Review of advanced physical and data‐driven models for dynamic bioprocess simulation: Case study of algae–bacteria consortium wastewater treatment

Microorganism production and remediation processes are of critical importance to the next generation of sustainable industries. Undertaking mathematical treatment of dynamic biosystems operating at any spatial or temporal scale is essential to guarantee their performance and safety. However, constru...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biotechnology and bioengineering 2019-02, Vol.116 (2), p.342-353
Hauptverfasser: Del Rio‐Chanona, Ehecatl Antonio, Cong, Xiaoyan, Bradford, Eric, Zhang, Dongda, Jing, Keju
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 353
container_issue 2
container_start_page 342
container_title Biotechnology and bioengineering
container_volume 116
creator Del Rio‐Chanona, Ehecatl Antonio
Cong, Xiaoyan
Bradford, Eric
Zhang, Dongda
Jing, Keju
description Microorganism production and remediation processes are of critical importance to the next generation of sustainable industries. Undertaking mathematical treatment of dynamic biosystems operating at any spatial or temporal scale is essential to guarantee their performance and safety. However, constructing physical models remains a challenge due to the extreme complexity of process biological mechanisms. Data‐driven models also encounter severe limitations because datasets from large‐scale bioprocesses are often scarce without complete information and on a restricted operational space. To fill this gap, the current research compares the performance of advanced physical and data‐driven models for dynamic bioprocess simulations subject to incomplete and scarce datasets, which to the best of our knowledge has never been addressed before. In specific, kinetic models were constructed by integrating different classic models, and state‐of‐the‐art hyperparameter selection frameworks were developed to design artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regression models. An algae–bacteria consortium wastewater treatment process was selected to test the accuracy of these modeling strategies, as it is one of the most sophisticated biosystems due to the intricate mutualistic and competitive interactions. Based on the current results and available data, a heuristic model selection procedure is provided. This study paves the way to facilitate future bioprocess modeling. Undertaking mathematical modelling and optimization of algae‐bacteria consortium wastewater treatment process is essential to guarantee its efficiency, but remains a challenge due to its complex biological mechanisms. The authors adopted rigorous physical and advanced data‐driven models to simulate the dynamics of this system subject to incomplete and scarce datasets (imitating industrial situations). Performance of these modelling approaches was compared and previously proposed algae‐bacteria interactions were successfully verified. Finally, a heuristic model selection procedure was provided for future complex bioprocess modelling.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bit.26881
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2138050446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2138050446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-fd115f2180484520d3843c70ad64836219c85216e845932868af0c95aabd94f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEQx4Mo7uzqwReQgBf30Lv56kzamw5-LCwIsp6b6qRas3R3xiQ9Q9_2EQTBB9wnMe6sHgRPoVI_flTVn5BnnJ1xxsR55_OZ0MbwB2TFWbOumGjYQ7JijOlK1o04IscpXZdybbR-TI4kU-taMbUiPz_hzuOehp6C28Fk0dHt1yV5CwOFyVEHGW5vvrvodzjRMTgcEu1DpG6ZYPSWdj5sY7CYEk1-nAfIPkyv6AYS0pRnt9y5hy-Atzc_OrAZowdqw5RCzH4e6R5Sxj2Uf5ojQh5xyk_Iox6GhE_v3xPy-d3bq82H6vLj-4vN68vKKlHzqnec173ghimjasGcNEraNQOnlZFa8MaaWnCNpdtIYbSBntmmBuhco3olT8jLg7es8G3GlNvRJ4vDABOGObWCS8NqppQu6It_0Oswx6lMVyituFTltoU6PVA2hpQi9u02-hHi0nLW_g6rLWG1d2EV9vm9ce5GdH_JP-kU4PwA7P2Ay_9N7ZuLq4PyF5TroVc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2164134866</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Review of advanced physical and data‐driven models for dynamic bioprocess simulation: Case study of algae–bacteria consortium wastewater treatment</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Del Rio‐Chanona, Ehecatl Antonio ; Cong, Xiaoyan ; Bradford, Eric ; Zhang, Dongda ; Jing, Keju</creator><creatorcontrib>Del Rio‐Chanona, Ehecatl Antonio ; Cong, Xiaoyan ; Bradford, Eric ; Zhang, Dongda ; Jing, Keju</creatorcontrib><description>Microorganism production and remediation processes are of critical importance to the next generation of sustainable industries. Undertaking mathematical treatment of dynamic biosystems operating at any spatial or temporal scale is essential to guarantee their performance and safety. However, constructing physical models remains a challenge due to the extreme complexity of process biological mechanisms. Data‐driven models also encounter severe limitations because datasets from large‐scale bioprocesses are often scarce without complete information and on a restricted operational space. To fill this gap, the current research compares the performance of advanced physical and data‐driven models for dynamic bioprocess simulations subject to incomplete and scarce datasets, which to the best of our knowledge has never been addressed before. In specific, kinetic models were constructed by integrating different classic models, and state‐of‐the‐art hyperparameter selection frameworks were developed to design artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regression models. An algae–bacteria consortium wastewater treatment process was selected to test the accuracy of these modeling strategies, as it is one of the most sophisticated biosystems due to the intricate mutualistic and competitive interactions. Based on the current results and available data, a heuristic model selection procedure is provided. This study paves the way to facilitate future bioprocess modeling. Undertaking mathematical modelling and optimization of algae‐bacteria consortium wastewater treatment process is essential to guarantee its efficiency, but remains a challenge due to its complex biological mechanisms. The authors adopted rigorous physical and advanced data‐driven models to simulate the dynamics of this system subject to incomplete and scarce datasets (imitating industrial