A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use
Aims We have developed a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter (AUC) impregnated with rifampicin, triclosan, and sparfloxacin and demonstrated that it has long‐term (∼84 days) protection against bacterial colonization in vitro. This study aimed to assess the safety and patient acceptability of this d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurourology and urodynamics 2019-01, Vol.38 (1), p.338-345 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 345 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 338 |
container_title | Neurourology and urodynamics |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Belfield, Katherine Betts, Helen Parkinson, Richard Bayston, Roger |
description | Aims
We have developed a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter (AUC) impregnated with rifampicin, triclosan, and sparfloxacin and demonstrated that it has long‐term (∼84 days) protection against bacterial colonization in vitro. This study aimed to assess the safety and patient acceptability of this device in long‐term catheter users.
Methods
Adults who use long term (>28 days) indwelling urinary catheters with capacity to consent were invited to receive the AUC at their next catheter change. The primary outcome measure was adverse events (AE) attributable to antimicrobial impregnation of the catheter. Secondary outcome measures included severity of related AEs, patient acceptability, early removal of the trial catheter, and degree of microbial colonization of trial catheters. Except for the last, outcomes were assessed by telephone interviews. Original and trial catheters were collected, and the lumens and balloons were separated and analyzed for microbiological colonization.
Results
Thirty participants were recruited. Eighty four AEs were reported, and only one was rated as “probably” related to antimicrobial impregnation. The AE was mild and resolved within 48 h. A total of 82.14% of participants rated the catheter as no different or better than their usual catheter. Two participants chose to remove the AUC early due to it feeling shorter. There were significantly fewer bacterial isolates attached to the balloons of trial catheters compared to the matched original catheters.
Conclusions
The AUC has an advantageous safety profile and was acceptable to the majority of participants. Information gained from this trial will support a larger randomized controlled study of efficacy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/nau.23858 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2141038179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2141038179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-8b3e52715cc0560974198aed4fded04a6e4255fc60f14416023255d0a88a62653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCghdAltjAIu34J7azvKpoQarKhq4jX2cCrpw42A7o7ngEnpEnqeG2LCp1NRrNN0dz5hDymsEJA-Cns11PuDCteUI2rOXQKK31U7IBLUTDpdJH5EXONwBghOyekyMBogWj9YakLS0xYLI7H3zZUzsPdLHF41yodQ6Xcj9ZfIiF5rIOexpHaukcf2CoC8VP3qW48zbQNfnZpj11tnzDgomOMdEQ569_fv2u7UTXjC_Js9GGjK_u6jG5Pv_w5exjc_n54tPZ9rJxwhjTmJ3AlmvWOgetgk5L1hmLgxwHHEBahZK37egUjExKpoCL2g9gjbGKq1Yck3cH3SXF7yvm0k8-OwzBzhjX3HMmGQjDdFfRtw_Qm7imuV5XKcVAdRJkpd4fqOo254RjvyQ_Vbs9g_5vEH0Nov8XRGXf3CmuuwmH_-T95ytwegB--oD7x5X6q-31QfIW23CTCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161069404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Belfield, Katherine ; Betts, Helen ; Parkinson, Richard ; Bayston, Roger</creator><creatorcontrib>Belfield, Katherine ; Betts, Helen ; Parkinson, Richard ; Bayston, Roger</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
We have developed a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter (AUC) impregnated with rifampicin, triclosan, and sparfloxacin and demonstrated that it has long‐term (∼84 days) protection against bacterial colonization in vitro. This study aimed to assess the safety and patient acceptability of this device in long‐term catheter users.
Methods
Adults who use long term (>28 days) indwelling urinary catheters with capacity to consent were invited to receive the AUC at their next catheter change. The primary outcome measure was adverse events (AE) attributable to antimicrobial impregnation of the catheter. Secondary outcome measures included severity of related AEs, patient acceptability, early removal of the trial catheter, and degree of microbial colonization of trial catheters. Except for the last, outcomes were assessed by telephone interviews. Original and trial catheters were collected, and the lumens and balloons were separated and analyzed for microbiological colonization.
