The Architecture of Fat Grafting II: Impact of Cannula Diameter
Fat grafting has emerged as the treatment of choice for soft-tissue augmentation and reconstruction. Variability of volume retention remains the greatest challenge for this technique, often requiring multiple operations to achieve the desired volume. Graft that is placed greater than 2 mm from the r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) 2018-11, Vol.142 (5), p.1219-1225 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1225 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1219 |
container_title | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963) |
container_volume | 142 |
creator | James, Isaac B. Bourne, Debra A. DiBernardo, Gabriella Wang, Sheri S. Gusenoff, Jeffrey A. Marra, Kacey Rubin, J. Peter |
description | Fat grafting has emerged as the treatment of choice for soft-tissue augmentation and reconstruction. Variability of volume retention remains the greatest challenge for this technique, often requiring multiple operations to achieve the desired volume. Graft that is placed greater than 2 mm from the recipient bed will undergo necrosis. Improved understanding of the architecture of fat within the recipient bed is paramount to improving outcomes. The impact of cannula diameter on graft architecture is unknown.
Fat was harvested by liposuction and stained with methylene blue. Stained fat was grafted into 4 × 2 × 1-cm sections of excised abdominal tissue with 12-, 14-, 16-, and 19-gauge Coleman cannulas at three different volumes: 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 cc. Each tissue block was sectioned for stained graft visualization. The diameter of each deposit and percentage with a radius greater than 2 mm were recorded.
With an injection volume of 0.1 cc, no fat deposits had a radius greater than 2 mm, regardless of cannula size. A graft volume of 0.5 cc created globules greater than 2 mm with larger cannulas (0 percent with 19-gauge, 2.9 percent with 16-gauge, 6.1 percent with 14-gauge, and 4.3 percent with 12-gauge). Injecting 1.0 cc resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of fat parcels expected to undergo central necrosis (16 percent with 19-gauge, 21 percent with 16-gauge, 26 percent with 14-gauge, and 44 percent with 12-gauge).
Injection cannulas of 14-gauge or larger are more likely to create deposits with dimensions that may be susceptible to central necrosis when injecting 1.0 cc per pass. Smaller cannula sizes or lower volumes per pass should be considered.
Therapeutic, V. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004837 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2149860760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2149860760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3520-1087c0424f102df58431be56d252be22e78d1bb214202117f0834295ed0b403a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUNtKxEAMHUTR9fIHIn30pWuSmenFF5HV1QVB8fJcpm3qVtvtOtMi_r2z3jEQQkjOyckRYh9hjJDGRze3d2P4EyqR8ZoYoaY0VKRoXYwAJIUImrbEtnNPABjLSG-KLQkaMY31SJzczzk4tcW87rnoB8tBVwVT0wcX1lR9vXgMZrPjYNYuTdGvRhOzWAyNCc5q03LPdldsVKZxvPdVd8TD9Px-chleXV_MJqdXYSE1gReRxAV4WRUClZVOlMScdVSSppyJOE5KzHNCRUCIcQWJVJRqLiFXII3cEYefvEvbvQzs-qytXcFNYxbcDS7zyDSJII7Ar6rP1cJ2zlmusqWtW2PfMoRsZV3mrcv-W-dhB18Xhrzl8gf07dUv72vX-M_dczO8ss3mbJp-_sEXaalCAkwQfRf6JJDv2Yx1Kg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2149860760</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Architecture of Fat Grafting II: Impact of Cannula Diameter</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>James, Isaac B. ; Bourne, Debra A. ; DiBernardo, Gabriella ; Wang, Sheri S. ; Gusenoff, Jeffrey A. ; Marra, Kacey ; Rubin, J. Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>James, Isaac B. ; Bourne, Debra A. ; DiBernardo, Gabriella ; Wang, Sheri S. ; Gusenoff, Jeffrey A. ; Marra, Kacey ; Rubin, J. Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Fat grafting has emerged as the treatment of choice for soft-tissue augmentation and reconstruction. Variability of volume retention remains the greatest challenge for this technique, often requiring multiple operations to achieve the desired volume. Graft that is placed greater than 2 mm from the recipient bed will undergo necrosis. Improved understanding of the architecture of fat within the recipient bed is paramount to improving outcomes. The impact of cannula diameter on graft architecture is unknown.
Fat was harvested by liposuction and stained with methylene blue. Stained fat was grafted into 4 × 2 × 1-cm sections of excised abdominal tissue with 12-, 14-, 16-, and 19-gauge Coleman cannulas at three different volumes: 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 cc. Each tissue block was sectioned for stained graft visualization. The diameter of each deposit and percentage with a radius greater than 2 mm were recorded.
