-0879</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhi3UqkDgH6DKx14Wxl6vd31MoxYigVLxcV45Xm9klLVTj5cq_74OSVHFAV_G0jzzjuYh5ILBJQNVX83v5pfw_6ukPCInrKpUAU2tPr3-ZaEaUR2TU8RnAFFKIb6Q4xIqAZViJ-TPvdUYPNW-o49ucH5F-xDpLPgXG9HlTgr0IdnoQwrDljpP78MyJGeKKaLDZLsMx-B13NJpzOCWft9uNCK9jrpPu8Bd9i-dnPWJLsZkwmDxjHzu9Rrt-aFOyNPPH4-zm-J2cT2fTW8LUwqVCgG2l7VhwKvScsZVJ6HjHJRomo7ruuZNDcoIZUBZw5mQptJML6WCXnZ1V07It33uJobfo8XUDg6NXa-1t2HElu98AZRCZFTsURMDYrR9u4luyHe1DNqd8jYrb98rz2NfDxvG5WC7t6F_jjPA9gDqlW2fwxh9vvjj0L-3ZIqU</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Christidis, Nickolas K.</creator><creator>Fox, Stephanie A.</creator><creator>Swinamer, Stuart A.</creator><creator>Bagur, Rodrigo</creator><creator>Sridhar, Kumar</creator><creator>Lavi, Shahar</creator><creator>Iglesias, Ivan</creator><creator>Bainbridge, Daniel</creator><creator>Jones, Philip M.</creator><creator>Harle, Christopher C.</creator><creator>Chu, Michael W. A.</creator><creator>Teefy, Patrick</creator><creator>Kiaii, Bob B.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Reason and Timing for Conversion to Sternotomy in Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Patient Outcomes</title><author>Christidis, Nickolas K. ; Fox, Stephanie A. ; Swinamer, Stuart A. ; Bagur, Rodrigo ; Sridhar, Kumar ; Lavi, Shahar ; Iglesias, Ivan ; Bainbridge, Daniel ; Jones, Philip M. ; Harle, Christopher C. ; Chu, Michael W. A. ; Teefy, Patrick ; Kiaii, Bob B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c349t-40ef67c10253e2129d60d2209488d2a7728709c49c09ec2146c5a1ab690f6d7d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christidis, Nickolas K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox, Stephanie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swinamer, Stuart A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bagur, Rodrigo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sridhar, Kumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavi, Shahar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iglesias, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bainbridge, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Philip M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harle, Christopher C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Michael W. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teefy, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiaii, Bob B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christidis, Nickolas K.</au><au>Fox, Stephanie A.</au><au>Swinamer, Stuart A.</au><au>Bagur, Rodrigo</au><au>Sridhar, Kumar</au><au>Lavi, Shahar</au><au>Iglesias, Ivan</au><au>Bainbridge, Daniel</au><au>Jones, Philip M.</au><au>Harle, Christopher C.</au><au>Chu, Michael W. A.</au><au>Teefy, Patrick</au><au>Kiaii, Bob B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reason and Timing for Conversion to Sternotomy in Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Patient Outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><addtitle>Innovations (Phila)</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>427</epage><pages>423-427</pages><issn>1556-9845</issn><eissn>1559-0879</eissn><abstract>Objective
Conversion to sternotomy is a primary bailout method for robotically assisted
coronary artery bypass grafting procedures. The aims of this study were to
identify the primary reasons for conversion from robotically assisted
coronary artery bypass grafting to sternotomy and to evaluate the
in-hospital outcomes in such patients.
Methods
Prospectively collected data from February 2004 to April 2017 were reviewed
for 72 patients (56 men; mean age = 63.8 years) who required conversion to
sternotomy during a robotically assisted coronary artery bypass grafting
procedure with planned endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvest and
anastomosis to the left anterior descending on the beating heart.
Results
The overall rate of conversion was 12.4% (72/581). Conversions occurred
either during attempted endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvest
(31.9%), during endoscopic left anterior descending isolation (40.3%),
during manual isolation and anastomosis of the left anterior descending
(19.4%), or after anastomosis due to unsatisfactory flow (8.3%). Overall,
the most common reason for conversion was an intramyocardial left anterior
descending (43.1%). The median stay in the intensive care unit was 1 day
(range = 0–20) and the median hospital length of stay was 5 days (range =
3–43). In-hospital complications included new atrial fibrillation (16.7%),
need for blood transfusion (20.8%), mediastinitis (4.2%), postoperative
myocardial infarction (2.8%), exploration for bleeding (2.8%), and 1
in-hospital death.
Conclusions
The reasons for conversion were primarily related to anatomical factors that
created difficulties for endoscopic left internal thoracic artery harvesting
and left anterior descending identification. Patients who required
conversion to sternotomy from robotically assisted coronary artery bypass
grafting demonstrated acceptable outcomes and low complication rates.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30540591</pmid><doi>10.1097/IMI.0000000000000566</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1556-9845 |
ispartof | Innovations (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2018-11, Vol.13 (6), p.423-427 |
issn | 1556-9845 1559-0879 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155900344 |
source | Access via SAGE |
title | Reason and Timing for Conversion to Sternotomy in Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Patient Outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A05%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reason%20and%20Timing%20for%20Conversion%20to%20Sternotomy%20in%20Robotic-Assisted%20Coronary%20Artery%20Bypass%20Grafting%20and%20Patient%20Outcomes&rft.jtitle=Innovations%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Christidis,%20Nickolas%20K.&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=427&rft.pages=423-427&rft.issn=1556-9845&rft.eissn=1559-0879&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/IMI.0000000000000566&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2155900344%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2155900344&rft_id=info:pmid/30540591&rft_sage_id=10.1097_IMI.0000000000000566&rfr_iscdi=true |