Antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo: A systematic review
An assessment of the evidence for the antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns is lacking. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and summarize clinical studies related to the antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 2019-04, Vol.121 (4), p.598-603 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 603 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 598 |
| container_title | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry |
| container_volume | 121 |
| creator | Gou, Min Chen, Helin Kang, Jian Wang, Hang |
| description | An assessment of the evidence for the antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns is lacking.
The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and summarize clinical studies related to the antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns.
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library searches were performed and complemented by manual searches from database inception to December 25, 2017, for title and abstract analysis.
Initially, 198 articles were obtained through database searches. Twenty-one articles were selected for full-text analysis, and 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. Because of the heterogeneity in design, surface treatment, measurement methods, and wear parameters, a meta-analysis was not possible. The selected studies were analyzed regarding the antagonist natural enamel wear of zirconia, measurement methods, and surface treatment. The results of the antagonist enamel wear varied widely, which made comparing them scientifically with absolute values difficult.
This review indicated that the antagonist enamel wear of zirconia was similar to or more than that of natural teeth but less than that of metal-ceramics. Additional properly designed, longer follow-up clinical trials with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the antagonist enamel wear of monolithic zirconia crowns in vivo. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.005 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2149854469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022391318305043</els_id><sourcerecordid>2149854469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-161736936d1e98e45f4430e4b69f7f3dba17d9a9d2b537eb289ae4b5c5ecd29b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1u1DAUhS0EosPAK1Resklqxz-JWTGqyo9UiQ2sLce-oR4ldrA9M2qfhmfhyXA1LVtWd3HPueeeD6FLSlpKqLzat2uK2UEobUfo0BLZEiJeoA0lqm_kwOlLtCGk6xqmKLtAb3LeE0IG0dPX6IIRQZTgYoPmXSjmZww-FwzBLDDjE5iE44RLjOWuyYd1jamAw0sMcfblzlv84JOtHoPXmAskHxO2KZ5Cxj78-X30x_gB73C-r8vFlGpIcPRweoteTWbO8O5pbtGPTzffr780t98-f73e3TaWM14aKmnPpGLSUVADcDFxzgjwUaqpn5gbDe2dMsp1o2A9jN2gTN0KK8C6To1si96f71ZGvw6Qi158tjDPJkA8ZN1RrgbBec3YInmW1v9zTjDpNfnFpHtNiX4krff6mbR-JK2J1JV0NV4-ZRzGBdw_2zPaKvh4FkBtWtsnna2HYMH5BLZoF_3_Mv4CCwCWrw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2149854469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Gou, Min ; Chen, Helin ; Kang, Jian ; Wang, Hang</creator><creatorcontrib>Gou, Min ; Chen, Helin ; Kang, Jian ; Wang, Hang</creatorcontrib><description>An assessment of the evidence for the antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns is lacking.
The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and summarize clinical studies related to the antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns.
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library searches were performed and complemented by manual searches from database inception to December 25, 2017, for title and abstract analysis.
Initially, 198 articles were obtained through database searches. Twenty-one articles were selected for full-text analysis, and 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. Because of the heterogeneity in design, surface treatment, measurement methods, and wear parameters, a meta-analysis was not possible. The selected studies were analyzed regarding the antagonist natural enamel wear of zirconia, measurement methods, and surface treatment. The results of the antagonist enamel wear varied widely, which made comparing them scientifically with absolute values difficult.
This review indicated that the antagonist enamel wear of zirconia was similar to or more than that of natural teeth but less than that of metal-ceramics. Additional properly designed, longer follow-up clinical trials with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the antagonist enamel wear of monolithic zirconia crowns in vivo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30509545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Crowns ; Dental Enamel ; Dental Materials ; Dental Porcelain ; Humans ; Tooth Wear ; Zirconium</subject><ispartof>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2019-04, Vol.121 (4), p.598-603</ispartof><rights>2018 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-161736936d1e98e45f4430e4b69f7f3dba17d9a9d2b537eb289ae4b5c5ecd29b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-161736936d1e98e45f4430e4b69f7f3dba17d9a9d2b537eb289ae4b5c5ecd29b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30509545$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gou, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Helin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hang</creatorcontrib><title>Antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo: A systematic review</title><title>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</title><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><description>An assessment of the evidence for the antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns is lacking.
The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and summarize clinical studies related to the antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns.
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library searches were performed and complemented by manual searches from database inception to December 25, 2017, for title and abstract analysis.
