Effects of Home Visiting Program Implementation on Preventive Health Care Access and Utilization: Results from a Randomized Trial of Healthy Families Oregon

Home visiting programs are an increasingly popular mechanism for providing a broad set of early prevention supports to high-risk families. A key intended outcome for these programs is to support maternal and child health by helping families increase access to and use of preventive health care servic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prevention science 2020, Vol.21 (1), p.15-24
Hauptverfasser: Green, Beth, Sanders, Mary Beth, Tarte, Jerod M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 24
container_issue 1
container_start_page 15
container_title Prevention science
container_volume 21
creator Green, Beth
Sanders, Mary Beth
Tarte, Jerod M.
description Home visiting programs are an increasingly popular mechanism for providing a broad set of early prevention supports to high-risk families. A key intended outcome for these programs is to support maternal and child health by helping families increase access to and use of preventive health care services. For many community-based home visiting programs, however, there is less evidence of positive outcomes in the health care domain. The current study used a randomized trial conducted in a statewide early childhood home visiting program, Healthy Families Oregon (HFO), to examine program impacts on families’ use of preventive health care services. The study recruited a large sample of participants ( n  = 1438 HFO families and n  = 1289 controls) and utilized state agency health insurance and medical records as the primary data source. There were challenges in providing services in alignment with an intent-to-treat research design, leading to the need to take alternative approaches to analyzing effects of service receipt on outcomes. Results found that while there were no significant differences in health care access or utilization in the intent-to-treat models, positive outcomes were found when propensity score matching was used to limit the program sample to those who actually received services. Further, within the program group, children who were enrolled for longer had fewer gaps in health insurance coverage and received more well-baby visits and immunizations compared to those with less service. The role of the home visitor in helping families navigate the complexities of publicly funded health care is discussed. Investments in professional development strategies that can increase staff expertise in this area and improve family retention may be needed to more effectively achieve intended health outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11121-018-0964-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2149870301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2149870301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d0d61aaf4b2f85e7e7e734a8dc78de6fc14b0f3d2b1f1fd5bfc39ebb80bff7ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1rHCEYhaW05LM_oDdF6E1upvUd58PpXViSbCCQEJLeiqOvW8M4bnUmkPyW_ti6u0kLhaCg4nPOEQ8hn4B9BcbabwkASigYiIJ1TVWId-QA6pYXTdPV7_Oei66oOtHsk8OUHhiDpuZsj-xzVmdp1R2Q32fWop4SDZYug0f6wyU3uXFFb2JYReXppV8P6HGc1OTCSPO8ifiYz-4R6RLVMP2kCxWRnmqNKVE1Gno_ucE9bwXf6S2mecgJNgZPFb3NQPDuGQ29i04N2-StzRM9Vz4LMdHriKswHpMPVg0JP76sR-T-_OxusSyuri8uF6dXheZtORWGmQaUslVfWlFjuxm8UsLoVhhsrIaqZ5absgcL1tS91bzDvhest7ZFxY_Iyc53HcOvGdMkvUsah0GNGOYky_xVomWcQUa__Ic-hDmO-XUbSlQlsJpnCnaUjiGliFauo_MqPklgclOd3FUnc3VyU50UWfP5xXnuPZq_iteuMlDugJSvxhXGf9Fvu_4BTHynAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2148421053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Home Visiting Program Implementation on Preventive Health Care Access and Utilization: Results from a Randomized Trial of Healthy Families Oregon</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Green, Beth ; Sanders, Mary Beth ; Tarte, Jerod M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Green, Beth ; Sanders, Mary Beth ; Tarte, Jerod M.</creatorcontrib><description>Home visiting programs are an increasingly popular mechanism for providing a broad set of early prevention supports to high-risk families. A key intended outcome for these programs is to support maternal and child health by helping families increase access to and use of preventive health care services. For many community-based home visiting programs, however, there is less evidence of positive outcomes in the health care domain. The current study used a randomized trial conducted in a statewide early childhood home visiting program, Healthy Families Oregon (HFO), to examine program impacts on families’ use of preventive health care services. The study recruited a large sample of participants ( n  = 1438 HFO families and n  = 1289 controls) and utilized state agency health insurance and medical records as the primary data source. There were challenges in providing services in alignment with an intent-to-treat research design, leading to the need to take alternative approaches to analyzing effects of service receipt on outcomes. Results found that while there were no significant differences in health care access or utilization in the intent-to-treat models, positive outcomes were found when propensity score matching was used to limit the program sample to those who actually received services. Further, within the program group, children who were enrolled for longer had fewer gaps in health insurance coverage and received more well-baby visits and immunizations compared to those with less service. The role of the home visitor in helping families navigate the complexities of publicly funded health care is discussed. Investments in professional development strategies that can increase staff expertise in this area and improve family retention may be needed to more effectively achieve intended health outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-4986</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-6695</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11121-018-0964-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30511149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Alternative approaches ; Child and School Psychology ; Childhood ; Children ; Childrens health ; Clinical outcomes ; Development strategies ; Domiciliary visits ; Early