With an injection volume of 0.1 cc, no fat deposits had a radius greater than 2 mm, regardless of cannula size. A graft volume of 0.5 cc created globules greater than 2 mm with larger cannulas (0 percent with 19-gauge, 2.9 percent with 16-gauge, 6.1 percent with 14-gauge, and 4.3 percent with 12-gauge). Injecting 1.0 cc resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of fat parcels expected to undergo central necrosis (16 percent with 19-gauge, 21 percent with 16-gauge, 26 percent with 14-gauge, and 44 percent with 12-gauge).
Injection cannulas of 14-gauge or larger are more likely to create deposits with dimensions that may be susceptible to central necrosis when injecting 1.0 cc per pass. Smaller cannula sizes or lower volumes per pass should be considered.
Therapeutic, V.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-1052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1529-4242</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004837</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30511975</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</publisher><subject>Adipose Tissue - transplantation ; Body Contouring - instrumentation ; Body Contouring - methods ; Cannula ; Equipment Design ; Humans ; Injections ; Lipectomy - instrumentation ; Lipectomy - methods ; Tissue and Organ Harvesting - instrumentation ; Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods</subject><ispartof>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2018-11, Vol.142 (5), p.1219-1225</ispartof><rights>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3520-1087c0424f102df58431be56d252be22e78d1bb214202117f0834295ed0b403a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3520-1087c0424f102df58431be56d252be22e78d1bb214202117f0834295ed0b403a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30511975$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>James, Isaac B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourne, Debra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiBernardo, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sheri S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gusenoff, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marra, Kacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, J. Peter</creatorcontrib><title>The Architecture of Fat Grafting II: Impact of Cannula Diameter</title><title>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</title><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><description>Fat grafting has emerged as the treatment of choice for soft-tissue augmentation and reconstruction. Variability of volume retention remains the greatest challenge for this technique, often requiring multiple operations to achieve the desired volume. Graft that is placed greater than 2 mm from the recipient bed will undergo necrosis. Improved understanding of the architecture of fat within the recipient bed is paramount to improving outcomes. The impact of cannula diameter on graft architecture is unknown.
Fat was harvested by liposuction and stained with methylene blue. Stained fat was grafted into 4 × 2 × 1-cm sections of excised abdominal tissue with 12-, 14-, 16-, and 19-gauge Coleman cannulas at three different volumes: 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 cc. Each tissue block was sectioned for stained graft visualization. The diameter of each deposit and percentage with a radius greater than 2 mm were recorded.
With an injection volume of 0.1 cc, no fat deposits had a radius greater than 2 mm, regardless of cannula size. A graft volume of 0.5 cc created globules greater than 2 mm with larger cannulas (0 percent with 19-gauge, 2.9 percent with 16-gauge, 6.1 percent with 14-gauge, and 4.3 percent with 12-gauge). Injecting 1.0 cc resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of fat parcels expected to undergo central necrosis (16 percent with 19-gauge, 21 percent with 16-gauge, 26 percent with 14-gauge, and 44 percent with 12-gauge).
Injection cannulas of 14-gauge or larger are more likely to create deposits with dimensions that may be susceptible to central necrosis when injecting 1.0 cc per pass. Smaller cannula sizes or lower volumes per pass should be considered.
