Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery
Background: Traditional fluid resuscitation during general anesthesia has been questioned in recent studies. One study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery showed decreased postoperative weight gain, earlier return of bowel function, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Vascular and endovascular surgery 2009-12, Vol.42 (6), p.531-536 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 536 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 531 |
container_title | Vascular and endovascular surgery |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Adesanya, Adebola Rosero, Eric Timaran, Carlos Clagett, Patrick Johnston, William E. |
description | Background: Traditional fluid resuscitation during general anesthesia has been questioned in recent studies. One study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery showed decreased postoperative weight gain, earlier return of bowel function, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) when intraoperative crystalloid infusion was restricted. The authors conducted a retrospective study of major vascular surgery patients (neo-aorto iliac system surgery) to correlate clinical outcomes with intraoperative crystalloid fluid administration. Methods: The charts of 41 patients who underwent major vascular surgery at our institution were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the crystalloid volume infused intraoperatively into 3 L (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative weights, intraoperative crystalloid administration, intraoperative vasopressor use, preoperative and postoperative creatinine, number of days to clear liquid diet, and the time to discharge from the ICU (ICU LOS) and hospital (hospital LOS) were collected. Results: There were statistically significant differences in duration of mechanical ventilation (0.55 ± 0.934 vs 2.03 ± 2.735 days, P = .013) and ICU LOS (3.0 ± 1.48 vs 5.79 ± 3.938, P = .029) in favor of the fluid restriction group. Major postoperative complications, such as sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, and graft thrombosis, were less frequent in the fluid restriction group but not statistically significant (5 vs 9, P = .742). Intraoperative crystalloid volume was found to be an independent predictor of ICU LOS after adjusting for estimated blood loss and duration of surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative serum albumin in both groups. Conclusions: Restricted intraoperative administration of crystalloid fluids ( |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1538574408318474 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21360297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1538574408318474</sage_id><sourcerecordid>21360297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16137753a91e091df98828944b9b51b8c5931fa5ad8db166b35075b3558e5f643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotn7cPUkuelvNbJLd5CjFaqFSUet1yWazZct-1GRT6L83pYuC4GVmYJ6ZeedF6ArIHUCa3gOngqeMEUFBsJQdoTFIKiIJkByHOrSjfX-EzpxbEwICmDhFIxBc0FjKMVrO2t6qbmOs6qutwdPaVwV-M663le6rrsWv1hShdHjWbGy3NQVe-F53jXG4avGLWncWfyqnfa0sfvd2ZezuAp2UqnbmcsjnaDl9_Jg8R_PF02zyMI80lUkfQQI0TTlVEgyRUJRSiFhIxnKZc8iF5pJCqbgqRJFDkuSUk5SHyIXhZcLoObo97A3KvnwQnTWV06auVWs677IYaEJimQaQHEBtO-esKbONrRpldxmQbG9l9tfKMHI97PZ5Y4rfgcG7ANwMQPhe1aVVra7cDxcDITwoDVx04JxamWzdedsGT_4__A2QHYfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21360297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Adesanya, Adebola ; Rosero, Eric ; Timaran, Carlos ; Clagett, Patrick ; Johnston, William E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adesanya, Adebola ; Rosero, Eric ; Timaran, Carlos ; Clagett, Patrick ; Johnston, William E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Traditional fluid resuscitation during general anesthesia has been questioned in recent studies. One study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery showed decreased postoperative weight gain, earlier return of bowel function, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) when intraoperative crystalloid infusion was restricted. The authors conducted a retrospective study of major vascular surgery patients (neo-aorto iliac system surgery) to correlate clinical outcomes with intraoperative crystalloid fluid administration. Methods: The charts of 41 patients who underwent major vascular surgery at our institution were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the crystalloid volume infused intraoperatively into <3 L (group 1) and >3 L (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative weights, intraoperative crystalloid administration, intraoperative vasopressor use, preoperative and postoperative creatinine, number of days to clear liquid diet, and the time to discharge from the ICU (ICU LOS) and hospital (hospital LOS) were collected. Results: There were statistically significant differences in duration of mechanical ventilation (0.55 ± 0.934 vs 2.03 ± 2.735 days, P = .013) and ICU LOS (3.0 ± 1.48 vs 5.79 ± 3.938, P = .029) in favor of the fluid restriction group. Major postoperative complications, such as sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, and graft thrombosis, were less frequent in the fluid restriction group but not statistically