Blunt Trauma Patients with Cervical Stenosis and No Fracture are More Likely to Have Neurologic Deficits and Require Surgery than those without Stenosis
The protocols for safely removing the cervical collar or clearing the cervical spine in alert adult blunt trauma patients are well established, and recently the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) has published guidelines suggesting that the cervical spine in obtunded patients with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The American surgeon 2018-06, Vol.84 (6), p.188-191 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 191 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 188 |
container_title | The American surgeon |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Koerner, John D. Blatt, Melissa Zielonka, Tania Sharma, Jyoti Kaul, Sanjeev |
description | The protocols for safely removing the cervical collar or clearing the cervical spine in alert adult blunt trauma patients are well established, and recently the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) has published guidelines suggesting that the cervical spine in obtunded patients with blunt trauma can be cleared with a CT scan that is negative for fracture.1 The authors acknowledge that although these recommendations are based on a systematic review of very low quality of evidence, there was a 100 per cent negative predictive value to identify an unstable cervical injury.1 This review, however, did not discuss the effect cervical stenosis may have on these injuries. [...]it may be important to evaluate these patients with early MRI to determine whether spinal cord compression is present, which could possibly decrease the time until surgical intervention when indicated. A retrospective case series study design was used to compare clinical outcomes (spinal cord compression, neurologic deficits, and surgical treatment) in blunt trauma patients with and without cervical stenosis admitted to a Level II trauma center. [...]the study population is skewed by the fact that an MRI was typically ordered to evaluate for ligamentous injury or spinal cord compression because of a concerning neurologic examination. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/000313481808400605 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2136060929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_000313481808400605</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2136060929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-f7a191ccb8072cb11aa14e597c31e13e91bb3c87e5d0595baa393a12b9f19bef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1uFDEQhC0EIkvgBTggS1y4LHGPxzP2ETYkQVoCIuE86vH2bBxmx4l_gvImeVy8bAgSSBzclqWvqlouxl6CeAvQtgdCCAmy1qCFroVohHrEZqCUmhtdycdstgXmW2KPPYvxsjzrRsFTtlcZo0FpPWN378c8JX4eMG-Qf8HkaEqR_3Dpgi8o3DiLIz9LNPnoIsdpxU89PwpoUw7EsZxPvoyl-07jLU-en-AN8VPKwY9-7Sw_pMFZl3bar3SdXcHPclhTKPwFTmX4SL8SfU4PWc_ZkwHHSC_u73327ejD-eJkvvx8_HHxbjm3smnSfGgRDFjba9FWtgdAhJqUaa0EAkkG-l5a3ZJaCWVUjyiNRKh6M4DpaZD77M3O9yr460wxdRsXLY0jTuRz7CqQTflaU5mCvv4LvfQ5TGW7rhK60aJp6rpQ1Y6ywccYaOiugttguO1AdNveun97K6JX99a539DqQfK7qAIc7ICIa_qT-x_Ln3JfoYc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2086806644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blunt Trauma Patients with Cervical Stenosis and No Fracture are More Likely to Have Neurologic Deficits and Require Surgery than those without Stenosis</title><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><creator>Koerner, John D. ; Blatt, Melissa ; Zielonka, Tania ; Sharma, Jyoti ; Kaul, Sanjeev</creator><creatorcontrib>Koerner, John D. ; Blatt, Melissa ; Zielonka, Tania ; Sharma, Jyoti ; Kaul, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><description>The protocols for safely removing the cervical collar or clearing the cervical spine in alert adult blunt trauma patients are well established, and recently the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) has published guidelines suggesting that the cervical spine in obtunded patients with blunt trauma can be cleared with a CT scan that is negative for fracture.1 The authors acknowledge that although these recommendations are based on a systematic review of very low quality of evidence, there was a 100 per cent negative predictive value to identify an unstable cervical injury.1 This review, however, did not discuss the effect cervical stenosis may have on these injuries. [...]it may be important to evaluate these patients with early MRI to determine whether spinal cord compression is present, which could possibly decrease the time until surgical intervention when indicated. A retrospective case series study design was used to compare clinical outcomes (spinal cord compression, neurologic deficits, and surgical treatment) in blunt trauma patients with and without cervical stenosis admitted to a Level II trauma center. [...]the study population is skewed by the fact that an MRI was typically ordered to evaluate for ligamentous injury or spinal cord compression because of a concerning neurologic examination.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313481808400605</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29981588</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Compression tests ; Computed tomography ; Evaluation ; Injuries ; Medical imaging ; Patients ; Spinal cord ; Spinal cord injuries ; Stenosis ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Trauma</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2018-06, Vol.84 (6), p.188-191</ispartof><rights>2018 Southeastern Surgical Congress</rights><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Jun 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-f7a191ccb8072cb11aa14e597c31e13e91bb3c87e5d0595baa393a12b9f19bef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/000313481808400605$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000313481808400605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29981588$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koerner, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blatt, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zielonka, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaul, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><title>Blunt Trauma Patients with Cervical Stenosis and No Fracture are More Likely to Have Neurologic Deficits and Require Surgery than those without Stenosis</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>The protocols for safely