Artificial intelligence using neural network architecture for radiology (AINNAR): classification of MR imaging sequences

Purpose The confusion of MRI sequence names could be solved if MR images were automatically identified after image data acquisition. We revealed the ability of deep learning to classify head MRI sequences. Materials and methods Seventy-eight patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) having appar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Japanese journal of radiology 2018-12, Vol.36 (12), p.691-697
Hauptverfasser: Noguchi, Tomoyuki, Higa, Daichi, Asada, Takashi, Kawata, Yusuke, Machitori, Akihiro, Shida, Yoshitaka, Okafuji, Takashi, Yokoyama, Kota, Uchiyama, Fumiya, Tajima, Tsuyoshi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose The confusion of MRI sequence names could be solved if MR images were automatically identified after image data acquisition. We revealed the ability of deep learning to classify head MRI sequences. Materials and methods Seventy-eight patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) having apparently normal head MR images and 78 intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) patients with morphologically deformed head MR images were enrolled. Six imaging protocols were selected to be performed: T2-weighted imaging, fluid attenuated inversion recovery imaging, T2-star-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient mapping, and source images of time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. The proximal first image slices and middle image slices having ambiguous and distinctive contrast patterns, respectively, were classified by two deep learning imaging classifiers, AlexNet and GoogLeNet. Results AlexNet had accuracies of 73.3%, 73.6%, 73.1%, and 60.7% in the middle slices of MCI group, middle slices of ICH group, first slices of MCI group, and first slices of ICH group, while GoogLeNet had accuracies of 100%, 98.1%, 93.1%, and 94.8%, respectively. AlexNet significantly had lower classification ability than GoogLeNet for all datasets. Conclusions GoogLeNet could judge the types of head MRI sequences with a small amount of training data, irrespective of morphological or contrast conditions.
ISSN:1867-1071
1867-108X
DOI:10.1007/s11604-018-0779-3