A systematic review of the effectiveness of health education interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake
Cervical cancer screening reduced cancer morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Health education interventions are expected to enhance screening and early detection. Thus, this review is aimed to see the effectiveness of the interventions in cervical cancer screening uptake. Online database...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of public health 2018-12, Vol.28 (6), p.1156-1162 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1162 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1156 |
container_title | European journal of public health |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Agide, Feleke Doyore Garmaroudi, Gholamreza Sadeghi, Roya Shakibazadeh, Elham Yaseri, Mehdi Koricha, Zewdie Birhanu Tigabu, Bereket Molla |
description | Cervical cancer screening reduced cancer morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Health education interventions are expected to enhance screening and early detection. Thus, this review is aimed to see the effectiveness of the interventions in cervical cancer screening uptake.
Online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE/PubMed Central, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were searched for all published eligible research articles in the past 12 years (as of January 2005-2017). A total of 17 research articles were included. The interventions were classified as 'individual level', 'community level' and 'cultural sensitive educations' which contains various interventions in their content as compared with usual care. A quality coding system was assessed using Cochrane checklists and rated by each researcher independently and the average score was given accordingly. This study was registered in PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017060405.
The review dovetailed 17 studies. Ten studies (58.82%) were conducted in the United States, three in Iran (17.65%) and one each in Malaysia, China, Cameroon and Nigeria (23.53%). Almost all levels of the interventions boosted the screening uptake and the Pap test. However, the individual level health education interventions were prioritized in many of the studies.
The review indicated that health education interventions have immense contributions in boosting the screening uptake. However, the effectiveness varies with study setting, populations and the way of delivery. Therefore, the limited quality of the studies indicated that further research is required to develop a simple and effective intervention to boost cervical cancer screening uptake. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/eurpub/cky197 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2136064975</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2430104904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2251d2ad58c04196523a4a98395c48d37b8efcc09f88915a2b1e1b8e12a8f0343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkTtPwzAURi0EoqUwsiJLLCyhfiWxx6riJSGxgMQWOc4NTZtHsZ1W_fc4SmFg8vXx0SfbH0LXlNxTovgcervt87nZHKhKT9CUikREPCGfp2GmhEaUJWyCLpxbE0LiVLJzNOGEiyQmYor2C-wOzkOjfWWwhV0Fe9yV2K8AQ1mC8dUOWnBugCvQtV9hKHoT9K7FVevBhvNh47DvAjAWtANsAq-MrrHRbZixCxzaqv3C_dbrDVyis1LXDq6O6wx9PD68L5-j17enl-XiNTKCJT5iLKYF00UsDRFUJTHjWmgluYqNkAVPcwmlMUSVUioaa5ZToIFRpmUZHsln6G7M3druuwfns6ZyBupat9D1LmM0_FUiVBoH9fafuu5624bbZUxwQolQZAiMRsvYzjkLZba1VaPtIaMkGxrJxkaysZHg3xxT-7yB4s_-rYD_AGlQing</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430104904</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A systematic review of the effectiveness of health education interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Agide, Feleke Doyore ; Garmaroudi, Gholamreza ; Sadeghi, Roya ; Shakibazadeh, Elham ; Yaseri, Mehdi ; Koricha, Zewdie Birhanu ; Tigabu, Bereket Molla</creator><creatorcontrib>Agide, Feleke Doyore ; Garmaroudi, Gholamreza ; Sadeghi, Roya ; Shakibazadeh, Elham ; Yaseri, Mehdi ; Koricha, Zewdie Birhanu ; Tigabu, Bereket Molla</creatorcontrib><description>Cervical cancer screening reduced cancer morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Health education interventions are expected to enhance screening and early detection. Thus, this review is aimed to see the effectiveness of the interventions in cervical cancer screening uptake.