childhood education ; Experts ; Families &amp; family life ; Family roles ; Government agencies ; Health care access ; Health care industry ; Health care policy ; Health insurance ; Health promotion ; Health Psychology ; Health Services Accessibility - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Health services utilization ; Health status ; Health visiting ; High risk ; House Calls ; Humans ; Immunization ; Infants ; Insurance coverage ; Maternal &amp; child health ; Maternal and infant welfare ; Maternal characteristics ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Oregon ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Prevention programs ; Preventive Health Services ; Preventive medicine ; Professional development ; Professional training ; Program implementation ; Propensity ; Public Health ; Research design ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>Prevention science, 2020, Vol.21 (1), p.15-24</ispartof><rights>Society for Prevention Research 2018</rights><rights>Prevention Science is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d0d61aaf4b2f85e7e7e734a8dc78de6fc14b0f3d2b1f1fd5bfc39ebb80bff7ea3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d0d61aaf4b2f85e7e7e734a8dc78de6fc14b0f3d2b1f1fd5bfc39ebb80bff7ea3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4089-2563</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11121-018-0964-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11121-018-0964-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27344,27866,27924,27925,33774,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30511149$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Green, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Mary Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarte, Jerod M.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Home Visiting Program Implementation on Preventive Health Care Access and Utilization: Results from a Randomized Trial of Healthy Families Oregon</title><title>Prevention science</title><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><description>Home visiting programs are an increasingly popular mechanism for providing a broad set of early prevention supports to high-risk families. A key intended outcome for these programs is to support maternal and child health by helping families increase access to and use of preventive health care services. For many community-based home visiting programs, however, there is less evidence of positive outcomes in the health care domain. The current study used a randomized trial conducted in a statewide early childhood home visiting program, Healthy Families Oregon (HFO), to examine program impacts on families’ use of preventive health care services. The study recruited a large sample of participants ( n  = 1438 HFO families and n  = 1289 controls) and utilized state agency health insurance and medical records as the primary data source. There were challenges in providing services in alignment with an intent-to-treat research design, leading to the need to take alternative approaches to analyzing effects of service receipt on outcomes. Results found that while there were no significant differences in health care access or utilization in the intent-to-treat models, positive outcomes were found when propensity score matching was used to limit the program sample to those who actually received services. Further, within the program group, children who were enrolled for longer had fewer gaps in health insurance coverage and received more well-baby visits and immunizations compared to those with less service. The role of the home visitor in helping families navigate the complexities of publicly funded health care is discussed. Investments in professional development strategies that can increase staff expertise in this area and improve family retention may be needed to more effectively achieve intended health outcomes.</description><subject>Alternative approaches</subject><subject>Child and School Psychology</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Development strategies</subject><subject>Domiciliary visits</subject><subject>Early childhood education</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Family roles</subject><subject>Government agencies</subject><subject>Health care access</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health care policy</subject><subject>Health insurance</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Health Psychology</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Health services utilization</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Health visiting</subject><subject>High risk</subject><subject>House Calls</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Insurance coverage</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Maternal and infant welfare</subject><subject>Maternal characteristics</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Prevention programs</subject><subject>Preventive Health Services</subject><subject>Preventive medicine</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Professional training</subject><subject>Program implementation</subject><subject>Propensity</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>1389-4986</issn><issn>1573-6695</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1rHCEYhaW05LM_oDdF6E1upvUd58PpXViSbCCQEJLeiqOvW8M4bnUmkPyW_ti6u0kLhaCg4nPOEQ8hn4B9BcbabwkASigYiIJ1TVWId-QA6pYXTdPV7_Oei66oOtHsk8OUHhiDpuZsj-xzVmdp1R2Q32fWop4SDZYug0f6wyU3uXFFb2JYReXppV8P6HGc1OTCSPO8ifiYz-4R6RLVMP2kCxWRnmqNKVE1Gno_ucE9bwXf6S2mecgJNgZPFb3NQPDuGQ29i04N2-StzRM9Vz4LMdHriKswHpMPVg0JP76sR-T-_OxusSyuri8uF6dXheZtORWGmQaUslVfWlFjuxm8UsLoVhhsrIaqZ5absgcL1tS91bzDvhest7ZFxY_Iyc53HcOvGdMkvUsah0GNGOYky_xVomWcQUa__Ic-hDmO-XUbSlQlsJpnCnaUjiGliFauo_MqPklgclOd3FUnc3VyU50UWfP5xXnuPZq_iteuMlDugJSvxhXGf9Fvu_4BTHynAg</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Green, Beth</creator><creator>Sanders, Mary Beth</creator><creator>Tarte, Jerod M.