Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration

With over 500,000 bone grafting procedures performed annually in the United States, the advancement of bone regeneration technology is at the forefront of medical research. Many tissue‐engineered approaches have been explored to develop a viable synthetic bone graft substitute, but a major challenge...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A 2019-04, Vol.107 (4), p.732-741
Hauptverfasser: Patel, Pushpendra P., Buckley, Christian, Taylor, Brittany L., Sahyoun, Christine C., Patel, Samarth D., Mont, Ashley J., Mai, Linh, Patel, Swati, Freeman, Joseph W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 741
container_issue 4
container_start_page 732
container_title Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A
container_volume 107
creator Patel, Pushpendra P.
Buckley, Christian
Taylor, Brittany L.
Sahyoun, Christine C.
Patel, Samarth D.
Mont, Ashley J.
Mai, Linh
Patel, Swati
Freeman, Joseph W.
description With over 500,000 bone grafting procedures performed annually in the United States, the advancement of bone regeneration technology is at the forefront of medical research. Many tissue‐engineered approaches have been explored to develop a viable synthetic bone graft substitute, but a major challenge is achieving a load‐bearing graft that appropriately mimics the mechanical properties of native bone. In this study, sintered hydroxyapatite (HAp) was used to structurally reinforce a scaffold and yield mechanical properties comparable to native bone. HAp was packed into a cylindrical framework and processed under varying conditions to maximize its mechanical properties. The resulting HAp columns were further tested in a 6‐week degradation study to determine their physical and mechanical response. The cellular response of sintered HAp was determined using a murine preosteoblast cell line, MC3T3‐E1. Cell viability and morphology were studied over a one‐week period and MC3T3‐E1 differentiation was determined by measuring the alkaline phosphatase levels. Finite element analysis was used to determine the columns' geometric configuration and arrangement within our previously developed composite bone scaffold. It was determined that incorporating four cylindrical HAp columns, fabricated under 44 MPa of pressure and sintered at 1200°C for 5 hr, led to load‐bearing properties that match the yield strength of native whole bone. These preliminary results indicate that the incorporation of a mechanically enhanced HAp structural support system is a promising step toward developing one of the first load‐bearing bone scaffolds that can also support cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 732–741, 2019.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jbm.a.36588
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2139584935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2180977488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3608-c023212875da393b49da40604459421dbc3e79c54365af6bd9e731e17405980d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtOGzEUBmCrAjUUWLFHltggVZP6OmMvIaJcFNQNrC2PfQYmmoyDnQGy4xH6jH2SOgmw6KIr-1iff9k_QkeUjCkh7Mesno_tmJdSqS9oj0rJCqFLubPeC11wpssR-pbSLOOSSPYVjTgRSpZc7iF_C-7R9q2zHba9x3UbuvCwGeHZdoNdtqHHocEWP658DK8ru8hnS_jz9jtC2zchOvA4Ods0ofM4z7gOPeAID9BD3Nw_QLuN7RIcvq_76P7nxd3kqpj-uryenE0Lx0uiCkcYZ5SpSnrLNa-F9laQkgghtWDU145DpZ0U-a-2KWuvoeIUaCWI1Ip4vo9Ot7mLGJ4GSEszb5ODrrM9hCEZRrmWSmguMz35h87CEPv8uqwU0VUllMrq-1a5GFKK0JhFbOc2rgwlZl2-yeUbazblZ338njnUc_Cf9qPtDNgWvLQdrP6XZW7Ob8-2qX8Bmz6QKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2180977488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Patel, Pushpendra P. ; Buckley, Christian ; Taylor, Brittany L. ; Sahyoun, Christine C. ; Patel, Samarth D. ; Mont, Ashley J. ; Mai, Linh ; Patel, Swati ; Freeman, Joseph W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pushpendra P. ; Buckley, Christian ; Taylor, Brittany L. ; Sahyoun, Christine C. ; Patel, Samarth D. ; Mont, Ashley J. ; Mai, Linh ; Patel, Swati ; Freeman, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><description>With over 500,000 bone grafting procedures performed annually in the United States, the advancement of bone regeneration technology is at the forefront of medical research. Many tissue‐engineered approaches have been explored to develop a viable synthetic bone graft substitute, but a major challenge is achieving a load‐bearing graft that appropriately mimics the mechanical properties of native bone. In this study, sintered hydroxyapatite (HAp) was used to structurally reinforce a scaffold and yield mechanical properties comparable to native bone. HAp was packed into a cylindrical framework and processed under varying conditions to maximize its mechanical properties. The resulting HAp columns were further tested in a 6‐week degradation study to determine their physical and mechanical response. The cellular response of sintered HAp was determined using a murine preosteoblast cell line, MC3T3‐E1. Cell viability and morphology were studied over a one‐week period and MC3T3‐E1 differentiation was determined by measuring the alkaline phosphatase levels. Finite element analysis was used to determine the columns' geometric configuration and arrangement within our previously developed composite bone scaffold. It was determined that incorporating four cylindrical HAp columns, fabricated under 44 MPa of pressure and sintered at 1200°C for 5 hr, led to load‐bearing properties that match the yield strength of native whole bone. These preliminary results indicate that the incorporation of a mechanically enhanced HAp structural support system is a promising step toward developing one of the first load‐bearing bone scaffolds that can also support cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 732–741, 2019.