Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery

Background: Traditional fluid resuscitation during general anesthesia has been questioned in recent studies. One study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery showed decreased postoperative weight gain, earlier return of bowel function, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vascular and endovascular surgery 2009-12, Vol.42 (6), p.531-536
Hauptverfasser: Adesanya, Adebola, Rosero, Eric, Timaran, Carlos, Clagett, Patrick, Johnston, William E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 536
container_issue 6
container_start_page 531
container_title Vascular and endovascular surgery
container_volume 42
creator Adesanya, Adebola
Rosero, Eric
Timaran, Carlos
Clagett, Patrick
Johnston, William E.
description Background: Traditional fluid resuscitation during general anesthesia has been questioned in recent studies. One study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery showed decreased postoperative weight gain, earlier return of bowel function, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) when intraoperative crystalloid infusion was restricted. The authors conducted a retrospective study of major vascular surgery patients (neo-aorto iliac system surgery) to correlate clinical outcomes with intraoperative crystalloid fluid administration. Methods: The charts of 41 patients who underwent major vascular surgery at our institution were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the crystalloid volume infused intraoperatively into 3 L (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative weights, intraoperative crystalloid administration, intraoperative vasopressor use, preoperative and postoperative creatinine, number of days to clear liquid diet, and the time to discharge from the ICU (ICU LOS) and hospital (hospital LOS) were collected. Results: There were statistically significant differences in duration of mechanical ventilation (0.55 ± 0.934 vs 2.03 ± 2.735 days, P = .013) and ICU LOS (3.0 ± 1.48 vs 5.79 ± 3.938, P = .029) in favor of the fluid restriction group. Major postoperative complications, such as sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, and graft thrombosis, were less frequent in the fluid restriction group but not statistically significant (5 vs 9, P = .742). Intraoperative crystalloid volume was found to be an independent predictor of ICU LOS after adjusting for estimated blood loss and duration of surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative serum albumin in both groups. Conclusions: Restricted intraoperative administration of crystalloid fluids (
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1538574408318474
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21360297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1538574408318474</sage_id><sourcerecordid>21360297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16137753a91e091df98828944b9b51b8c5931fa5ad8db166b35075b3558e5f643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotn7cPUkuelvNbJLd5CjFaqFSUet1yWazZct-1GRT6L83pYuC4GVmYJ6ZeedF6ArIHUCa3gOngqeMEUFBsJQdoTFIKiIJkByHOrSjfX-EzpxbEwICmDhFIxBc0FjKMVrO2t6qbmOs6qutwdPaVwV-M663le6rrsWv1hShdHjWbGy3NQVe-F53jXG4avGLWncWfyqnfa0sfvd2ZezuAp2UqnbmcsjnaDl9_Jg8R_PF02zyMI80lUkfQQI0TTlVEgyRUJRSiFhIxnKZc8iF5pJCqbgqRJFDkuSUk5SHyIXhZcLoObo97A3KvnwQnTWV06auVWs677IYaEJimQaQHEBtO-esKbONrRpldxmQbG9l9tfKMHI97PZ5Y4rfgcG7ANwMQPhe1aVVra7cDxcDITwoDVx04JxamWzdedsGT_4__A2QHYfQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21360297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Adesanya, Adebola ; Rosero, Eric ; Timaran, Carlos ; Clagett, Patrick ; Johnston, William E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Adesanya, Adebola ; Rosero, Eric ; Timaran, Carlos ; Clagett, Patrick ; Johnston, William E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Traditional fluid resuscitation during general anesthesia has been questioned in recent studies. One study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery showed decreased postoperative weight gain, earlier return of bowel function, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) when intraoperative crystalloid infusion was restricted. The authors conducted a retrospective study of major vascular surgery patients (neo-aorto iliac system surgery) to correlate clinical outcomes with intraoperative crystalloid fluid administration. Methods: The charts of 41 patients who underwent major vascular surgery at our institution were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the crystalloid volume infused intraoperatively into &lt;3 L (group 1) and &gt;3 L (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative weights, intraoperative crystalloid administration, intraoperative vasopressor use, preoperative and postoperative creatinine, number of days to clear liquid diet, and the time to discharge from the ICU (ICU LOS) and hospital (hospital LOS) were collected. Results: There were statistically significant differences in duration of mechanical ventilation (0.55 ± 0.934 vs 2.03 ± 2.735 days, P = .013) and ICU LOS (3.0 ± 1.48 vs 5.79 ± 3.938, P = .029) in favor of the fluid restriction group. Major postoperative complications, such as sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, and graft thrombosis, were less frequent in the fluid restriction group but not statistically significant (5 vs 9, P = .742). Intraoperative crystalloid volume was found to be an independent predictor of ICU LOS after adjusting for estimated