significant (5 vs 9, P = .742). Intraoperative crystalloid volume was found to be an independent predictor of ICU LOS after adjusting for estimated blood loss and duration of surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative serum albumin in both groups. Conclusions: Restricted intraoperative administration of crystalloid fluids (<3 L) may be beneficial in major vascular surgery patients. These benefits are similar to those previously described in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-5744</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-9116</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1538574408318474</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18583299</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Aorta - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management ; Female ; Fluid Therapy - adverse effects ; Humans ; Iliac Artery - surgery ; Intensive care medicine ; Intensive Care Units ; Intraoperative Care ; Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use ; Leg - blood supply ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Rehydration Solutions - therapeutic use ; Respiration, Artificial ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Veins - transplantation</subject><ispartof>Vascular and endovascular surgery, 2009-12, Vol.42 (6), p.531-536</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16137753a91e091df98828944b9b51b8c5931fa5ad8db166b35075b3558e5f643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16137753a91e091df98828944b9b51b8c5931fa5ad8db166b35075b3558e5f643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1538574408318474$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1538574408318474$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21005558$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18583299$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adesanya, Adebola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosero, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timaran, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clagett, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William E.</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery</title><title>Vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Vasc Endovascular Surg</addtitle><description>Background: Traditional fluid resuscitation during general anesthesia has been questioned in recent studies. One study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery showed decreased postoperative weight gain, earlier return of bowel function, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) when intraoperative crystalloid infusion was restricted. The authors conducted a retrospective study of major vascular surgery patients (neo-aorto iliac system surgery) to correlate clinical outcomes with intraoperative crystalloid fluid administration. Methods: The charts of 41 patients who underwent major vascular surgery at our institution were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the crystalloid volume infused intraoperatively into <3 L (group 1) and >3 L (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative weights, intraoperative crystalloid administration, intraoperative vasopressor use, preoperative and postoperative creatinine, number of days to clear liquid diet, and the time to discharge from the ICU (ICU LOS) and hospital (hospital LOS) were collected. Results: There were statistically significant differences in duration of mechanical ventilation (0.55 ± 0.934 vs 2.03 ± 2.735 days, P = .013) and ICU LOS (3.0 ± 1.48 vs 5.79 ± 3.938, P = .029) in favor of the fluid restriction group. Major postoperative complications, such as sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, and graft thrombosis, were less frequent in the fluid restriction group but not statistically significant (5 vs 9, P = .742). Intraoperative crystalloid volume was found to be an independent predictor of ICU LOS after adjusting for estimated blood loss and duration of surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative serum albumin in both groups. Conclusions: Restricted intraoperative administration of crystalloid fluids (<3 L) may be beneficial in major vascular surgery patients. These benefits are similar to those previously described in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Aorta - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iliac Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care</subject><subject>Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Leg - blood supply</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Rehydration Solutions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Veins - transplantation</subject><issn>1538-5744</issn><issn>1938-9116</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotn7cPUkuelvNbJLd5CjFaqFSUet1yWazZct-1GRT6L83pYuC4GVmYJ6ZeedF6ArIHUCa3gOngqeMEUFBsJQdoTFIKiIJkByHOrSjfX-EzpxbEwICmDhFIxBc0FjKMVrO2t6qbmOs6qutwdPaVwV-M663le6rrsWv1hShdHjWbGy3NQVe-F53jXG4avGLWncWfyqnfa0sfvd2ZezuAp2UqnbmcsjnaDl9_Jg8R_PF02zyMI80lUkfQQI0TTlVEgyRUJRSiFhIxnKZc8iF5pJCqbgqRJFDkuSUk5SHyIXhZcLoObo97A3KvnwQnTWV06auVWs677IYaEJimQaQHEBtO-esKbONrRpldxmQbG9l9tfKMHI97PZ5Y4rfgcG7ANwMQPhe1aVVra7cDxcDITwoDVx04JxamWzdedsGT_4__A2QHYfQ</recordid><startdate>200912</startdate><enddate>200912</enddate><creator>Adesanya, Adebola</creator><creator>Rosero, Eric</creator><creator>Timaran, Carlos</creator><creator>Clagett, Patrick</creator><creator>Johnston, William