Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration
With over 500,000 bone grafting procedures performed annually in the United States, the advancement of bone regeneration technology is at the forefront of medical research. Many tissue‐engineered approaches have been explored to develop a viable synthetic bone graft substitute, but a major challenge...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A 2019-04, Vol.107 (4), p.732-741 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 741 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 732 |
container_title | Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Patel, Pushpendra P. Buckley, Christian Taylor, Brittany L. Sahyoun, Christine C. Patel, Samarth D. Mont, Ashley J. Mai, Linh Patel, Swati Freeman, Joseph W. |
description | With over 500,000 bone grafting procedures performed annually in the United States, the advancement of bone regeneration technology is at the forefront of medical research. Many tissue‐engineered approaches have been explored to develop a viable synthetic bone graft substitute, but a major challenge is achieving a load‐bearing graft that appropriately mimics the mechanical properties of native bone. In this study, sintered hydroxyapatite (HAp) was used to structurally reinforce a scaffold and yield mechanical properties comparable to native bone. HAp was packed into a cylindrical framework and processed under varying conditions to maximize its mechanical properties. The resulting HAp columns were further tested in a 6‐week degradation study to determine their physical and mechanical response. The cellular response of sintered HAp was determined using a murine preosteoblast cell line, MC3T3‐E1. Cell viability and morphology were studied over a one‐week period and MC3T3‐E1 differentiation was determined by measuring the alkaline phosphatase levels. Finite element analysis was used to determine the columns' geometric configuration and arrangement within our previously developed composite bone scaffold. It was determined that incorporating four cylindrical HAp columns, fabricated under 44 MPa of pressure and sintered at 1200°C for 5 hr, led to load‐bearing properties that match the yield strength of native whole bone. These preliminary results indicate that the incorporation of a mechanically enhanced HAp structural support system is a promising step toward developing one of the first load‐bearing bone scaffolds that can also support cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 732–741, 2019. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jbm.a.36588 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2139584935</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2180977488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3608-c023212875da393b49da40604459421dbc3e79c54365af6bd9e731e17405980d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MtOGzEUBmCrAjUUWLFHltggVZP6OmMvIaJcFNQNrC2PfQYmmoyDnQGy4xH6jH2SOgmw6KIr-1iff9k_QkeUjCkh7Mesno_tmJdSqS9oj0rJCqFLubPeC11wpssR-pbSLOOSSPYVjTgRSpZc7iF_C-7R9q2zHba9x3UbuvCwGeHZdoNdtqHHocEWP658DK8ru8hnS_jz9jtC2zchOvA4Ods0ofM4z7gOPeAID9BD3Nw_QLuN7RIcvq_76P7nxd3kqpj-uryenE0Lx0uiCkcYZ5SpSnrLNa-F9laQkgghtWDU145DpZ0U-a-2KWuvoeIUaCWI1Ip4vo9Ot7mLGJ4GSEszb5ODrrM9hCEZRrmWSmguMz35h87CEPv8uqwU0VUllMrq-1a5GFKK0JhFbOc2rgwlZl2-yeUbazblZ338njnUc_Cf9qPtDNgWvLQdrP6XZW7Ob8-2qX8Bmz6QKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2180977488</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Patel, Pushpendra P. ; Buckley, Christian ; Taylor, Brittany L. ; Sahyoun, Christine C. ; Patel, Samarth D. ; Mont, Ashley J. ; Mai, Linh ; Patel, Swati ; Freeman, Joseph W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pushpendra P. ; Buckley, Christian ; Taylor, Brittany L. ; Sahyoun, Christine C. ; Patel, Samarth D. ; Mont, Ashley J. ; Mai, Linh ; Patel, Swati ; Freeman, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><description>With over 500,000 bone grafting procedures performed annually in the United States, the advancement of bone regeneration technology is at the forefront of medical research. Many tissue‐engineered approaches have been explored to develop a viable synthetic bone graft substitute, but a major challenge is achieving a load‐bearing graft that appropriately mimics the mechanical properties of native bone. In this study, sintered hydroxyapatite (HAp) was used to structurally reinforce a scaffold and yield mechanical properties comparable to native bone. HAp was packed into a cylindrical framework and processed under varying conditions to maximize its mechanical properties. The resulting HAp columns were further tested in a 6‐week degradation study to determine their physical and mechanical response. The cellular response of sintered HAp was determined using a murine preosteoblast cell line, MC3T3‐E1. Cell viability and morphology were studied over a one‐week period and MC3T3‐E1 differentiation was determined by measuring the alkaline phosphatase levels. Finite element analysis was used to determine the columns' geometric configuration and arrangement within our previously developed composite bone scaffold. It was determined that incorporating four cylindrical HAp columns, fabricated under 44 MPa of pressure and sintered at 1200°C for 5 hr, led to load‐bearing properties that match the yield strength of native whole bone. These preliminary results indicate that the incorporation of a mechanically enhanced HAp structural support system is a promising step toward developing one of the first load‐bearing bone scaffolds that can also support cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 732–741, 2019.