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-3296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36588</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30485635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Alkaline phosphatase ; Bearing ; Biocompatibility ; Biomedical materials ; Bone grafts ; Bone growth ; bone regeneration ; bone scaffold ; Cell proliferation ; Columns (structural) ; Cytology ; Differentiation (biology) ; Finite element method ; Grafting ; Hydroxyapatite ; load‐bearing ; Mathematical morphology ; Mechanical analysis ; Mechanical properties ; Medical research ; Regeneration ; Regeneration (physiology) ; Scaffolds ; Sintering ; Substitute bone ; Support systems ; Surgical implants ; Tissue engineering</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2019-04, Vol.107 (4), p.732-741</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3608-c023212875da393b49da40604459421dbc3e79c54365af6bd9e731e17405980d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3608-c023212875da393b49da40604459421dbc3e79c54365af6bd9e731e17405980d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbm.a.36588$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbm.a.36588$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30485635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pushpendra P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Brittany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahyoun, Christine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Samarth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mont, Ashley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mai, Linh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Swati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A</title><addtitle>J Biomed Mater Res A</addtitle><description>With over 500,000 bone grafting procedures performed annually in the United States, the advancement of bone regeneration technology is at the forefront of medical research. Many tissue‐engineered approaches have been explored to develop a viable synthetic bone graft substitute, but a major challenge is achieving a load‐bearing graft that appropriately mimics the mechanical properties of native bone. In this study, sintered hydroxyapatite (HAp) was used to structurally reinforce a scaffold and yield mechanical properties comparable to native bone. HAp was packed into a cylindrical framework and processed under varying conditions to maximize its mechanical properties. The resulting HAp columns were further tested in a 6‐week degradation study to determine their physical and mechanical response. The cellular response of sintered HAp was determined using a murine preosteoblast cell line, MC3T3‐E1. Cell viability and morphology were studied over a one‐week period and MC3T3‐E1 differentiation was determined by measuring the alkaline phosphatase levels. Finite element analysis was used to determine the columns' geometric configuration and arrangement within our previously developed composite bone scaffold. It was determined that incorporating four cylindrical HAp columns, fabricated under 44 MPa of pressure and sintered at 1200°C for 5 hr, led to load‐bearing properties that match the yield strength of native whole bone. These preliminary results indicate that the incorporation of a mechanically enhanced HAp structural support system is a promising step toward developing one of the first load‐bearing bone scaffolds that can also support cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 732–741, 2019.</description><subject>Alkaline phosphatase</subject><subject>Bearing</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone grafts</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>bone regeneration</subject><subject>bone scaffold</subject><subject>Cell proliferation</subject><subject>Columns (structural)</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Differentiation (biology)</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>load‐bearing</subject><subject>Mathematical morphology</subject><subject>Mechanical analysis</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Regeneration (physiology)</subject><subject>Scaffolds</subject><subject>Sintering</subject><subject>Substitute bone</subject><subject>Support systems</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><issn>1549-3296</issn><issn>1552-4965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtOGzEUBmCrAjUUWLFHltggVZP6OmMvIaJcFNQNrC2PfQYmmoyDnQGy4xH6jH2SOgmw6KIr-1iff9k_QkeUjCkh7Mesno_tmJdSqS9oj0rJCqFLubPeC11wpssR-pbSLOOSSPYVjTgRSpZc7iF_C-7R9q2zHba9x3UbuvCwGeHZdoNdtqHHocEWP658DK8ru8hnS_jz9jtC2zchOvA4Ods0ofM4z7gOPeAID9BD3Nw_QLuN7RIcvq_76P7nxd3kqpj-uryenE0Lx0uiCkcYZ5SpSnrLNa-F9laQkgghtWDU145DpZ0U-a-2KWuvoeIUaCWI1Ip4vo9Ot7mLGJ4GSEszb5ODrrM9hCEZRrmWSmguMz35h87CEPv8uqwU0VUllMrq-1a5GFKK0JhFbOc2rgwlZl2-yeUbazblZ338njnUc_Cf9qPtDNgWvLQdrP6XZW7Ob8-2qX8Bmz6QKA</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Patel, Pushpendra P.</creator><creator>Buckley, Christian</creator><creator>Taylor, Brittany L.</creator><creator>Sahyoun, Christine C.</creator><creator>Patel, Samarth D.