situations). Performance of these modelling approaches was compared and previously proposed algae‐bacteria interactions were successfully verified. Finally, a heuristic model selection procedure was provided for future complex bioprocess modelling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3592</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0290</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bit.26881</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30475404</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Algae ; algae–bacteria consortium ; artificial neural network ; Artificial neural networks ; Bacillus subtilis - growth &amp; development ; Bacillus subtilis - metabolism ; Bacteria ; Biological activity ; Biological models (mathematics) ; Case studies ; Chlorella vulgaris - growth &amp; development ; Chlorella vulgaris - metabolism ; Computer simulation ; Consortia ; Datasets ; Gaussian process ; Gaussian processes ; kinetic modeling ; Mathematical models ; Microbial Consortia ; Model accuracy ; Models, Theoretical ; Neural networks ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; scarce dataset ; Waste Water - microbiology ; Wastewater treatment ; Water Purification - methods ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2019-02, Vol.116 (2), p.342-353</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-fd115f2180484520d3843c70ad64836219c85216e845932868af0c95aabd94f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-fd115f2180484520d3843c70ad64836219c85216e845932868af0c95aabd94f43</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0274-2852 ; 0000-0001-5956-4618</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fbit.26881$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fbit.26881$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30475404$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Del Rio‐Chanona, Ehecatl Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cong, Xiaoyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dongda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jing, Keju</creatorcontrib><title>Review of advanced physical and data‐driven models for dynamic bioprocess simulation: Case study of algae–bacteria consortium wastewater treatment</title><title>Biotechnology and bioengineering</title><addtitle>Biotechnol Bioeng</addtitle><description>Microorganism production and remediation processes are of critical importance to the next generation of sustainable industries. Undertaking mathematical treatment of dynamic biosystems operating at any spatial or temporal scale is essential to guarantee their performance and safety. However, constructing physical models remains a challenge due to the extreme complexity of process biological mechanisms. Data‐driven models also encounter severe limitations because datasets from large‐scale bioprocesses are often scarce without complete information and on a restricted operational space. To fill this gap, the current research compares the performance of advanced physical and data‐driven models for dynamic bioprocess simulations subject to incomplete and scarce datasets, which to the best of our knowledge has never been addressed before. In specific, kinetic models were constructed by integrating different classic models, and state‐of‐the‐art hyperparameter selection frameworks were developed to design artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regression models. An algae–bacteria consortium wastewater treatment process was selected to test the accuracy of these modeling strategies, as it is one of the most sophisticated biosystems due to the intricate mutualistic and competitive interactions. Based on the current results and available data, a heuristic model selection procedure is provided. This study paves the way to facilitate future bioprocess modeling. Undertaking mathematical modelling and optimization of algae‐bacteria consortium wastewater treatment process is essential to guarantee its efficiency, but remains a challenge due to its complex biological mechanisms. The authors adopted rigorous physical and advanced data‐driven models to simulate the dynamics of this system subject to incomplete and scarce datasets (imitating industrial situations). Performance of these modelling approaches was compared and previously proposed algae‐bacteria interactions were successfully verified. Finally, a heuristic model selection procedure was provided for future complex bioprocess modelling.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>algae–bacteria consortium</subject><subject>artificial neural network</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Bacillus subtilis - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Bacillus subtilis - metabolism</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Biological models (mathematics)</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Chlorella vulgaris - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Chlorella vulgaris - metabolism</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Gaussian processes</subject><subject>kinetic modeling</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Microbial Consortia</subject><subject>Model accuracy</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>scarce dataset</subject><subject>Waste Water - microbiology</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0006-3592</issn><issn>1097-0290</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEQx4Mo7uzqwReQgBf30Lv56kzamw5-LCwIsp6b6qRas3R3xiQ9Q9_2EQTBB9wnMe6sHgRPoVI_flTVn5BnnJ1xxsR55_OZ0MbwB2TFWbOumGjYQ7JijOlK1o04IscpXZdybbR-TI4kU-taMbUiPz_hzuOehp6C28Fk0dHt1yV5CwOFyVEHGW5vvrvodzjRMTgcEu1DpG6ZYPSWdj5sY7CYEk1-nAfIPkyv6AYS0pRnt9y5hy-Atzc_OrAZowdqw5RCzH4e6R5Sxj2Uf5ojQh5xyk_Iox6GhE_v3xPy-d3bq82H6vLj-4vN68vKKlHzqnec173ghimjasGcNEraNQOnlZFa8MaaWnCNpdtIYbSBntmmBuhco3olT8jLg7es8G3GlNvRJ4vDABOGObWCS8NqppQu6It_0Oswx6lMVyituFTltoU6PVA2hpQi9u02-hHi0nLW_g6rLWG1d2EV9vm9ce5GdH_JP-kU4PwA7P2Ay_9N7ZuLq4PyF5TroVc</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Del Rio‐Chanona, Ehecatl Antonio</creator><creator>Cong, Xiaoyan</creator><creator>Bradford, Eric</creator><creator>Zhang, Dongda</creator><creator>Jing, Keju</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0274-2852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5956-4618</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Review