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1549-3296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4965</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.36588</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30485635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Alkaline phosphatase ; Bearing ; Biocompatibility ; Biomedical materials ; Bone grafts ; Bone growth ; bone regeneration ; bone scaffold ; Cell proliferation ; Columns (structural) ; Cytology ; Differentiation (biology) ; Finite element method ; Grafting ; Hydroxyapatite ; load‐bearing ; Mathematical morphology ; Mechanical analysis ; Mechanical properties ; Medical research ; Regeneration ; Regeneration (physiology) ; Scaffolds ; Sintering ; Substitute bone ; Support systems ; Surgical implants ; Tissue engineering</subject><ispartof>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2019-04, Vol.107 (4), p.732-741</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3608-c023212875da393b49da40604459421dbc3e79c54365af6bd9e731e17405980d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3608-c023212875da393b49da40604459421dbc3e79c54365af6bd9e731e17405980d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjbm.a.36588$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjbm.a.36588$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30485635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pushpendra P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Brittany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahyoun, Christine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Samarth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mont, Ashley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mai, Linh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Swati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration</title><title>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A</title><addtitle>J Biomed Mater Res A</addtitle><description>With over 500,000 bone grafting procedures performed annually in the United States, the advancement of bone regeneration technology is at the forefront of medical research. Many tissue‐engineered approaches have been explored to develop a viable synthetic bone graft substitute, but a major challenge is achieving a load‐bearing graft that appropriately mimics the mechanical properties of native bone. In this study, sintered hydroxyapatite (HAp) was used to structurally reinforce a scaffold and yield mechanical properties comparable to native bone. HAp was packed into a cylindrical framework and processed under varying conditions to maximize its mechanical properties. The resulting HAp columns were further tested in a 6‐week degradation study to determine their physical and mechanical response. The cellular response of sintered HAp was determined using a murine preosteoblast cell line, MC3T3‐E1. Cell viability and morphology were studied over a one‐week period and MC3T3‐E1 differentiation was determined by measuring the alkaline phosphatase levels. Finite element analysis was used to determine the columns' geometric configuration and arrangement within our previously developed composite bone scaffold. It was determined that incorporating four cylindrical HAp columns, fabricated under 44 MPa of pressure and sintered at 1200°C for 5 hr, led to load‐bearing properties that match the yield strength of native whole bone. These preliminary results indicate that the incorporation of a mechanically enhanced HAp structural support system is a promising step toward developing one of the first load‐bearing bone scaffolds that can also support cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 732–741, 2019.</description><subject>Alkaline phosphatase</subject><subject>Bearing</subject><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Bone grafts</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>bone regeneration</subject><subject>bone scaffold</subject><subject>Cell proliferation</subject><subject>Columns (structural)</subject><subject>Cytology</subject><subject>Differentiation (biology)</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Grafting</subject><subject>Hydroxyapatite</subject><subject>load‐bearing</subject><subject>Mathematical morphology</subject><subject>Mechanical analysis</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Regeneration</subject><subject>Regeneration (physiology)</subject><subject>Scaffolds</subject><subject>Sintering</subject><subject>Substitute bone</subject><subject>Support systems</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Tissue engineering</subject><issn>1549-3296</issn><issn>1552-4965</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90MtOGzEUBmCrAjUUWLFHltggVZP6OmMvIaJcFNQNrC2PfQYmmoyDnQGy4xH6jH2SOgmw6KIr-1iff9k_QkeUjCkh7Mesno_tmJdSqS9oj0rJCqFLubPeC11wpssR-pbSLOOSSPYVjTgRSpZc7iF_C-7R9q2zHba9x3UbuvCwGeHZdoNdtqHHocEWP658DK8ru8hnS_jz9jtC2zchOvA4Ods0ofM4z7gOPeAID9BD3Nw_QLuN7RIcvq_76P7nxd3kqpj-uryenE0Lx0uiCkcYZ5SpSnrLNa-F9laQkgghtWDU145DpZ0U-a-2KWuvoeIUaCWI1Ip4vo9Ot7mLGJ4GSEszb5ODrrM9hCEZRrmWSmguMz35h87CEPv8uqwU0VUllMrq-1a5GFKK0JhFbOc2rgwlZl2-yeUbazblZ338njnUc_Cf9qPtDNgWvLQdrP6XZW7Ob8-2qX8Bmz6QKA</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Patel, Pushpendra P.</creator><creator>Buckley, Christian</creator><creator>Taylor, Brittany L.</creator><creator>Sahyoun, Christine C.</creator><creator>Patel, Samarth D.</creator><creator>Mont, Ashley J.</creator><creator>Mai, Linh</creator><creator>Patel, Swati</creator><creator>Freeman, Joseph W.