Effects of Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sensory Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review

Objectives Even if spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is widely used and effective in treating intractable chronic neuropathic pain conditions, little is known about its possible impacts on sensory perception. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a useful tool to assess this issue. The aim of this study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.) Mass.), 2019-02, Vol.22 (2), p.149-162
Hauptverfasser: Bordeleau, Martine, Carrondo Cottin, Sylvine, Meier, Kaare, Prud'Homme, Michel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 162
container_issue 2
container_start_page 149
container_title Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.)
container_volume 22
creator Bordeleau, Martine
Carrondo Cottin, Sylvine
Meier, Kaare
Prud'Homme, Michel
description Objectives Even if spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is widely used and effective in treating intractable chronic neuropathic pain conditions, little is known about its possible impacts on sensory perception. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a useful tool to assess this issue. The aim of this study was to review the impact of tonic SCS on somatosensory perception quantified by QST in chronic pain patients. Materials and Methods Relevant articles and s were searched in all languages from CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Knowledge data bases. Data were extracted and included studies were assessed for risk of bias. Results Out of 5610 records, 15 peer‐reviewed articles were eligible and included. The results are heterogeneous due to inadequate comparability among studies for populations (a total of 224 patients diagnosed with more than 13 chronic pain conditions), QST parameters (22 measured with 25 different devices) and experimental procedures (study design, comparator, evaluation time, and area tested). The wide variety of studies, designs, populations, and measures included in this review did not lead to strong evidence on how conventional (“tonic”) SCS affects sensory processing in patients with chronic pain. Conclusions The data available tend to suggest that conventional SCS does not interfere with perception of external stimuli. New studies that follow a standardized procedure and consider the possible influence of sensory profile, after‐effect bias, and confounding factors are required to confirm this observation. Moreover, the impact on sensory perception of other SCS modalities and alternative electrical neuromodulation therapies could also be explored.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ner.12893
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2149024957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2149024957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-c35780858a9b085488ac6e5e44e446dde7c8088a7e04de79c879b808f1f6ed393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1rGzEQhkVpaJykh_6BIuilOTiWtKuVlJsxzgeY1tjJeZG1s1Rhd-VIuzX-9x3baQ-FiEGjmXn0HuYl5AtnNxzPpIN4w4U22Qcy4lLIMc9Z9hHfzORjxaU5JxcpvTDGlRHqEznPmGSFKdiINPO6BtcnGmr6FDrv6HrrO9vQWYgVXfe-HRrb-9BRjDV0KcQ9XUJ0sD12fUdnv-Lx49JisUQYuj7d0ild71MPLTYcXcFvD7srclbbJsHnt3xJnu_mT7OH8eLn_eNsuhi7TGbZ4Vaaaamt2WDKtbauAAl5jlFUFSiHY20VsBwL47QyG-zUvC6gykx2Sb6fdLcxvA6Q-rL1yUHT2A7CkErBc8NEbqRC9Nt_6EsYIi7gQClthJBCIHV9olwMKUWoy230rY37krPyYEGJFpRHC5D9-qY4bFqo_pF_d47A5ATsfAP795XKH_PVSfIP-SqPCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2178922522</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sensory Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bordeleau, Martine ; Carrondo Cottin, Sylvine ; Meier, Kaare ; Prud'Homme, Michel</creator><creatorcontrib>Bordeleau, Martine ; Carrondo Cottin, Sylvine ; Meier, Kaare ; Prud'Homme, Michel</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Even if spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is widely used and effective in treating intractable chronic neuropathic pain conditions, little is known about its possible impacts on sensory perception. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a useful tool to assess this issue. The aim of this study was to review the impact of tonic SCS on somatosensory perception quantified by QST in chronic pain patients. Materials and Methods Relevant articles and s were searched in all languages from CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Knowledge data bases. Data were extracted and included studies were assessed for risk of bias. Results Out of 5610 records, 15 peer‐reviewed articles were eligible and included. The results are heterogeneous due to inadequate comparability among studies for populations (a total of 224 patients diagnosed with more than 13 chronic pain conditions), QST parameters (22 measured with 25 different devices) and experimental procedures (study design, comparator, evaluation time, and area tested). The wide variety of studies, designs, populations, and measures included in this review did not lead to strong evidence on how conventional (“tonic”) SCS affects sensory processing in patients with chronic pain. Conclusions The data available tend to suggest that conventional SCS does not interfere with perception of external stimuli. New studies that follow a standardized procedure and consider the possible influence of sensory profile, after‐effect bias, and confounding factors are required to confirm this observation. Moreover, the impact on sensory perception of other SCS modalities and alternative electrical neuromodulation therapies could also be explored.