Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department

Objective To compare pharmacist‐led prescribing changes and associated 30‐day revisit rates across different regimens for patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods An observational, retrospective cohort analysis was conducte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The International journal of pharmacy practice 2019-06, Vol.27 (3), p.279-285
Hauptverfasser: Zimmerman, David E., Covvey, Jordan R., Nemecek, Branden D., Guarascio, Anthony J., Wilson, Laura, Freedy, Henry R., Yassin, Mohamed H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 285
container_issue 3
container_start_page 279
container_title The International journal of pharmacy practice
container_volume 27
creator Zimmerman, David E.
Covvey, Jordan R.
Nemecek, Branden D.
Guarascio, Anthony J.
Wilson, Laura
Freedy, Henry R.
Yassin, Mohamed H.
description Objective To compare pharmacist‐led prescribing changes and associated 30‐day revisit rates across different regimens for patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods An observational, retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients who were discharged from an ED over a 4‐year period with a diagnosis of CAP. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, antibiotic selection and comorbidity and condition severity scores were collected for two cohorts: 2012–13 (before protocol change) and 2014–15 (post‐protocol change). During January 2014, a pharmacist‐led protocol change with prescriber education was implemented to better align ED treatment practices with clinical practice guidelines. The primary endpoint was the change in prescribing practices across the two cohorts. Key findings A total of 741 patients with CAP were identified, including 411 (55.5%) patients in 2012–13 and 330 (44.5%) in 2014–15. Prescribing of macrolide monotherapy regimens decreased significantly following protocol change (70.1% versus 42.7%; difference: 27.4%, 95% CI: 23.8–31.0%) with a reciprocal increase in macrolide/β‐lactam combination prescribing (6.3–21.8%; difference: 15.5%, 95% CI: 12.9–18.1%). A total of 12.2% of patients who received macrolide/β‐lactam combination treatment revisited a network ED within 30 days due to worsening pneumonia, compared to 8.6% of patients who received macrolide monotherapy treatment (P = NS). Conclusions The current study showed a significant increase in antibiotic prescribing compliance following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change and education, but no statistical difference in rates of return for macrolide monotherapy versus other regimens.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijpp.12497
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155165370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2227714415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-15b42da9e5250bf8f6eb4704fde767910051ffc9486411b571a190f59545daef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90cFu1DAQBmALgehSuPAAyBIXhJTicex4c0QVhaJK7AHOkeOMt14ldmo7rfbGI6A-Ik-Cly0cODAXXz79ntFPyEtgZ1DmndvN8xlw0apHZMWZ4JUCJR6TFWsbqFSj4IQ8S2nHGG_kWj0lJzWTdSOa9YrcbyImE13v_JbmiH5IVPuBRrx1yWUadcZEbRjHcHcgms7XOk7auJR_fv8xRHeLns4x5GDCSM219lssPlITpmnxLu8L0-ZmcREHOntcpuCdps6XfyhOGLfozZ4OOOuYJ_T5OXli9ZjwxcN7Sr5dfPh6_qm6-vLx8vz9VWXqtlYVyF7wQbcouWS9XdsGe6GYsAOWk1tgTIK1phXrRgD0UoGGllnZSiEHjbY-JW-OuWX7mwVT7iaXDI6j9hiW1HGQEhpZK1bo63_oLizRl-06zrlSIATIot4elYkhpYi2m6ObdNx3wLpDU92hqe53UwW_eohc-gmHv_RPNQXAEdy5Eff_ieouP282x9Bfs8CjKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2227714415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zimmerman, David E. ; Covvey, Jordan R. ; Nemecek, Branden D. ; Guarascio, Anthony J. ; Wilson, Laura ; Freedy, Henry R. ; Yassin, Mohamed H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David E. ; Covvey, Jordan R. ; Nemecek, Branden D. ; Guarascio, Anthony J. ; Wilson, Laura ; Freedy, Henry R. ; Yassin, Mohamed H.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To compare pharmacist‐led prescribing changes and associated 30‐day revisit rates across different regimens for patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods An observational, retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients who were discharged from an ED over a 4‐year period with a diagnosis of CAP. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, antibiotic selection and comorbidity and condition severity scores were collected for two cohorts: 2012–13 (before protocol change) and 2014–15 (post‐protocol change). During January 2014, a pharmacist‐led protocol change with prescriber education was implemented to better align ED treatment practices with clinical practice guidelines. The primary endpoint was the change in prescribing practices across the two cohorts. Key findings A total of 741 patients with CAP were identified, including 411 (55.5%) patients in 2012–13 and 330 (44.5%) in 2014–15. Prescribing of macrolide monotherapy regimens decreased significantly following protocol change (70.1% versus 42.7%; difference: 27.4%, 95% CI: 23.8–31.0%) with a reciprocal increase in macrolide/β‐lactam combination prescribing (6.3–21.8%; difference: 15.5%, 95% CI: 12.9–18.1%). A total of 12.2% of patients who received macrolide/β‐lactam combination treatment revisited a network ED within 30 days due to worsening pneumonia, compared to 8.6% of patients who received macrolide monotherapy treatment (P = NS). Conclusions The current study showed a significant increase in antibiotic prescribing compliance following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change and education, but no statistical difference in rates of return for macrolide monotherapy versus other regimens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-7671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-7174</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12497</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30536468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; community‐acquired pneumonia ; emergency department ; Pharmacists ; Pneumonia</subject><ispartof>The International journal of pharmacy practice, 2019-06, Vol.27 (3), p.279-285</ispartof><rights>2018 Royal Pharmaceutical Society</rights><rights>2018 Royal Pharmaceutical Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Royal Pharmaceutical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-15b42da9e5250bf8f6eb4704fde767910051ffc9486411b571a190f59545daef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-15b42da9e5250bf8f6eb4704fde767910051ffc9486411b571a190f59545daef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2913-2042 ; 0000-0002-9661-0895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijpp.12497$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijpp.12497$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30536468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covvey, Jordan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemecek, Branden D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarascio, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedy, Henry R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yassin, Mohamed H.</creatorcontrib><title>Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department</title><title>The International journal of pharmacy practice</title><addtitle>Int J Pharm Pract</addtitle><description>Objective To compare pharmacist‐led prescribing changes and associated 30‐day revisit rates across different regimens for patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods An observational, retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients who were discharged from an ED over a 4‐year period with a diagnosis of CAP. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, antibiotic selection and comorbidity and condition severity scores were collected for two cohorts: 2012–13 (before protocol change) and 2014–15 (post‐protocol change). During January 2014, a pharmacist‐led protocol change with prescriber education was implemented to better align ED treatment practices with clinical practice guidelines. The primary endpoint was the change in prescribing practices across the two cohorts. Key findings A total of 741 patients with CAP were identified, including 411 (55.5%) patients in 2012–13 and 330 (44.5%) in 2014–15. Prescribing of macrolide monotherapy regimens decreased significantly following protocol change (70.1% versus 42.7%; difference: 27.4%, 95% CI: 23.8–31.0%) with a reciprocal increase in macrolide/β‐lactam combination prescribing (6.3–21.8%; difference: 15.5%, 95% CI: 12.9–18.1%). A total of 12.2% of patients who received macrolide/β‐lactam combination treatment revisited a network ED within 30 days due to worsening pneumonia, compared to 8.6% of patients who received macrolide monotherapy treatment (P = NS). Conclusions The current study showed a significant increase in antibiotic prescribing compliance following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change and education, but no statistical difference in rates of return for macrolide monotherapy versus other regimens.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>community‐acquired pneumonia</subject><subject>emergency department</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><issn>0961-7671</issn><issn>2042-7174</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90cFu1DAQBmALgehSuPAAyBIXhJTicex4c0QVhaJK7AHOkeOMt14ldmo7rfbGI6A-Ik-Cly0cODAXXz79ntFPyEtgZ1DmndvN8xlw0apHZMWZ4JUCJR6TFWsbqFSj4IQ8S2nHGG_kWj0lJzWTdSOa9YrcbyImE13v_JbmiH5IVPuBRrx1yWUadcZEbRjHcHcgms7XOk7auJR_fv8xRHeLns4x5GDCSM219lssPlITpmnxLu8L0-ZmcREHOntcpuCdps6XfyhOGLfozZ4OOOuYJ_T5OXli9ZjwxcN7Sr5dfPh6_qm6-vLx8vz9VWXqtlYVyF7wQbcouWS9XdsGe6GYsAOWk1tgTIK1phXrRgD0UoGGllnZSiEHjbY-JW-OuWX7mwVT7iaXDI6j9hiW1HGQEhpZK1bo63_oLizRl-06zrlSIATIot4elYkhpYi2m6ObdNx3wLpDU92hqe53UwW_eohc-gmHv_RPNQXAEdy5Eff_ieouP282x9Bfs8CjKQ</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Zimmerman, David E.