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4089-2563</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Effects of Home Visiting Program Implementation on Preventive Health Care Access and Utilization: Results from a Randomized Trial of Healthy Families Oregon</title><author>Green, Beth ; Sanders, Mary Beth ; Tarte, Jerod M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d0d61aaf4b2f85e7e7e734a8dc78de6fc14b0f3d2b1f1fd5bfc39ebb80bff7ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Alternative approaches</topic><topic>Child and School Psychology</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Development strategies</topic><topic>Domiciliary visits</topic><topic>Early childhood education</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Family roles</topic><topic>Government agencies</topic><topic>Health care access</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health care policy</topic><topic>Health insurance</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Health Psychology</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Health services utilization</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Health visiting</topic><topic>High risk</topic><topic>House Calls</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Insurance coverage</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Maternal and infant welfare</topic><topic>Maternal characteristics</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Prevention programs</topic><topic>Preventive Health Services</topic><topic>Preventive medicine</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Professional training</topic><topic>Program implementation</topic><topic>Propensity</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Green, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanders, Mary Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarte, Jerod M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Green, Beth</au><au>Sanders, Mary Beth</au><au>Tarte, Jerod M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Home Visiting Program Implementation on Preventive Health Care Access and Utilization: Results from a Randomized Trial of Healthy Families Oregon</atitle><jtitle>Prevention science</jtitle><stitle>Prev Sci</stitle><addtitle>Prev Sci</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>15</spage><epage>24</epage><pages>15-24</pages><issn>1389-4986</issn><eissn>1573-6695</eissn><abstract>Home visiting programs are an increasingly popular mechanism for providing a broad set of early prevention supports to high-risk families. A key intended outcome for these programs is to support maternal and child health by helping families increase access to and use of preventive health care services. For many community-based home visiting programs, however, there is less evidence of positive outcomes in the health care domain. The current study used a randomized trial conducted in a statewide early childhood home visiting program, Healthy Families Oregon (HFO), to examine program impacts on families’ use of preventive health care services. The study recruited a large sample of participants ( n  = 1438 HFO families and n  = 1289 controls) and utilized state agency health insurance and medical records as the primary data source. There were challenges in providing services in alignment with an intent-to-treat research design, leading to the need to take alternative approaches to analyzing effects of service receipt on outcomes. Results found that while there were no significant differences in health care access or utilization in the intent-to-treat models, positive outcomes were found when propensity score matching was used to limit the program sample to those who actually received services. Further, within the program group, children who were enrolled for longer had fewer gaps in health insurance coverage and received more well-baby visits and immunizations compared to those with less service. The role of the home visitor in helping families navigate the complexities of publicly funded health care is discussed. Investments in professional development strategies that can increase staff expertise in this area and improve family retention may be needed to more effectively achieve intended health outcomes.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>30511149</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11121-018-0964-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4089-2563</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-4986
ispartof Prevention science, 2020, Vol.21 (1), p.15-24
issn 1389-4986
1573-6695
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2149870301
source MEDLINE; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Alternative approaches
Child and School Psychology
Childhood
Children
Childrens health
Clinical outcomes
Development strategies
Domiciliary visits
Early childhood education
Experts
Families & family life
Family roles
Government agencies
Health care access
Health care industry
Health care policy
Health insurance
Health promotion
Health Psychology
Health Services Accessibility - statistics & numerical data
Health services utilization
Health status
Health visiting
High risk
House Calls
Humans
Immunization
Infants
Insurance coverage
Maternal & child health
Maternal and infant welfare
Maternal characteristics
Medical records
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Oregon
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Patient Acceptance of Health Care - statistics & numerical data
Prevention programs
Preventive Health Services
Preventive medicine
Professional development
Professional training
Program implementation
Propensity
Public Health
Research design
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Effects of Home Visiting Program Implementation on Preventive Health Care Access and Utilization: Results from a Randomized Trial of Healthy Families Oregon
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T03%3A10%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Home%20Visiting%20Program%20Implementation%20on%20Preventive%20Health%20Care%20Access%20and%20Utilization:%20Results%20from%20a%20Randomized%20Trial%20of%20Healthy%20Families%20Oregon&rft.jtitle=Prevention%20science&rft.au=Green,%20Beth&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=15&rft.epage=24&rft.pages=15-24&rft.issn=1389-4986&rft.eissn=1573-6695&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11121-018-0964-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2149870301%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2148421053&rft_id=info:pmid/30511149&rfr_iscdi=true