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-7159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-1403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ner.12893</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30506960</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Chronic neuropathic pain ; Chronic pain ; Chronic Pain - physiopathology ; Chronic Pain - therapy ; Databases, Bibliographic - statistics &amp; numerical data ; External stimuli ; Humans ; Information processing ; Neuralgia ; Neuromodulation ; Pain ; Pain Measurement ; Pain perception ; Patients ; Perception - physiology ; Population studies ; quantitative sensory testing ; Sensory integration ; Sensory perception ; Spinal cord ; Spinal Cord Stimulation - methods ; tonic spinal cord stimulation</subject><ispartof>Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.), 2019-02, Vol.22 (2), p.149-162</ispartof><rights>2018 International Neuromodulation Society</rights><rights>2018 International Neuromodulation Society.</rights><rights>2019 International Neuromodulation Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-c35780858a9b085488ac6e5e44e446dde7c8088a7e04de79c879b808f1f6ed393</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-c35780858a9b085488ac6e5e44e446dde7c8088a7e04de79c879b808f1f6ed393</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7677-406X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30506960$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bordeleau, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrondo Cottin, Sylvine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Kaare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prud'Homme, Michel</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sensory Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review</title><title>Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Neuromodulation</addtitle><description>Objectives Even if spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is widely used and effective in treating intractable chronic neuropathic pain conditions, little is known about its possible impacts on sensory perception. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a useful tool to assess this issue. The aim of this study was to review the impact of tonic SCS on somatosensory perception quantified by QST in chronic pain patients. Materials and Methods Relevant articles and s were searched in all languages from CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Knowledge data bases. Data were extracted and included studies were assessed for risk of bias. Results Out of 5610 records, 15 peer‐reviewed articles were eligible and included. The results are heterogeneous due to inadequate comparability among studies for populations (a total of 224 patients diagnosed with more than 13 chronic pain conditions), QST parameters (22 measured with 25 different devices) and experimental procedures (study design, comparator, evaluation time, and area tested). The wide variety of studies, designs, populations, and measures included in this review did not lead to strong evidence on how conventional (“tonic”) SCS affects sensory processing in patients with chronic pain. Conclusions The data available tend to suggest that conventional SCS does not interfere with perception of external stimuli. New studies that follow a standardized procedure and consider the possible influence of sensory profile, after‐effect bias, and confounding factors are required to confirm this observation. Moreover, the impact on sensory perception of other SCS modalities and alternative electrical neuromodulation therapies could also be explored.</description><subject>Chronic neuropathic pain</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>Chronic Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Databases, Bibliographic - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>External stimuli</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Neuralgia</subject><subject>Neuromodulation</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>Pain perception</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>quantitative sensory testing</subject><subject>Sensory integration</subject><subject>Sensory perception</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>tonic spinal cord stimulation</subject><issn>1094-7159</issn><issn>1525-1403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1rGzEQhkVpaJykh_6BIuilOTiWtKuVlJsxzgeY1tjJeZG1s1Rhd-VIuzX-9x3baQ-FiEGjmXn0HuYl5AtnNxzPpIN4w4U22Qcy4lLIMc9Z9hHfzORjxaU5JxcpvTDGlRHqEznPmGSFKdiINPO6BtcnGmr6FDrv6HrrO9vQWYgVXfe-HRrb-9BRjDV0KcQ9XUJ0sD12fUdnv-Lx49JisUQYuj7d0ild71MPLTYcXcFvD7srclbbJsHnt3xJnu_mT7OH8eLn_eNsuhi7TGbZ4Vaaaamt2WDKtbauAAl5jlFUFSiHY20VsBwL47QyG-zUvC6gykx2Sb6fdLcxvA6Q-rL1yUHT2A7CkErBc8NEbqRC9Nt_6EsYIi7gQClthJBCIHV9olwMKUWoy230rY37krPyYEGJFpRHC5D9-qY4bFqo_pF_d47A5ATsfAP795XKH_PVSfIP-SqPCQ</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Bordeleau, Martine</creator><creator>Carrondo