Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of the effects of sorafenib in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma

To compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of changes in tissue vascularization as result of sorafenib treatment in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Male Buffalo rats with orthot...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Magnetic resonance imaging 2019-04, Vol.57, p.156-164
Hauptverfasser: Muñoz, Nina M., Minhaj, Adeeb A., Maldonado, Kiersten L., Kingsley, Charles V., Cortes, Andrea C., Taghavi, Houra, Polak, Urszula, Mitchell, Jennifer M., Ensor, Joe E., Bankson, James A., Rashid, Asif, Avritscher, Rony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 164
container_issue
container_start_page 156
container_title Magnetic resonance imaging
container_volume 57
creator Muñoz, Nina M.
Minhaj, Adeeb A.
Maldonado, Kiersten L.
Kingsley, Charles V.
Cortes, Andrea C.
Taghavi, Houra
Polak, Urszula
Mitchell, Jennifer M.
Ensor, Joe E.
Bankson, James A.
Rashid, Asif
Avritscher, Rony
description To compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of changes in tissue vascularization as result of sorafenib treatment in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Male Buffalo rats with orthotopic liver tumors treated daily with 7.5 mg/kg sorafenib via oral gavage for 2 weeks (n = 9) were subject to DCE-MRI and CEUS 2 weeks after tumor implantation - right before treatment initiation - and also after treatment completion - right before tumor harvest. Untreated animals (n = 10) were used as control. Tumor tissue sections were stained for hematoxylin-eosin, pimonidazole, and CD34 for quantitative assessment of necrosis, hypoxia, and microvessel density (MVD), respectively. Of all the DCE-MRI parameters that were evaluated, only volume transfer constant (Ktrans) measurements were significantly lower in sorafenib-treated tumors (0.18 vs 0.33 min−1, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.mri.2018.11.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2137462270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0730725X18302017</els_id><sourcerecordid>2137462270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b626103633bc0d43c7535c00d2ab4c3c50eac8b0dd512812a2f22d92a5519b723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQtBCIHRY-gAvykUtC246TjDih0fKQVuICEjerY3d2PErswU5W2k_j73A0CyfEyXLXo-0qxl4LqAWI9t2pnpOvJYi-FqIGIZ-wneg7Vel-3zxlO-gUVJ3UP67Yi5xPAKCl0s_ZlYKm1X0HO_brEOczJp9j4HHk7iHg7C23MSwJ81JROGKw5PiMd4GWAiUq3G3GfZn5cMcxuH8I1mkbxLWAY0yc7nFacfGXPcuROI0j2SVv1xwTjhT8wH3gyBMufI6Opg070hmXaGma1gkTt5isD3HGl-zZiFOmV4_nNfv-8ebb4XN1-_XTl8OH28o2Yr9UQytbAapVarDgGmU7rbQFcBKHxiqrgdD2AzinheyFRDlK6fYStRb7oZPqmr29-J5T_LlSXszs8_YcDBTXbKRQXdNK2UGhigvVpphzotGcUwkpPRgBZmvMnExpzGyNGSFMaaxo3jzar8NM7q_iT0WF8P5CoPLJe0_JZOtpi9inkp9x0f_H_jdwdKsc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2137462270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of the effects of sorafenib in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Muñoz, Nina M. ; Minhaj, Adeeb A. ; Maldonado, Kiersten L. ; Kingsley, Charles V. ; Cortes, Andrea C. ; Taghavi, Houra ; Polak, Urszula ; Mitchell, Jennifer M. ; Ensor, Joe E. ; Bankson, James A. ; Rashid, Asif ; Avritscher, Rony</creator><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Nina M. ; Minhaj, Adeeb A. ; Maldonado, Kiersten L. ; Kingsley, Charles V. ; Cortes, Andrea C. ; Taghavi, Houra ; Polak, Urszula ; Mitchell, Jennifer M. ; Ensor, Joe E. ; Bankson, James A. ; Rashid, Asif ; Avritscher, Rony</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[To compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of changes in tissue vascularization as result of sorafenib treatment in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Male Buffalo rats with orthotopic liver tumors treated daily with 7.5 mg/kg sorafenib via oral gavage for 2 weeks (n = 9) were subject to DCE-MRI and CEUS 2 weeks after tumor implantation - right before treatment initiation - and also after treatment completion - right before tumor harvest. Untreated animals (n = 10) were used as control. Tumor tissue sections were stained for hematoxylin-eosin, pimonidazole, and CD34 for quantitative assessment of necrosis, hypoxia, and microvessel density (MVD), respectively. Of all the DCE-MRI parameters that were evaluated, only volume transfer