Information Retrieval in Food Science Research: A Bibliographic Database Analysis
The aim of the present research was to ascertain the importance of electronic bibliographic database selection and multiple database usage during the information retrieval phase of research in the food sciences. Six commonly recommended databases were compared with respect to overall journal coverag...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of food science 2018-12, Vol.83 (12), p.2912-2922 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2922 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2912 |
container_title | Journal of food science |
container_volume | 83 |
creator | Urhan, Tuba Karaarslan Rempel, Hannah Gascho Meunier‐Goddik, Lisbeth Penner, Michael H. |
description | The aim of the present research was to ascertain the importance of electronic bibliographic database selection and multiple database usage during the information retrieval phase of research in the food sciences. Six commonly recommended databases were compared with respect to overall journal coverage and journal overlap. Databases were also evaluated with respect to coverage of food science‐based journals and the extent of article coverage therein. A case study approach, focused on bile acid/dietary fiber interactions, was used to illustrate the ramifications of database selection/usage when dealing with specific research topics. Databases differed with respect to the breadth of disciplines covered, the total number of journals indexed, the number of food science discipline‐specific journals indexed, and the number of articles included per indexed journal. All of the databases contained citations that were unique to the given database. The data resulting from the case study provide an example of the extent to which relevant information may be missed if pertinent databases are not mined. In the present case, over half of the articles retrieved on the focus research topic were unique to a single database. The combined data from this study point to the importance of thoughtful database selection and multiple database usage when comprehensively assessing knowledge in the food sciences.
Practical Application
This paper provides insights into article database usage for food science‐relevant information retrieval. Online information retrieval is an efficient way to assess current knowledge in any of the food science disciplines. Acquired knowledge in turn is the underpinning of effective problem solving; whether it be private sector‐ or academic/government‐based research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1750-3841.14388 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2136061796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2154273467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-b884d3627a8d4ef19f737e3b50f1f9ee7bf98490380e5c5bc5e03ac7bb1ccea63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFPwjAUhxujEUTP3swSL14G7dqtnTcEUQyJUfTctOVNasaKLWj4790EOXixl5e-971fXj6Ezgnukvr1CE9xTAUjXcKoEAeove8cojbGSRITwngLnYTwjps_zY5Ri2KWJlzgNnoaV4XzC7WyroqeYeUtfKoyslU0cm4WTY2FykA9CaC8mV9H_ejG6tK6N6-Wc2uioVoprQJE_UqVm2DDKToqVBngbFc76HV0-zK4jyePd-NBfxIbyhMRayHYjGYJV2LGoCB5wSkHqlNckCIH4LrIBcsxFRhSk2qTAqbKcK2JMaAy2kFX29yldx9rCCu5sMFAWaoK3DrIhNAMZ4TnDXr5B313a1_f21ApSzhlGa-p3pYy3oXgoZBLbxfKbyTBsrEtG7eycSt_bNcbF7vctV7AbM__6q2BbAt82RI2_-XJh9Fwuk3-BjnXiFk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2154273467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Information Retrieval in Food Science Research: A Bibliographic Database Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Urhan, Tuba Karaarslan ; Rempel, Hannah Gascho ; Meunier‐Goddik, Lisbeth ; Penner, Michael H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Urhan, Tuba Karaarslan ; Rempel, Hannah Gascho ; Meunier‐Goddik, Lisbeth ; Penner, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present research was to ascertain the importance of electronic bibliographic database selection and multiple database usage during the information retrieval phase of research in the food sciences. Six commonly recommended databases were compared with respect to overall journal coverage and journal overlap. Databases were also evaluated with respect to coverage of food science‐based journals and the extent of article coverage therein. A case study approach, focused on bile acid/dietary fiber interactions, was used to illustrate the ramifications of database selection/usage when dealing with specific research topics. Databases differed with respect to the breadth of disciplines covered, the total number of journals indexed, the number of food science discipline‐specific journals indexed, and the number of articles included per indexed journal. All of the databases contained citations that were unique to the given database. The data resulting from the case study provide an example of the extent to which relevant information may be missed if pertinent databases are not mined. In the present case, over half of the articles retrieved on the focus research topic were unique to a single database. The combined data from this study point to the importance of thoughtful database selection and multiple database usage when comprehensively assessing knowledge in the food sciences.
