Reconstructing the Evolution of Giant Extinct Kangaroos: Comparing the Utility of DNA, Morphology, and Total Evidence

Combined “total evidence” analysis of molecular and morphological data offers the opportunity to objectively merge fossils into the tree of life, and challenges the primacy of solely DNA based phylogenetic and dating inference, even among modern taxa. To investigate the relative utility of DNA, morp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Systematic biology 2019-05, Vol.68 (3), p.520-537
Hauptverfasser: Cascini, Manuela, Mitchell, Kieren J., Cooper, Alan, Phillips, Matthew J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 537
container_issue 3
container_start_page 520
container_title Systematic biology
container_volume 68
creator Cascini, Manuela
Mitchell, Kieren J.
Cooper, Alan
Phillips, Matthew J.
description Combined “total evidence” analysis of molecular and morphological data offers the opportunity to objectively merge fossils into the tree of life, and challenges the primacy of solely DNA based phylogenetic and dating inference, even among modern taxa. To investigate the relative utility of DNA, morphology, and total evidence for evolutionary inference, we sequenced the first near-complete mitochondrial genomes from extinct Australian megafauna: a 40–50 thousand year old giant short-faced kangaroo (Simosthenurus occidentalis) and giant wallaby (Protemnodon anak). We analyzed the ancient DNA and fossil data alongside comparable data from extant species to infer phylogeny, divergence times, and ancestral body mass among macropods (kangaroos and wallabies). Our results confirm a close relationship between Protemnodon and the iconic kangaroo genus complex “Macropus”, and unite the giant Simothenurus with the hare-sized Lagostrophus fasciatus (banded hare-wallaby), suggesting that the latter is the closest living link to the once diverse sthenurine kangaroo radiation. We find that large body size evolved multiple times among kangaroos, coincident with expansion of open woodland habitats beginning in the Late Miocene. In addition, our results suggest that morphological data mislead macropod phylogeny reconstruction and in turn can distort total evidence estimation of divergence dates. However, a novel result with potentially broad application is that the accuracy and precision of reconstructing ancestral body mass was improved by tracing body mass on morphological branch lengths. This is likely due to positive allometric correlation between morphological and body size variation—a relationship that may be masked or even misleadingly inverted with the temporal or molecular branch lengths that typically underpin ancestral body size reconstruction. Our study supports complementary roles for DNA and morphology in evolutionary inference, and opens a new window into the evolution of Australia’s unique marsupial fauna.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/sysbio/syy080
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2138640975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26735599</jstor_id><oup_id>10.1093/sysbio/syy080</oup_id><sourcerecordid>26735599</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-a672186620184e906392d507829e3458381eb9b8c0dc4325725dabce0e0035293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4Mobk6PHpUevVRfkubXUcac4kAQBW8lTbPZ0TUzSYf77-3onEdP3wfvw_c9PghdYrjFoOhd2Iaicl1sQcIRGmIQPJWUfxzvZk5ThpkYoLMQlgAYc4ZP0YBCJjFlcojEqzWuCdG3JlbNIomfNplsXN3GyjWJmyfTSjcxmXx3WxOTZ90stHcunKOTua6DvdjnCL0_TN7Gj-nsZfo0vp-lhmYyppoLgiXnBLDMrOr-UaRkICRRlmZMUoltoQppoDQZJUwQVurCWLAAlBFFR-im711799XaEPNVFYyta91Y14acYCp5BkqwDk171HgXgrfzfO2rlfbbHEO-c5X3rvLeVcdf76vbYmXLA_0r5--2a9f_dl316DJE5w8w4YIyphT9AdOrfS4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2138640975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reconstructing the Evolution of Giant Extinct Kangaroos: Comparing the Utility of DNA, Morphology, and Total Evidence</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Cascini, Manuela ; Mitchell, Kieren J. ; Cooper, Alan ; Phillips, Matthew J.</creator><contributor>Buckley, Thomas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cascini, Manuela ; Mitchell, Kieren J. ; Cooper, Alan ; Phillips, Matthew J. ; Buckley, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Combined “total evidence” analysis of molecular and morphological data offers the opportunity to objectively merge fossils into the tree of life, and challenges the primacy of solely DNA based phylogenetic and dating inference, even among modern taxa. To investigate the relative utility of DNA, morphology, and total evidence for evolutionary inference, we sequenced the first near-complete mitochondrial genomes from extinct Australian megafauna: a 40–50 thousand year old giant short-faced kangaroo (Simosthenurus occidentalis) and giant wallaby (Protemnodon anak). We analyzed the ancient DNA and fossil data alongside comparable data from extant