Investigation of the relation between administered dose and image quality for pediatric 99mTc-DMSA renal scintigraphy: clinical study applying the JSNM (Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine) pediatric dosage card: The Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine Technology (JSNMT), the Optimization of Imaging Technique Committee for Pediatric Nuclear Medicine Studies

Purpose In 2013, the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine (JSNM) announced consensus guidelines for pediatric nuclear medicine. These JSNM guidelines proposed use of lower administered doses compared with traditionally determined doses, which were estimated from age, weight or body surface area (BSA) based on the administered dose for adults in Japan. When the JSNM guidelines are used, the relationship between this recommended administered dose and image quality remains unclear. In this study, we clarified the relationship between administered dose and image quality for pediatric 99m Tc-DMSA renal scan retrospectively, and verified the diagnosable image quality with the recommended administered dose of the JSNM guidelines. Materials and methods Data from 7 pediatric patients who underwent 99m Tc-DMSA dynamic renal scans according to the guidelines’ recommended doses were collected. Scan frame rate was 1 frame/min, and scan time was up to 8 min. Eight images, which had different acquired time periods from 1 min to 8 min were prepared by adding each frame. Nine nuclear medicine specialists determined 8 images with different acquired times as diagnosable or undiagnosable. A region of interest (ROI) with 50% thresholds was placed on each kidney of every image. Coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated by dividing the standard deviation ( σ ) by the mean counts ( µ ) of each ROI (CV = σ / µ × 100). 99m Tc-DMSA renal scans (total of 2821 cases) that were performed previously in collaboration with 6 hospitals were collected, and CVs of these images were calculated in all cases. These 2821 cases were separated into 5 groups for every 10 kg weight; i.e., (1) less than 10 kg, (2) 10–19.9 kg, (3) 20–29.9 kg, (4) 30–39.9 kg, and (5) above 40 kg. Regression line of each group was analyzed in relation to the CV and administered dose. The CV at the point of intersection with the recommended dose range from the guideline was determined for each group. This CV value was considered as the estimated CV of the image obtained when the recommended dose of the guideline was used. Thus, if the CV was equal to or less than the estimated CV value, then the diagnostic image quality was deemed satisfactory. Results Average CV of the lower limit of diagnosable images in 7 cases as determined by 9 nuclear medicine specialists was 19.9%. Estimated CV was 21.2–24.2% in the group weighing 10 kg and