</creator><creator>Mont, Ashley J.</creator><creator>Mai, Linh</creator><creator>Patel, Swati</creator><creator>Freeman, Joseph W.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration</title><author>Patel, Pushpendra P. ; Buckley, Christian ; Taylor, Brittany L. ; Sahyoun, Christine C. ; Patel, Samarth D. ; Mont, Ashley J. ; Mai, Linh ; Patel, Swati ; Freeman, Joseph W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3608-c023212875da393b49da40604459421dbc3e79c54365af6bd9e731e17405980d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alkaline phosphatase</topic><topic>Bearing</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone grafts</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>bone regeneration</topic><topic>bone scaffold</topic><topic>Cell proliferation</topic><topic>Columns (structural)</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Differentiation (biology)</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>load‐bearing</topic><topic>Mathematical morphology</topic><topic>Mechanical analysis</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Regeneration (physiology)</topic><topic>Scaffolds</topic><topic>Sintering</topic><topic>Substitute bone</topic><topic>Support systems</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pushpendra P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Brittany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahyoun, Christine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Samarth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mont, Ashley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mai, Linh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Swati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patel, Pushpendra P.</au><au>Buckley, Christian</au><au>Taylor, Brittany L.</au><au>Sahyoun, Christine C.</au><au>Patel, Samarth D.</au><au>Mont, Ashley J.</au><au>Mai, Linh</au><au>Patel, Swati</au><au>Freeman, Joseph W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomed Mater Res A</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>732</spage><epage>741</epage><pages>732-741</pages><issn>1549-3296</issn><eissn>1552-4965</eissn><abstract>With over 500,000 bone grafting procedures performed annually in the United States, the advancement of bone regeneration technology is at the forefront of medical research. Many tissue‐engineered approaches have been explored to develop a viable synthetic bone graft substitute, but a major challenge is achieving a load‐bearing graft that appropriately mimics the mechanical properties of native bone. In this study, sintered hydroxyapatite (HAp) was used to structurally reinforce a scaffold and yield mechanical properties comparable to native bone. HAp was packed into a cylindrical framework and processed under varying conditions to maximize its mechanical properties. The resulting HAp columns were further tested in a 6‐week degradation study to determine their physical and mechanical response. The cellular response of sintered HAp was determined using a murine preosteoblast cell line, MC3T3‐E1. Cell viability and morphology were studied over a one‐week period and MC3T3‐E1 differentiation was determined by measuring the alkaline phosphatase levels. Finite element analysis was used to determine the columns' geometric configuration and arrangement within our previously developed composite bone scaffold. It was determined that incorporating four cylindrical HAp columns, fabricated under 44 MPa of pressure and sintered at 1200°C for 5 hr, led to load‐bearing properties that match the yield strength of native whole bone. These preliminary results indicate that the incorporation of a mechanically enhanced HAp structural support system is a promising step toward developing one of the first load‐bearing bone scaffolds that can also support cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 732–741, 2019.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30485635</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.a.36588</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1549-3296
ispartof Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2019-04, Vol.107 (4), p.732-741
issn 1549-3296
1552-4965
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2139584935
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Alkaline phosphatase
Bearing
Biocompatibility
Biomedical materials
Bone grafts
Bone growth
bone regeneration
bone scaffold
Cell proliferation
Columns (structural)
Cytology
Differentiation (biology)
Finite element method
Grafting
Hydroxyapatite
load‐bearing
Mathematical morphology
Mechanical analysis
Mechanical properties
Medical research
Regeneration
Regeneration (physiology)
Scaffolds
Sintering
Substitute bone
Support systems
Surgical implants
Tissue engineering
title Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A26%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanical%20and%20biological%20evaluation%20of%20a%20hydroxyapatite%E2%80%90reinforced%20scaffold%20for%20bone%20regeneration&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research.%20Part%20A&rft.au=Patel,%20Pushpendra%20P.&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=732&rft.epage=741&rft.pages=732-741&rft.issn=1549-3296&rft.eissn=1552-4965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.a.36588&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2180977488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2180977488&rft_id=info:pmid/30485635&rfr_iscdi=true