Parameter Uncertainty and Variability In Evaluative Fate and Exposure Models

The human toxicity potential, a weighting scheme used to evaluate toxicemissions for life cycle assessment and toxics release inventories, is based on potential dose calculations and toxicity factors. This paper evaluatesthe variance in potential dose calculations that can be attributed to the uncer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Risk analysis 1999-12, Vol.19 (6), p.1193-1204
Hauptverfasser: Hertwich, Edgar G., McKone, Thomas E., Pease, William S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1204
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1193
container_title Risk analysis
container_volume 19
creator Hertwich, Edgar G.
McKone, Thomas E.
Pease, William S.
description The human toxicity potential, a weighting scheme used to evaluate toxicemissions for life cycle assessment and toxics release inventories, is based on potential dose calculations and toxicity factors. This paper evaluatesthe variance in potential dose calculations that can be attributed to the uncertainty in chemical‐specific input parameters as well as the variabilit in exposure factors and landscape parameters. A knowledge of the uncertainty allows us to assess the robustness of a decision based on the toxicity potential; a knowledge of the sources of uncertainty allows us to focus our resources if we want to reduce the uncertainty. The potential dose of 236 chemicals was assessed. The chemicals were grouped by dominant exposure route, and a Monte Carlo analysis was conducted for one representative chemical in each group. The variance is typically one to two orders of magnitude. For comparison, the point estimates in potential dose for 236 chemicals span ten orders of magnitude. Most of the variance in the potential dose is due to chemical‐specific input parameters, especially half‐lives, although exposure factors such as fish intake and the source of drinking water can be important for chemicals whose dominant exposure is through indirect routes. Landscape characteristics are generally of minor importance.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb01138.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21397636</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>445738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-c13570bbbfe9f7cd3f10a41cdb19493318e76e0f551068fbc74796d44c4b34683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkF1v0zAUhi0EYqXwF1DEBXfJfOKvmCumqStFHVTA2KXlOCeSS5oUOxntv19KqolbfGNZft736DyEvAOawXgutxkIplOpc56B1jrrSwrAiuzwjMyevp6TGc1VnnLG8gvyKsYtpUCpUC_JBVAlBRdyRtYbG-wOewzJXesw9Na3_TGxbZX8tMHb0jd-fK_aZPFgm8H2_gGTG9vjX2Rx2HdxCJjcdhU28TV5Udsm4pvzPSd3N4sf15_S9dfl6vpqnTpWMJY6YELRsixr1LVyFauBWg6uKkFzzRgUqCTSWgigsqhLp7jSsuLc8ZJxWbA5eT_17kP3e8DYm52PDpvGttgN0eTAtJJMjuCHCXShizFgbfbB72w4GqDm5NJszUmYOQkzJ5fm7NIcxvDb85Sh3GH1T3SSNwIfJ-CPb_D4H9Xm2-r7FcC46pykU4WPPR6eKmz4ZaRiSpj7L0uzEet7vrn9bJbsEUZ2k58</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21397636</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parameter Uncertainty and Variability In Evaluative Fate and Exposure Models</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Hertwich, Edgar G. ; McKone, Thomas E. ; Pease, William S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hertwich, Edgar G. ; McKone, Thomas E. ; Pease, William S.</creatorcontrib><description>The human toxicity potential, a weighting scheme used to evaluate toxicemissions for life cycle assessment and toxics release inventories, is based on potential dose calculations and toxicity factors. This paper evaluatesthe variance in potential dose calculations that can be attributed to the uncertainty in chemical‐specific input parameters as well as the variabilit in exposure factors and landscape parameters. A knowledge of the uncertainty allows us to assess the robustness of a decision based on the toxicity potential; a knowledge of the sources of uncertainty allows us to focus our resources if we want to reduce the uncertainty. The potential dose of 236 chemicals was assessed. The chemicals were grouped by dominant exposure route, and a Monte Carlo analysis was conducted for one representative chemical in each group. The variance is typically one to two orders of magnitude. For comparison, the point estimates in potential dose for 236 chemicals span ten orders of magnitude. Most of the variance in the potential dose is due to chemical‐specific input parameters, especially half‐lives, although exposure factors such as fish intake and the source of drinking water can be important for chemicals whose dominant exposure is through indirect routes. Landscape characteristics are generally of minor importance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb01138.