of advanced physical and data‐driven models for dynamic bioprocess simulation: Case study of algae–bacteria consortium wastewater treatment</title><author>Del Rio‐Chanona, Ehecatl Antonio ; Cong, Xiaoyan ; Bradford, Eric ; Zhang, Dongda ; Jing, Keju</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4251-fd115f2180484520d3843c70ad64836219c85216e845932868af0c95aabd94f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>algae–bacteria consortium</topic><topic>artificial neural network</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Bacillus subtilis - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Bacillus subtilis - metabolism</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Biological models (mathematics)</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Chlorella vulgaris - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Chlorella vulgaris - metabolism</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Gaussian processes</topic><topic>kinetic modeling</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Microbial Consortia</topic><topic>Model accuracy</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>scarce dataset</topic><topic>Waste Water - microbiology</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Del Rio‐Chanona, Ehecatl Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cong, Xiaoyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradford, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Dongda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jing, Keju</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Del Rio‐Chanona, Ehecatl Antonio</au><au>Cong, Xiaoyan</au><au>Bradford, Eric</au><au>Zhang, Dongda</au><au>Jing, Keju</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Review of advanced physical and data‐driven models for dynamic bioprocess simulation: Case study of algae–bacteria consortium wastewater treatment</atitle><jtitle>Biotechnology and bioengineering</jtitle><addtitle>Biotechnol Bioeng</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>342</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>342-353</pages><issn>0006-3592</issn><eissn>1097-0290</eissn><abstract>Microorganism production and remediation processes are of critical importance to the next generation of sustainable industries. Undertaking mathematical treatment of dynamic biosystems operating at any spatial or temporal scale is essential to guarantee their performance and safety. However, constructing physical models remains a challenge due to the extreme complexity of process biological mechanisms. Data‐driven models also encounter severe limitations because datasets from large‐scale bioprocesses are often scarce without complete information and on a restricted operational space. To fill this gap, the current research compares the performance of advanced physical and data‐driven models for dynamic bioprocess simulations subject to incomplete and scarce datasets, which to the best of our knowledge has never been addressed before. In specific, kinetic models were constructed by integrating different classic models, and state‐of‐the‐art hyperparameter selection frameworks were developed to design artificial neural networks and Gaussian process regression models. An algae–bacteria consortium wastewater treatment process was selected to test the accuracy of these modeling strategies, as it is one of the most sophisticated biosystems due to the intricate mutualistic and competitive interactions. Based on the current results and available data, a heuristic model selection procedure is provided. This study paves the way to facilitate future bioprocess modeling. Undertaking mathematical modelling and optimization of algae‐bacteria consortium wastewater treatment process is essential to guarantee its efficiency, but remains a challenge due to its complex biological mechanisms. The authors adopted rigorous physical and advanced data‐driven models to simulate the dynamics of this system subject to incomplete and scarce datasets (imitating industrial situations). Performance of these modelling approaches was compared and previously proposed algae‐bacteria interactions were successfully verified. Finally, a heuristic model selection procedure was provided for future complex bioprocess modelling.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30475404</pmid><doi>10.1002/bit.26881</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0274-2852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5956-4618</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3592
ispartof Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2019-02, Vol.116 (2), p.342-353
issn 0006-3592
1097-0290
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2138050446
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Algae
algae–bacteria consortium
artificial neural network
Artificial neural networks
Bacillus subtilis - growth & development
Bacillus subtilis - metabolism
Bacteria
Biological activity
Biological models (mathematics)
Case studies
Chlorella vulgaris - growth & development
Chlorella vulgaris - metabolism
Computer simulation
Consortia
Datasets
Gaussian process
Gaussian processes
kinetic modeling
Mathematical models
Microbial Consortia
Model accuracy
Models, Theoretical
Neural networks
Regression analysis
Regression models
scarce dataset
Waste Water - microbiology
Wastewater treatment
Water Purification - methods
Water treatment
title Review of advanced physical and data‐driven models for dynamic bioprocess simulation: Case study of algae–bacteria consortium wastewater treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T18%3A43%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Review%20of%20advanced%20physical%20and%20data%E2%80%90driven%20models%20for%20dynamic%20bioprocess%20simulation:%20Case%20study%20of%20algae%E2%80%93bacteria%20consortium%20wastewater%20treatment&rft.jtitle=Biotechnology%20and%20bioengineering&rft.au=Del%20Rio%E2%80%90Chanona,%20Ehecatl%20Antonio&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=342&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=342-353&rft.issn=0006-3592&rft.eissn=1097-0290&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bit.26881&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2138050446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2164134866&rft_id=info:pmid/30475404&rfr_iscdi=true