Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry
Objective To examine the morphologic similarities and differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in patients with facial asymmetry using statistical analysis. Methods One hundred eighty-four patients (95 men, 89 women; mean age, 22.30 ± 3.87 years...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oral radiology 2019-09, Vol.35 (3), p.251-259 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 259 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 251 |
container_title | Oral radiology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Han, Seulgi Shin, Sang Min Choi, Yong-Seok Kim, Ki Beom Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro Maki, Koutaro Chung, Chooryung J. Kim, Yong-Il |
description | Objective
To examine the morphologic similarities and differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in patients with facial asymmetry using statistical analysis.
Methods
One hundred eighty-four patients (95 men, 89 women; mean age, 22.30 ± 3.87 years) with facial asymmetry were examined with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Shape analysis was performed to compare the shapes and sizes of the condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in the frontal and lateral aspects. Ordinary Procrustes analysis (OPA) was used to determine shape variations of the fossa and condyle.
Results
Shape variations derived from ordinary sum of squares (OSS) suggested that, in the frontal aspect, there was a difference between the two sides in both the fossa and condyle (
P
0.05); however, the shape of condyle was different between the non-deviated and deviated sides (
P
0.05); however, the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side for condyle (
P
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2138634676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2093013238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7a886e1d74fa784e0ba1a37075d9880aa4a8734aaa04af15e9628e81e9a0dac63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFEEQhhuJmE30B-QiDV68TKzq7u2PoyxqAoFc1GtTO9NjepmZHrtnMOuvd5ZNFALmVFD11FsFD2MXCJcIYD4URGFFBWgrkEpV9y_YCjXKymmjTtgKHGKlQdhTdlbKDkA4pewrdipBWSUAV-z7JvUj5VjSwFPLp9CPKaeehiZu544y36U4TLzc0Rj40uUl_g48DnykKYZhKvxXnO54S3WkjlPZ932Y8v41e9lSV8Kbh3rOvn3-9HVzVd3cfrnefLypaiXUVBmyVgdsjGrJWBVgS0jSgFk3zlogUmSNVEQEilpcB6eFDRaDI2io1vKcvT_mjjn9nEOZfB9LHbqOhpDm4gVKq6XS5oC-e4Lu0pyH5TsvhHZKrK11z1LgJKAU0i4UHqk6p1JyaP2YY0957xH8QY0_qvGLGn9Q4--XnbcPyfO2D83fjUcXCyCOQFlGw4-Q_53-f-ofLLKZDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2093013238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Han, Seulgi ; Shin, Sang Min ; Choi, Yong-Seok ; Kim, Ki Beom ; Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro ; Maki, Koutaro ; Chung, Chooryung J. ; Kim, Yong-Il</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Seulgi ; Shin, Sang Min ; Choi, Yong-Seok ; Kim, Ki Beom ; Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro ; Maki, Koutaro ; Chung, Chooryung J. ; Kim, Yong-Il</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To examine the morphologic similarities and differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in patients with facial asymmetry using statistical analysis.
Methods
One hundred eighty-four patients (95 men, 89 women; mean age, 22.30 ± 3.87 years) with facial asymmetry were examined with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Shape analysis was performed to compare the shapes and sizes of the condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in the frontal and lateral aspects. Ordinary Procrustes analysis (OPA) was used to determine shape variations of the fossa and condyle.
Results
Shape variations derived from ordinary sum of squares (OSS) suggested that, in the frontal aspect, there was a difference between the two sides in both the fossa and condyle (
P
< 0.05). In the lateral aspect, there was no difference in fossa shape between the two sides (
P
> 0.05); however, the shape of condyle was different between the non-deviated and deviated sides (
P
< 0.05). Size comparison in OPA matching and centroid size (CS) in the frontal aspect demonstrated that the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side. In the lateral aspect, fossa showed no difference in CS between the two sides (
P
> 0.05); however, the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side for condyle (
P
< 0.05).
Conclusions
Morphometric differences in condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides were observed. Structures of the non-deviated side were relatively larger than those of the deviated side, except for fossa in the lateral aspect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0911-6028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-9674</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30484201</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Asymmetry ; Computed tomography ; Dentistry ; Imaging ; Mandible ; Medicine ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original Article ; Radiology ; Statistical analysis ; Temporomandibular joint</subject><ispartof>Oral radiology, 2019-09, Vol.35 (3), p.251-259</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018</rights><rights>Oral Radiology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7a886e1d74fa784e0ba1a37075d9880aa4a8734aaa04af15e9628e81e9a0dac63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7a886e1d74fa784e0ba1a37075d9880aa4a8734aaa04af15e9628e81e9a0dac63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3889-2545</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30484201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Seulgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yong-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ki Beom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maki, Koutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chooryung J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong-Il</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry</title><title>Oral radiology</title><addtitle>Oral Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Oral Radiol</addtitle><description>Objective
To examine the morphologic similarities and differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in patients with facial asymmetry using statistical analysis.
Methods
One hundred eighty-four patients (95 men, 89 women; mean age, 22.30 ± 3.87 years) with facial asymmetry were examined with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Shape analysis was performed to compare the shapes and sizes of the condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in the frontal and lateral aspects. Ordinary Procrustes analysis (OPA) was used to determine shape variations of the fossa and condyle.