E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200912</creationdate><title>Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery</title><author>Adesanya, Adebola ; Rosero, Eric ; Timaran, Carlos ; Clagett, Patrick ; Johnston, William E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16137753a91e091df98828944b9b51b8c5931fa5ad8db166b35075b3558e5f643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Aorta - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iliac Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care</topic><topic>Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Leg - blood supply</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Rehydration Solutions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Veins - transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adesanya, Adebola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosero, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timaran, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clagett, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adesanya, Adebola</au><au>Rosero, Eric</au><au>Timaran, Carlos</au><au>Clagett, Patrick</au><au>Johnston, William E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Vasc Endovascular Surg</addtitle><date>2009-12</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>536</epage><pages>531-536</pages><issn>1538-5744</issn><eissn>1938-9116</eissn><abstract>Background: Traditional fluid resuscitation during general anesthesia has been questioned in recent studies. One study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery showed decreased postoperative weight gain, earlier return of bowel function, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) when intraoperative crystalloid infusion was restricted. The authors conducted a retrospective study of major vascular surgery patients (neo-aorto iliac system surgery) to correlate clinical outcomes with intraoperative crystalloid fluid administration. Methods: The charts of 41 patients who underwent major vascular surgery at our institution were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the crystalloid volume infused intraoperatively into <3 L (group 1) and >3 L (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative weights, intraoperative crystalloid administration, intraoperative vasopressor use, preoperative and postoperative creatinine, number of days to clear liquid diet, and the time to discharge from the ICU (ICU LOS) and hospital (hospital LOS) were collected. Results: There were statistically significant differences in duration of mechanical ventilation (0.55 ± 0.934 vs 2.03 ± 2.735 days, P = .013) and ICU LOS (3.0 ± 1.48 vs 5.79 ± 3.938, P = .029) in favor of the fluid restriction group. Major postoperative complications, such as sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, and graft thrombosis, were less frequent in the fluid restriction group but not statistically significant (5 vs 9, P = .742). Intraoperative crystalloid volume was found to be an independent predictor of ICU LOS after adjusting for estimated blood loss and duration of surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative serum albumin in both groups. Conclusions: Restricted intraoperative administration of crystalloid fluids (<3 L) may be beneficial in major vascular surgery patients. These benefits are similar to those previously described in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>18583299</pmid><doi>10.1177/1538574408318474</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1538-5744 |
ispartof | Vascular and endovascular surgery, 2009-12, Vol.42 (6), p.531-536 |
issn | 1538-5744 1938-9116 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21360297 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aged Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Aorta - surgery Biological and medical sciences Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management Female Fluid Therapy - adverse effects Humans Iliac Artery - surgery Intensive care medicine Intensive Care Units Intraoperative Care Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use Leg - blood supply Length of Stay Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Rehydration Solutions - therapeutic use Respiration, Artificial Retrospective Studies Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases Treatment Outcome Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects Veins - transplantation |
title | Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T06%3A53%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20Fluid%20Restriction%20Predicts%20Improved%20Outcomes%20in%20Major%20Vascular%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Adesanya,%20Adebola&rft.date=2009-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=536&rft.pages=531-536&rft.issn=1538-5744&rft.eissn=1938-9116&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1538574408318474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21360297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21360297&rft_id=info:pmid/18583299&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1538574408318474&rfr_iscdi=true |