species to infer phylogeny, divergence times, and ancestral body mass among macropods (kangaroos and wallabies). Our results confirm a close relationship between Protemnodon and the iconic kangaroo genus complex “Macropus”, and unite the giant Simothenurus with the hare-sized Lagostrophus fasciatus (banded hare-wallaby), suggesting that the latter is the closest living link to the once diverse sthenurine kangaroo radiation. We find that large body size evolved multiple times among kangaroos, coincident with expansion of open woodland habitats beginning in the Late Miocene. In addition, our results suggest that morphological data mislead macropod phylogeny reconstruction and in turn can distort total evidence estimation of divergence dates. However, a novel result with potentially broad application is that the accuracy and precision of reconstructing ancestral body mass was improved by tracing body mass on morphological branch lengths. This is likely due to positive allometric correlation between morphological and body size variation—a relationship that may be masked or even misleadingly inverted with the temporal or molecular branch lengths that typically underpin ancestral body size reconstruction. Our study supports complementary roles for DNA and morphology in evolutionary inference, and opens a new window into the evolution of Australia’s unique marsupial fauna.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-5157</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1076-836X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syy080</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30481358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>REGULAR ARTICLES</subject><ispartof>Systematic biology, 2019-05, Vol.68 (3), p.520-537</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2018</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-a672186620184e906392d507829e3458381eb9b8c0dc4325725dabce0e0035293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-a672186620184e906392d507829e3458381eb9b8c0dc4325725dabce0e0035293</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26735599$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26735599$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,1585,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30481358$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Buckley, Thomas</contributor><creatorcontrib>Cascini, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Kieren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><title>Reconstructing the Evolution of Giant Extinct Kangaroos: Comparing the Utility of DNA, Morphology, and Total Evidence</title><title>Systematic biology</title><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><description>Combined “total evidence” analysis of molecular and morphological data offers the opportunity to objectively merge fossils into the tree of life, and challenges the primacy of solely DNA based phylogenetic and dating inference, even among modern taxa. To investigate the relative utility of DNA, morphology, and total evidence for evolutionary inference, we sequenced the first near-complete mitochondrial genomes from extinct Australian megafauna: a 40–50 thousand year old giant short-faced kangaroo (Simosthenurus occidentalis) and giant wallaby (Protemnodon anak). We analyzed the ancient DNA and fossil data alongside comparable data from extant species to infer phylogeny, divergence times, and ancestral body mass among macropods (kangaroos and wallabies). Our results confirm a close relationship between Protemnodon and the iconic kangaroo genus complex “Macropus”, and unite the giant Simothenurus with the hare-sized Lagostrophus fasciatus (banded hare-wallaby), suggesting that the latter is the closest living link to the once diverse sthenurine kangaroo radiation. We find that large body size evolved multiple times among kangaroos, coincident with expansion of open woodland habitats beginning in the Late Miocene. In addition, our results suggest that morphological data mislead macropod phylogeny reconstruction and in turn can distort total evidence estimation of divergence dates. However, a novel result with potentially broad application is that the accuracy and precision of reconstructing ancestral body mass was improved by tracing body mass on morphological branch lengths. This is likely due to positive allometric correlation between morphological and body size variation—a relationship that may be masked or even misleadingly inverted with the temporal or molecular branch lengths that typically underpin ancestral body size reconstruction. Our study supports complementary roles for DNA and morphology in evolutionary inference, and opens a new window into the evolution of Australia’s unique marsupial fauna.