constant (Ktrans) measurements were significantly lower in sorafenib-treated tumors (0.18 vs 0.33 min−1, p < 0.01), indicating a substantial decrease in vascular permeability caused by the therapy. This reduction was associated with decreased MVD (3.9 vs 10.8% CD34+ cells, p < 0.01), higher tumor necrosis (31.9 vs 21.8%, p < 0.001) and hypoxia (19.7 vs 10.5% pimonidazole binding, p < 0.01). Moreover, statistical analysis demonstrate significant correlation of DCE-MRI Ktrans with histopathologic tissue necrosis (r = −0.537, p < 0.05) and MVD (r = 0.599, p < 0.05). Interestingly, none of the CEUS measurements were significantly different between the control and treatment groups, and did not show statistical correlation with any of the histopathological parameters assessed (p > 0.05). Sorafenib-induced reduction in vascular permeability in this preclinical model of HCC is detected more accurately through DCE-MRI than CEUS, and DCE-MRI parameters strongly correlate with histopathological changes in tissue vascularization and tissue necrosis.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0730-725X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5894</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.11.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30465870</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomarkers, Tumor ; Capillary Permeability ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology ; Cell Line, Tumor ; Contrast Media - chemistry ; Contrast-enhanced functional imaging ; Disease Models, Animal ; Hepatocellular carcinoma ; Hypoxia ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Liver Neoplasms - pathology ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Necrosis ; Neovascularization, Pathologic ; Permeability ; Rats ; Sorafenib ; Sorafenib - chemistry ; Tissue perfusion ; Vascular permeability</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance imaging, 2019-04, Vol.57, p.156-164</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b626103633bc0d43c7535c00d2ab4c3c50eac8b0dd512812a2f22d92a5519b723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b626103633bc0d43c7535c00d2ab4c3c50eac8b0dd512812a2f22d92a5519b723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2018.11.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30465870$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Nina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minhaj, Adeeb A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado, Kiersten L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsley, Charles V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Andrea C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taghavi, Houra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polak, Urszula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ensor, Joe E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bankson, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashid, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avritscher, Rony</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of the effects of sorafenib in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma</title><title>Magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description><![CDATA[To compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of changes in tissue vascularization as result of sorafenib treatment in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Male Buffalo rats with orthotopic liver tumors treated daily with 7.5 mg/kg sorafenib via oral gavage for 2 weeks (n = 9) were subject to DCE-MRI and CEUS 2 weeks after tumor implantation - right before treatment initiation - and also after treatment completion - right before tumor harvest. Untreated animals (n = 10) were used as control. Tumor tissue sections were stained for hematoxylin-eosin, pimonidazole, and CD34 for quantitative assessment of necrosis, hypoxia, and microvessel density (MVD), respectively. Of all the DCE-MRI parameters that were evaluated, only volume transfer constant (Ktrans) measurements were significantly lower in sorafenib-treated tumors (0.18 vs 0.33 min−1, p < 0.01), indicating a substantial decrease in vascular permeability caused by the therapy. This reduction was associated with decreased MVD (3.9 vs 10.8% CD34+ cells, p < 0.01), higher tumor necrosis (31.9 vs 21.8%, p < 0.001) and hypoxia (19.7 vs 10.5% pimonidazole