Initially, 198 articles were obtained through database searches. Twenty-one articles were selected for full-text analysis, and 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. Because of the heterogeneity in design, surface treatment, measurement methods, and wear parameters, a meta-analysis was not possible. The selected studies were analyzed regarding the antagonist natural enamel wear of zirconia, measurement methods, and surface treatment. The results of the antagonist enamel wear varied widely, which made comparing them scientifically with absolute values difficult.
This review indicated that the antagonist enamel wear of zirconia was similar to or more than that of natural teeth but less than that of metal-ceramics. Additional properly designed, longer follow-up clinical trials with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the antagonist enamel wear of monolithic zirconia crowns in vivo.</description><subject>Crowns</subject><subject>Dental Enamel</subject><subject>Dental Materials</subject><subject>Dental Porcelain</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Tooth Wear</subject><subject>Zirconium</subject><issn>0022-3913</issn><issn>1097-6841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1u1DAUhS0EosPAK1Resklqxz-JWTGqyo9UiQ2sLce-oR4ldrA9M2qfhmfhyXA1LVtWd3HPueeeD6FLSlpKqLzat2uK2UEobUfo0BLZEiJeoA0lqm_kwOlLtCGk6xqmKLtAb3LeE0IG0dPX6IIRQZTgYoPmXSjmZww-FwzBLDDjE5iE44RLjOWuyYd1jamAw0sMcfblzlv84JOtHoPXmAskHxO2KZ5Cxj78-X30x_gB73C-r8vFlGpIcPRweoteTWbO8O5pbtGPTzffr780t98-f73e3TaWM14aKmnPpGLSUVADcDFxzgjwUaqpn5gbDe2dMsp1o2A9jN2gTN0KK8C6To1si96f71ZGvw6Qi158tjDPJkA8ZN1RrgbBec3YInmW1v9zTjDpNfnFpHtNiX4krff6mbR-JK2J1JV0NV4-ZRzGBdw_2zPaKvh4FkBtWtsnna2HYMH5BLZoF_3_Mv4CCwCWrw</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Gou, Min</creator><creator>Chen, Helin</creator><creator>Kang, Jian</creator><creator>Wang, Hang</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo: A systematic review</title><author>Gou, Min ; Chen, Helin ; Kang, Jian ; Wang, Hang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-161736936d1e98e45f4430e4b69f7f3dba17d9a9d2b537eb289ae4b5c5ecd29b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Crowns</topic><topic>Dental Enamel</topic><topic>Dental Materials</topic><topic>Dental Porcelain</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Tooth Wear</topic><topic>Zirconium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gou, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Helin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Jian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gou, Min</au><au>Chen, Helin</au><au>Kang, Jian</au><au>Wang, Hang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of prosthetic dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Prosthet Dent</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>598</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>598-603</pages><issn>0022-3913</issn><eissn>1097-6841</eissn><abstract>An assessment of the evidence for the antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns is lacking.
The purpose of this systematic review was to identify and summarize clinical studies related to the antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns.
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library searches were performed and complemented by manual searches from database inception to December 25, 2017, for title and abstract analysis.
Initially, 198 articles were obtained through database searches. Twenty-one articles were selected for full-text analysis, and 5 studies met the inclusion criteria. Because of the heterogeneity in design, surface treatment, measurement methods, and wear parameters, a meta-analysis was not possible. The selected studies were analyzed regarding the antagonist natural enamel wear of zirconia, measurement methods, and surface treatment. The results of the antagonist enamel wear varied widely, which made comparing them scientifically with absolute values difficult.
This review indicated that the antagonist enamel wear of zirconia was similar to or more than that of natural teeth but less than that of metal-ceramics. Additional properly designed, longer follow-up clinical trials with larger sample sizes are needed to evaluate the antagonist enamel wear of monolithic zirconia crowns in vivo.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30509545</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.005</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-3913 |
| ispartof | The Journal of prosthetic dentistry, 2019-04, Vol.121 (4), p.598-603 |
| issn | 0022-3913 1097-6841 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2149854469 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Crowns Dental Enamel Dental Materials Dental Porcelain Humans Tooth Wear Zirconium |
| title | Antagonist enamel wear of tooth-supported monolithic zirconia posterior crowns in vivo: A systematic review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A53%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Antagonist%20enamel%20wear%20of%20tooth-supported%20monolithic%20zirconia%20posterior%20crowns%20in%C2%A0vivo:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20prosthetic%20dentistry&rft.au=Gou,%20Min&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=598&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=598-603&rft.issn=0022-3913&rft.eissn=1097-6841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.06.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2149854469%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2149854469&rft_id=info:pmid/30509545&rft_els_id=S0022391318305043&rfr_iscdi=true |