The nightside poleward boundary of the auroral oval as seen by DMSP and the Ultraviolet Imager

A lack of reliable error estimates for poleward auroral emission (PAE) boundaries derived from satellite‐borne auroral imagers has hampered the application of these instruments in quantitative magnetospheric energy balance and substorm analysis. In this study, PAE boundaries from Polar Ultraviolet I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC Washington, DC, 2000-09, Vol.105 (A9), p.21267-21280
Hauptverfasser: Baker, J. B., Clauer, C. R., Ridley, A. J., Papitashvili, V. O., Brittnacher, M. J., Newell, P. T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 21280
container_issue A9
container_start_page 21267
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC
container_volume 105
creator Baker, J. B.
Clauer, C. R.
Ridley, A. J.
Papitashvili, V. O.
Brittnacher, M. J.
Newell, P. T.
description A lack of reliable error estimates for poleward auroral emission (PAE) boundaries derived from satellite‐borne auroral imagers has hampered the application of these instruments in quantitative magnetospheric energy balance and substorm analysis. In this study, PAE boundaries from Polar Ultraviolet Imager (UVI) images are compared with precipitation boundaries from Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellite spectrograms. In particular, the study quantifies the accuracy with which UVI images can be used to reproduce the DMSP poleward auroral oval (b5e) boundary. Most of the DMSP b5e boundaries were obtained in the evening sector. It has been determined that a UVI PAE boundary defined by a fixed ratio to the maximum in the auroral oval at each magnetic local time correlates better with the DMSP b5e boundary than one defined by a constant brightness threshold (0.90 versus 0.80 maximum correlation). The optimal threshold and ratio values are found to be 4.3 photons cm−2S−1 and 0.30 normalized flux, respectively. The study also reveals a systematic latitudinal offset between UVI and DMSP in the evening sector with a magnitude of approximately 1°. This offset might represent a real height‐dependent geomagnetic influence (e.g., active magnetic topology) or result from systematic errors in the analysis (e.g., removal of the UVI platform wobble). It is demonstrated that the offset can be partially removed with a linear calibration model, allowing the reproduction of DMSP b5e boundaries from UVI images with a standard deviation error of approximately 1°.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/1999JA000363
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21500943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>21500943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4810-5d5038c32a414d19067306a1990c5a2dba49246e69de107ff13187fa3b989ce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEhWw4wO8QKwIjB95eNkWKFS8BEXssCaJQwNpUuy00L_HEASs2MxszrnSvYTsMjhkwNURU0qN-wAgIrFGepyFUcA58HXSAyaTADiPN8mOc8-eARlGEliPPE6mhtbl07R1ZW7ovKnMG9qcps2iztGuaFPQ1iO4sI3FijZLf9BRZ0xN0xU9vry7oVjnX9B91Vpclj6jpeczfDJ2m2wUWDmz8_23yOT0ZDI8Cy6uR-fD_kWQyYRBEOYhiCQTHCWTOVMQxQIi9JUgC5HnKUrFZWQilRsGcVEwwZK4QJGqRGVGbJH9LnZum9eFca2elS4zVYW1aRZO-zEAlBQePOjAzDbOWVPouS1nvqdmoD9n1H9n9Pjedy66DKvCYp2V7teRSnWY6LC3sjKrfyP1eHTb914M3go6q3Stef-x0L5oXz8O9cPVSA-Gyc1xMhhrEB_9qo2U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21500943</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The nightside poleward boundary of the auroral oval as seen by DMSP and the Ultraviolet Imager</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Baker, J. B. ; Clauer, C. R. ; Ridley, A. J. ; Papitashvili, V. O. ; Brittnacher, M. J. ; Newell, P. T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, J. B. ; Clauer, C. R. ; Ridley, A. J. ; Papitashvili, V. O. ; Brittnacher, M. J. ; Newell, P. T.