Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department
Objective To compare pharmacist‐led prescribing changes and associated 30‐day revisit rates across different regimens for patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods An observational, retrospective cohort analysis was conducte...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The International journal of pharmacy practice 2019-06, Vol.27 (3), p.279-285 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 285 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 279 |
container_title | The International journal of pharmacy practice |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Zimmerman, David E. Covvey, Jordan R. Nemecek, Branden D. Guarascio, Anthony J. Wilson, Laura Freedy, Henry R. Yassin, Mohamed H. |
description | Objective
To compare pharmacist‐led prescribing changes and associated 30‐day revisit rates across different regimens for patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Methods
An observational, retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients who were discharged from an ED over a 4‐year period with a diagnosis of CAP. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, antibiotic selection and comorbidity and condition severity scores were collected for two cohorts: 2012–13 (before protocol change) and 2014–15 (post‐protocol change). During January 2014, a pharmacist‐led protocol change with prescriber education was implemented to better align ED treatment practices with clinical practice guidelines. The primary endpoint was the change in prescribing practices across the two cohorts.
Key findings
A total of 741 patients with CAP were identified, including 411 (55.5%) patients in 2012–13 and 330 (44.5%) in 2014–15. Prescribing of macrolide monotherapy regimens decreased significantly following protocol change (70.1% versus 42.7%; difference: 27.4%, 95% CI: 23.8–31.0%) with a reciprocal increase in macrolide/β‐lactam combination prescribing (6.3–21.8%; difference: 15.5%, 95% CI: 12.9–18.1%). A total of 12.2% of patients who received macrolide/β‐lactam combination treatment revisited a network ED within 30 days due to worsening pneumonia, compared to 8.6% of patients who received macrolide monotherapy treatment (P = NS).
Conclusions
The current study showed a significant increase in antibiotic prescribing compliance following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change and education, but no statistical difference in rates of return for macrolide monotherapy versus other regimens. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ijpp.12497 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155165370</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2227714415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-15b42da9e5250bf8f6eb4704fde767910051ffc9486411b571a190f59545daef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90cFu1DAQBmALgehSuPAAyBIXhJTicex4c0QVhaJK7AHOkeOMt14ldmo7rfbGI6A-Ik-Cly0cODAXXz79ntFPyEtgZ1DmndvN8xlw0apHZMWZ4JUCJR6TFWsbqFSj4IQ8S2nHGG_kWj0lJzWTdSOa9YrcbyImE13v_JbmiH5IVPuBRrx1yWUadcZEbRjHcHcgms7XOk7auJR_fv8xRHeLns4x5GDCSM219lssPlITpmnxLu8L0-ZmcREHOntcpuCdps6XfyhOGLfozZ4OOOuYJ_T5OXli9ZjwxcN7Sr5dfPh6_qm6-vLx8vz9VWXqtlYVyF7wQbcouWS9XdsGe6GYsAOWk1tgTIK1phXrRgD0UoGGllnZSiEHjbY-JW-OuWX7mwVT7iaXDI6j9hiW1HGQEhpZK1bo63_oLizRl-06zrlSIATIot4elYkhpYi2m6ObdNx3wLpDU92hqe53UwW_eohc-gmHv_RPNQXAEdy5Eff_ieouP282x9Bfs8CjKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2227714415</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zimmerman, David E. ; Covvey, Jordan R. ; Nemecek, Branden D. ; Guarascio, Anthony J. ; Wilson, Laura ; Freedy, Henry R. ; Yassin, Mohamed H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David E. ; Covvey, Jordan R. ; Nemecek, Branden D. ; Guarascio, Anthony J. ; Wilson, Laura ; Freedy, Henry R. ; Yassin, Mohamed H.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To compare pharmacist‐led prescribing changes and associated 30‐day revisit rates across different regimens for patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Methods
An observational, retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients who were discharged from an ED over a 4‐year period with a diagnosis of CAP. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, antibiotic selection and comorbidity and condition severity scores were collected for two cohorts: 2012–13 (before protocol change) and 2014–15 (post‐protocol change). During January 2014, a pharmacist‐led protocol change with prescriber education was implemented to better align ED treatment practices with clinical practice guidelines. The primary endpoint was the change in prescribing practices across the two cohorts.