blood loss and duration of surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative serum albumin in both groups. Conclusions: Restricted intraoperative administration of crystalloid fluids (&lt;3 L) may be beneficial in major vascular surgery patients. These benefits are similar to those previously described in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1538-5744</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-9116</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1538574408318474</identifier><identifier>PMID: 18583299</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Aorta - surgery ; Biological and medical sciences ; Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management ; Female ; Fluid Therapy - adverse effects ; Humans ; Iliac Artery - surgery ; Intensive care medicine ; Intensive Care Units ; Intraoperative Care ; Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use ; Leg - blood supply ; Length of Stay ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Rehydration Solutions - therapeutic use ; Respiration, Artificial ; Retrospective Studies ; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Veins - transplantation</subject><ispartof>Vascular and endovascular surgery, 2009-12, Vol.42 (6), p.531-536</ispartof><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16137753a91e091df98828944b9b51b8c5931fa5ad8db166b35075b3558e5f643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16137753a91e091df98828944b9b51b8c5931fa5ad8db166b35075b3558e5f643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1538574408318474$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1538574408318474$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21005558$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18583299$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adesanya, Adebola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosero, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timaran, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clagett, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William E.</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery</title><title>Vascular and endovascular surgery</title><addtitle>Vasc Endovascular Surg</addtitle><description>Background: Traditional fluid resuscitation during general anesthesia has been questioned in recent studies. One study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery showed decreased postoperative weight gain, earlier return of bowel function, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) when intraoperative crystalloid infusion was restricted. The authors conducted a retrospective study of major vascular surgery patients (neo-aorto iliac system surgery) to correlate clinical outcomes with intraoperative crystalloid fluid administration. Methods: The charts of 41 patients who underwent major vascular surgery at our institution were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the crystalloid volume infused intraoperatively into &lt;3 L (group 1) and &gt;3 L (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative weights, intraoperative crystalloid administration, intraoperative vasopressor use, preoperative and postoperative creatinine, number of days to clear liquid diet, and the time to discharge from the ICU (ICU LOS) and hospital (hospital LOS) were collected. Results: There were statistically significant differences in duration of mechanical ventilation (0.55 ± 0.934 vs 2.03 ± 2.735 days, P = .013) and ICU LOS (3.0 ± 1.48 vs 5.79 ± 3.938, P = .029) in favor of the fluid restriction group. Major postoperative complications, such as sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, and graft thrombosis, were less frequent in the fluid restriction group but not statistically significant (5 vs 9, P = .742). Intraoperative crystalloid volume was found to be an independent predictor of ICU LOS after adjusting for estimated blood loss and duration of surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative serum albumin in both groups. Conclusions: Restricted intraoperative administration of crystalloid fluids (&lt;3 L) may be beneficial in major vascular surgery patients. These benefits are similar to those previously described in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Aorta - surgery</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iliac Artery - surgery</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Intraoperative Care</subject><subject>Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Leg - blood supply</subject><subject>Length of Stay</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Rehydration Solutions - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Veins - transplantation</subject><issn>1538-5744</issn><issn>1938-9116</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1LAzEQhoMotn7cPUkuelvNbJLd5CjFaqFSUet1yWazZct-1GRT6L83pYuC4GVmYJ6ZeedF6ArIHUCa3gOngqeMEUFBsJQdoTFIKiIJkByHOrSjfX-EzpxbEwICmDhFIxBc0FjKMVrO2t6qbmOs6qutwdPaVwV-M663le6rrsWv1hShdHjWbGy3NQVe-F53jXG4avGLWncWfyqnfa0sfvd2ZezuAp2UqnbmcsjnaDl9_Jg8R_PF02zyMI80lUkfQQI0TTlVEgyRUJRSiFhIxnKZc8iF5pJCqbgqRJFDkuSUk5SHyIXhZcLoObo97A3KvnwQnTWV06auVWs677IYaEJimQaQHEBtO-esKbONrRpldxmQbG9l9tfKMHI97PZ5Y4rfgcG7ANwMQPhe1aVVra7cDxcDITwoDVx04JxamWzdedsGT_4__A2QHYfQ</recordid><startdate>200912</startdate><enddate>200912</enddate><creator>Adesanya, Adebola</creator><creator>Rosero, Eric</creator><creator>Timaran, Carlos</creator><creator>Clagett, Patrick</creator><creator>Johnston, William