</creatorcontrib><description>A lack of reliable error estimates for poleward auroral emission (PAE) boundaries derived from satellite‐borne auroral imagers has hampered the application of these instruments in quantitative magnetospheric energy balance and substorm analysis. In this study, PAE boundaries from Polar Ultraviolet Imager (UVI) images are compared with precipitation boundaries from Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellite spectrograms. In particular, the study quantifies the accuracy with which UVI images can be used to reproduce the DMSP poleward auroral oval (b5e) boundary. Most of the DMSP b5e boundaries were obtained in the evening sector. It has been determined that a UVI PAE boundary defined by a fixed ratio to the maximum in the auroral oval at each magnetic local time correlates better with the DMSP b5e boundary than one defined by a constant brightness threshold (0.90 versus 0.80 maximum correlation). The optimal threshold and ratio values are found to be 4.3 photons cm−2S−1 and 0.30 normalized flux, respectively. The study also reveals a systematic latitudinal offset between UVI and DMSP in the evening sector with a magnitude of approximately 1°. This offset might represent a real height‐dependent geomagnetic influence (e.g., active magnetic topology) or result from systematic errors in the analysis (e.g., removal of the UVI platform wobble). It is demonstrated that the offset can be partially removed with a linear calibration model, allowing the reproduction of DMSP b5e boundaries from UVI images with a standard deviation error of approximately 1°.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/1999JA000363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Other topics in aeronomy and magnetospheric physics</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC, 2000-09, Vol.105 (A9), p.21267-21280</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4810-5d5038c32a414d19067306a1990c5a2dba49246e69de107ff13187fa3b989ce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4810-5d5038c32a414d19067306a1990c5a2dba49246e69de107ff13187fa3b989ce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F1999JA000363$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F1999JA000363$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,11512,27922,27923,45572,45573,46407,46466,46831,46890</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1499363$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clauer, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridley, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papitashvili, V. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brittnacher, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, P. T.</creatorcontrib><title>The nightside poleward boundary of the auroral oval as seen by DMSP and the Ultraviolet Imager</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>A lack of reliable error estimates for poleward auroral emission (PAE) boundaries derived from satellite‐borne auroral imagers has hampered the application of these instruments in quantitative magnetospheric energy balance and substorm analysis. In this study, PAE boundaries from Polar Ultraviolet Imager (UVI) images are compared with precipitation boundaries from Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellite spectrograms. In particular, the study quantifies the accuracy with which UVI images can be used to reproduce the DMSP poleward auroral oval (b5e) boundary. Most of the DMSP b5e boundaries were obtained in the evening sector. It has been determined that a UVI PAE boundary defined by a fixed ratio to the maximum in the auroral oval at each magnetic local time correlates better with the DMSP b5e boundary than one defined by a constant brightness threshold (0.90 versus 0.80 maximum correlation). The optimal threshold and ratio values are found to be 4.3 photons cm−2S−1 and 0.30 normalized flux, respectively. The study also reveals a systematic latitudinal offset between UVI and DMSP in the evening sector with a magnitude of approximately 1°. This offset might represent a real height‐dependent geomagnetic influence (e.g., active magnetic topology) or result from systematic errors in the analysis (e.g., removal of the UVI platform wobble). It is demonstrated that the offset can be partially removed with a linear calibration model, allowing the reproduction of DMSP b5e boundaries from UVI images with a standard deviation error of approximately 1°.</description><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Other topics in aeronomy and magnetospheric physics</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEhWw4wO8QKwIjB95eNkWKFS8BEXssCaJQwNpUuy00L_HEASs2MxszrnSvYTsMjhkwNURU0qN-wAgIrFGepyFUcA58HXSAyaTADiPN8mOc8-eARlGEliPPE6mhtbl07R1ZW7ovKnMG9qcps2iztGuaFPQ1iO4sI3FijZLf9BRZ0xN0xU9vry7oVjnX9B91Vpclj6jpeczfDJ2m2wUWDmz8_23yOT0ZDI8Cy6uR-fD_kWQyYRBEOYhiCQTHCWTOVMQxQIi9JUgC5HnKUrFZWQilRsGcVEwwZK4QJGqRGVGbJH9LnZum9eFca2elS4zVYW1aRZO-zEAlBQePOjAzDbOWVPouS1nvqdmoD9n1H9n9Pjedy66DKvCYp2V7teRSnWY6LC3sjKrfyP1eHTb914M3go6q3Stef-x0L5oXz8O9cPVSA-Gyc1xMhhrEB_9qo2U</recordid><startdate>20000901</startdate><enddate>20000901</enddate><creator>Baker, J. B.