Key findings
A total of 741 patients with CAP were identified, including 411 (55.5%) patients in 2012–13 and 330 (44.5%) in 2014–15. Prescribing of macrolide monotherapy regimens decreased significantly following protocol change (70.1% versus 42.7%; difference: 27.4%, 95% CI: 23.8–31.0%) with a reciprocal increase in macrolide/β‐lactam combination prescribing (6.3–21.8%; difference: 15.5%, 95% CI: 12.9–18.1%). A total of 12.2% of patients who received macrolide/β‐lactam combination treatment revisited a network ED within 30 days due to worsening pneumonia, compared to 8.6% of patients who received macrolide monotherapy treatment (P = NS).
Conclusions
The current study showed a significant increase in antibiotic prescribing compliance following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change and education, but no statistical difference in rates of return for macrolide monotherapy versus other regimens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0961-7671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2042-7174</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12497</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30536468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; community‐acquired pneumonia ; emergency department ; Pharmacists ; Pneumonia</subject><ispartof>The International journal of pharmacy practice, 2019-06, Vol.27 (3), p.279-285</ispartof><rights>2018 Royal Pharmaceutical Society</rights><rights>2018 Royal Pharmaceutical Society.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Royal Pharmaceutical Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-15b42da9e5250bf8f6eb4704fde767910051ffc9486411b571a190f59545daef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-15b42da9e5250bf8f6eb4704fde767910051ffc9486411b571a190f59545daef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2913-2042 ; 0000-0002-9661-0895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fijpp.12497$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fijpp.12497$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30536468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covvey, Jordan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemecek, Branden D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarascio, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedy, Henry R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yassin, Mohamed H.</creatorcontrib><title>Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department</title><title>The International journal of pharmacy practice</title><addtitle>Int J Pharm Pract</addtitle><description>Objective
To compare pharmacist‐led prescribing changes and associated 30‐day revisit rates across different regimens for patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Methods
An observational, retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients who were discharged from an ED over a 4‐year period with a diagnosis of CAP. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, antibiotic selection and comorbidity and condition severity scores were collected for two cohorts: 2012–13 (before protocol change) and 2014–15 (post‐protocol change). During January 2014, a pharmacist‐led protocol change with prescriber education was implemented to better align ED treatment practices with clinical practice guidelines. The primary endpoint was the change in prescribing practices across the two cohorts.
Key findings
A total of 741 patients with CAP were identified, including 411 (55.5%) patients in 2012–13 and 330 (44.5%) in 2014–15. Prescribing of macrolide monotherapy regimens decreased significantly following protocol change (70.1% versus 42.7%; difference: 27.4%, 95% CI: 23.8–31.0%) with a reciprocal increase in macrolide/β‐lactam combination prescribing (6.3–21.8%; difference: 15.5%, 95% CI: 12.9–18.1%). A total of 12.2% of patients who received macrolide/β‐lactam combination treatment revisited a network ED within 30 days due to worsening pneumonia, compared to 8.6% of patients who received macrolide monotherapy treatment (P = NS).