E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200912</creationdate><title>Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery</title><author>Adesanya, Adebola ; Rosero, Eric ; Timaran, Carlos ; Clagett, Patrick ; Johnston, William E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-16137753a91e091df98828944b9b51b8c5931fa5ad8db166b35075b3558e5f643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Aorta - surgery</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluid Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iliac Artery - surgery</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Intraoperative Care</topic><topic>Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Leg - blood supply</topic><topic>Length of Stay</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Rehydration Solutions - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Veins - transplantation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adesanya, Adebola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosero, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timaran, Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clagett, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnston, William E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adesanya, Adebola</au><au>Rosero, Eric</au><au>Timaran, Carlos</au><au>Clagett, Patrick</au><au>Johnston, William E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery</atitle><jtitle>Vascular and endovascular surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Vasc Endovascular Surg</addtitle><date>2009-12</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>536</epage><pages>531-536</pages><issn>1538-5744</issn><eissn>1938-9116</eissn><abstract>Background: Traditional fluid resuscitation during general anesthesia has been questioned in recent studies. One study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery showed decreased postoperative weight gain, earlier return of bowel function, and shorter intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) when intraoperative crystalloid infusion was restricted. The authors conducted a retrospective study of major vascular surgery patients (neo-aorto iliac system surgery) to correlate clinical outcomes with intraoperative crystalloid fluid administration. Methods: The charts of 41 patients who underwent major vascular surgery at our institution were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to the crystalloid volume infused intraoperatively into &lt;3 L (group 1) and &gt;3 L (group 2). Preoperative and postoperative weights, intraoperative crystalloid administration, intraoperative vasopressor use, preoperative and postoperative creatinine, number of days to clear liquid diet, and the time to discharge from the ICU (ICU LOS) and hospital (hospital LOS) were collected. Results: There were statistically significant differences in duration of mechanical ventilation (0.55 ± 0.934 vs 2.03 ± 2.735 days, P = .013) and ICU LOS (3.0 ± 1.48 vs 5.79 ± 3.938, P = .029) in favor of the fluid restriction group. Major postoperative complications, such as sepsis, acute myocardial infarction, and graft thrombosis, were less frequent in the fluid restriction group but not statistically significant (5 vs 9, P = .742). Intraoperative crystalloid volume was found to be an independent predictor of ICU LOS after adjusting for estimated blood loss and duration of surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative serum albumin in both groups. Conclusions: Restricted intraoperative administration of crystalloid fluids (&lt;3 L) may be beneficial in major vascular surgery patients. These benefits are similar to those previously described in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>18583299</pmid><doi>10.1177/1538574408318474</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1538-5744
ispartof Vascular and endovascular surgery, 2009-12, Vol.42 (6), p.531-536
issn 1538-5744
1938-9116
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21360297
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Aorta - surgery
Biological and medical sciences
Emergency and intensive care: renal failure. Dialysis management
Female
Fluid Therapy - adverse effects
Humans
Iliac Artery - surgery
Intensive care medicine
Intensive Care Units
Intraoperative Care
Isotonic Solutions - therapeutic use
Leg - blood supply
Length of Stay
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Rehydration Solutions - therapeutic use
Respiration, Artificial
Retrospective Studies
Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases
Treatment Outcome
Vascular surgery: aorta, extremities, vena cava. Surgery of the lymphatic vessels
Vascular Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Veins - transplantation
title Intraoperative Fluid Restriction Predicts Improved Outcomes in Major Vascular Surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T06%3A53%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20Fluid%20Restriction%20Predicts%20Improved%20Outcomes%20in%20Major%20Vascular%20Surgery&rft.jtitle=Vascular%20and%20endovascular%20surgery&rft.au=Adesanya,%20Adebola&rft.date=2009-12&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=536&rft.pages=531-536&rft.issn=1538-5744&rft.eissn=1938-9116&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1538574408318474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21360297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21360297&rft_id=info:pmid/18583299&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1538574408318474&rfr_iscdi=true