Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry

Objective To examine the morphologic similarities and differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in patients with facial asymmetry using statistical analysis. Methods One hundred eighty-four patients (95 men, 89 women; mean age, 22.30 ± 3.87 years...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oral radiology 2019-09, Vol.35 (3), p.251-259
Hauptverfasser: Han, Seulgi, Shin, Sang Min, Choi, Yong-Seok, Kim, Ki Beom, Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro, Maki, Koutaro, Chung, Chooryung J., Kim, Yong-Il
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 259
container_issue 3
container_start_page 251
container_title Oral radiology
container_volume 35
creator Han, Seulgi
Shin, Sang Min
Choi, Yong-Seok
Kim, Ki Beom
Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro
Maki, Koutaro
Chung, Chooryung J.
Kim, Yong-Il
description Objective To examine the morphologic similarities and differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in patients with facial asymmetry using statistical analysis. Methods One hundred eighty-four patients (95 men, 89 women; mean age, 22.30 ± 3.87 years) with facial asymmetry were examined with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Shape analysis was performed to compare the shapes and sizes of the condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in the frontal and lateral aspects. Ordinary Procrustes analysis (OPA) was used to determine shape variations of the fossa and condyle. Results Shape variations derived from ordinary sum of squares (OSS) suggested that, in the frontal aspect, there was a difference between the two sides in both the fossa and condyle ( P   0.05); however, the shape of condyle was different between the non-deviated and deviated sides ( P   0.05); however, the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side for condyle ( P  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2138634676</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2093013238</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7a886e1d74fa784e0ba1a37075d9880aa4a8734aaa04af15e9628e81e9a0dac63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rFEEQhhuJmE30B-QiDV68TKzq7u2PoyxqAoFc1GtTO9NjepmZHrtnMOuvd5ZNFALmVFD11FsFD2MXCJcIYD4URGFFBWgrkEpV9y_YCjXKymmjTtgKHGKlQdhTdlbKDkA4pewrdipBWSUAV-z7JvUj5VjSwFPLp9CPKaeehiZu544y36U4TLzc0Rj40uUl_g48DnykKYZhKvxXnO54S3WkjlPZ932Y8v41e9lSV8Kbh3rOvn3-9HVzVd3cfrnefLypaiXUVBmyVgdsjGrJWBVgS0jSgFk3zlogUmSNVEQEilpcB6eFDRaDI2io1vKcvT_mjjn9nEOZfB9LHbqOhpDm4gVKq6XS5oC-e4Lu0pyH5TsvhHZKrK11z1LgJKAU0i4UHqk6p1JyaP2YY0957xH8QY0_qvGLGn9Q4--XnbcPyfO2D83fjUcXCyCOQFlGw4-Q_53-f-ofLLKZDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2093013238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Han, Seulgi ; Shin, Sang Min ; Choi, Yong-Seok ; Kim, Ki Beom ; Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro ; Maki, Koutaro ; Chung, Chooryung J. ; Kim, Yong-Il</creator><creatorcontrib>Han, Seulgi ; Shin, Sang Min ; Choi, Yong-Seok ; Kim, Ki Beom ; Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro ; Maki, Koutaro ; Chung, Chooryung J. ; Kim, Yong-Il</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To examine the morphologic similarities and differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in patients with facial asymmetry using statistical analysis. Methods One hundred eighty-four patients (95 men, 89 women; mean age, 22.30 ± 3.87 years) with facial asymmetry were examined with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Shape analysis was performed to compare the shapes and sizes of the condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in the frontal and lateral aspects. Ordinary Procrustes analysis (OPA) was used to determine shape variations of the fossa and condyle. Results Shape variations derived from ordinary sum of squares (OSS) suggested that, in the frontal aspect, there was a difference between the two sides in both the fossa and condyle ( P  &lt; 0.05). In the lateral aspect, there was no difference in fossa shape between the two sides ( P  &gt; 0.05); however, the shape of condyle was different between the non-deviated and deviated sides ( P  &lt; 0.05). Size comparison in OPA matching and centroid size (CS) in the frontal aspect demonstrated that the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side. In the lateral aspect, fossa showed no difference in CS between the two sides ( P  &gt; 0.05); however, the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side for condyle ( P  &lt; 0.05). Conclusions Morphometric differences in condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides were observed. Structures of the non-deviated side were relatively larger than those of the deviated side, except for fossa in the lateral aspect.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0911-6028</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-9674</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30484201</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Asymmetry ; Computed tomography ; Dentistry ; Imaging ; Mandible ; Medicine ; Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery ; Original Article ; Radiology ; Statistical analysis ; Temporomandibular joint</subject><ispartof>Oral radiology, 2019-09, Vol.35 (3), p.251-259</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018</rights><rights>Oral Radiology is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7a886e1d74fa784e0ba1a37075d9880aa4a8734aaa04af15e9628e81e9a0dac63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7a886e1d74fa784e0ba1a37075d9880aa4a8734aaa04af15e9628e81e9a0dac63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3889-2545</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30484201$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Han, Seulgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yong-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ki Beom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maki, Koutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chooryung J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong-Il</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry</title><title>Oral radiology</title><addtitle>Oral Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Oral Radiol</addtitle><description>Objective To examine the morphologic similarities and differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in patients with facial asymmetry using statistical analysis. Methods One hundred eighty-four patients (95 men, 89 women; mean age, 22.30 ± 3.87 years) with facial asymmetry were examined with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Shape analysis was performed to compare the shapes