A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use

Aims We have developed a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter (AUC) impregnated with rifampicin, triclosan, and sparfloxacin and demonstrated that it has long‐term (∼84 days) protection against bacterial colonization in vitro. This study aimed to assess the safety and patient acceptability of this d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 2019-01, Vol.38 (1), p.338-345
Hauptverfasser: Belfield, Katherine, Betts, Helen, Parkinson, Richard, Bayston, Roger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 345
container_issue 1
container_start_page 338
container_title Neurourology and urodynamics
container_volume 38
creator Belfield, Katherine
Betts, Helen
Parkinson, Richard
Bayston, Roger
description Aims We have developed a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter (AUC) impregnated with rifampicin, triclosan, and sparfloxacin and demonstrated that it has long‐term (∼84 days) protection against bacterial colonization in vitro. This study aimed to assess the safety and patient acceptability of this device in long‐term catheter users. Methods Adults who use long term (>28 days) indwelling urinary catheters with capacity to consent were invited to receive the AUC at their next catheter change. The primary outcome measure was adverse events (AE) attributable to antimicrobial impregnation of the catheter. Secondary outcome measures included severity of related AEs, patient acceptability, early removal of the trial catheter, and degree of microbial colonization of trial catheters. Except for the last, outcomes were assessed by telephone interviews. Original and trial catheters were collected, and the lumens and balloons were separated and analyzed for microbiological colonization. Results Thirty participants were recruited. Eighty four AEs were reported, and only one was rated as “probably” related to antimicrobial impregnation. The AE was mild and resolved within 48 h. A total of 82.14% of participants rated the catheter as no different or better than their usual catheter. Two participants chose to remove the AUC early due to it feeling shorter. There were significantly fewer bacterial isolates attached to the balloons of trial catheters compared to the matched original catheters. Conclusions The AUC has an advantageous safety profile and was acceptable to the majority of participants. Information gained from this trial will support a larger randomized controlled study of efficacy.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nau.23858
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2141038179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2141038179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-8b3e52715cc0560974198aed4fded04a6e4255fc60f14416023255d0a88a62653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCghdAltjAIu34J7azvKpoQarKhq4jX2cCrpw42A7o7ngEnpEnqeG2LCp1NRrNN0dz5hDymsEJA-Cns11PuDCteUI2rOXQKK31U7IBLUTDpdJH5EXONwBghOyekyMBogWj9YakLS0xYLI7H3zZUzsPdLHF41yodQ6Xcj9ZfIiF5rIOexpHaukcf2CoC8VP3qW48zbQNfnZpj11tnzDgomOMdEQ569_fv2u7UTXjC_Js9GGjK_u6jG5Pv_w5exjc_n54tPZ9rJxwhjTmJ3AlmvWOgetgk5L1hmLgxwHHEBahZK37egUjExKpoCL2g9gjbGKq1Yck3cH3SXF7yvm0k8-OwzBzhjX3HMmGQjDdFfRtw_Qm7imuV5XKcVAdRJkpd4fqOo254RjvyQ_Vbs9g_5vEH0Nov8XRGXf3CmuuwmH_-T95ytwegB--oD7x5X6q-31QfIW23CTCw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161069404</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Belfield, Katherine ; Betts, Helen ; Parkinson, Richard ; Bayston, Roger</creator><creatorcontrib>Belfield, Katherine ; Betts, Helen ; Parkinson, Richard ; Bayston, Roger</creatorcontrib><description>Aims We have developed a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter (AUC) impregnated with rifampicin, triclosan, and sparfloxacin and demonstrated that it has long‐term (∼84 days) protection against bacterial colonization in vitro. This study aimed to assess the safety and patient acceptability of this device in long‐term catheter users. Methods Adults who use long term (&gt;28 days) indwelling urinary catheters with capacity to consent were invited to receive the AUC at their next catheter change. The primary outcome measure was adverse events (AE) attributable to antimicrobial impregnation of the catheter. Secondary outcome measures included severity of related AEs, patient acceptability, early removal of the trial catheter, and degree of microbial colonization of trial catheters. Except for the last, outcomes were assessed by telephone interviews. Original and trial catheters were collected, and the lumens and balloons were separated and analyzed for microbiological colonization. Results Thirty participants were recruited. Eighty four AEs were reported, and only one was rated as “probably” related to antimicrobial impregnation. The AE was mild and resolved within 48 h. A total of 82.14% of participants rated the catheter as no different or better than their usual catheter. Two participants chose to remove the AUC early due to it feeling shorter. There were significantly fewer bacterial isolates attached to the balloons