Results
Thirty participants were recruited. Eighty four AEs were reported, and only one was rated as “probably” related to antimicrobial impregnation. The AE was mild and resolved within 48 h. A total of 82.14% of participants rated the catheter as no different or better than their usual catheter. Two participants chose to remove the AUC early due to it feeling shorter. There were significantly fewer bacterial isolates attached to the balloons of trial catheters compared to the matched original catheters.
Conclusions
The AUC has an advantageous safety profile and was acceptable to the majority of participants. Information gained from this trial will support a larger randomized controlled study of efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.23858</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30350877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antimicrobial agents ; anti‐infective agents ; Balloon catheters ; Catheters ; Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects ; Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology ; catheter‐related urinary tract infections ; clinical trial ; Colonization ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pilot Projects ; Rifampin ; safety ; Sparfloxacin ; Triclosan ; Urinary Catheterization - instrumentation ; urinary catheters ; Urinary Catheters - adverse effects ; Urinary Catheters - microbiology ; Urinary tract infections ; Urinary Tract Infections - etiology ; Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2019-01, Vol.38 (1), p.338-345</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-8b3e52715cc0560974198aed4fded04a6e4255fc60f14416023255d0a88a62653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-8b3e52715cc0560974198aed4fded04a6e4255fc60f14416023255d0a88a62653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8312-3844 ; 0000-0001-5893-0882</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.23858$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.23858$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30350877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belfield, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayston, Roger</creatorcontrib><title>A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><description>Aims
We have developed a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter (AUC) impregnated with rifampicin, triclosan, and sparfloxacin and demonstrated that it has long‐term (∼84 days) protection against bacterial colonization in vitro. This study aimed to assess the safety and patient acceptability of this device in long‐term catheter users.
Methods
Adults who use long term (>28 days) indwelling urinary catheters with capacity to consent were invited to receive the AUC at their next catheter change. The primary outcome measure was adverse events (AE) attributable to antimicrobial impregnation of the catheter. Secondary outcome measures included severity of related AEs, patient acceptability, early removal of the trial catheter, and degree of microbial colonization of trial catheters. Except for the last, outcomes were assessed by telephone interviews. Original and trial catheters were collected, and the lumens and balloons were separated and analyzed for microbiological colonization.
Results
Thirty participants were recruited. Eighty four AEs were reported, and only one was rated as “probably” related to antimicrobial impregnation. The AE was mild and resolved within 48 h. A total of 82.14% of participants rated the catheter as no different or better than their usual catheter. Two participants chose to remove the AUC early due to it feeling shorter. There were significantly fewer bacterial isolates attached to the balloons of trial catheters compared to the matched original catheters.