Practical Application
This paper provides insights into article database usage for food science‐relevant information retrieval. Online information retrieval is an efficient way to assess current knowledge in any of the food science disciplines. Acquired knowledge in turn is the underpinning of effective problem solving; whether it be private sector‐ or academic/government‐based research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-3841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.14388</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30452780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bibliographic data bases ; Bibliographies ; Case studies ; Data processing ; Databases, Bibliographic ; Dietary fiber ; Food ; Food processing ; Food science ; food sciences ; Food Technology ; Information processing ; Information retrieval ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Knowledge acquisition ; Private sector ; Problem solving ; Relevance ; Uniqueness</subject><ispartof>Journal of food science, 2018-12, Vol.83 (12), p.2912-2922</ispartof><rights>2018 Institute of Food Technologists</rights><rights>2018 Institute of Food Technologists®.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-b884d3627a8d4ef19f737e3b50f1f9ee7bf98490380e5c5bc5e03ac7bb1ccea63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-b884d3627a8d4ef19f737e3b50f1f9ee7bf98490380e5c5bc5e03ac7bb1ccea63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3657-7173 ; 0000-0002-4995-6885</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1750-3841.14388$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1750-3841.14388$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30452780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Urhan, Tuba Karaarslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rempel, Hannah Gascho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meunier‐Goddik, Lisbeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penner, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><title>Information Retrieval in Food Science Research: A Bibliographic Database Analysis</title><title>Journal of food science</title><addtitle>J Food Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of the present research was to ascertain the importance of electronic bibliographic database selection and multiple database usage during the information retrieval phase of research in the food sciences. Six commonly recommended databases were compared with respect to overall journal coverage and journal overlap. Databases were also evaluated with respect to coverage of food science‐based journals and the extent of article coverage therein. A case study approach, focused on bile acid/dietary fiber interactions, was used to illustrate the ramifications of database selection/usage when dealing with specific research topics. Databases differed with respect to the breadth of disciplines covered, the total number of journals indexed, the number of food science discipline‐specific journals indexed, and the number of articles included per indexed journal. All of the databases contained citations that were unique to the given database. The data resulting from the case study provide an example of the extent to which relevant information may be missed if pertinent databases are not mined. In the present case, over half of the articles retrieved on the focus research topic were unique to a single database. The combined data from this study point to the importance of thoughtful database selection and multiple database usage when comprehensively assessing knowledge in the food sciences.
Practical Application
This paper provides insights into article database usage for food science‐relevant information retrieval. Online information retrieval is an efficient way to assess current knowledge in any of the food science disciplines. Acquired knowledge in turn is the underpinning of effective problem solving; whether it be private sector‐ or academic/government‐based research.</description><subject>Bibliographic data bases</subject><subject>Bibliographies</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Databases, Bibliographic</subject><subject>Dietary fiber</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food processing</subject><subject>Food science</subject><subject>food sciences</subject><subject>Food Technology</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Information retrieval</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Knowledge acquisition</subject><subject>Private sector</subject><subject>Problem solving</subject><subject>Relevance</subject><subject>Uniqueness</subject><issn>0022-1147</issn><issn>1750-3841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFPwjAUhxujEUTP3swSL14G7dqtnTcEUQyJUfTctOVNasaKLWj4790EOXixl5e-971fXj6Ezgnukvr1CE9xTAUjXcKoEAeove8cojbGSRITwngLnYTwjps_zY5Ri2KWJlzgNnoaV4XzC7WyroqeYeUtfKoyslU0cm4WTY2FykA9CaC8mV9H_ejG6tK6N6-Wc2uioVoprQJE_UqVm2DDKToqVBngbFc76HV0-zK4jyePd-NBfxIbyhMRayHYjGYJV2LGoCB5wSkHqlNckCIH4LrIBcsxFRhSk2qTAqbKcK2JMaAy2kFX29yldx9rCCu5sMFAWaoK3DrIhNAMZ4TnDXr5B313a1_f21ApSzhlGa-p3pYy3oXgoZBLbxfKbyTBsrEtG7eycSt_bNcbF7vctV7AbM__6q2BbAt82RI2_-XJh9Fwuk3-BjnXiFk</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Urhan, Tuba Karaarslan</creator><creator>Rempel, Hannah Gascho</creator><creator>Meunier‐Goddik, Lisbeth</creator><creator>Penner, Michael H.