of trial catheters compared to the matched original catheters. Conclusions The AUC has an advantageous safety profile and was acceptable to the majority of participants. Information gained from this trial will support a larger randomized controlled study of efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.23858</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30350877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use ; Antimicrobial agents ; anti‐infective agents ; Balloon catheters ; Catheters ; Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects ; Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology ; catheter‐related urinary tract infections ; clinical trial ; Colonization ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pilot Projects ; Rifampin ; safety ; Sparfloxacin ; Triclosan ; Urinary Catheterization - instrumentation ; urinary catheters ; Urinary Catheters - adverse effects ; Urinary Catheters - microbiology ; Urinary tract infections ; Urinary Tract Infections - etiology ; Urinary Tract Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2019-01, Vol.38 (1), p.338-345</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-8b3e52715cc0560974198aed4fded04a6e4255fc60f14416023255d0a88a62653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-8b3e52715cc0560974198aed4fded04a6e4255fc60f14416023255d0a88a62653</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8312-3844 ; 0000-0001-5893-0882</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.23858$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.23858$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30350877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belfield, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayston, Roger</creatorcontrib><title>A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><description>Aims We have developed a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter (AUC) impregnated with rifampicin, triclosan, and sparfloxacin and demonstrated that it has long‐term (∼84 days) protection against bacterial colonization in vitro. This study aimed to assess the safety and patient acceptability of this device in long‐term catheter users. Methods Adults who use long term (&gt;28 days) indwelling urinary catheters with capacity to consent were invited to receive the AUC at their next catheter change. The primary outcome measure was adverse events (AE) attributable to antimicrobial impregnation of the catheter. Secondary outcome measures included severity of related AEs, patient acceptability, early removal of the trial catheter, and degree of microbial colonization of trial catheters. Except for the last, outcomes were assessed by telephone interviews. Original and trial catheters were collected, and the lumens and balloons were separated and analyzed for microbiological colonization. Results Thirty participants were recruited. Eighty four AEs were reported, and only one was rated as “probably” related to antimicrobial impregnation. The AE was mild and resolved within 48 h. A total of 82.14% of participants rated the catheter as no different or better than their usual catheter. Two participants chose to remove the AUC early due to it feeling shorter. There were significantly fewer bacterial isolates attached to the balloons of trial catheters compared to the matched original catheters. Conclusions The AUC has an advantageous safety profile and was acceptable to the majority of participants. Information gained from this trial will support a larger randomized controlled study of efficacy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antimicrobial agents</subject><subject>anti‐infective agents</subject><subject>Balloon catheters</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology</subject><subject>catheter‐related urinary tract infections</subject><subject>clinical trial</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Rifampin</subject><subject>safety</subject><subject>Sparfloxacin</subject><subject>Triclosan</subject><subject>Urinary Catheterization - instrumentation</subject><subject>urinary catheters</subject><subject>Urinary Catheters - adverse effects</subject><subject>Urinary Catheters - microbiology</subject><subject>Urinary tract infections</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Tract Infections - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EopfCghdAltjAIu34J7azvKpoQarKhq4jX2cCrpw42A7o7ngEnpEnqeG2LCp1NRrNN0dz5hDymsEJA-Cns11PuDCteUI2rOXQKK31U7IBLUTDpdJH5EXONwBghOyekyMBogWj9YakLS0xYLI7H3zZUzsPdLHF41yodQ6Xcj9ZfIiF5rIOexpHaukcf2CoC8VP3qW48zbQNfnZpj11tnzDgomOMdEQ569_fv2u7UTXjC_Js9GGjK_u6jG5Pv_w5exjc_n54tPZ9rJxwhjTmJ3AlmvWOgetgk5L1hmLgxwHHEBahZK37egUjExKpoCL2g9gjbGKq1Yck3cH3SXF7yvm0k8-OwzBzhjX3HMmGQjDdFfRtw_Qm7imuV5XKcVAdRJkpd4fqOo254RjvyQ_Vbs9g_5vEH0Nov8XRGXf3CmuuwmH_-T95ytwegB--oD7x5X6q-31QfIW23CTCw</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Belfield, Katherine</creator><creator>Betts, Helen</creator><creator>Parkinson, Richard</creator><creator>Bayston, Roger</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8312-3844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-0882</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use</title><author>Belfield, Katherine ; Betts, Helen ; Parkinson, Richard ; Bayston, Roger</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3888-8b3e52715cc0560974198aed4fded04a6e4255fc60f14416023255d0a88a62653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antimicrobial agents</topic><topic>anti‐infective agents</topic><topic>Balloon catheters</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology</topic><topic>catheter‐related urinary tract infections</topic><topic>clinical trial</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Rifampin</topic><topic>safety</topic><topic>Sparfloxacin</topic><topic>Triclosan</topic><topic>Urinary Catheterization - instrumentation</topic><topic>urinary catheters</topic><topic>Urinary Catheters - adverse effects</topic><topic>Urinary Catheters - microbiology</topic><topic>Urinary tract infections</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Tract Infections - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belfield, Katherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkinson, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayston, Roger</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belfield, Katherine</au><au>Betts, Helen</au><au>Parkinson, Richard</au><au>Bayston, Roger</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>338</spage><epage>345</epage><pages>338-345</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Aims We have developed a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter (AUC) impregnated with rifampicin, triclosan, and sparfloxacin and demonstrated that it has long‐term (∼84 days) protection against bacterial colonization in vitro. This study aimed to assess the safety and patient acceptability of this device in long‐term catheter users. Methods Adults who use long term (&gt;28 days) indwelling urinary catheters with capacity to consent were invited to receive the AUC at their next catheter change. The primary outcome measure was adverse events (AE) attributable to antimicrobial impregnation of the catheter. Secondary outcome measures included severity of related AEs, patient acceptability, early removal of the trial catheter, and degree of microbial colonization of trial catheters. Except for the last, outcomes were assessed by telephone interviews. Original and trial catheters were collected, and the lumens and balloons were separated and analyzed for microbiological colonization. Results Thirty participants were recruited. Eighty four AEs were reported, and only one was rated as “probably” related to antimicrobial impregnation. The AE was mild and resolved within 48 h. A total of 82.14% of participants rated the catheter as no different or better than their usual catheter. Two participants chose to remove the AUC early due to it feeling shorter. There were significantly fewer bacterial isolates attached to the balloons of trial catheters compared to the matched original catheters. Conclusions The AUC has an advantageous safety profile and was acceptable to the majority of participants. Information gained from this trial will support a larger randomized controlled study of efficacy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30350877</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.23858</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8312-3844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5893-0882</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-2467
ispartof Neurourology and urodynamics, 2019-01, Vol.38 (1), p.338-345
issn 0733-2467
1520-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2141038179
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents - therapeutic use
Antimicrobial agents
anti‐infective agents
Balloon catheters
Catheters
Catheters, Indwelling - adverse effects
Catheters, Indwelling - microbiology
catheter‐related urinary tract infections
clinical trial
Colonization
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pilot Projects
Rifampin
safety
Sparfloxacin
Triclosan
Urinary Catheterization - instrumentation
urinary catheters
Urinary Catheters - adverse effects
Urinary Catheters - microbiology
Urinary tract infections
Urinary Tract Infections - etiology
Urinary Tract Infections - prevention & control
title A tolerability and patient acceptability pilot study of a novel antimicrobial urinary catheter for long‐term use
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A37%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20tolerability%20and%20patient%20acceptability%20pilot%20study%20of%20a%20novel%20antimicrobial%20urinary%20catheter%20for%20long%E2%80%90term%20use&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Belfield,%20Katherine&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=338&rft.epage=345&rft.pages=338-345&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.23858&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2141038179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161069404&rft_id=info:pmid/30350877&rfr_iscdi=true