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration</title><author>Patel, Pushpendra P. ; Buckley, Christian ; Taylor, Brittany L. ; Sahyoun, Christine C. ; Patel, Samarth D. ; Mont, Ashley J. ; Mai, Linh ; Patel, Swati ; Freeman, Joseph W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3608-c023212875da393b49da40604459421dbc3e79c54365af6bd9e731e17405980d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alkaline phosphatase</topic><topic>Bearing</topic><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Bone grafts</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>bone regeneration</topic><topic>bone scaffold</topic><topic>Cell proliferation</topic><topic>Columns (structural)</topic><topic>Cytology</topic><topic>Differentiation (biology)</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Grafting</topic><topic>Hydroxyapatite</topic><topic>load‐bearing</topic><topic>Mathematical morphology</topic><topic>Mechanical analysis</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Regeneration</topic><topic>Regeneration (physiology)</topic><topic>Scaffolds</topic><topic>Sintering</topic><topic>Substitute bone</topic><topic>Support systems</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Tissue engineering</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patel, Pushpendra P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buckley, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Brittany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahyoun, Christine C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Samarth D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mont, Ashley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mai, Linh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Swati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Joseph W.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patel, Pushpendra P.</au><au>Buckley, Christian</au><au>Taylor, Brittany L.</au><au>Sahyoun, Christine C.</au><au>Patel, Samarth D.</au><au>Mont, Ashley J.</au><au>Mai, Linh</au><au>Patel, Swati</au><au>Freeman, Joseph W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomed Mater Res A</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>732</spage><epage>741</epage><pages>732-741</pages><issn>1549-3296</issn><eissn>1552-4965</eissn><abstract>With over 500,000 bone grafting procedures performed annually in the United States, the advancement of bone regeneration technology is at the forefront of medical research. Many tissue‐engineered approaches have been explored to develop a viable synthetic bone graft substitute, but a major challenge is achieving a load‐bearing graft that appropriately mimics the mechanical properties of native bone. In this study, sintered hydroxyapatite (HAp) was used to structurally reinforce a scaffold and yield mechanical properties comparable to native bone. HAp was packed into a cylindrical framework and processed under varying conditions to maximize its mechanical properties. The resulting HAp columns were further tested in a 6‐week degradation study to determine their physical and mechanical response. The cellular response of sintered HAp was determined using a murine preosteoblast cell line, MC3T3‐E1. Cell viability and morphology were studied over a one‐week period and MC3T3‐E1 differentiation was determined by measuring the alkaline phosphatase levels. Finite element analysis was used to determine the columns' geometric configuration and arrangement within our previously developed composite bone scaffold. It was determined that incorporating four cylindrical HAp columns, fabricated under 44 MPa of pressure and sintered at 1200°C for 5 hr, led to load‐bearing properties that match the yield strength of native whole bone. These preliminary results indicate that the incorporation of a mechanically enhanced HAp structural support system is a promising step toward developing one of the first load‐bearing bone scaffolds that can also support cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 107A: 732–741, 2019.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30485635</pmid><doi>10.1002/jbm.a.36588</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1549-3296 |
ispartof | Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 2019-04, Vol.107 (4), p.732-741 |
issn | 1549-3296 1552-4965 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2139584935 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Alkaline phosphatase Bearing Biocompatibility Biomedical materials Bone grafts Bone growth bone regeneration bone scaffold Cell proliferation Columns (structural) Cytology Differentiation (biology) Finite element method Grafting Hydroxyapatite load‐bearing Mathematical morphology Mechanical analysis Mechanical properties Medical research Regeneration Regeneration (physiology) Scaffolds Sintering Substitute bone Support systems Surgical implants Tissue engineering |
title | Mechanical and biological evaluation of a hydroxyapatite‐reinforced scaffold for bone regeneration |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T13%3A26%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanical%20and%20biological%20evaluation%20of%20a%20hydroxyapatite%E2%80%90reinforced%20scaffold%20for%20bone%20regeneration&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biomedical%20materials%20research.%20Part%20A&rft.au=Patel,%20Pushpendra%20P.&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=732&rft.epage=741&rft.pages=732-741&rft.issn=1549-3296&rft.eissn=1552-4965&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jbm.a.36588&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2180977488%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2180977488&rft_id=info:pmid/30485635&rfr_iscdi=true |