Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling

Suspended culture of scallops (Pectinidae: Bivalvia) is plagued by invertebrate fouling. Scallops covered in an orange sponge ( Suberites ficus ssp. rubrus), however, do not have any other invertebrates fouling their shells and the sponge is easily removed. Sponges may also be valuable sources of bi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biotechnology 1999-04, Vol.70 (1), p.163-174
Hauptverfasser: Armstrong, Evelyn, Douglas McKenzie, J, Goldsworthy, Gordon T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 174
container_issue 1
container_start_page 163
container_title Journal of biotechnology
container_volume 70
creator Armstrong, Evelyn
Douglas McKenzie, J
Goldsworthy, Gordon T
description Suspended culture of scallops (Pectinidae: Bivalvia) is plagued by invertebrate fouling. Scallops covered in an orange sponge ( Suberites ficus ssp. rubrus), however, do not have any other invertebrates fouling their shells and the sponge is easily removed. Sponges may also be valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Seven species of sponge were found to be associated with Chlamys opercularis but none were found associated with Pecten maximus. Standing crop of sponge on the scallop farm was just over one tonne. If all the scallops were covered by sponge this would rise to approximately 4.5 tonnes (from three million scallops). Primary cell cultures of ( S.f. rubrus) were successfully established but no cell lines were achieved. A number of techniques were tried for establishing cells and pieces of sponge tissue onto scallop shells but none gave satisfactory results. Likewise mechanical methods for sticking small pieces of sponge to scallop shells were deemed impractical even where they resulted in subsequent sponge growth. Improving natural settlement of sponges onto the scallops was the only economically practical method for increasing sponge yield for C. opercularis, though other methods would need to be devised for P. maximus.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00069-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21364507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168165699000693</els_id><sourcerecordid>17307243</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-c3b5541ae1834ed0e00fc2f4423e1a9164b060f01203743f6e61042ae1c30d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0E1LHTEUBuBQKnir_gRpFqXoYvTkYzKTVRHRtiAoqOsQMye3KXMn9yYzgv_ejCPt0kWSzXOSNy8hxwzOGDB1fl-2tmKqVidanwKA0pX4RFasbUQlWyU-k9U_sk--5Py3IKlrtiJ3F7vJuqkfp4Q0epq3cVhjpnGg2dm-j9tMfUx0sEXYnm5T7CY3Zpowo03uD7VDV9YYfJz6MKwPyZ63fcaj9_OAPFxfPVz-qm5uf_6-vLipnOR8rJx4qmvJLLJWSOwAAbzjXkoukFnNlHwCBR4YB9FI4RUqBpIX7wR0UhyQ78u1JdBuwjyaTcgO-94OGKdsOBNK1tB8CFkjoOFSFFgv0KWYc0JvtilsbHoxDMzcs3nr2cwlGq3NW89mnvv2_oCdG_PJDi7k_8Otnv9Q2NeFeRuNXadCHu85MAFcQ13CFvFjEVhqew6YTHYBB4ddSOhG08XwQZRX-S-aVg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17307243</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Armstrong, Evelyn ; Douglas McKenzie, J ; Goldsworthy, Gordon T</creator><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Evelyn ; Douglas McKenzie, J ; Goldsworthy, Gordon T</creatorcontrib><description>Suspended culture of scallops (Pectinidae: Bivalvia) is plagued by invertebrate fouling. Scallops covered in an orange sponge ( Suberites ficus ssp. rubrus), however, do not have any other invertebrates fouling their shells and the sponge is easily removed. Sponges may also be valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Seven species of sponge were found to be associated with Chlamys opercularis but none were found associated with Pecten maximus. Standing crop of sponge on the scallop farm was just over one tonne. If all the scallops were covered by sponge this would rise to approximately 4.5 tonnes (from three million scallops). Primary cell cultures of ( S.f. rubrus) were successfully established but no cell lines were achieved. A number of techniques were tried for establishing cells and pieces of sponge tissue onto scallop shells but none gave satisfactory results. Likewise mechanical methods for sticking small pieces of sponge to scallop shells were deemed impractical even where they resulted in subsequent sponge growth. Improving natural settlement of sponges onto the scallops was the only economically practical method for increasing sponge yield for C. opercularis, though other methods would need to be devised for P. maximus.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1656</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4863</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00069-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBITD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lausanne: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adhesion ; Animal aquaculture ; Animal productions ; Aquaculture ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cell culture ; Chlamys ; Chlamys opercularis ; Fouling ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Invertebrate aquaculture ; Marine ; Marine biology ; Mollusca ; parazoa ; Pecten maximus ; Pectinidae ; Suberites ficus ; Suberites ficus rubrus ; Suberites ficus rubus ; Tissue</subject><ispartof>Journal of biotechnology, 1999-04, Vol.70 (1), p.163-174</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-c3b5541ae1834ed0e00fc2f4423e1a9164b060f01203743f6e61042ae1c30d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-c3b5541ae1834ed0e00fc2f4423e1a9164b060f01203743f6e61042ae1c30d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168165699000693$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1891203$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Evelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas McKenzie, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsworthy, Gordon T</creatorcontrib><title>Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling</title><title>Journal of biotechnology</title><description>Suspended culture of scallops (Pectinidae: Bivalvia) is plagued by invertebrate fouling. Scallops covered in an orange sponge ( Suberites ficus ssp. rubrus), however, do not have any other invertebrates fouling their shells and the sponge is easily removed. Sponges may also be valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Seven species of sponge were found to be associated with Chlamys opercularis but none were found associated with Pecten maximus. Standing crop of sponge on the scallop farm was just over one tonne. If all the scallops were covered by sponge this would rise to approximately 4.5 tonnes (from three million scallops). Primary cell cultures of ( S.f. rubrus) were successfully established but no cell lines were achieved. A number of techniques were tried for establishing cells and pieces of sponge tissue onto scallop shells but none gave satisfactory results. Likewise mechanical methods for sticking small pieces of sponge to scallop shells were deemed impractical even where they resulted in subsequent sponge growth. Improving natural settlement of sponges onto the scallops was the only economically practical method for increasing sponge yield for C. opercularis, though other methods would need to be devised for P. maximus.