and sizes of the condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in the frontal and lateral aspects. Ordinary Procrustes analysis (OPA) was used to determine shape variations of the fossa and condyle. Results Shape variations derived from ordinary sum of squares (OSS) suggested that, in the frontal aspect, there was a difference between the two sides in both the fossa and condyle ( P  &lt; 0.05). In the lateral aspect, there was no difference in fossa shape between the two sides ( P  &gt; 0.05); however, the shape of condyle was different between the non-deviated and deviated sides ( P  &lt; 0.05). Size comparison in OPA matching and centroid size (CS) in the frontal aspect demonstrated that the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side. In the lateral aspect, fossa showed no difference in CS between the two sides ( P  &gt; 0.05); however, the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side for condyle ( P  &lt; 0.05). Conclusions Morphometric differences in condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides were observed. Structures of the non-deviated side were relatively larger than those of the deviated side, except for fossa in the lateral aspect.</description><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Mandible</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Temporomandibular joint</subject><issn>0911-6028</issn><issn>1613-9674</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1rFEEQhhuJmE30B-QiDV68TKzq7u2PoyxqAoFc1GtTO9NjepmZHrtnMOuvd5ZNFALmVFD11FsFD2MXCJcIYD4URGFFBWgrkEpV9y_YCjXKymmjTtgKHGKlQdhTdlbKDkA4pewrdipBWSUAV-z7JvUj5VjSwFPLp9CPKaeehiZu544y36U4TLzc0Rj40uUl_g48DnykKYZhKvxXnO54S3WkjlPZ932Y8v41e9lSV8Kbh3rOvn3-9HVzVd3cfrnefLypaiXUVBmyVgdsjGrJWBVgS0jSgFk3zlogUmSNVEQEilpcB6eFDRaDI2io1vKcvT_mjjn9nEOZfB9LHbqOhpDm4gVKq6XS5oC-e4Lu0pyH5TsvhHZKrK11z1LgJKAU0i4UHqk6p1JyaP2YY0957xH8QY0_qvGLGn9Q4--XnbcPyfO2D83fjUcXCyCOQFlGw4-Q_53-f-ofLLKZDA</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Han, Seulgi</creator><creator>Shin, Sang Min</creator><creator>Choi, Yong-Seok</creator><creator>Kim, Ki Beom</creator><creator>Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro</creator><creator>Maki, Koutaro</creator><creator>Chung, Chooryung J.</creator><creator>Kim, Yong-Il</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3889-2545</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry</title><author>Han, Seulgi ; Shin, Sang Min ; Choi, Yong-Seok ; Kim, Ki Beom ; Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro ; Maki, Koutaro ; Chung, Chooryung J. ; Kim, Yong-Il</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-7a886e1d74fa784e0ba1a37075d9880aa4a8734aaa04af15e9628e81e9a0dac63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Mandible</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Temporomandibular joint</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Han, Seulgi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sang Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yong-Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Ki Beom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maki, Koutaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Chooryung J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yong-Il</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Oral radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Han, Seulgi</au><au>Shin, Sang Min</au><au>Choi, Yong-Seok</au><au>Kim, Ki Beom</au><au>Yamaguchi, Tetsutaro</au><au>Maki, Koutaro</au><au>Chung, Chooryung J.</au><au>Kim, Yong-Il</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry</atitle><jtitle>Oral radiology</jtitle><stitle>Oral Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Oral Radiol</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>259</epage><pages>251-259</pages><issn>0911-6028</issn><eissn>1613-9674</eissn><abstract>Objective To examine the morphologic similarities and differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in patients with facial asymmetry using statistical analysis. Methods One hundred eighty-four patients (95 men, 89 women; mean age, 22.30 ± 3.87 years) with facial asymmetry were examined with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Shape analysis was performed to compare the shapes and sizes of the condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides in the frontal and lateral aspects. Ordinary Procrustes analysis (OPA) was used to determine shape variations of the fossa and condyle. Results Shape variations derived from ordinary sum of squares (OSS) suggested that, in the frontal aspect, there was a difference between the two sides in both the fossa and condyle ( P  &lt; 0.05). In the lateral aspect, there was no difference in fossa shape between the two sides ( P  &gt; 0.05); however, the shape of condyle was different between the non-deviated and deviated sides ( P  &lt; 0.05). Size comparison in OPA matching and centroid size (CS) in the frontal aspect demonstrated that the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side. In the lateral aspect, fossa showed no difference in CS between the two sides ( P  &gt; 0.05); however, the non-deviated side was larger than the deviated side for condyle ( P  &lt; 0.05). Conclusions Morphometric differences in condyle and fossa between the deviated and non-deviated sides were observed. Structures of the non-deviated side were relatively larger than those of the deviated side, except for fossa in the lateral aspect.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><pmid>30484201</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3889-2545</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0911-6028
ispartof Oral radiology, 2019-09, Vol.35 (3), p.251-259
issn 0911-6028
1613-9674
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2138634676
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Asymmetry
Computed tomography
Dentistry
Imaging
Mandible
Medicine
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Original Article
Radiology
Statistical analysis
Temporomandibular joint
title Comparison of temporomandibular joint shape and size in patients with facial asymmetry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T19%3A28%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20temporomandibular%20joint%20shape%20and%20size%20in%20patients%20with%20facial%20asymmetry&rft.jtitle=Oral%20radiology&rft.au=Han,%20Seulgi&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=259&rft.pages=251-259&rft.issn=0911-6028&rft.eissn=1613-9674&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11282-018-0344-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2093013238%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2093013238&rft_id=info:pmid/30484201&rfr_iscdi=true