Hydrological components of a young loblolly pine plantation on a sandy soil with estimates of water use and loss

Fertilizer and irrigation treatments were applied in a 7- to 10-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation on a sandy soil near Laurinburg, North Carolina. Rainfall, throughfall, stemflow, and soil water content were measured throughout the study period. Monthly interception losses ranged fr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water resources research 1998-12, Vol.34 (12), p.3503-3513
Hauptverfasser: Abrahamson, D.A, Dougherty, P.M, Zarnoch, S.J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3513
container_issue 12
container_start_page 3503
container_title Water resources research
container_volume 34
creator Abrahamson, D.A
Dougherty, P.M
Zarnoch, S.J
description Fertilizer and irrigation treatments were applied in a 7- to 10-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation on a sandy soil near Laurinburg, North Carolina. Rainfall, throughfall, stemflow, and soil water content were measured throughout the study period. Monthly interception losses ranged from 4 to 15% of rainfall. Stemflow ranged from 0.2 to 6.5% of rainfall. Rainfall, leaf area index (LAI), basal area (BA), and the interactions of rainfall with LAI or BA influenced prediction models of throughfall, but not stemflow, on a stand level. We found significant differences due to the effects of treatments in the soil water of the top 0.5- and 1-m soil layers by the beginning of the second growing season and throughout the remainder of the study period. Average daily water use and loss from a 1-m soil layer reflected the low water-holding capacity of the sand. Soil water in a l-m layer was rapidly depleted to within 10% of available water during periods of little or no rainfall. Irrigation did not significantly affect productivity and created a greater potential for loss of water to drainage below 1 m. On the basis of Zahner's [1966] method of soil water depletion in a sandy soil under forest cover, total drainage to below 1 m was 55% of evapotranspiration in unirrigated plots and 150% of evapotranspiration in irrigated plots.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/98WR02363
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21404884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17272896</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-768e89b5564332e0952ef01aa24ef207443f05ce5cfc1a9b7b040301f9c279883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1vEzEQBuAVAolQOPAL8AmJw9Lx19o-0ggaUD-kQJWj5bh2MDjrrb1R2H9fw6LeqkqW7MMzr2Y8TfMWw0cMRJ0quVkDoR191iywYqwVStDnzQKA0RZTJV42r0r5BYAZ78SiGVbTbU4x7YI1Edm0H1Lv-rGg5JFBUzr0OxTTNqYYJzSE3qEhmn40Y0g9qsegYvrbCZUUIjqG8SdyZQx7M7p_Ecf6yOhQHKqqBpXyunnhTSzuzf_7pLn58vnHctVeXJ9_XX66aC0jRLWik06qLecdo5Q4UJw4D9gYwpwnIBijHrh13HqLjdqKLTCggL2yRCgp6Unzfs4dcro71Kb0PhTrYu3epUPRBDNgUrInIZYYOk7gaSiIIFJ1FX6Yoc114Oy8HnL9kjxpDPrvlvTDlqo9ne0xRDc9DvVmvVwLxVStaOeKUEb356HC5N-6E1Rwvbk612dX5GzFvy31ZfXvZu9N0maXQ9E33wlgWvMBC4zpPfwVqt4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17272896</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydrological components of a young loblolly pine plantation on a sandy soil with estimates of water use and loss</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Abrahamson, D.A ; Dougherty, P.M ; Zarnoch, S.J</creator><creatorcontrib>Abrahamson, D.A ; Dougherty, P.M ; Zarnoch, S.J</creatorcontrib><description>Fertilizer and irrigation treatments were applied in a 7- to 10-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation on a sandy soil near Laurinburg, North Carolina. Rainfall, throughfall, stemflow, and soil water content were measured throughout the study period. Monthly interception losses ranged from 4 to 15% of rainfall. Stemflow ranged from 0.2 to 6.5% of rainfall. Rainfall, leaf area index (LAI), basal area (BA), and the interactions of rainfall with LAI or BA influenced prediction models of throughfall, but not stemflow, on a stand level. We found significant differences due to the effects of treatments in the soil water of the top 0.5- and 1-m soil layers by the beginning of the second growing season and throughout the remainder of the study period. Average daily water use and loss from a 1-m soil layer reflected the low water-holding capacity of the sand. Soil water in a l-m layer was rapidly depleted to within 10% of available water during periods of little or no rainfall. Irrigation did not significantly affect productivity and created a greater potential for loss of water to drainage below 1 m. On the basis of Zahner's [1966] method of soil water depletion in a sandy soil under forest cover, total drainage to below 1 m was 55% of evapotranspiration in unirrigated plots and 150% of evapotranspiration in irrigated plots.