removing the cervical collar or clearing the cervical spine in alert adult blunt trauma patients are well established, and recently the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) has published guidelines suggesting that the cervical spine in obtunded patients with blunt trauma can be cleared with a CT scan that is negative for fracture.1 The authors acknowledge that although these recommendations are based on a systematic review of very low quality of evidence, there was a 100 per cent negative predictive value to identify an unstable cervical injury.1 This review, however, did not discuss the effect cervical stenosis may have on these injuries. [...]it may be important to evaluate these patients with early MRI to determine whether spinal cord compression is present, which could possibly decrease the time until surgical intervention when indicated. A retrospective case series study design was used to compare clinical outcomes (spinal cord compression, neurologic deficits, and surgical treatment) in blunt trauma patients with and without cervical stenosis admitted to a Level II trauma center. [...]the study population is skewed by the fact that an MRI was typically ordered to evaluate for ligamentous injury or spinal cord compression because of a concerning neurologic examination.</description><subject>Compression tests</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal cord injuries</subject><subject>Stenosis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1uFDEQhC0EIkvgBTggS1y4LHGPxzP2ETYkQVoCIuE86vH2bBxmx4l_gvImeVy8bAgSSBzclqWvqlouxl6CeAvQtgdCCAmy1qCFroVohHrEZqCUmhtdycdstgXmW2KPPYvxsjzrRsFTtlcZo0FpPWN378c8JX4eMG-Qf8HkaEqR_3Dpgi8o3DiLIz9LNPnoIsdpxU89PwpoUw7EsZxPvoyl-07jLU-en-AN8VPKwY9-7Sw_pMFZl3bar3SdXcHPclhTKPwFTmX4SL8SfU4PWc_ZkwHHSC_u73327ejD-eJkvvx8_HHxbjm3smnSfGgRDFjba9FWtgdAhJqUaa0EAkkG-l5a3ZJaCWVUjyiNRKh6M4DpaZD77M3O9yr460wxdRsXLY0jTuRz7CqQTflaU5mCvv4LvfQ5TGW7rhK60aJp6rpQ1Y6ywccYaOiugttguO1AdNveun97K6JX99a539DqQfK7qAIc7ICIa_qT-x_Ln3JfoYc</recordid><startdate>201806</startdate><enddate>201806</enddate><creator>Koerner, John D.</creator><creator>Blatt, Melissa</creator><creator>Zielonka, Tania</creator><creator>Sharma, Jyoti</creator><creator>Kaul, Sanjeev</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201806</creationdate><title>Blunt Trauma Patients with Cervical Stenosis and No Fracture are More Likely to Have Neurologic Deficits and Require Surgery than those without Stenosis</title><author>Koerner, John D. ; Blatt, Melissa ; Zielonka, Tania ; Sharma, Jyoti ; Kaul, Sanjeev</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-f7a191ccb8072cb11aa14e597c31e13e91bb3c87e5d0595baa393a12b9f19bef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Compression tests</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal cord injuries</topic><topic>Stenosis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koerner, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blatt, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zielonka, Tania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Jyoti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaul, Sanjeev</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koerner, John D.</au><au>Blatt, Melissa</au><au>Zielonka, Tania</au><au>Sharma, Jyoti</au><au>Kaul, Sanjeev</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blunt Trauma Patients with Cervical Stenosis and No Fracture are More Likely to Have Neurologic Deficits and Require Surgery than those without Stenosis</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2018-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>188-191</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>The protocols for safely removing the cervical collar or clearing the cervical spine in alert adult blunt trauma patients are well established, and recently the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) has published guidelines suggesting that the cervical spine in obtunded patients with blunt trauma can be cleared with a CT scan that is negative for fracture.1 The authors acknowledge that although these recommendations are based on a systematic review of very low quality of evidence, there was a 100 per cent negative predictive value to identify an unstable cervical injury.1 This review, however, did not discuss the effect cervical stenosis may have on these injuries. [...]it may be important to evaluate these patients with early MRI to determine whether spinal cord compression is present, which could possibly decrease the time until surgical intervention when indicated. A retrospective case series study design was used to compare clinical outcomes (spinal cord compression, neurologic deficits, and surgical treatment) in blunt trauma patients with and without cervical stenosis admitted to a Level II trauma center. [...]the study population is skewed by the fact that an MRI was typically ordered to evaluate for ligamentous injury or spinal cord compression because of a concerning neurologic examination.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>29981588</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313481808400605</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-1348 |
ispartof | The American surgeon, 2018-06, Vol.84 (6), p.188-191 |
issn | 0003-1348 1555-9823 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2136060929 |
source | SAGE Journals Online |
subjects | Compression tests Computed tomography Evaluation Injuries Medical imaging Patients Spinal cord Spinal cord injuries Stenosis Surgery Systematic review Trauma |
title | Blunt Trauma Patients with Cervical Stenosis and No Fracture are More Likely to Have Neurologic Deficits and Require Surgery than those without Stenosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A49%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blunt%20Trauma%20Patients%20with%20Cervical%20Stenosis%20and%20No%20Fracture%20are%20More%20Likely%20to%20Have%20Neurologic%20Deficits%20and%20Require%20Surgery%20than%20those%20without%20Stenosis&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=Koerner,%20John%20D.&rft.date=2018-06&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=188-191&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313481808400605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2136060929%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2086806644&rft_id=info:pmid/29981588&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000313481808400605&rfr_iscdi=true |