A spatial analysis of health status in Britain, 1991–2011
Using Census-derived data for consistent spatial units, this paper explores how the population of Britain in 1991, 2001 and 2011 was spatially structured by self-reported health including exploring the trajectories of change. This paper uses consistent small area units to examine the changing spatia...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Social science & medicine (1982) 2019-01, Vol.220, p.340-352 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 352 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 340 |
| container_title | Social science & medicine (1982) |
| container_volume | 220 |
| creator | Dearden, Emily K. Lloyd, Christopher D. Catney, Gemma |
| description | Using Census-derived data for consistent spatial units, this paper explores how the population of Britain in 1991, 2001 and 2011 was spatially structured by self-reported health including exploring the trajectories of change. This paper uses consistent small area units to examine the changing spatial structure of census-derived Limiting, Long-Term Illness (LLTI) in Britain over the twenty year period and utilises the 2011 Office for National Statistics Output Area Classification (OAC) as a geodemographic indicator. The results allow the geography of change to be captured, highlighting how health is inextricably linked to geography, demonstrating quantitatively a complex, yet distinctive, spatial organisation of health inequalities within Britain. Overall decreasing unevenness values, coupled with increased positive spatial association suggests that neighbouring areas have become more similar over time – the distinction between areas characterised by poor health or by good health is decreasing.
•Health inequalities are distinctively spatially organised within Britain.•Britain is now more visibly divided by its geography of long-term illness.•Distinct spatial concentrations of good and poor health correspond with area type. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.014 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2149016391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0277953618306488</els_id><sourcerecordid>2195252864</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-77929fd017be1d854e34f709db26412459b066dcbf2da6bcd34725d608fb5d1b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtOxDAQhi0EguVxBYhEQ0GCx_EjFtWCeEkr0UBtObYjvMomi50g0XEHbshJ8GoXChqqKeabf2Y-hE4AF4CBX8yL2Jto_MLZgmCoCoACA91CE6hEmbOSim00wUSIXLKS76H9GOcYY8BVuYv2Ssww4aKaoMtpFpd68LrNdKfb9-hj1jfZi9Pt8JLFQQ9jzHyXXQU_aN-dZyAlfH18pqVwiHYa3UZ3tKkH6Pn25un6Pp893j1cT2e5obQaciEkkY3FIGoHtmLUlbQRWNqacAqEMlljzq2pG2I1r41NxxNmOa6amlmoywN0ts5dhv51dHFQCx-Na1vduX6MigCVSUopIaGnf9B5P4b02IqSjDBScZoosaZM6GMMrlHL4Bc6vCvAauVXzdWvX7XyqwBU8psmjzf5Y73q_cz9CE3AdA24JOTNu6BSiuuMsz44Myjb-3-XfAMURY1p</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2195252864</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A spatial analysis of health status in Britain, 1991–2011</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Dearden, Emily K. ; Lloyd, Christopher D. ; Catney, Gemma</creator><creatorcontrib>Dearden, Emily K. ; Lloyd, Christopher D. ; Catney, Gemma</creatorcontrib><description>Using Census-derived data for consistent spatial units, this paper explores how the population of Britain in 1991, 2001 and 2011 was spatially structured by self-reported health including exploring the trajectories of change. This paper uses consistent small area units to examine the changing spatial structure of census-derived Limiting, Long-Term Illness (LLTI) in Britain over the twenty year period and utilises the 2011 Office for National Statistics Output Area Classification (OAC) as a geodemographic indicator. The results allow the geography of change to be captured, highlighting how health is inextricably linked to geography, demonstrating quantitatively a complex, yet distinctive, spatial organisation of health inequalities within Britain. Overall decreasing unevenness values, coupled with increased positive spatial association suggests that neighbouring areas have become more similar over time – the distinction between areas characterised by poor health or by good health is decreasing.
•Health inequalities are distinctively spatially organised within Britain.•Britain is now more visibly divided by its geography of long-term illness.•Distinct spatial concentrations of good and poor health correspond with area type.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0277-9536</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30502678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Census ; Censuses ; Classification ; Clustering ; Diagnostic Self Evaluation ; Geodemographics ; Geography ; Geography - trends ; Great Britain ; Health ; Health disparities ; Health Status ; Humans ; Illnesses ; Inequalities ; Limiting long term illness ; Segregation ; Socioeconomic Factors ; Spatial ; Spatial Analysis ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Social science & medicine (1982), 2019-01, Vol.220, p.340-352</ispartof><rights>2018 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jan 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-77929fd017be1d854e34f709db26412459b066dcbf2da6bcd34725d608fb5d1b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-77929fd017be1d854e34f709db26412459b066dcbf2da6bcd34725d608fb5d1b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953618306488$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,33751,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30502678$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dearden, Emily K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catney, Gemma</creatorcontrib><title>A spatial analysis of health status in Britain, 1991–2011</title><title>Social science & medicine (1982)</title><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><description>Using Census-derived data for consistent spatial units, this paper explores how the population of Britain in 1991, 2001 and 2011 was spatially structured by self-reported health including exploring the trajectories of change. This paper uses consistent small area units to examine the changing spatial structure of census-derived Limiting, Long-Term Illness (LLTI) in Britain over the twenty year period and utilises the 2011 Office for National Statistics Output Area Classification (OAC) as a geodemographic indicator. The results allow the geography of change to be captured, highlighting how health is inextricably linked to geography, demonstrating quantitatively a complex, yet distinctive, spatial organisation of health inequalities within Britain. Overall decreasing unevenness values, coupled with increased positive spatial association suggests that neighbouring areas have become more similar over time – the distinction between areas characterised by poor health or by good health is decreasing.