</description><subject>REGULAR ARTICLES</subject><issn>1063-5157</issn><issn>1076-836X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAUx4Mobk6PHpUevVRfkubXUcac4kAQBW8lTbPZ0TUzSYf77-3onEdP3wfvw_c9PghdYrjFoOhd2Iaicl1sQcIRGmIQPJWUfxzvZk5ThpkYoLMQlgAYc4ZP0YBCJjFlcojEqzWuCdG3JlbNIomfNplsXN3GyjWJmyfTSjcxmXx3WxOTZ90stHcunKOTua6DvdjnCL0_TN7Gj-nsZfo0vp-lhmYyppoLgiXnBLDMrOr-UaRkICRRlmZMUoltoQppoDQZJUwQVurCWLAAlBFFR-im711799XaEPNVFYyta91Y14acYCp5BkqwDk171HgXgrfzfO2rlfbbHEO-c5X3rvLeVcdf76vbYmXLA_0r5--2a9f_dl316DJE5w8w4YIyphT9AdOrfS4</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Cascini, Manuela</creator><creator>Mitchell, Kieren J.</creator><creator>Cooper, Alan</creator><creator>Phillips, Matthew J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>Reconstructing the Evolution of Giant Extinct Kangaroos</title><author>Cascini, Manuela ; Mitchell, Kieren J. ; Cooper, Alan ; Phillips, Matthew J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c348t-a672186620184e906392d507829e3458381eb9b8c0dc4325725dabce0e0035293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>REGULAR ARTICLES</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cascini, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Kieren J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Matthew J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cascini, Manuela</au><au>Mitchell, Kieren J.</au><au>Cooper, Alan</au><au>Phillips, Matthew J.</au><au>Buckley, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reconstructing the Evolution of Giant Extinct Kangaroos: Comparing the Utility of DNA, Morphology, and Total Evidence</atitle><jtitle>Systematic biology</jtitle><addtitle>Syst Biol</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>520</spage><epage>537</epage><pages>520-537</pages><issn>1063-5157</issn><eissn>1076-836X</eissn><abstract>Combined “total evidence” analysis of molecular and morphological data offers the opportunity to objectively merge fossils into the tree of life, and challenges the primacy of solely DNA based phylogenetic and dating inference, even among modern taxa. To investigate the relative utility of DNA, morphology, and total evidence for evolutionary inference, we sequenced the first near-complete mitochondrial genomes from extinct Australian megafauna: a 40–50 thousand year old giant short-faced kangaroo (Simosthenurus occidentalis) and giant wallaby (Protemnodon anak). We analyzed the ancient DNA and fossil data alongside comparable data from extant species to infer phylogeny, divergence times, and ancestral body mass among macropods (kangaroos and wallabies). Our results confirm a close relationship between Protemnodon and the iconic kangaroo genus complex “Macropus”, and unite the giant Simothenurus with the hare-sized Lagostrophus fasciatus (banded hare-wallaby), suggesting that the latter is the closest living link to the once diverse sthenurine kangaroo radiation. We find that large body size evolved multiple times among kangaroos, coincident with expansion of open woodland habitats beginning in the Late Miocene. In addition, our results suggest that morphological data mislead macropod phylogeny reconstruction and in turn can distort total evidence estimation of divergence dates. However, a novel result with potentially broad application is that the accuracy and precision of reconstructing ancestral body mass was improved by tracing body mass on morphological branch lengths. This is likely due to positive allometric correlation between morphological and body size variation—a relationship that may be masked or even misleadingly inverted with the temporal or molecular branch lengths that typically underpin ancestral body size reconstruction. Our study supports complementary roles for DNA and morphology in evolutionary inference, and opens a new window into the evolution of Australia’s unique marsupial fauna.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>30481358</pmid><doi>10.1093/sysbio/syy080</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1063-5157
ispartof Systematic biology, 2019-05, Vol.68 (3), p.520-537
issn 1063-5157
1076-836X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2138640975
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects REGULAR ARTICLES
title Reconstructing the Evolution of Giant Extinct Kangaroos: Comparing the Utility of DNA, Morphology, and Total Evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T18%3A50%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reconstructing%20the%20Evolution%20of%20Giant%20Extinct%20Kangaroos:%20Comparing%20the%20Utility%20of%20DNA,%20Morphology,%20and%20Total%20Evidence&rft.jtitle=Systematic%20biology&rft.au=Cascini,%20Manuela&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=520&rft.epage=537&rft.pages=520-537&rft.issn=1063-5157&rft.eissn=1076-836X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/sysbio/syy080&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26735599%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2138640975&rft_id=info:pmid/30481358&rft_jstor_id=26735599&rft_oup_id=10.1093/sysbio/syy080&rfr_iscdi=true