Improving Bone Mineral Density Assessment Using Spectral Detector CT
Introduction: Bone mineral density (BMD) analysis by Dual-Energy x-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) can have some false negatives due to overlapping structures in the projections. Spectral Detector CT (SDCT) can overcome these limitations by providing volumetric information. We investigated its performance...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical densitometry 2019-07, Vol.22 (3), p.374-381 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 381 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 374 |
container_title | Journal of clinical densitometry |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Van Hedent, Steven Su, Kuan-Hao Jordan, David W. Eck, Brendan Liang, Fan Kessner, Rivka Kuo, Jung-Wen Buls, Nico Klahr, Paul Ros, Pablo Muzic, Raymond F. |
description | Introduction: Bone mineral density (BMD) analysis by Dual-Energy x-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) can have some false negatives due to overlapping structures in the projections. Spectral Detector CT (SDCT) can overcome these limitations by providing volumetric information. We investigated its performance for BMD assessment and compared it to DXA and phantomless volumetric bone mineral density (PLvBMD), the latter known to systematically underestimate BMD. DXA is the current standard for BMD assessment, while PLvBMD is an established alternative for opportunistic BMD analysis using CT. Similarly to PLvBMD, spectral data could allow BMD screening opportunistically, without additional phantom calibration. Methodology: Ten concentrations of dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4) ranging from 0 to 600 mg/ml, in an acrylic phantom were scanned using SDCT in four different, clinically-relevant scan conditions. Images were processed to estimate the K2HPO4 concentrations. A model representing a human lumbar spine (European Spine Phantom) was scanned and used for calibration via linear regression analysis. After calibration, our method was retrospectively applied to abdominal SDCT scans of 20 patients for BMD assessment, who also had PLvBMD and DXA. Performance of PLvBMD, DXA and our SDCT method were compared by sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for decreased BMD. Results: There was excellent correlation (R2 >0.99, p < 0.01) between true and measured K2HPO4 concentrations for all scan conditions. Overall mean measurement error ranged from −11.5 ± 4.7 mg/ml (−2.8 ± 6.0%) to −12.3 ± 6.3 mg/ml (−4.8 ± 3.0%) depending on scan conditions. Using DXA as a reference standard, sensitivity/specificity for detecting decreased BMD in the scanned patients were 100%/73% using SDCT, 100%/40% using PLvBMD provided T-scores, and 90–100%/40–53% using PLvBMD hydroxyapatite density classifications, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show excellent sensitivity and high specificity of SDCT for detecting decreased BMD, demonstrating clinical feasibility. Further validation in prospective clinical trials will be required. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2141070175</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S109469501830163X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2141070175</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8144aee652892c7d4bbadb939ef60dfdd0af4560d087a880a177f21432983e173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQRpaUc-LEtsRSWj4qFTHQzpYTX5CrJil2Wqn_HkctjEx-dXrule8h5JbCmALNH9bjdVuacQJUhMEYgJ2RIc0yGQNn_DxkkCzOZQYDcuX9GiChVPBLMkiBSS5yOSSzeb117d42X9FT22D0bht0ehPNsPG2O0QT79H7GpsuWvme-txi2R2JLqTWRdPlNbmo9MbjzekdkdXL83L6Fi8-XufTySIu0yzvYkEZ04h5lgiZlNywotCmkKnEKgdTGQO6YlmIILgWAjTlvEooSxMpUqQ8HZH7Y2_48vcOfadq60vcbHSD7c6rwFLgQHkW0OSIlq713mGlts7W2h0UBdXbU2vV21O9vX4W7IWlu1P_rqjR_K386grA4xHAcOXeolO-tNiUaKwLMpRp7X_9P8mXf48</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2141070175</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving Bone Mineral Density Assessment Using Spectral Detector CT</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Van Hedent, Steven ; Su, Kuan-Hao ; Jordan, David W. ; Eck, Brendan ; Liang, Fan ; Kessner, Rivka ; Kuo, Jung-Wen ; Buls, Nico ; Klahr, Paul ; Ros, Pablo ; Muzic, Raymond F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Hedent, Steven ; Su, Kuan-Hao ; Jordan, David W. ; Eck, Brendan ; Liang, Fan ; Kessner, Rivka ; Kuo, Jung-Wen ; Buls, Nico ; Klahr, Paul ; Ros, Pablo ; Muzic, Raymond F.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Bone mineral density (BMD) analysis by Dual-Energy x-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) can have some false negatives due to overlapping structures in the projections. Spectral Detector CT (SDCT) can overcome these limitations by providing volumetric information. We investigated its performance for BMD assessment and compared it to DXA and phantomless volumetric bone mineral density (PLvBMD), the latter known to systematically underestimate BMD. DXA is the current standard for BMD assessment, while PLvBMD is an established alternative for opportunistic BMD analysis using CT. Similarly to PLvBMD, spectral data could allow BMD screening opportunistically, without additional phantom calibration. Methodology: Ten concentrations of dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4) ranging from 0 to 600 mg/ml, in an acrylic phantom were scanned using SDCT in four different, clinically-relevant scan conditions. Images were processed to estimate the K2HPO4 concentrations. A model representing a human lumbar spine (European Spine Phantom) was scanned and used for calibration via linear regression analysis. After calibration, our method was retrospectively applied to abdominal SDCT scans of 20 patients for BMD assessment, who also had PLvBMD and DXA. Performance of PLvBMD, DXA and our SDCT method were compared by sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for decreased BMD. Results: There was excellent correlation (R2 >0.99, p < 0.01) between true and measured K2HPO4 concentrations for all scan conditions. Overall mean measurement error ranged from −11.5 ± 4.7 mg/ml (−2.8 ± 6.0%) to −12.3 ± 6.3 mg/ml (−4.8 ± 3.0%) depending on scan conditions. Using DXA as a reference standard, sensitivity/specificity for detecting decreased BMD in the scanned patients were 100%/73% using SDCT, 100%/40% using PLvBMD provided T-scores, and 90–100%/40–53% using PLvBMD hydroxyapatite density classifications, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show excellent sensitivity and high specificity of SDCT for detecting decreased BMD, demonstrating clinical feasibility. Further validation in prospective clinical trials will be required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-6950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-0747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30497869</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bone mineral density ; Dual-energy CT ; Dual-layer detector ; Osteopenia ; Quantitative computed tomography ; Spectral detector computed tomography</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical densitometry, 2019-07, Vol.22 (3), p.374-381</ispartof><rights>2018 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8144aee652892c7d4bbadb939ef60dfdd0af4560d087a880a177f21432983e173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8144aee652892c7d4bbadb939ef60dfdd0af4560d087a880a177f21432983e173</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4065-7459 ; 0000-0001-8336-8748 ; 0000-0003-3974-0797 ; 0000-0002-5994-9507</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30497869$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Hedent, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Kuan-Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eck, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessner, Rivka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Jung-Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buls, Nico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klahr, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ros, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzic, Raymond F.</creatorcontrib><title>Improving Bone Mineral Density Assessment Using Spectral Detector CT</title><title>Journal of clinical densitometry</title><addtitle>J Clin Densitom</addtitle><description>Introduction: Bone mineral density (BMD) analysis by Dual-Energy x-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) can have some false negatives due to overlapping structures in the projections. Spectral Detector CT (SDCT) can overcome these limitations by providing volumetric information. We investigated its performance for BMD assessment and compared it to DXA and phantomless volumetric bone mineral density (PLvBMD), the latter known to systematically underestimate BMD. DXA is the current standard for BMD assessment, while PLvBMD is an established alternative for opportunistic BMD analysis using CT. Similarly to PLvBMD, spectral data could allow BMD screening opportunistically, without additional phantom calibration. Methodology: Ten concentrations of dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4) ranging from 0 to 600 mg/ml, in an acrylic phantom were scanned using SDCT in four different, clinically-relevant scan conditions. Images were processed to estimate the K2HPO4 concentrations. A model representing a human lumbar spine (European Spine Phantom) was scanned and used for calibration via linear regression analysis. After calibration, our method was retrospectively applied to abdominal SDCT scans of 20 patients for BMD assessment, who also had PLvBMD and DXA. Performance of PLvBMD, DXA and our SDCT method were compared by sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for decreased BMD. Results: There was excellent correlation (R2 >0.99, p < 0.01) between true and measured K2HPO4 concentrations for all scan conditions. Overall mean measurement error ranged from −11.5 ± 4.7 mg/ml (−2.8 ± 6.0%) to −12.3 ± 6.3 mg/ml (−4.8 ± 3.0%) depending on scan conditions. Using DXA as a reference standard, sensitivity/specificity for detecting decreased BMD in the scanned patients were 100%/73% using SDCT, 100%/40% using PLvBMD provided T-scores, and 90–100%/40–53% using PLvBMD hydroxyapatite density classifications, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show excellent sensitivity and high specificity of SDCT for detecting decreased BMD, demonstrating clinical feasibility. Further validation in prospective clinical trials will be required.</description><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>Dual-energy CT</subject><subject>Dual-layer detector</subject><subject>Osteopenia</subject><subject>Quantitative computed tomography</subject><subject>Spectral detector computed tomography</subject><issn>1094-6950</issn><issn>1559-0747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EoqXwBxhQRpaUc-LEtsRSWj4qFTHQzpYTX5CrJil2Wqn_HkctjEx-dXrule8h5JbCmALNH9bjdVuacQJUhMEYgJ2RIc0yGQNn_DxkkCzOZQYDcuX9GiChVPBLMkiBSS5yOSSzeb117d42X9FT22D0bht0ehPNsPG2O0QT79H7GpsuWvme-txi2R2JLqTWRdPlNbmo9MbjzekdkdXL83L6Fi8-XufTySIu0yzvYkEZ04h5lgiZlNywotCmkKnEKgdTGQO6YlmIILgWAjTlvEooSxMpUqQ8HZH7Y2_48vcOfadq60vcbHSD7c6rwFLgQHkW0OSIlq713mGlts7W2h0UBdXbU2vV21O9vX4W7IWlu1P_rqjR_K386grA4xHAcOXeolO-tNiUaKwLMpRp7X_9P8mXf48</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Van Hedent, Steven</creator><creator>Su, Kuan-Hao</creator><creator>Jordan, David W.</creator><creator>Eck, Brendan</creator><creator>Liang, Fan</creator><creator>Kessner, Rivka</creator><creator>Kuo, Jung-Wen</creator><creator>Buls, Nico</creator><creator>Klahr, Paul</creator><creator>Ros, Pablo</creator><creator>Muzic, Raymond F.