Comparison of Two Versions of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index for Quantification of Dysphonia Severity

The acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) is a specific acoustic indicator designed to objectively estimate dysphonia severity and measure the values of acoustic parameters based on the diagnostic category. This study compared the performance of two AVQI versions (2.02 and 3.01, v2 and v3) and PraatCP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of voice 2020-05, Vol.34 (3), p.489.e11-489.e19
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Geun-Hyo, Lee, Yeon-Woo, Bae, In-Ho, Park, Hee-June, Lee, Byung-Joo, Kwon, Soon-Bok
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The acoustic voice quality index (AVQI) is a specific acoustic indicator designed to objectively estimate dysphonia severity and measure the values of acoustic parameters based on the diagnostic category. This study compared the performance of two AVQI versions (2.02 and 3.01, v2 and v3) and PraatCPPS using a voice sample of Korean population. Voice samples for sustained vowel and connected speech were elicited from 2257 patients across 14 diagnostic categories. Auditory-perceptual (A-P) assessments of dysphonia severity were compared to acoustic parameters of severity derived from two versions of the AVQI (v2 and v3) as well as the PraatCPPS. The AVQI-estimated severity (v2 and v3) and PraatCPPS severity for concatenated voice samples strongly correlated with each other and were significantly associated with A-P ratings. The AVQI (v2 and v3) and PraatCPPS showed high reliability in differentiating between pathological voice disorders. The AVQI (v2 and v3) and PraatCPPS were strongly correlated with the A-P ratings and provided valid estimates of dysphonia severity. However, the associations of the A-P ratings with the AVQIv2 were significantly stronger than those with the AVQIv3 and PraatCPPS, suggesting that the V2 outperformed the V3 and PraatCPPS.
ISSN:0892-1997
1873-4588
DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.11.013