Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling
Suspended culture of scallops (Pectinidae: Bivalvia) is plagued by invertebrate fouling. Scallops covered in an orange sponge ( Suberites ficus ssp. rubrus), however, do not have any other invertebrates fouling their shells and the sponge is easily removed. Sponges may also be valuable sources of bi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of biotechnology 1999-04, Vol.70 (1), p.163-174 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 174 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 163 |
container_title | Journal of biotechnology |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Armstrong, Evelyn Douglas McKenzie, J Goldsworthy, Gordon T |
description | Suspended culture of scallops (Pectinidae: Bivalvia) is plagued by invertebrate fouling. Scallops covered in an orange sponge (
Suberites ficus ssp.
rubrus), however, do not have any other invertebrates fouling their shells and the sponge is easily removed. Sponges may also be valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Seven species of sponge were found to be associated with
Chlamys opercularis but none were found associated with
Pecten maximus. Standing crop of sponge on the scallop farm was just over one tonne. If all the scallops were covered by sponge this would rise to approximately 4.5 tonnes (from three million scallops). Primary cell cultures of (
S.f. rubrus) were successfully established but no cell lines were achieved. A number of techniques were tried for establishing cells and pieces of sponge tissue onto scallop shells but none gave satisfactory results. Likewise mechanical methods for sticking small pieces of sponge to scallop shells were deemed impractical even where they resulted in subsequent sponge growth. Improving natural settlement of sponges onto the scallops was the only economically practical method for increasing sponge yield for
C. opercularis, though other methods would need to be devised for
P. maximus. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00069-3 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21364507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168165699000693</els_id><sourcerecordid>17307243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-c3b5541ae1834ed0e00fc2f4423e1a9164b060f01203743f6e61042ae1c30d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LHTEUBuBQKnir_gRpFqXoYvTkYzKTVRHRtiAoqOsQMye3KXMn9yYzgv_ejCPt0kWSzXOSNy8hxwzOGDB1fl-2tmKqVidanwKA0pX4RFasbUQlWyU-k9U_sk--5Py3IKlrtiJ3F7vJuqkfp4Q0epq3cVhjpnGg2dm-j9tMfUx0sEXYnm5T7CY3Zpowo03uD7VDV9YYfJz6MKwPyZ63fcaj9_OAPFxfPVz-qm5uf_6-vLipnOR8rJx4qmvJLLJWSOwAAbzjXkoukFnNlHwCBR4YB9FI4RUqBpIX7wR0UhyQ78u1JdBuwjyaTcgO-94OGKdsOBNK1tB8CFkjoOFSFFgv0KWYc0JvtilsbHoxDMzcs3nr2cwlGq3NW89mnvv2_oCdG_PJDi7k_8Otnv9Q2NeFeRuNXadCHu85MAFcQ13CFvFjEVhqew6YTHYBB4ddSOhG08XwQZRX-S-aVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17307243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Armstrong, Evelyn ; Douglas McKenzie, J ; Goldsworthy, Gordon T</creator><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Evelyn ; Douglas McKenzie, J ; Goldsworthy, Gordon T</creatorcontrib><description>Suspended culture of scallops (Pectinidae: Bivalvia) is plagued by invertebrate fouling. Scallops covered in an orange sponge (
Suberites ficus ssp.
rubrus), however, do not have any other invertebrates fouling their shells and the sponge is easily removed. Sponges may also be valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Seven species of sponge were found to be associated with
Chlamys opercularis but none were found associated with
Pecten maximus. Standing crop of sponge on the scallop farm was just over one tonne. If all the scallops were covered by sponge this would rise to approximately 4.5 tonnes (from three million scallops). Primary cell cultures of (
S.f. rubrus) were successfully established but no cell lines were achieved. A number of techniques were tried for establishing cells and pieces of sponge tissue onto scallop shells but none gave satisfactory results. Likewise mechanical methods for sticking small pieces of sponge to scallop shells were deemed impractical even where they resulted in subsequent sponge growth. Improving natural settlement of sponges onto the scallops was the only economically practical method for increasing sponge yield for
C. opercularis, though other methods would need to be devised for
P. maximus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00069-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBITD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adhesion ; Animal aquaculture ; Animal productions ; Aquaculture ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cell culture ; Chlamys ; Chlamys opercularis ; Fouling ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Invertebrate aquaculture ; Marine ; Marine biology ; Mollusca ; parazoa ; Pecten maximus ; Pectinidae ; Suberites ficus ; Suberites ficus rubrus ; Suberites ficus rubus ; Tissue</subject><ispartof>Journal of biotechnology, 1999-04, Vol.70 (1), p.163-174</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-c3b5541ae1834ed0e00fc2f4423e1a9164b060f01203743f6e61042ae1c30d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-c3b5541ae1834ed0e00fc2f4423e1a9164b060f01203743f6e61042ae1c30d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168165699000693$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1891203$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Evelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas McKenzie, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsworthy, Gordon T</creatorcontrib><title>Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling</title><title>Journal of biotechnology</title><description>Suspended culture of scallops (Pectinidae: Bivalvia) is plagued by invertebrate fouling. Scallops covered in an orange sponge (
Suberites ficus ssp.