</creator><creator>Clauer, C. R.</creator><creator>Ridley, A. J.</creator><creator>Papitashvili, V. O.</creator><creator>Brittnacher, M. J.</creator><creator>Newell, P. T.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000901</creationdate><title>The nightside poleward boundary of the auroral oval as seen by DMSP and the Ultraviolet Imager</title><author>Baker, J. B. ; Clauer, C. R. ; Ridley, A. J. ; Papitashvili, V. O. ; Brittnacher, M. J. ; Newell, P. T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4810-5d5038c32a414d19067306a1990c5a2dba49246e69de107ff13187fa3b989ce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Other topics in aeronomy and magnetospheric physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, J. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clauer, C. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridley, A. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papitashvili, V. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brittnacher, M. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, P. T.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, J. B.</au><au>Clauer, C. R.</au><au>Ridley, A. J.</au><au>Papitashvili, V. O.</au><au>Brittnacher, M. J.</au><au>Newell, P. T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The nightside poleward boundary of the auroral oval as seen by DMSP and the Ultraviolet Imager</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2000-09-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>A9</issue><spage>21267</spage><epage>21280</epage><pages>21267-21280</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>A lack of reliable error estimates for poleward auroral emission (PAE) boundaries derived from satellite‐borne auroral imagers has hampered the application of these instruments in quantitative magnetospheric energy balance and substorm analysis. In this study, PAE boundaries from Polar Ultraviolet Imager (UVI) images are compared with precipitation boundaries from Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellite spectrograms. In particular, the study quantifies the accuracy with which UVI images can be used to reproduce the DMSP poleward auroral oval (b5e) boundary. Most of the DMSP b5e boundaries were obtained in the evening sector. It has been determined that a UVI PAE boundary defined by a fixed ratio to the maximum in the auroral oval at each magnetic local time correlates better with the DMSP b5e boundary than one defined by a constant brightness threshold (0.90 versus 0.80 maximum correlation). The optimal threshold and ratio values are found to be 4.3 photons cm−2S−1 and 0.30 normalized flux, respectively. The study also reveals a systematic latitudinal offset between UVI and DMSP in the evening sector with a magnitude of approximately 1°. This offset might represent a real height‐dependent geomagnetic influence (e.g., active magnetic topology) or result from systematic errors in the analysis (e.g., removal of the UVI platform wobble). It is demonstrated that the offset can be partially removed with a linear calibration model, allowing the reproduction of DMSP b5e boundaries from UVI images with a standard deviation error of approximately 1°.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/1999JA000363</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research, Washington, DC, 2000-09, Vol.105 (A9), p.21267-21280
issn 0148-0227
2156-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21500943
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Other topics in aeronomy and magnetospheric physics
title The nightside poleward boundary of the auroral oval as seen by DMSP and the Ultraviolet Imager
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T00%3A13%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20nightside%20poleward%20boundary%20of%20the%20auroral%20oval%20as%20seen%20by%20DMSP%20and%20the%20Ultraviolet%20Imager&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research,%20Washington,%20DC&rft.au=Baker,%20J.%20B.&rft.date=2000-09-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=A9&rft.spage=21267&rft.epage=21280&rft.pages=21267-21280&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/1999JA000363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21500943%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21500943&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true