Conclusions
The AUC has an advantageous safety profile and was acceptable to the majority of participants. Information gained from this trial will support a larger randomized controlled study of efficacy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>anti‐infective agents</subject><subject>Balloon catheters</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology</subject><subject>catheter‐related urinary tract infections</subject><subject>clinical trial</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Rifampin</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>Sparfloxacin</subject><subject>Triclosan</subject><subject>Urinary Catheterization - instrumentation</subject><subject>urinary catheters</subject><subject>Urinary Catheters - adverse effects</subject><subject>Urinary Catheters - microbiology</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCghdAltjAIu34J7azvKpoQarKhq4jX2cCrpw42A7o7ngEnpEnqeG2LCp1NRrNN0dz5hDymsEJA-Cns11PuDCteUI2rOXQKK31U7IBLUTDpdJH5EXONwBghOyekyMBogWj9YakLS0xYLI7H3zZUzsPdLHF41yodQ6Xcj9ZfIiF5rIOexpHaukcf2CoC8VP3qW48zbQNfnZpj11tnzDgomOMdEQ569_fv2u7UTXjC_Js9GGjK_u6jG5Pv_w5exjc_n54tPZ9rJxwhjTmJ3AlmvWOgetgk5L1hmLgxwHHEBahZK37egUjExKpoCL2g9gjbGKq1Yck3cH3SXF7yvm0k8-OwzBzhjX3HMmGQjDdFfRtw_Qm7imuV5XKcVAdRJkpd4fqOo254RjvyQ_Vbs9g_5vEH0Nov8XRGXf3CmuuwmH_-T95ytwegB--oD7x5X6q-31QfIW23CTCw</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Belfield, Katherine</creator><creator>Betts, Helen</creator><creator>Parkinson, Richard</creator><creator>Bayston, Roger</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8312-3844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-0882</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use</title><author>Belfield, Katherine ; Betts, Helen ; Parkinson, Richard ; Bayston, Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-8b3e52715cc0560974198aed4fded04a6e4255fc60f14416023255d0a88a62653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>anti‐infective agents</topic><topic>Balloon catheters</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology</topic><topic>catheter‐related urinary tract infections</topic><topic>clinical trial</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Rifampin</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>Sparfloxacin</topic><topic>Triclosan</topic><topic>Urinary Catheterization - instrumentation</topic><topic>urinary catheters</topic><topic>Urinary Catheters - adverse effects</topic><topic>Urinary Catheters - microbiology</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belfield, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayston, Roger</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belfield, Katherine</au><au>Betts, Helen</au><au>Parkinson, Richard</au><au>Bayston, Roger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>338</spage><epage>345</epage><pages>338-345</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Aims
We have developed a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter (AUC) impregnated with rifampicin, triclosan, and sparfloxacin and demonstrated that it has long‐term (∼84 days) protection against bacterial colonization in vitro. This study aimed to assess the safety and patient acceptability of this device in long‐term catheter users.
Methods
Adults who use long term (>28 days) indwelling urinary catheters with capacity to consent were invited to receive the AUC at their next catheter change. The primary outcome measure was adverse events (AE) attributable to antimicrobial impregnation of the catheter. Secondary outcome measures included severity of related AEs, patient acceptability, early removal of the trial catheter, and degree of microbial colonization of trial catheters. Except for the last, outcomes were assessed by telephone interviews. Original and trial catheters were collected, and the lumens and balloons were separated and analyzed for microbiological colonization.
Results
Thirty participants were recruited. Eighty four AEs were reported, and only one was rated as “probably” related to antimicrobial impregnation. The AE was mild and resolved within 48 h. A total of 82.14% of participants rated the catheter as no different or better than their usual catheter. Two participants chose to remove the AUC early due to it feeling shorter. There were significantly fewer bacterial isolates attached to the balloons of trial catheters compared to the matched original catheters.
Conclusions
The AUC has an advantageous safety profile and was acceptable to the majority of participants. Information gained from this trial will support a larger randomized controlled study of efficacy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30350877</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.23858</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8312-3844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-0882</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-2467 |
ispartof | Neurourology and urodynamics, 2019-01, Vol.38 (1), p.338-345 |
issn | 0733-2467 1520-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2141038179 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use Antimicrobial agents anti‐infective agents Balloon catheters Catheters Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology catheter‐related urinary tract infections clinical trial Colonization Female Humans Male Middle Aged Pilot Projects Rifampin safety Sparfloxacin Triclosan Urinary Catheterization - instrumentation urinary catheters Urinary Catheters - adverse effects Urinary Catheters - microbiology Urinary tract infections Urinary Tract Infections - etiology Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control |
title | A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A37%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20tolerability%20and%20patient%20acceptability%20pilot%20study%20of%20a%20novel%20antimicrobial%20urinary%20catheter%20for%20long%E2%80%90term%20use&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Belfield,%20Katherine&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=338&rft.epage=345&rft.pages=338-345&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.23858&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2141038179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161069404&rft_id=info:pmid/30350877&rfr_iscdi=true |