Comparison of Blood Flow Rates and Hydraulic Resistance Between the Mahurkar Catheter, the Tesio Twin Catheter, and the Ash Split Cath
The Ash Split Cath (Medcomp, Harleysville, PA) is a recently introduced dual lumen permanent catheter designed to be placed through the internal jugular vein into the superior vena cava by single venipuncture technique. The transcutaneous portion is a 14 French cylindrically shaped catheter with Dsh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ASAIO journal (1992) 1998-09, Vol.44 (5), p.M532-M534 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | M534 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | M532 |
container_title | ASAIO journal (1992) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Mankus, Rita A Ash, Stephen R Sutton, James M |
description | The Ash Split Cath (Medcomp, Harleysville, PA) is a recently introduced dual lumen permanent catheter designed to be placed through the internal jugular vein into the superior vena cava by single venipuncture technique. The transcutaneous portion is a 14 French cylindrically shaped catheter with Dshaped lumens and a Dacron (DuPont, Wilmington, DE) cuff. At the entrance to the jugular vein, the catheter splits into two separate D-shaped limbs that then merge into multiholed cylindrical tips in the vena cava. Split Caths (n = 10) have been placed in patients with end-stage renal disease and used for outpatient dialysis for approximately 2 months. Flow rates and hydraulic resistance have been compared with Mahurkar (Bard, Salt Lake City, UT) (n = 22) and Tesio (Medcomp) (n = 17) catheters in the same unit. Average blood flow rates (Qb) were 295 ± 42 (SD) for Ash Split Caths vs 279 ± 38 and 300 ± 39 ml/min for Mahurkar and Tesio catheters, respectively, and hydraulic resistances were 0.44 ± 0.17,0.52 ± 0.15, and 0.56 ± 0.11 mmHg/ml/min, respectively (not significant). No Split Caths have been removed for bleeding or flow complications. The Split Cath provides catheter with flow advantages of independent, cylindrical, multiholed tips. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/00002480-199809000-00043 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21393477</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>359809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3553-602d8e55133d9184fc3ea8046e1d2c38348b7e48d295fb8d74670fd87f159efc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kV1PwyAUhonR6Pz4CSZceWUVCl3h0i3OmWhMdCbeEVZO0yorE9o0-wP-btmHxhtJCOfwvOcQzosQpuSKEplfk7hSLkhCpRRExiyJm7M9NKAZE4nk7G0_xiQTSSrp8Agdh_BOSISMHqLDWMS5EAP0NXaLpfZ1cA12JR5Z5wyeWNfjZ91CwLoxeLoyXne2LvAzhDq0uikAj6DtARrcVoAfddX5D-3xWMe0BX-5uZ5FtcOzvm7-gHXDNbwJFX5Z2rrdsFN0UGob4Gx3nqDXye1sPE0enu7uxzcPScGyjCVDkhoBWUYZM5IKXhYMdPzKEKhJCyYYF_McuDCpzMq5MDkf5qQ0Ii9pJiGqT9DFtu_Su88OQqsWdSjAWt2A64JKKZOM53kUiq2w8C4ED6Va-nqh_UpRotYWqB8L1K8FamNBLD3fvdHNF2B-C3czj5xvee9sHEn4sF0PXlWgbVup_5xl39TFkPs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21393477</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Blood Flow Rates and Hydraulic Resistance Between the Mahurkar Catheter, the Tesio Twin Catheter, and the Ash Split Cath</title><source>Ovid Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Journal Legacy Archive</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Mankus, Rita A ; Ash, Stephen R ; Sutton, James M</creator><creatorcontrib>Mankus, Rita A ; Ash, Stephen R ; Sutton, James M</creatorcontrib><description>The Ash Split Cath (Medcomp, Harleysville, PA) is a recently introduced dual lumen permanent catheter designed to be placed through the internal jugular vein into the superior vena cava by single venipuncture technique. The transcutaneous portion is a 14 French cylindrically shaped catheter with Dshaped lumens and a Dacron (DuPont, Wilmington, DE) cuff. At the entrance to the jugular vein, the catheter splits into two separate D-shaped limbs that then merge into multiholed cylindrical tips in the vena cava. Split Caths (n = 10) have been placed in patients with end-stage renal disease and used for outpatient dialysis for approximately 2 months. Flow rates and hydraulic resistance have been compared with Mahurkar (Bard, Salt Lake City, UT) (n = 22) and Tesio (Medcomp) (n = 17) catheters in the same unit. Average blood flow rates (Qb) were 295 ± 42 (SD) for Ash Split Caths vs 279 ± 38 and 300 ± 39 ml/min for Mahurkar and Tesio catheters, respectively, and hydraulic resistances were 0.44 ± 0.17,0.52 ± 0.15, and 0.56 ± 0.11 mmHg/ml/min, respectively (not significant). No Split Caths have been removed for bleeding or flow complications. The Split Cath provides catheter with flow advantages of independent, cylindrical, multiholed tips.