Cottin, Sylvine</creator><creator>Meier, Kaare</creator><creator>Prud'Homme, Michel</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7677-406X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Effects of Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sensory Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review</title><author>Bordeleau, Martine ; Carrondo Cottin, Sylvine ; Meier, Kaare ; Prud'Homme, Michel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-c35780858a9b085488ac6e5e44e446dde7c8088a7e04de79c879b808f1f6ed393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Chronic neuropathic pain</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>Chronic Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Databases, Bibliographic - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>External stimuli</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Neuralgia</topic><topic>Neuromodulation</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>Pain perception</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>quantitative sensory testing</topic><topic>Sensory integration</topic><topic>Sensory perception</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>tonic spinal cord stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bordeleau, Martine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrondo Cottin, Sylvine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Kaare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prud'Homme, Michel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bordeleau, Martine</au><au>Carrondo Cottin, Sylvine</au><au>Meier, Kaare</au><au>Prud'Homme, Michel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sensory Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Neuromodulation</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>149</spage><epage>162</epage><pages>149-162</pages><issn>1094-7159</issn><eissn>1525-1403</eissn><abstract>Objectives Even if spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is widely used and effective in treating intractable chronic neuropathic pain conditions, little is known about its possible impacts on sensory perception. Quantitative sensory testing (QST) is a useful tool to assess this issue. The aim of this study was to review the impact of tonic SCS on somatosensory perception quantified by QST in chronic pain patients. Materials and Methods Relevant articles and s were searched in all languages from CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Knowledge data bases. Data were extracted and included studies were assessed for risk of bias. Results Out of 5610 records, 15 peer‐reviewed articles were eligible and included. The results are heterogeneous due to inadequate comparability among studies for populations (a total of 224 patients diagnosed with more than 13 chronic pain conditions), QST parameters (22 measured with 25 different devices) and experimental procedures (study design, comparator, evaluation time, and area tested). The wide variety of studies, designs, populations, and measures included in this review did not lead to strong evidence on how conventional (“tonic”) SCS affects sensory processing in patients with chronic pain. Conclusions The data available tend to suggest that conventional SCS does not interfere with perception of external stimuli. New studies that follow a standardized procedure and consider the possible influence of sensory profile, after‐effect bias, and confounding factors are required to confirm this observation. Moreover, the impact on sensory perception of other SCS modalities and alternative electrical neuromodulation therapies could also be explored.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30506960</pmid><doi>10.1111/ner.12893</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7677-406X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1094-7159
ispartof Neuromodulation (Malden, Mass.), 2019-02, Vol.22 (2), p.149-162
issn 1094-7159
1525-1403
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2149024957
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Chronic neuropathic pain
Chronic pain
Chronic Pain - physiopathology
Chronic Pain - therapy
Databases, Bibliographic - statistics & numerical data
External stimuli
Humans
Information processing
Neuralgia
Neuromodulation
Pain
Pain Measurement
Pain perception
Patients
Perception - physiology
Population studies
quantitative sensory testing
Sensory integration
Sensory perception
Spinal cord
Spinal Cord Stimulation - methods
tonic spinal cord stimulation
title Effects of Tonic Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sensory Perception in Chronic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T02%3A19%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Tonic%20Spinal%20Cord%20Stimulation%20on%20Sensory%20Perception%20in%20Chronic%20Pain%20Patients:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Neuromodulation%20(Malden,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Bordeleau,%20Martine&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=149&rft.epage=162&rft.pages=149-162&rft.issn=1094-7159&rft.eissn=1525-1403&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ner.12893&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2149024957%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2178922522&rft_id=info:pmid/30506960&rfr_iscdi=true