Online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE/PubMed Central, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were searched for all published eligible research articles in the past 12 years (as of January 2005-2017). A total of 17 research articles were included. The interventions were classified as 'individual level', 'community level' and 'cultural sensitive educations' which contains various interventions in their content as compared with usual care. A quality coding system was assessed using Cochrane checklists and rated by each researcher independently and the average score was given accordingly. This study was registered in PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017060405.
The review dovetailed 17 studies. Ten studies (58.82%) were conducted in the United States, three in Iran (17.65%) and one each in Malaysia, China, Cameroon and Nigeria (23.53%). Almost all levels of the interventions boosted the screening uptake and the Pap test. However, the individual level health education interventions were prioritized in many of the studies.
The review indicated that health education interventions have immense contributions in boosting the screening uptake. However, the effectiveness varies with study setting, populations and the way of delivery. Therefore, the limited quality of the studies indicated that further research is required to develop a simple and effective intervention to boost cervical cancer screening uptake.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky197</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30346504</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Cervical cancer ; Cervix ; Check lists ; Developed countries ; Education ; Effectiveness ; Health education ; Internet ; Intervention ; Medical screening ; Morbidity ; Population studies ; Public health ; Quality assessment ; Quality of care ; Reviews ; Search engines ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2018-12, Vol.28 (6), p.1156-1162</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2251d2ad58c04196523a4a98395c48d37b8efcc09f88915a2b1e1b8e12a8f0343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2251d2ad58c04196523a4a98395c48d37b8efcc09f88915a2b1e1b8e12a8f0343</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9311-9275</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30346504$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agide, Feleke Doyore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garmaroudi, Gholamreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, Roya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shakibazadeh, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaseri, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koricha, Zewdie Birhanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tigabu, Bereket Molla</creatorcontrib><title>A systematic review of the effectiveness of health education interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake</title><title>European journal of public health</title><addtitle>Eur J Public Health</addtitle><description>Cervical cancer screening reduced cancer morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Health education interventions are expected to enhance screening and early detection. Thus, this review is aimed to see the effectiveness of the interventions in cervical cancer screening uptake.
Online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE/PubMed Central, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were searched for all published eligible research articles in the past 12 years (as of January 2005-2017). A total of 17 research articles were included. The interventions were classified as 'individual level', 'community level' and 'cultural sensitive educations' which contains various interventions in their content as compared with usual care. A quality coding system was assessed using Cochrane checklists and rated by each researcher independently and the average score was given accordingly. This study was registered in PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017060405.
The review dovetailed 17 studies. Ten studies (58.82%) were conducted in the United States, three in Iran (17.65%) and one each in Malaysia, China, Cameroon and Nigeria (23.53%). Almost all levels of the interventions boosted the screening uptake and the Pap test. However, the individual level health education interventions were prioritized in many of the studies.
The review indicated that health education interventions have immense contributions in boosting the screening uptake. However, the effectiveness varies with study setting, populations and the way of delivery. Therefore, the limited quality of the studies indicated that further research is required to develop a simple and effective intervention to boost cervical cancer screening uptake.