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/00002480-199809000-00043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 9804488</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Copyright by the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs</publisher><subject>Biophysical Phenomena ; Biophysics ; Blood Flow Velocity ; Blood vessels ; Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation ; Catheters, Indwelling ; Dialysis ; Hemodynamics ; Humans ; Hydraulics ; Patient treatment ; Renal Dialysis - instrumentation ; Urology</subject><ispartof>ASAIO journal (1992), 1998-09, Vol.44 (5), p.M532-M534</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1998 by the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3553-602d8e55133d9184fc3ea8046e1d2c38348b7e48d295fb8d74670fd87f159efc3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf><![CDATA[$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&PDF=y&D=ovft&AN=00002480-199809000-00043$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H]]></linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=fulltext&D=ovft&AN=00002480-199809000-00043$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4609,27924,27925,64666,65461</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9804488$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mankus, Rita A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ash, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, James M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Blood Flow Rates and Hydraulic Resistance Between the Mahurkar Catheter, the Tesio Twin Catheter, and the Ash Split Cath</title><title>ASAIO journal (1992)</title><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><description>The Ash Split Cath (Medcomp, Harleysville, PA) is a recently introduced dual lumen permanent catheter designed to be placed through the internal jugular vein into the superior vena cava by single venipuncture technique. The transcutaneous portion is a 14 French cylindrically shaped catheter with Dshaped lumens and a Dacron (DuPont, Wilmington, DE) cuff. At the entrance to the jugular vein, the catheter splits into two separate D-shaped limbs that then merge into multiholed cylindrical tips in the vena cava. Split Caths (n = 10) have been placed in patients with end-stage renal disease and used for outpatient dialysis for approximately 2 months. Flow rates and hydraulic resistance have been compared with Mahurkar (Bard, Salt Lake City, UT) (n = 22) and Tesio (Medcomp) (n = 17) catheters in the same unit. Average blood flow rates (Qb) were 295 ± 42 (SD) for Ash Split Caths vs 279 ± 38 and 300 ± 39 ml/min for Mahurkar and Tesio catheters, respectively, and hydraulic resistances were 0.44 ± 0.17,0.52 ± 0.15, and 0.56 ± 0.11 mmHg/ml/min, respectively (not significant). No Split Caths have been removed for bleeding or flow complications. The Split Cath provides catheter with flow advantages of independent, cylindrical, multiholed tips.</description><subject>Biophysical Phenomena</subject><subject>Biophysics</subject><subject>Blood Flow Velocity</subject><subject>Blood vessels</subject><subject>Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling</subject><subject>Dialysis</subject><subject>Hemodynamics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hydraulics</subject><subject>Patient treatment</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - instrumentation</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1058-2916</issn><issn>1538-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kV1PwyAUhonR6Pz4CSZceWUVCl3h0i3OmWhMdCbeEVZO0yorE9o0-wP-btmHxhtJCOfwvOcQzosQpuSKEplfk7hSLkhCpRRExiyJm7M9NKAZE4nk7G0_xiQTSSrp8Agdh_BOSISMHqLDWMS5EAP0NXaLpfZ1cA12JR5Z5wyeWNfjZ91CwLoxeLoyXne2LvAzhDq0uikAj6DtARrcVoAfddX5D-3xWMe0BX-5uZ5FtcOzvm7-gHXDNbwJFX5Z2rrdsFN0UGob4Gx3nqDXye1sPE0enu7uxzcPScGyjCVDkhoBWUYZM5IKXhYMdPzKEKhJCyYYF_McuDCpzMq5MDkf5qQ0Ii9pJiGqT9DFtu_Su88OQqsWdSjAWt2A64JKKZOM53kUiq2w8C4ED6Va-nqh_UpRotYWqB8L1K8FamNBLD3fvdHNF2B-C3czj5xvee9sHEn4sF0PXlWgbVup_5xl39TFkPs</recordid><startdate>199809</startdate><enddate>199809</enddate><creator>Mankus, Rita A</creator><creator>Ash, Stephen R</creator><creator>Sutton, James M</creator><general>Copyright by