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/98WR02363</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Evapotranspiration ; fertilized stands ; Fertilizers ; forest plantations ; Forestry ; irrigated conditions ; Irrigation ; losses ; Pinus taeda ; Plants (botany) ; potential evapotranspiration ; Rain ; Sand ; sandy soils ; soil water ; soil water content ; Soils ; stemflow ; throughfall ; water balance ; water use</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 1998-12, Vol.34 (12), p.3503-3513</ispartof><rights>This paper is not subject to U.S. copyright. Published in 1998 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-768e89b5564332e0952ef01aa24ef207443f05ce5cfc1a9b7b040301f9c279883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-768e89b5564332e0952ef01aa24ef207443f05ce5cfc1a9b7b040301f9c279883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F98WR02363$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F98WR02363$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46468,46892</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abrahamson, D.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougherty, P.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarnoch, S.J</creatorcontrib><title>Hydrological components of a young loblolly pine plantation on a sandy soil with estimates of water use and loss</title><title>Water resources research</title><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><description>Fertilizer and irrigation treatments were applied in a 7- to 10-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation on a sandy soil near Laurinburg, North Carolina. Rainfall, throughfall, stemflow, and soil water content were measured throughout the study period. Monthly interception losses ranged from 4 to 15% of rainfall. Stemflow ranged from 0.2 to 6.5% of rainfall. Rainfall, leaf area index (LAI), basal area (BA), and the interactions of rainfall with LAI or BA influenced prediction models of throughfall, but not stemflow, on a stand level. We found significant differences due to the effects of treatments in the soil water of the top 0.5- and 1-m soil layers by the beginning of the second growing season and throughout the remainder of the study period. Average daily water use and loss from a 1-m soil layer reflected the low water-holding capacity of the sand. Soil water in a l-m layer was rapidly depleted to within 10% of available water during periods of little or no rainfall. Irrigation did not significantly affect productivity and created a greater potential for loss of water to drainage below 1 m. On the basis of Zahner's [1966] method of soil water depletion in a sandy soil under forest cover, total drainage to below 1 m was 55% of evapotranspiration in unirrigated plots and 150% of evapotranspiration in irrigated plots.</description><subject>Evapotranspiration</subject><subject>fertilized stands</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>forest plantations</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>irrigated conditions</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>losses</subject><subject>Pinus taeda</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>potential evapotranspiration</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>sandy soils</subject><subject>soil water</subject><subject>soil water content</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>stemflow</subject><subject>throughfall</subject><subject>water balance</subject><subject>water use</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U1vEzEQBuAVAolQOPAL8AmJw9Lx19o-0ggaUD-kQJWj5bh2MDjrrb1R2H9fw6LeqkqW7MMzr2Y8TfMWw0cMRJ0quVkDoR191iywYqwVStDnzQKA0RZTJV42r0r5BYAZ78SiGVbTbU4x7YI1Edm0H1Lv-rGg5JFBUzr0OxTTNqYYJzSE3qEhmn40Y0g9qsegYvrbCZUUIjqG8SdyZQx7M7p_Ecf6yOhQHKqqBpXyunnhTSzuzf_7pLn58vnHctVeXJ9_XX66aC0jRLWik06qLecdo5Q4UJw4D9gYwpwnIBijHrh13HqLjdqKLTCggL2yRCgp6Unzfs4dcro71Kb0PhTrYu3epUPRBDNgUrInIZYYOk7gaSiIIFJ1FX6Yoc114Oy8HnL9kjxpDPrvlvTDlqo9ne0xRDc9DvVmvVwLxVStaOeKUEb356HC5N-6E1Rwvbk612dX5GzFvy31ZfXvZu9N0maXQ9E33wlgWvMBC4zpPfwVqt4</recordid><startdate>199812</startdate><enddate>199812</enddate><creator>Abrahamson, D.A</creator><creator>Dougherty, P.M</creator><creator>Zarnoch, S.J</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199812</creationdate><title>Hydrological