binding, p < 0.01). Moreover, statistical analysis demonstrate significant correlation of DCE-MRI Ktrans with histopathologic tissue necrosis (r = −0.537, p < 0.05) and MVD (r = 0.599, p < 0.05). Interestingly, none of the CEUS measurements were significantly different between the control and treatment groups, and did not show statistical correlation with any of the histopathological parameters assessed (p > 0.05). Sorafenib-induced reduction in vascular permeability in this preclinical model of HCC is detected more accurately through DCE-MRI than CEUS, and DCE-MRI parameters strongly correlate with histopathological changes in tissue vascularization and tissue necrosis.]]></description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor</subject><subject>Capillary Permeability</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</subject><subject>Cell Line, Tumor</subject><subject>Contrast Media - chemistry</subject><subject>Contrast-enhanced functional imaging</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Hepatocellular carcinoma</subject><subject>Hypoxia</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Necrosis</subject><subject>Neovascularization, Pathologic</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Rats</subject><subject>Sorafenib</subject><subject>Sorafenib - chemistry</subject><subject>Tissue perfusion</subject><subject>Vascular permeability</subject><issn>0730-725X</issn><issn>1873-5894</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UcuO1DAQtBCIHRY-gAvykUtC246TjDih0fKQVuICEjerY3d2PErswU5W2k_j73A0CyfEyXLXo-0qxl4LqAWI9t2pnpOvJYi-FqIGIZ-wneg7Vel-3zxlO-gUVJ3UP67Yi5xPAKCl0s_ZlYKm1X0HO_brEOczJp9j4HHk7iHg7C23MSwJ81JROGKw5PiMd4GWAiUq3G3GfZn5cMcxuH8I1mkbxLWAY0yc7nFacfGXPcuROI0j2SVv1xwTjhT8wH3gyBMufI6Opg070hmXaGma1gkTt5isD3HGl-zZiFOmV4_nNfv-8ebb4XN1-_XTl8OH28o2Yr9UQytbAapVarDgGmU7rbQFcBKHxiqrgdD2AzinheyFRDlK6fYStRb7oZPqmr29-J5T_LlSXszs8_YcDBTXbKRQXdNK2UGhigvVpphzotGcUwkpPRgBZmvMnExpzGyNGSFMaaxo3jzar8NM7q_iT0WF8P5CoPLJe0_JZOtpi9inkp9x0f_H_jdwdKsc</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Muñoz, Nina M.</creator><creator>Minhaj, Adeeb A.</creator><creator>Maldonado, Kiersten L.</creator><creator>Kingsley, Charles V.</creator><creator>Cortes, Andrea C.</creator><creator>Taghavi, Houra</creator><creator>Polak, Urszula</creator><creator>Mitchell, Jennifer M.</creator><creator>Ensor, Joe E.</creator><creator>Bankson, James A.</creator><creator>Rashid, Asif</creator><creator>Avritscher, Rony</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of the effects of sorafenib in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma</title><author>Muñoz, Nina M. ; Minhaj, Adeeb A. ; Maldonado, Kiersten L. ; Kingsley, Charles V. ; Cortes, Andrea C. ; Taghavi, Houra ; Polak, Urszula ; Mitchell, Jennifer M. ; Ensor, Joe E. ; Bankson, James A. ; Rashid, Asif ; Avritscher, Rony</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-b626103633bc0d43c7535c00d2ab4c3c50eac8b0dd512812a2f22d92a5519b723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor</topic><topic>Capillary Permeability</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology</topic><topic>Cell Line, Tumor</topic><topic>Contrast Media - chemistry</topic><topic>Contrast-enhanced functional imaging</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Hepatocellular carcinoma</topic><topic>Hypoxia</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Necrosis</topic><topic>Neovascularization, Pathologic</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Rats</topic><topic>Sorafenib</topic><topic>Sorafenib - chemistry</topic><topic>Tissue perfusion</topic><topic>Vascular permeability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Muñoz, Nina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Minhaj, Adeeb A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado, Kiersten L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kingsley, Charles V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cortes, Andrea C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taghavi, Houra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polak, Urszula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ensor, Joe E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bankson, James A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rashid, Asif</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avritscher, Rony</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Muñoz, Nina M.