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4065-7459</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-8748</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-0797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-9507</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Improving Bone Mineral Density Assessment Using Spectral Detector CT</title><author>Van Hedent, Steven ; Su, Kuan-Hao ; Jordan, David W. ; Eck, Brendan ; Liang, Fan ; Kessner, Rivka ; Kuo, Jung-Wen ; Buls, Nico ; Klahr, Paul ; Ros, Pablo ; Muzic, Raymond F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-8144aee652892c7d4bbadb939ef60dfdd0af4560d087a880a177f21432983e173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>Dual-energy CT</topic><topic>Dual-layer detector</topic><topic>Osteopenia</topic><topic>Quantitative computed tomography</topic><topic>Spectral detector computed tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Hedent, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Kuan-Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eck, Brendan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Fan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessner, Rivka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Jung-Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buls, Nico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klahr, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ros, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzic, Raymond F.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical densitometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Hedent, Steven</au><au>Su, Kuan-Hao</au><au>Jordan, David W.</au><au>Eck, Brendan</au><au>Liang, Fan</au><au>Kessner, Rivka</au><au>Kuo, Jung-Wen</au><au>Buls, Nico</au><au>Klahr, Paul</au><au>Ros, Pablo</au><au>Muzic, Raymond F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving Bone Mineral Density Assessment Using Spectral Detector CT</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical densitometry</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Densitom</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>381</epage><pages>374-381</pages><issn>1094-6950</issn><eissn>1559-0747</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Bone mineral density (BMD) analysis by Dual-Energy x-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) can have some false negatives due to overlapping structures in the projections. Spectral Detector CT (SDCT) can overcome these limitations by providing volumetric information. We investigated its performance for BMD assessment and compared it to DXA and phantomless volumetric bone mineral density (PLvBMD), the latter known to systematically underestimate BMD. DXA is the current standard for BMD assessment, while PLvBMD is an established alternative for opportunistic BMD analysis using CT. Similarly to PLvBMD, spectral data could allow BMD screening opportunistically, without additional phantom calibration. Methodology: Ten concentrations of dipotassium phosphate (K2HPO4) ranging from 0 to 600 mg/ml, in an acrylic phantom were scanned using SDCT in four different, clinically-relevant scan conditions. Images were processed to estimate the K2HPO4 concentrations. A model representing a human lumbar spine (European Spine Phantom) was scanned and used for calibration via linear regression analysis. After calibration, our method was retrospectively applied to abdominal SDCT scans of 20 patients for BMD assessment, who also had PLvBMD and DXA. Performance of PLvBMD, DXA and our SDCT method were compared by sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for decreased BMD. Results: There was excellent correlation (R2 >0.99, p < 0.01) between true and measured K2HPO4 concentrations for all scan conditions. Overall mean measurement error ranged from −11.5 ± 4.7 mg/ml (−2.8 ± 6.0%) to −12.3 ± 6.3 mg/ml (−4.8 ± 3.0%) depending on scan conditions. Using DXA as a reference standard, sensitivity/specificity for detecting decreased BMD in the scanned patients were 100%/73% using SDCT, 100%/40% using PLvBMD provided T-scores, and 90–100%/40–53% using PLvBMD hydroxyapatite density classifications, respectively. Conclusions: Our results show excellent sensitivity and high specificity of SDCT for detecting decreased BMD, demonstrating clinical feasibility. Further validation in prospective clinical trials will be required.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30497869</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.004</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4065-7459</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8336-8748</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-0797</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5994-9507</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1094-6950 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical densitometry, 2019-07, Vol.22 (3), p.374-381 |
issn | 1094-6950 1559-0747 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2141070175 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Bone mineral density Dual-energy CT Dual-layer detector Osteopenia Quantitative computed tomography Spectral detector computed tomography |
title | Improving Bone Mineral Density Assessment Using Spectral Detector CT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A31%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20Bone%20Mineral%20Density%20Assessment%20Using%20Spectral%20Detector%20CT&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20densitometry&rft.au=Van%20Hedent,%20Steven&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=381&rft.pages=374-381&rft.issn=1094-6950&rft.eissn=1559-0747&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jocd.2018.10.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2141070175%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2141070175&rft_id=info:pmid/30497869&rft_els_id=S109469501830163X&rfr_iscdi=true |