Conclusions
The current study showed a significant increase in antibiotic prescribing compliance following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change and education, but no statistical difference in rates of return for macrolide monotherapy versus other regimens.</description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>community‐acquired pneumonia</subject><subject>emergency department</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><issn>0961-7671</issn><issn>2042-7174</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90cFu1DAQBmALgehSuPAAyBIXhJTicex4c0QVhaJK7AHOkeOMt14ldmo7rfbGI6A-Ik-Cly0cODAXXz79ntFPyEtgZ1DmndvN8xlw0apHZMWZ4JUCJR6TFWsbqFSj4IQ8S2nHGG_kWj0lJzWTdSOa9YrcbyImE13v_JbmiH5IVPuBRrx1yWUadcZEbRjHcHcgms7XOk7auJR_fv8xRHeLns4x5GDCSM219lssPlITpmnxLu8L0-ZmcREHOntcpuCdps6XfyhOGLfozZ4OOOuYJ_T5OXli9ZjwxcN7Sr5dfPh6_qm6-vLx8vz9VWXqtlYVyF7wQbcouWS9XdsGe6GYsAOWk1tgTIK1phXrRgD0UoGGllnZSiEHjbY-JW-OuWX7mwVT7iaXDI6j9hiW1HGQEhpZK1bo63_oLizRl-06zrlSIATIot4elYkhpYi2m6ObdNx3wLpDU92hqe53UwW_eohc-gmHv_RPNQXAEdy5Eff_ieouP282x9Bfs8CjKQ</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Zimmerman, David E.</creator><creator>Covvey, Jordan R.</creator><creator>Nemecek, Branden D.</creator><creator>Guarascio, Anthony J.</creator><creator>Wilson, Laura</creator><creator>Freedy, Henry R.</creator><creator>Yassin, Mohamed H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2913-2042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-0895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department</title><author>Zimmerman, David E. ; Covvey, Jordan R. ; Nemecek, Branden D. ; Guarascio, Anthony J. ; Wilson, Laura ; Freedy, Henry R. ; Yassin, Mohamed H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-15b42da9e5250bf8f6eb4704fde767910051ffc9486411b571a190f59545daef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>community‐acquired pneumonia</topic><topic>emergency department</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimmerman, David E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Covvey, Jordan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nemecek, Branden D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guarascio, Anthony J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freedy, Henry R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yassin, Mohamed H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The International journal of pharmacy practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimmerman, David E.</au><au>Covvey, Jordan R.</au><au>Nemecek, Branden D.</au><au>Guarascio, Anthony J.</au><au>Wilson, Laura</au><au>Freedy, Henry R.</au><au>Yassin, Mohamed H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department</atitle><jtitle>The International journal of pharmacy practice</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Pharm Pract</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>279</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>279-285</pages><issn>0961-7671</issn><eissn>2042-7174</eissn><abstract>Objective
To compare pharmacist‐led prescribing changes and associated 30‐day revisit rates across different regimens for patients discharged from an emergency department (ED) with a diagnosis of community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Methods
An observational, retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of patients who were discharged from an ED over a 4‐year period with a diagnosis of CAP. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, antibiotic selection and comorbidity and condition severity scores were collected for two cohorts: 2012–13 (before protocol change) and 2014–15 (post‐protocol change). During January 2014, a pharmacist‐led protocol change with prescriber education was implemented to better align ED treatment practices with clinical practice guidelines. The primary endpoint was the change in prescribing practices across the two cohorts.
Key findings
A total of 741 patients with CAP were identified, including 411 (55.5%) patients in 2012–13 and 330 (44.5%) in 2014–15. Prescribing of macrolide monotherapy regimens decreased significantly following protocol change (70.1% versus 42.7%; difference: 27.4%, 95% CI: 23.8–31.0%) with a reciprocal increase in macrolide/β‐lactam combination prescribing (6.3–21.8%; difference: 15.5%, 95% CI: 12.9–18.1%). A total of 12.2% of patients who received macrolide/β‐lactam combination treatment revisited a network ED within 30 days due to worsening pneumonia, compared to 8.6% of patients who received macrolide monotherapy treatment (P = NS).
Conclusions
The current study showed a significant increase in antibiotic prescribing compliance following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change and education, but no statistical difference in rates of return for macrolide monotherapy versus other regimens.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30536468</pmid><doi>10.1111/ijpp.12497</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2913-2042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-0895</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0961-7671 |
ispartof | The International journal of pharmacy practice, 2019-06, Vol.27 (3), p.279-285 |
issn | 0961-7671 2042-7174 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2155165370 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Antibiotics community‐acquired pneumonia emergency department Pharmacists Pneumonia |
title | Prescribing trends and revisit rates following a pharmacist‐driven protocol change for community‐acquired pneumonia in an emergency department |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T11%3A24%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prescribing%20trends%20and%20revisit%20rates%20following%20a%20pharmacist%E2%80%90driven%20protocol%20change%20for%20community%E2%80%90acquired%20pneumonia%20in%20an%20emergency%20department&rft.jtitle=The%20International%20journal%20of%20pharmacy%20practice&rft.au=Zimmerman,%20David%20E.&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=279&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=279-285&rft.issn=0961-7671&rft.eissn=2042-7174&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijpp.12497&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2227714415%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2227714415&rft_id=info:pmid/30536468&rfr_iscdi=true |