the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199809</creationdate><title>Comparison of Blood Flow Rates and Hydraulic Resistance Between the Mahurkar Catheter, the Tesio Twin Catheter, and the Ash Split Cath</title><author>Mankus, Rita A ; Ash, Stephen R ; Sutton, James M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3553-602d8e55133d9184fc3ea8046e1d2c38348b7e48d295fb8d74670fd87f159efc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Biophysical Phenomena</topic><topic>Biophysics</topic><topic>Blood Flow Velocity</topic><topic>Blood vessels</topic><topic>Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling</topic><topic>Dialysis</topic><topic>Hemodynamics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hydraulics</topic><topic>Patient treatment</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - instrumentation</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mankus, Rita A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ash, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, James M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mankus, Rita A</au><au>Ash, Stephen R</au><au>Sutton, James M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Blood Flow Rates and Hydraulic Resistance Between the Mahurkar Catheter, the Tesio Twin Catheter, and the Ash Split Cath</atitle><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><date>1998-09</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>M532</spage><epage>M534</epage><pages>M532-M534</pages><issn>1058-2916</issn><eissn>1538-943X</eissn><abstract>The Ash Split Cath (Medcomp, Harleysville, PA) is a recently introduced dual lumen permanent catheter designed to be placed through the internal jugular vein into the superior vena cava by single venipuncture technique. The transcutaneous portion is a 14 French cylindrically shaped catheter with Dshaped lumens and a Dacron (DuPont, Wilmington, DE) cuff. At the entrance to the jugular vein, the catheter splits into two separate D-shaped limbs that then merge into multiholed cylindrical tips in the vena cava. Split Caths (n = 10) have been placed in patients with end-stage renal disease and used for outpatient dialysis for approximately 2 months. Flow rates and hydraulic resistance have been compared with Mahurkar (Bard, Salt Lake City, UT) (n = 22) and Tesio (Medcomp) (n = 17) catheters in the same unit. Average blood flow rates (Qb) were 295 ± 42 (SD) for Ash Split Caths vs 279 ± 38 and 300 ± 39 ml/min for Mahurkar and Tesio catheters, respectively, and hydraulic resistances were 0.44 ± 0.17,0.52 ± 0.15, and 0.56 ± 0.11 mmHg/ml/min, respectively (not significant). No Split Caths have been removed for bleeding or flow complications. The Split Cath provides catheter with flow advantages of independent, cylindrical, multiholed tips.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Copyright by the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs</pub><pmid>9804488</pmid><doi>10.1097/00002480-199809000-00043</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1058-2916 |
ispartof | ASAIO journal (1992), 1998-09, Vol.44 (5), p.M532-M534 |
issn | 1058-2916 1538-943X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21393477 |
source | Ovid Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Journal Legacy Archive; MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Biophysical Phenomena Biophysics Blood Flow Velocity Blood vessels Catheterization, Central Venous - instrumentation Catheters, Indwelling Dialysis Hemodynamics Humans Hydraulics Patient treatment Renal Dialysis - instrumentation Urology |
title | Comparison of Blood Flow Rates and Hydraulic Resistance Between the Mahurkar Catheter, the Tesio Twin Catheter, and the Ash Split Cath |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T16%3A15%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Blood%20Flow%20Rates%20and%20Hydraulic%20Resistance%20Between%20the%20Mahurkar%20Catheter,%20the%20Tesio%20Twin%20Catheter,%20and%20the%20Ash%20Split%20Cath&rft.jtitle=ASAIO%20journal%20(1992)&rft.au=Mankus,%20Rita%20A&rft.date=1998-09&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=M532&rft.epage=M534&rft.pages=M532-M534&rft.issn=1058-2916&rft.eissn=1538-943X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/00002480-199809000-00043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E359809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21393477&rft_id=info:pmid/9804488&rfr_iscdi=true |