components of a young loblolly pine plantation on a sandy soil with estimates of water use and loss</title><author>Abrahamson, D.A ; Dougherty, P.M ; Zarnoch, S.J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4229-768e89b5564332e0952ef01aa24ef207443f05ce5cfc1a9b7b040301f9c279883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Evapotranspiration</topic><topic>fertilized stands</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>forest plantations</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>irrigated conditions</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>losses</topic><topic>Pinus taeda</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>potential evapotranspiration</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>sandy soils</topic><topic>soil water</topic><topic>soil water content</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>stemflow</topic><topic>throughfall</topic><topic>water balance</topic><topic>water use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abrahamson, D.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dougherty, P.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zarnoch, S.J</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abrahamson, D.A</au><au>Dougherty, P.M</au><au>Zarnoch, S.J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydrological components of a young loblolly pine plantation on a sandy soil with estimates of water use and loss</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><addtitle>Water Resour. Res</addtitle><date>1998-12</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>3503</spage><epage>3513</epage><pages>3503-3513</pages><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Fertilizer and irrigation treatments were applied in a 7- to 10-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation on a sandy soil near Laurinburg, North Carolina. Rainfall, throughfall, stemflow, and soil water content were measured throughout the study period. Monthly interception losses ranged from 4 to 15% of rainfall. Stemflow ranged from 0.2 to 6.5% of rainfall. Rainfall, leaf area index (LAI), basal area (BA), and the interactions of rainfall with LAI or BA influenced prediction models of throughfall, but not stemflow, on a stand level. We found significant differences due to the effects of treatments in the soil water of the top 0.5- and 1-m soil layers by the beginning of the second growing season and throughout the remainder of the study period. Average daily water use and loss from a 1-m soil layer reflected the low water-holding capacity of the sand. Soil water in a l-m layer was rapidly depleted to within 10% of available water during periods of little or no rainfall. Irrigation did not significantly affect productivity and created a greater potential for loss of water to drainage below 1 m. On the basis of Zahner's [1966] method of soil water depletion in a sandy soil under forest cover, total drainage to below 1 m was 55% of evapotranspiration in unirrigated plots and 150% of evapotranspiration in irrigated plots.</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/98WR02363</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-1397
ispartof Water resources research, 1998-12, Vol.34 (12), p.3503-3513
issn 0043-1397
1944-7973
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21404884
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Evapotranspiration
fertilized stands
Fertilizers
forest plantations
Forestry
irrigated conditions
Irrigation
losses
Pinus taeda
Plants (botany)
potential evapotranspiration
Rain
Sand
sandy soils
soil water
soil water content
Soils
stemflow
throughfall
water balance
water use
title Hydrological components of a young loblolly pine plantation on a sandy soil with estimates of water use and loss
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T18%3A43%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydrological%20components%20of%20a%20young%20loblolly%20pine%20plantation%20on%20a%20sandy%20soil%20with%20estimates%20of%20water%20use%20and%20loss&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Abrahamson,%20D.A&rft.date=1998-12&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=3503&rft.epage=3513&rft.pages=3503-3513&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/98WR02363&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17272896%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17272896&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true