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3657-7173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4995-6885</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Information Retrieval in Food Science Research: A Bibliographic Database Analysis</title><author>Urhan, Tuba Karaarslan ; Rempel, Hannah Gascho ; Meunier‐Goddik, Lisbeth ; Penner, Michael H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3728-b884d3627a8d4ef19f737e3b50f1f9ee7bf98490380e5c5bc5e03ac7bb1ccea63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Bibliographic data bases</topic><topic>Bibliographies</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Databases, Bibliographic</topic><topic>Dietary fiber</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food processing</topic><topic>Food science</topic><topic>food sciences</topic><topic>Food Technology</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Information retrieval</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Knowledge acquisition</topic><topic>Private sector</topic><topic>Problem solving</topic><topic>Relevance</topic><topic>Uniqueness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Urhan, Tuba Karaarslan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rempel, Hannah Gascho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meunier‐Goddik, Lisbeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Penner, Michael H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Urhan, Tuba Karaarslan</au><au>Rempel, Hannah Gascho</au><au>Meunier‐Goddik, Lisbeth</au><au>Penner, Michael H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Information Retrieval in Food Science Research: A Bibliographic Database Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food science</jtitle><addtitle>J Food Sci</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2912</spage><epage>2922</epage><pages>2912-2922</pages><issn>0022-1147</issn><eissn>1750-3841</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present research was to ascertain the importance of electronic bibliographic database selection and multiple database usage during the information retrieval phase of research in the food sciences. Six commonly recommended databases were compared with respect to overall journal coverage and journal overlap. Databases were also evaluated with respect to coverage of food science‐based journals and the extent of article coverage therein. A case study approach, focused on bile acid/dietary fiber interactions, was used to illustrate the ramifications of database selection/usage when dealing with specific research topics. Databases differed with respect to the breadth of disciplines covered, the total number of journals indexed, the number of food science discipline‐specific journals indexed, and the number of articles included per indexed journal. All of the databases contained citations that were unique to the given database. The data resulting from the case study provide an example of the extent to which relevant information may be missed if pertinent databases are not mined. In the present case, over half of the articles retrieved on the focus research topic were unique to a single database. The combined data from this study point to the importance of thoughtful database selection and multiple database usage when comprehensively assessing knowledge in the food sciences.
Practical Application
This paper provides insights into article database usage for food science‐relevant information retrieval. Online information retrieval is an efficient way to assess current knowledge in any of the food science disciplines. Acquired knowledge in turn is the underpinning of effective problem solving; whether it be private sector‐ or academic/government‐based research.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>30452780</pmid><doi>10.1111/1750-3841.14388</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3657-7173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4995-6885</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1147 |
ispartof | Journal of food science, 2018-12, Vol.83 (12), p.2912-2922 |
issn | 0022-1147 1750-3841 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2136061796 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Bibliographic data bases Bibliographies Case studies Data processing Databases, Bibliographic Dietary fiber Food Food processing Food science food sciences Food Technology Information processing Information retrieval Information Storage and Retrieval Knowledge acquisition Private sector Problem solving Relevance Uniqueness |
title | Information Retrieval in Food Science Research: A Bibliographic Database Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T14%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Information%20Retrieval%20in%20Food%20Science%20Research:%20A%20Bibliographic%20Database%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20science&rft.au=Urhan,%20Tuba%20Karaarslan&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2912&rft.epage=2922&rft.pages=2912-2922&rft.issn=0022-1147&rft.eissn=1750-3841&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1750-3841.14388&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2154273467%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2154273467&rft_id=info:pmid/30452780&rfr_iscdi=true |