</creator><creator>Covvey, Jordan R.</creator><creator>Nemecek, Branden D.</creator><creator>Guarascio, Anthony J.</creator><creator>Wilson, Laura</creator><creator>Freedy, Henry R.</creator><creator>Yassin, Mohamed H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2913-2042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-0895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department</title><author>Zimmerman, David E. ; Covvey, Jordan R. ; Nemecek, Branden D. ; Guarascio, Anthony J. ; Wilson, Laura ; Freedy, Henry R. ; Yassin, Mohamed H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-15b42da9e5250bf8f6eb4704fde767910051ffc9486411b571a190f59545daef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>community‐acquired pneumonia</topic><topic>emergency department</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covvey, Jordan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemecek, Branden D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarascio, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedy, Henry R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yassin, Mohamed H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The International journal of pharmacy practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimmerman, David E.</au><au>Covvey, Jordan R.</au><au>Nemecek, Branden D.</au><au>Guarascio, Anthony J.</au><au>Wilson, Laura</au><au>Freedy, Henry R.</au><au>Yassin, Mohamed H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of pharmacy practice</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pharm Pract</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>279-285</pages><issn>0961-7671</issn><eissn>2042-7174</eissn><abstract>Objective To compare pharmacist‐led prescribing changes and associated 30‐day revisit rates across different regimens for patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods An observational, retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients who were discharged from an ED over a 4‐year period with a diagnosis of CAP. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, antibiotic selection and comorbidity and condition severity scores were collected for two cohorts: 2012–13 (before protocol change) and 2014–15 (post‐protocol change). During January 2014, a pharmacist‐led protocol change with prescriber education was implemented to better align ED treatment practices with clinical practice guidelines. The primary endpoint was the change in prescribing practices across the two cohorts. Key findings A total of 741 patients with CAP were identified, including 411 (55.5%) patients in 2012–13 and 330 (44.5%) in 2014–15. Prescribing of macrolide monotherapy regimens decreased significantly following protocol change (70.1% versus 42.7%; difference: 27.4%, 95% CI: 23.8–31.0%) with a reciprocal increase in macrolide/β‐lactam combination prescribing (6.3–21.8%; difference: 15.5%, 95% CI: 12.9–18.1%). A total of 12.2% of patients who received macrolide/β‐lactam combination treatment revisited a network ED within 30 days due to worsening pneumonia, compared to 8.6% of patients who received macrolide monotherapy treatment (P = NS). Conclusions The current study showed a significant increase in antibiotic prescribing compliance following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change and education, but no statistical difference in rates of return for macrolide monotherapy versus other regimens.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30536468</pmid><doi>10.1111/ijpp.12497</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2913-2042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-0895</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0961-7671
ispartof The International journal of pharmacy practice, 2019-06, Vol.27 (3), p.279-285
issn 0961-7671
2042-7174
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155165370
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Antibiotics
community‐acquired pneumonia
emergency department
Pharmacists
Pneumonia
title Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T11%3A24%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prescribing%20trends%20and%20revisit%20rates%20following%20a%20pharmacist%E2%80%90driven%20protocol%20change%20for%20community%E2%80%90acquired%20pneumonia%20in%20an%20emergency%20department&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20pharmacy%20practice&rft.au=Zimmerman,%20David%20E.&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=279-285&rft.issn=0961-7671&rft.eissn=2042-7174&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijpp.12497&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2227714415%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2227714415&rft_id=info:pmid/30536468&rfr_iscdi=true