Therapeutic, V.</description><subject>Adipose Tissue - transplantation</subject><subject>Body Contouring - instrumentation</subject><subject>Body Contouring - methods</subject><subject>Cannula</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Injections</subject><subject>Lipectomy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Lipectomy - methods</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - instrumentation</subject><subject>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods</subject><issn>0032-1052</issn><issn>1529-4242</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUNtKxEAMHUTR9fIHIn30pWuSmenFF5HV1QVB8fJcpm3qVtvtOtMi_r2z3jEQQkjOyckRYh9hjJDGRze3d2P4EyqR8ZoYoaY0VKRoXYwAJIUImrbEtnNPABjLSG-KLQkaMY31SJzczzk4tcW87rnoB8tBVwVT0wcX1lR9vXgMZrPjYNYuTdGvRhOzWAyNCc5q03LPdldsVKZxvPdVd8TD9Px-chleXV_MJqdXYSE1gReRxAV4WRUClZVOlMScdVSSppyJOE5KzHNCRUCIcQWJVJRqLiFXII3cEYefvEvbvQzs-qytXcFNYxbcDS7zyDSJII7Ar6rP1cJ2zlmusqWtW2PfMoRsZV3mrcv-W-dhB18Xhrzl8gf07dUv72vX-M_dczO8ss3mbJp-_sEXaalCAkwQfRf6JJDv2Yx1Kg</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>James, Isaac B.</creator><creator>Bourne, Debra A.</creator><creator>DiBernardo, Gabriella</creator><creator>Wang, Sheri S.</creator><creator>Gusenoff, Jeffrey A.</creator><creator>Marra, Kacey</creator><creator>Rubin, J. Peter</creator><general>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>The Architecture of Fat Grafting II: Impact of Cannula Diameter</title><author>James, Isaac B. ; Bourne, Debra A. ; DiBernardo, Gabriella ; Wang, Sheri S. ; Gusenoff, Jeffrey A. ; Marra, Kacey ; Rubin, J. Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3520-1087c0424f102df58431be56d252be22e78d1bb214202117f0834295ed0b403a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adipose Tissue - transplantation</topic><topic>Body Contouring - instrumentation</topic><topic>Body Contouring - methods</topic><topic>Cannula</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Injections</topic><topic>Lipectomy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Lipectomy - methods</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - instrumentation</topic><topic>Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>James, Isaac B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourne, Debra A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiBernardo, Gabriella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Sheri S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gusenoff, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marra, Kacey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, J. Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>James, Isaac B.</au><au>Bourne, Debra A.</au><au>DiBernardo, Gabriella</au><au>Wang, Sheri S.</au><au>Gusenoff, Jeffrey A.</au><au>Marra, Kacey</au><au>Rubin, J. Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Architecture of Fat Grafting II: Impact of Cannula Diameter</atitle><jtitle>Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963)</jtitle><addtitle>Plast Reconstr Surg</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1219</spage><epage>1225</epage><pages>1219-1225</pages><issn>0032-1052</issn><eissn>1529-4242</eissn><abstract>Fat grafting has emerged as the treatment of choice for soft-tissue augmentation and reconstruction. Variability of volume retention remains the greatest challenge for this technique, often requiring multiple operations to achieve the desired volume. Graft that is placed greater than 2 mm from the recipient bed will undergo necrosis. Improved understanding of the architecture of fat within the recipient bed is paramount to improving outcomes. The impact of cannula diameter on graft architecture is unknown.
Fat was harvested by liposuction and stained with methylene blue. Stained fat was grafted into 4 × 2 × 1-cm sections of excised abdominal tissue with 12-, 14-, 16-, and 19-gauge Coleman cannulas at three different volumes: 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0 cc. Each tissue block was sectioned for stained graft visualization. The diameter of each deposit and percentage with a radius greater than 2 mm were recorded.
With an injection volume of 0.1 cc, no fat deposits had a radius greater than 2 mm, regardless of cannula size. A graft volume of 0.5 cc created globules greater than 2 mm with larger cannulas (0 percent with 19-gauge, 2.9 percent with 16-gauge, 6.1 percent with 14-gauge, and 4.3 percent with 12-gauge). Injecting 1.0 cc resulted in a significant increase in the percentage of fat parcels expected to undergo central necrosis (16 percent with 19-gauge, 21 percent with 16-gauge, 26 percent with 14-gauge, and 44 percent with 12-gauge).
Injection cannulas of 14-gauge or larger are more likely to create deposits with dimensions that may be susceptible to central necrosis when injecting 1.0 cc per pass. Smaller cannula sizes or lower volumes per pass should be considered.
Therapeutic, V.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons</pub><pmid>30511975</pmid><doi>10.1097/PRS.0000000000004837</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-1052 |
ispartof | Plastic and reconstructive surgery (1963), 2018-11, Vol.142 (5), p.1219-1225 |
issn | 0032-1052 1529-4242 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2149860760 |
source | MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete |
subjects | Adipose Tissue - transplantation Body Contouring - instrumentation Body Contouring - methods Cannula Equipment Design Humans Injections Lipectomy - instrumentation Lipectomy - methods Tissue and Organ Harvesting - instrumentation Tissue and Organ Harvesting - methods |
title | The Architecture of Fat Grafting II: Impact of Cannula Diameter |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A45%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Architecture%20of%20Fat%20Grafting%20II:%20Impact%20of%20Cannula%20Diameter&rft.jtitle=Plastic%20and%20reconstructive%20surgery%20(1963)&rft.au=James,%20Isaac%20B.&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1219&rft.epage=1225&rft.pages=1219-1225&rft.issn=0032-1052&rft.eissn=1529-4242&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2149860760%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2149860760&rft_id=info:pmid/30511975&rfr_iscdi=true |