</au><au>Minhaj, Adeeb A.</au><au>Maldonado, Kiersten L.</au><au>Kingsley, Charles V.</au><au>Cortes, Andrea C.</au><au>Taghavi, Houra</au><au>Polak, Urszula</au><au>Mitchell, Jennifer M.</au><au>Ensor, Joe E.</au><au>Bankson, James A.</au><au>Rashid, Asif</au><au>Avritscher, Rony</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of the effects of sorafenib in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>57</volume><spage>156</spage><epage>164</epage><pages>156-164</pages><issn>0730-725X</issn><eissn>1873-5894</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[To compare the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of changes in tissue vascularization as result of sorafenib treatment in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Male Buffalo rats with orthotopic liver tumors treated daily with 7.5 mg/kg sorafenib via oral gavage for 2 weeks (n = 9) were subject to DCE-MRI and CEUS 2 weeks after tumor implantation - right before treatment initiation - and also after treatment completion - right before tumor harvest. Untreated animals (n = 10) were used as control. Tumor tissue sections were stained for hematoxylin-eosin, pimonidazole, and CD34 for quantitative assessment of necrosis, hypoxia, and microvessel density (MVD), respectively. Of all the DCE-MRI parameters that were evaluated, only volume transfer constant (Ktrans) measurements were significantly lower in sorafenib-treated tumors (0.18 vs 0.33 min−1, p < 0.01), indicating a substantial decrease in vascular permeability caused by the therapy. This reduction was associated with decreased MVD (3.9 vs 10.8% CD34+ cells, p < 0.01), higher tumor necrosis (31.9 vs 21.8%, p < 0.001) and hypoxia (19.7 vs 10.5% pimonidazole binding, p < 0.01). Moreover, statistical analysis demonstrate significant correlation of DCE-MRI Ktrans with histopathologic tissue necrosis (r = −0.537, p < 0.05) and MVD (r = 0.599, p < 0.05). Interestingly, none of the CEUS measurements were significantly different between the control and treatment groups, and did not show statistical correlation with any of the histopathological parameters assessed (p > 0.05). Sorafenib-induced reduction in vascular permeability in this preclinical model of HCC is detected more accurately through DCE-MRI than CEUS, and DCE-MRI parameters strongly correlate with histopathological changes in tissue vascularization and tissue necrosis.]]></abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30465870</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.mri.2018.11.012</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0730-725X
ispartof Magnetic resonance imaging, 2019-04, Vol.57, p.156-164
issn 0730-725X
1873-5894
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2137462270
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Animals
Biomarkers, Tumor
Capillary Permeability
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular - pathology
Cell Line, Tumor
Contrast Media - chemistry
Contrast-enhanced functional imaging
Disease Models, Animal
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Hypoxia
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Liver Neoplasms - pathology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Necrosis
Neovascularization, Pathologic
Permeability
Rats
Sorafenib
Sorafenib - chemistry
Tissue perfusion
Vascular permeability
title Comparison of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of the effects of sorafenib in a rat model of hepatocellular carcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A53%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20dynamic%20contrast-enhanced%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20and%20contrast-enhanced%20ultrasound%20for%20evaluation%20of%20the%20effects%20of%20sorafenib%20in%20a%20rat%20model%20of%20hepatocellular%20carcinoma&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Mu%C3%B1oz,%20Nina%20M.&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=57&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=164&rft.pages=156-164&rft.issn=0730-725X&rft.eissn=1873-5894&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.mri.2018.11.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2137462270%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2137462270&rft_id=info:pmid/30465870&rft_els_id=S0730725X18302017&rfr_iscdi=true