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Cervix</subject><subject>Check lists</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Health education</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Search engines</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkTtPwzAURi0EoqUwsiJLLCyhfiWxx6riJSGxgMQWOc4NTZtHsZ1W_fc4SmFg8vXx0SfbH0LXlNxTovgcervt87nZHKhKT9CUikREPCGfp2GmhEaUJWyCLpxbE0LiVLJzNOGEiyQmYor2C-wOzkOjfWWwhV0Fe9yV2K8AQ1mC8dUOWnBugCvQtV9hKHoT9K7FVevBhvNh47DvAjAWtANsAq-MrrHRbZixCxzaqv3C_dbrDVyis1LXDq6O6wx9PD68L5-j17enl-XiNTKCJT5iLKYF00UsDRFUJTHjWmgluYqNkAVPcwmlMUSVUioaa5ZToIFRpmUZHsln6G7M3druuwfns6ZyBupat9D1LmM0_FUiVBoH9fafuu5624bbZUxwQolQZAiMRsvYzjkLZba1VaPtIaMkGxrJxkaysZHg3xxT-7yB4s_-rYD_AGlQing</recordid><startdate>20181201</startdate><enddate>20181201</enddate><creator>Agide, Feleke Doyore</creator><creator>Garmaroudi, Gholamreza</creator><creator>Sadeghi, Roya</creator><creator>Shakibazadeh, Elham</creator><creator>Yaseri, Mehdi</creator><creator>Koricha, Zewdie Birhanu</creator><creator>Tigabu, Bereket Molla</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9311-9275</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20181201</creationdate><title>A systematic review of the effectiveness of health education interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake</title><author>Agide, Feleke Doyore ; Garmaroudi, Gholamreza ; Sadeghi, Roya ; Shakibazadeh, Elham ; Yaseri, Mehdi ; Koricha, Zewdie Birhanu ; Tigabu, Bereket Molla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2251d2ad58c04196523a4a98395c48d37b8efcc09f88915a2b1e1b8e12a8f0343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Cervix</topic><topic>Check lists</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Health education</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Search engines</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agide, Feleke Doyore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garmaroudi, Gholamreza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sadeghi, Roya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shakibazadeh, Elham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yaseri, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koricha, Zewdie Birhanu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tigabu, Bereket Molla</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agide, Feleke Doyore</au><au>Garmaroudi, Gholamreza</au><au>Sadeghi, Roya</au><au>Shakibazadeh, Elham</au><au>Yaseri, Mehdi</au><au>Koricha, Zewdie Birhanu</au><au>Tigabu, Bereket Molla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A systematic review of the effectiveness of health education interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Public Health</addtitle><date>2018-12-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1156</spage><epage>1162</epage><pages>1156-1162</pages><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Cervical cancer screening reduced cancer morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Health education interventions are expected to enhance screening and early detection. Thus, this review is aimed to see the effectiveness of the interventions in cervical cancer screening uptake.
Online databases (PubMed/MEDLINE/PubMed Central, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science and Google Scholar) were searched for all published eligible research articles in the past 12 years (as of January 2005-2017). A total of 17 research articles were included. The interventions were classified as 'individual level', 'community level' and 'cultural sensitive educations' which contains various interventions in their content as compared with usual care. A quality coding system was assessed using Cochrane checklists and rated by each researcher independently and the average score was given accordingly. This study was registered in PROSPERO 2017: CRD42017060405.
The review dovetailed 17 studies. Ten studies (58.82%) were conducted in the United States, three in Iran (17.65%) and one each in Malaysia, China, Cameroon and Nigeria (23.53%). Almost all levels of the interventions boosted the screening uptake and the Pap test. However, the individual level health education interventions were prioritized in many of the studies.
The review indicated that health education interventions have immense contributions in boosting the screening uptake. However, the effectiveness varies with study setting, populations and the way of delivery. Therefore, the limited quality of the studies indicated that further research is required to develop a simple and effective intervention to boost cervical cancer screening uptake.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub><pmid>30346504</pmid><doi>10.1093/eurpub/cky197</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9311-9275</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1101-1262 |
ispartof | European journal of public health, 2018-12, Vol.28 (6), p.1156-1162 |
issn | 1101-1262 1464-360X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2136064975 |
source | PAIS Index; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Cancer Cancer screening Cervical cancer Cervix Check lists Developed countries Education Effectiveness Health education Internet Intervention Medical screening Morbidity Population studies Public health Quality assessment Quality of care Reviews Search engines Systematic review |
title | A systematic review of the effectiveness of health education interventions to increase cervical cancer screening uptake |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A04%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20health%20education%20interventions%20to%20increase%20cervical%20cancer%20screening%20uptake&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Agide,%20Feleke%20Doyore&rft.date=2018-12-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1156&rft.epage=1162&rft.pages=1156-1162&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/cky197&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2430104904%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430104904&rft_id=info:pmid/30346504&rfr_iscdi=true |