•Health inequalities are distinctively spatially organised within Britain.•Britain is now more visibly divided by its geography of long-term illness.•Distinct spatial concentrations of good and poor health correspond with area type.</description><subject>Census</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Diagnostic Self Evaluation</subject><subject>Geodemographics</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>Geography - trends</subject><subject>Great Britain</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health Status</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Illnesses</subject><subject>Inequalities</subject><subject>Limiting long term illness</subject><subject>Segregation</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><subject>Spatial</subject><subject>Spatial Analysis</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>0277-9536</issn><issn>1873-5347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDtOxDAQhi0EguVxBYhEQ0GCx_EjFtWCeEkr0UBtObYjvMomi50g0XEHbshJ8GoXChqqKeabf2Y-hE4AF4CBX8yL2Jto_MLZgmCoCoACA91CE6hEmbOSim00wUSIXLKS76H9GOcYY8BVuYv2Ssww4aKaoMtpFpd68LrNdKfb9-hj1jfZi9Pt8JLFQQ9jzHyXXQU_aN-dZyAlfH18pqVwiHYa3UZ3tKkH6Pn25un6Pp893j1cT2e5obQaciEkkY3FIGoHtmLUlbQRWNqacAqEMlljzq2pG2I1r41NxxNmOa6amlmoywN0ts5dhv51dHFQCx-Na1vduX6MigCVSUopIaGnf9B5P4b02IqSjDBScZoosaZM6GMMrlHL4Bc6vCvAauVXzdWvX7XyqwBU8psmjzf5Y73q_cz9CE3AdA24JOTNu6BSiuuMsz44Myjb-3-XfAMURY1p</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Dearden, Emily K.</creator><creator>Lloyd, Christopher D.</creator><creator>Catney, Gemma</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Pergamon Press Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>A spatial analysis of health status in Britain, 1991–2011</title><author>Dearden, Emily K. ; Lloyd, Christopher D. ; Catney, Gemma</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-77929fd017be1d854e34f709db26412459b066dcbf2da6bcd34725d608fb5d1b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Census</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Diagnostic Self Evaluation</topic><topic>Geodemographics</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>Geography - trends</topic><topic>Great Britain</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health Status</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Illnesses</topic><topic>Inequalities</topic><topic>Limiting long term illness</topic><topic>Segregation</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><topic>Spatial</topic><topic>Spatial Analysis</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dearden, Emily K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Christopher D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catney, Gemma</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dearden, Emily K.</au><au>Lloyd, Christopher D.</au><au>Catney, Gemma</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A spatial analysis of health status in Britain, 1991–2011</atitle><jtitle>Social science & medicine (1982)</jtitle><addtitle>Soc Sci Med</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>220</volume><spage>340</spage><epage>352</epage><pages>340-352</pages><issn>0277-9536</issn><eissn>1873-5347</eissn><abstract>Using Census-derived data for consistent spatial units, this paper explores how the population of Britain in 1991, 2001 and 2011 was spatially structured by self-reported health including exploring the trajectories of change. This paper uses consistent small area units to examine the changing spatial structure of census-derived Limiting, Long-Term Illness (LLTI) in Britain over the twenty year period and utilises the 2011 Office for National Statistics Output Area Classification (OAC) as a geodemographic indicator. The results allow the geography of change to be captured, highlighting how health is inextricably linked to geography, demonstrating quantitatively a complex, yet distinctive, spatial organisation of health inequalities within Britain. Overall decreasing unevenness values, coupled with increased positive spatial association suggests that neighbouring areas have become more similar over time – the distinction between areas characterised by poor health or by good health is decreasing.
•Health inequalities are distinctively spatially organised within Britain.•Britain is now more visibly divided by its geography of long-term illness.•Distinct spatial concentrations of good and poor health correspond with area type.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30502678</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.014</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0277-9536 |
| ispartof | Social science & medicine (1982), 2019-01, Vol.220, p.340-352 |
| issn | 0277-9536 1873-5347 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2149016391 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Census Censuses Classification Clustering Diagnostic Self Evaluation Geodemographics Geography Geography - trends Great Britain Health Health disparities Health Status Humans Illnesses Inequalities Limiting long term illness Segregation Socioeconomic Factors Spatial Spatial Analysis United Kingdom |
| title | A spatial analysis of health status in Britain, 1991–2011 |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T21%3A43%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20spatial%20analysis%20of%20health%20status%20in%20Britain,%201991%E2%80%932011&rft.jtitle=Social%20science%20&%20medicine%20(1982)&rft.au=Dearden,%20Emily%20K.&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=220&rft.spage=340&rft.epage=352&rft.pages=340-352&rft.issn=0277-9536&rft.eissn=1873-5347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.11.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2195252864%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2195252864&rft_id=info:pmid/30502678&rft_els_id=S0277953618306488&rfr_iscdi=true |