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 10765456</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Computational methods ; Computer simulation ; Decision theory ; Diet - adverse effects ; Environmental Exposure ; Environmental Pollutants - adverse effects ; exposure efficiency ; Health hazards ; Health risks ; Humans ; Life cycle ; life cycle assessment (LCA) ; Mathematical models ; Monte Carlo Method ; Monte Carlo methods ; Multimedia modeling ; Multimedia systems ; Risk Assessment ; Toxicity ; toxicity scoring ; toxics release inventory (TRI) ; uncertainty ; variability ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects ; Water Supply</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 1999-12, Vol.19 (6), p.1193-1204</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-c13570bbbfe9f7cd3f10a41cdb19493318e76e0f551068fbc74796d44c4b34683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-c13570bbbfe9f7cd3f10a41cdb19493318e76e0f551068fbc74796d44c4b34683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1539-6924.1999.tb01138.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1539-6924.1999.tb01138.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10765456$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hertwich, Edgar G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKone, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pease, William S.</creatorcontrib><title>Parameter Uncertainty and Variability In Evaluative Fate and Exposure Models</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><description>The human toxicity potential, a weighting scheme used to evaluate toxicemissions for life cycle assessment and toxics release inventories, is based on potential dose calculations and toxicity factors. This paper evaluatesthe variance in potential dose calculations that can be attributed to the uncertainty in chemical‐specific input parameters as well as the variabilit in exposure factors and landscape parameters. A knowledge of the uncertainty allows us to assess the robustness of a decision based on the toxicity potential; a knowledge of the sources of uncertainty allows us to focus our resources if we want to reduce the uncertainty. The potential dose of 236 chemicals was assessed. The chemicals were grouped by dominant exposure route, and a Monte Carlo analysis was conducted for one representative chemical in each group. The variance is typically one to two orders of magnitude. For comparison, the point estimates in potential dose for 236 chemicals span ten orders of magnitude. Most of the variance in the potential dose is due to chemical‐specific input parameters, especially half‐lives, although exposure factors such as fish intake and the source of drinking water can be important for chemicals whose dominant exposure is through indirect routes. Landscape characteristics are generally of minor importance.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Computational methods</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Decision theory</subject><subject>Diet - adverse effects</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure</subject><subject>Environmental Pollutants - adverse effects</subject><subject>exposure efficiency</subject><subject>Health hazards</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Life cycle</subject><subject>life cycle assessment (LCA)</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Monte Carlo methods</subject><subject>Multimedia modeling</subject><subject>Multimedia systems</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>toxicity scoring</subject><subject>toxics release inventory (TRI)</subject><subject>uncertainty</subject><subject>variability</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkF1v0zAUhi0EYqXwF1DEBXfJfOKvmCumqStFHVTA2KXlOCeSS5oUOxntv19KqolbfGNZft736DyEvAOawXgutxkIplOpc56B1jrrSwrAiuzwjMyevp6TGc1VnnLG8gvyKsYtpUCpUC_JBVAlBRdyRtYbG-wOewzJXesw9Na3_TGxbZX8tMHb0jd-fK_aZPFgm8H2_gGTG9vjX2Rx2HdxCJjcdhU28TV5Udsm4pvzPSd3N4sf15_S9dfl6vpqnTpWMJY6YELRsixr1LVyFauBWg6uKkFzzRgUqCTSWgigsqhLp7jSsuLc8ZJxWbA5eT_17kP3e8DYm52PDpvGttgN0eTAtJJMjuCHCXShizFgbfbB72w4GqDm5NJszUmYOQkzJ5fm7NIcxvDb85Sh3GH1T3SSNwIfJ-CPb_D4H9Xm2-r7FcC46pykU4WPPR6eKmz4ZaRiSpj7L0uzEet7vrn9bJbsEUZ2k58</recordid><startdate>199912</startdate><enddate>199912</enddate><creator>Hertwich, Edgar G.</creator><creator>McKone, Thomas E.