</description><subject>Adhesion</subject><subject>Animal aquaculture</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Aquaculture</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Chlamys</subject><subject>Chlamys opercularis</subject><subject>Fouling</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Invertebrate aquaculture</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine biology</subject><subject>Mollusca</subject><subject>parazoa</subject><subject>Pecten maximus</subject><subject>Pectinidae</subject><subject>Suberites ficus</subject><subject>Suberites ficus rubrus</subject><subject>Suberites ficus rubus</subject><subject>Tissue</subject><issn>0168-1656</issn><issn>1873-4863</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0E1LHTEUBuBQKnir_gRpFqXoYvTkYzKTVRHRtiAoqOsQMye3KXMn9yYzgv_ejCPt0kWSzXOSNy8hxwzOGDB1fl-2tmKqVidanwKA0pX4RFasbUQlWyU-k9U_sk--5Py3IKlrtiJ3F7vJuqkfp4Q0epq3cVhjpnGg2dm-j9tMfUx0sEXYnm5T7CY3Zpowo03uD7VDV9YYfJz6MKwPyZ63fcaj9_OAPFxfPVz-qm5uf_6-vLipnOR8rJx4qmvJLLJWSOwAAbzjXkoukFnNlHwCBR4YB9FI4RUqBpIX7wR0UhyQ78u1JdBuwjyaTcgO-94OGKdsOBNK1tB8CFkjoOFSFFgv0KWYc0JvtilsbHoxDMzcs3nr2cwlGq3NW89mnvv2_oCdG_PJDi7k_8Otnv9Q2NeFeRuNXadCHu85MAFcQ13CFvFjEVhqew6YTHYBB4ddSOhG08XwQZRX-S-aVg</recordid><startdate>19990430</startdate><enddate>19990430</enddate><creator>Armstrong, Evelyn</creator><creator>Douglas McKenzie, J</creator><creator>Goldsworthy, Gordon T</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990430</creationdate><title>Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling</title><author>Armstrong, Evelyn ; Douglas McKenzie, J ; Goldsworthy, Gordon T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c422t-c3b5541ae1834ed0e00fc2f4423e1a9164b060f01203743f6e61042ae1c30d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Adhesion</topic><topic>Animal aquaculture</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Aquaculture</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Chlamys</topic><topic>Chlamys opercularis</topic><topic>Fouling</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Invertebrate aquaculture</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine biology</topic><topic>Mollusca</topic><topic>parazoa</topic><topic>Pecten maximus</topic><topic>Pectinidae</topic><topic>Suberites ficus</topic><topic>Suberites ficus rubrus</topic><topic>Suberites ficus rubus</topic><topic>Tissue</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Armstrong, Evelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Douglas McKenzie, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsworthy, Gordon T</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of biotechnology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Armstrong, Evelyn</au><au>Douglas McKenzie, J</au><au>Goldsworthy, Gordon T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biotechnology</jtitle><date>1999-04-30</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>163</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>163-174</pages><issn>0168-1656</issn><eissn>1873-4863</eissn><coden>JBITD4</coden><abstract>Suspended culture of scallops (Pectinidae: Bivalvia) is plagued by invertebrate fouling. Scallops covered in an orange sponge ( Suberites ficus ssp. rubrus), however, do not have any other invertebrates fouling their shells and the sponge is easily removed. Sponges may also be valuable sources of bioactive compounds. Seven species of sponge were found to be associated with Chlamys opercularis but none were found associated with Pecten maximus. Standing crop of sponge on the scallop farm was just over one tonne. If all the scallops were covered by sponge this would rise to approximately 4.5 tonnes (from three million scallops). Primary cell cultures of ( S.f. rubrus) were successfully established but no cell lines were achieved. A number of techniques were tried for establishing cells and pieces of sponge tissue onto scallop shells but none gave satisfactory results. Likewise mechanical methods for sticking small pieces of sponge to scallop shells were deemed impractical even where they resulted in subsequent sponge growth. Improving natural settlement of sponges onto the scallops was the only economically practical method for increasing sponge yield for C. opercularis, though other methods would need to be devised for P. maximus.</abstract><cop>Lausanne</cop><cop>Amsterdam</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00069-3</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-1656
ispartof Journal of biotechnology, 1999-04, Vol.70 (1), p.163-174
issn 0168-1656
1873-4863
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21364507
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adhesion
Animal aquaculture
Animal productions
Aquaculture
Biological and medical sciences
Cell culture
Chlamys
Chlamys opercularis
Fouling
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Invertebrate aquaculture
Marine
Marine biology
Mollusca
parazoa
Pecten maximus
Pectinidae
Suberites ficus
Suberites ficus rubrus
Suberites ficus rubus
Tissue
title Aquaculture of sponges on scallops for natural products research and antifouling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A57%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aquaculture%20of%20sponges%20on%20scallops%20for%20natural%20products%20research%20and%20antifouling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biotechnology&rft.au=Armstrong,%20Evelyn&rft.date=1999-04-30&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=163&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=163-174&rft.issn=0168-1656&rft.eissn=1873-4863&rft.coden=JBITD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0168-1656(99)00069-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17307243%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17307243&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168165699000693&rfr_iscdi=true