Results
Shape variations derived from ordinary sum of squares (OSS) suggested that, in the frontal aspect, there was a difference between the two sides in both the fossa and condyle (
P
< 0.05). In the lateral aspect, there was no difference in fossa shape between the two sides (
P
> 0.05); however, the shape of condyle was different between the non-deviated and deviated sides (
P
< 0.05). Size comparison in OPA matching and centroid size (CS) in the frontal aspect demonstrated that the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side. In the lateral aspect, fossa showed no difference in CS between the two sides (
P
> 0.05); however, the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side for condyle (
P
< 0.05).
Conclusions
Morphometric differences in condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides were observed. Structures of the non-deviated side were relatively larger than those of the deviated side, except for fossa in the lateral aspect.</description><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Temporomandibular joint</subject><issn>0911-6028</issn><issn>1613-9674</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFEEQhhuJmE30B-QiDV68TKzq7u2PoyxqAoFc1GtTO9NjepmZHrtnMOuvd5ZNFALmVFD11FsFD2MXCJcIYD4URGFFBWgrkEpV9y_YCjXKymmjTtgKHGKlQdhTdlbKDkA4pewrdipBWSUAV-z7JvUj5VjSwFPLp9CPKaeehiZu544y36U4TLzc0Rj40uUl_g48DnykKYZhKvxXnO54S3WkjlPZ932Y8v41e9lSV8Kbh3rOvn3-9HVzVd3cfrnefLypaiXUVBmyVgdsjGrJWBVgS0jSgFk3zlogUmSNVEQEilpcB6eFDRaDI2io1vKcvT_mjjn9nEOZfB9LHbqOhpDm4gVKq6XS5oC-e4Lu0pyH5TsvhHZKrK11z1LgJKAU0i4UHqk6p1JyaP2YY0957xH8QY0_qvGLGn9Q4--XnbcPyfO2D83fjUcXCyCOQFlGw4-Q_53-f-ofLLKZDA</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Han, Seulgi</creator><creator>Shin, Sang Min</creator><creator>Choi, Yong-Seok</creator><creator>Kim, Ki Beom</creator><creator>Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro</creator><creator>Maki, Koutaro</creator><creator>Chung, Chooryung J.</creator><creator>Kim, Yong-Il</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3889-2545</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry</title><author>Han, Seulgi ; Shin, Sang Min ; Choi, Yong-Seok ; Kim, Ki Beom ; Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro ; Maki, Koutaro ; Chung, Chooryung J. ; Kim, Yong-Il</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7a886e1d74fa784e0ba1a37075d9880aa4a8734aaa04af15e9628e81e9a0dac63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Temporomandibular joint</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Seulgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yong-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ki Beom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maki, Koutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chooryung J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong-Il</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Seulgi</au><au>Shin, Sang Min</au><au>Choi, Yong-Seok</au><au>Kim, Ki Beom</au><au>Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro</au><au>Maki, Koutaro</au><au>Chung, Chooryung J.</au><au>Kim, Yong-Il</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry</atitle><jtitle>Oral radiology</jtitle><stitle>Oral Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Oral Radiol</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>251-259</pages><issn>0911-6028</issn><eissn>1613-9674</eissn><abstract>Objective
To examine the morphologic similarities and differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in patients with facial asymmetry using statistical analysis.
Methods
One hundred eighty-four patients (95 men, 89 women; mean age, 22.30 ± 3.87 years) with facial asymmetry were examined with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Shape analysis was performed to compare the shapes and sizes of the condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in the frontal and lateral aspects. Ordinary Procrustes analysis (OPA) was used to determine shape variations of the fossa and condyle.
Results
Shape variations derived from ordinary sum of squares (OSS) suggested that, in the frontal aspect, there was a difference between the two sides in both the fossa and condyle (
P
< 0.05). In the lateral aspect, there was no difference in fossa shape between the two sides (
P
> 0.05); however, the shape of condyle was different between the non-deviated and deviated sides (
P
< 0.05). Size comparison in OPA matching and centroid size (CS) in the frontal aspect demonstrated that the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side. In the lateral aspect, fossa showed no difference in CS between the two sides (
P
> 0.05); however, the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side for condyle (
P
< 0.05).
Conclusions
Morphometric differences in condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides were observed. Structures of the non-deviated side were relatively larger than those of the deviated side, except for fossa in the lateral aspect.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><pmid>30484201</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3889-2545</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0911-6028 |
ispartof | Oral radiology, 2019-09, Vol.35 (3), p.251-259 |
issn | 0911-6028 1613-9674 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2138634676 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Asymmetry Computed tomography Dentistry Imaging Mandible Medicine Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Original Article Radiology Statistical analysis Temporomandibular joint |
title | Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A28%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20temporomandibular%20joint%20shape%20and%20size%20in%20patients%20with%20facial%20asymmetry&rft.jtitle=Oral%20radiology&rft.au=Han,%20Seulgi&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=251-259&rft.issn=0911-6028&rft.eissn=1613-9674&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2093013238%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2093013238&rft_id=info:pmid/30484201&rfr_iscdi=true |