</creator><creator>Pease, William S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199912</creationdate><title>Parameter Uncertainty and Variability In Evaluative Fate and Exposure Models</title><author>Hertwich, Edgar G. ; McKone, Thomas E. ; Pease, William S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3833-c13570bbbfe9f7cd3f10a41cdb19493318e76e0f551068fbc74796d44c4b34683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Computational methods</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Decision theory</topic><topic>Diet - adverse effects</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure</topic><topic>Environmental Pollutants - adverse effects</topic><topic>exposure efficiency</topic><topic>Health hazards</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Life cycle</topic><topic>life cycle assessment (LCA)</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Monte Carlo methods</topic><topic>Multimedia modeling</topic><topic>Multimedia systems</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>toxicity scoring</topic><topic>toxics release inventory (TRI)</topic><topic>uncertainty</topic><topic>variability</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hertwich, Edgar G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKone, Thomas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pease, William S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hertwich, Edgar G.</au><au>McKone, Thomas E.</au><au>Pease, William S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parameter Uncertainty and Variability In Evaluative Fate and Exposure Models</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Anal</addtitle><date>1999-12</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1193</spage><epage>1204</epage><pages>1193-1204</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><abstract>The human toxicity potential, a weighting scheme used to evaluate toxicemissions for life cycle assessment and toxics release inventories, is based on potential dose calculations and toxicity factors. This paper evaluatesthe variance in potential dose calculations that can be attributed to the uncertainty in chemical‐specific input parameters as well as the variabilit in exposure factors and landscape parameters. A knowledge of the uncertainty allows us to assess the robustness of a decision based on the toxicity potential; a knowledge of the sources of uncertainty allows us to focus our resources if we want to reduce the uncertainty. The potential dose of 236 chemicals was assessed. The chemicals were grouped by dominant exposure route, and a Monte Carlo analysis was conducted for one representative chemical in each group. The variance is typically one to two orders of magnitude. For comparison, the point estimates in potential dose for 236 chemicals span ten orders of magnitude. Most of the variance in the potential dose is due to chemical‐specific input parameters, especially half‐lives, although exposure factors such as fish intake and the source of drinking water can be important for chemicals whose dominant exposure is through indirect routes. Landscape characteristics are generally of minor importance.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>10765456</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb01138.x</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-4332
ispartof Risk analysis, 1999-12, Vol.19 (6), p.1193-1204
issn 0272-4332
1539-6924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21397636
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Animals
Computational methods
Computer simulation
Decision theory
Diet - adverse effects
Environmental Exposure
Environmental Pollutants - adverse effects
exposure efficiency
Health hazards
Health risks
Humans
Life cycle
life cycle assessment (LCA)
Mathematical models
Monte Carlo Method
Monte Carlo methods
Multimedia modeling
Multimedia systems
Risk Assessment
Toxicity
toxicity scoring
toxics release inventory (TRI)
uncertainty
variability
Water Pollutants, Chemical - adverse effects
Water Supply
title Parameter Uncertainty and Variability In Evaluative Fate and Exposure Models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A47%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parameter%20Uncertainty%20and%20Variability%20In%20Evaluative%20Fate%20and%20Exposure%20Models&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=Hertwich,%20Edgar%20G.&rft.date=1999-12&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1193&rft.epage=1204&rft.pages=1193-1204&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb01138.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E445738%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21397636&rft_id=info:pmid/10765456&rfr_iscdi=true