rubrus), however, do not have any other invertebrates fouling their shells and the sponge is easily removed. Sponges may also be valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Seven species of sponge were found to be associated with
Chlamys opercularis but none were found associated with
Pecten maximus. Standing crop of sponge on the scallop farm was just over one tonne. If all the scallops were covered by sponge this would rise to approximately 4.5 tonnes (from three million scallops). Primary cell cultures of (
S.f. rubrus) were successfully established but no cell lines were achieved. A number of techniques were tried for establishing cells and pieces of sponge tissue onto scallop shells but none gave satisfactory results. Likewise mechanical methods for sticking small pieces of sponge to scallop shells were deemed impractical even where they resulted in subsequent sponge growth. Improving natural settlement of sponges onto the scallops was the only economically practical method for increasing sponge yield for
C. opercularis, though other methods would need to be devised for
P. maximus.</description><subject>Adhesion</subject><subject>Animal aquaculture</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Chlamys</subject><subject>Chlamys opercularis</subject><subject>Fouling</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Invertebrate aquaculture</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Mollusca</subject><subject>parazoa</subject><subject>Pecten maximus</subject><subject>Pectinidae</subject><subject>Suberites ficus</subject><subject>Suberites ficus rubrus</subject><subject>Suberites ficus rubus</subject><subject>Tissue</subject><issn>0168-1656</issn><issn>1873-4863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0E1LHTEUBuBQKnir_gRpFqXoYvTkYzKTVRHRtiAoqOsQMye3KXMn9yYzgv_ejCPt0kWSzXOSNy8hxwzOGDB1fl-2tmKqVidanwKA0pX4RFasbUQlWyU-k9U_sk--5Py3IKlrtiJ3F7vJuqkfp4Q0epq3cVhjpnGg2dm-j9tMfUx0sEXYnm5T7CY3Zpowo03uD7VDV9YYfJz6MKwPyZ63fcaj9_OAPFxfPVz-qm5uf_6-vLipnOR8rJx4qmvJLLJWSOwAAbzjXkoukFnNlHwCBR4YB9FI4RUqBpIX7wR0UhyQ78u1JdBuwjyaTcgO-94OGKdsOBNK1tB8CFkjoOFSFFgv0KWYc0JvtilsbHoxDMzcs3nr2cwlGq3NW89mnvv2_oCdG_PJDi7k_8Otnv9Q2NeFeRuNXadCHu85MAFcQ13CFvFjEVhqew6YTHYBB4ddSOhG08XwQZRX-S-aVg</recordid><startdate>19990430</startdate><enddate>19990430</enddate><creator>Armstrong, Evelyn</creator><creator>Douglas McKenzie, J</creator><creator>Goldsworthy, Gordon T</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990430</creationdate><title>Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling</title><author>Armstrong, Evelyn ; Douglas McKenzie, J ; Goldsworthy, Gordon T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-c3b5541ae1834ed0e00fc2f4423e1a9164b060f01203743f6e61042ae1c30d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adhesion</topic><topic>Animal aquaculture</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Chlamys</topic><topic>Chlamys opercularis</topic><topic>Fouling</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Invertebrate aquaculture</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Mollusca</topic><topic>parazoa</topic><topic>Pecten maximus</topic><topic>Pectinidae</topic><topic>Suberites ficus</topic><topic>Suberites ficus rubrus</topic><topic>Suberites ficus rubus</topic><topic>Tissue</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Evelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas McKenzie, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsworthy, Gordon T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Armstrong, Evelyn</au><au>Douglas McKenzie, J</au><au>Goldsworthy, Gordon T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biotechnology</jtitle><date>1999-04-30</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>163-174</pages><issn>0168-1656</issn><eissn>1873-4863</eissn><coden>JBITD4</coden><abstract>Suspended culture of scallops (Pectinidae: Bivalvia) is plagued by invertebrate fouling. Scallops covered in an orange sponge (
Suberites ficus ssp.
rubrus), however, do not have any other invertebrates fouling their shells and the sponge is easily removed. Sponges may also be valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Seven species of sponge were found to be associated with
Chlamys opercularis but none were found associated with
Pecten maximus. Standing crop of sponge on the scallop farm was just over one tonne. If all the scallops were covered by sponge this would rise to approximately 4.5 tonnes (from three million scallops). Primary cell cultures of (
S.f. rubrus) were successfully established but no cell lines were achieved. A number of techniques were tried for establishing cells and pieces of sponge tissue onto scallop shells but none gave satisfactory results. Likewise mechanical methods for sticking small pieces of sponge to scallop shells were deemed impractical even where they resulted in subsequent sponge growth. Improving natural settlement of sponges onto the scallops was the only economically practical method for increasing sponge yield for
C. opercularis, though other methods would need to be devised for
P. maximus.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00069-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-1656 |
ispartof | Journal of biotechnology, 1999-04, Vol.70 (1), p.163-174 |
issn | 0168-1656 1873-4863 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21364507 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adhesion Animal aquaculture Animal productions Aquaculture Biological and medical sciences Cell culture Chlamys Chlamys opercularis Fouling Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Invertebrate aquaculture Marine Marine biology Mollusca parazoa Pecten maximus Pectinidae Suberites ficus Suberites ficus rubrus Suberites ficus rubus Tissue |
title | Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A57%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aquaculture%20of%20sponges%20on%20scallops%20for%20natural%20products%20research%20and%20antifouling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biotechnology&rft.au=Armstrong,%20Evelyn&rft.date=1999-04-30&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=163-174&rft.issn=0168-1656&rft.eissn=1873-4863&rft.coden=JBITD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00069-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17307243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17307243&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168165699000693&rfr_iscdi=true |