Interleukin 2 plus anti-GD2 immunotherapy: helpful or harmful?
Both interleukin 2 (IL-2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) increase antibody-dependent and complement-dependent cytotoxicity with anti-GD2.3 A chimeric anti-GD2 antibody, ch14.18 (dinutuximab), was tested in pilot trials with IL-2 and GM-CSF in the setting of minimal res...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The lancet oncology 2018-12, Vol.19 (12), p.1549-1551 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1551 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1549 |
container_title | The lancet oncology |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Matthay, Katherine K |
description | Both interleukin 2 (IL-2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) increase antibody-dependent and complement-dependent cytotoxicity with anti-GD2.3 A chimeric anti-GD2 antibody, ch14.18 (dinutuximab), was tested in pilot trials with IL-2 and GM-CSF in the setting of minimal residual disease after autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplant, showing tolerability.4 Subsequently, a Children's Oncology Group (COG) phase 3 trial5 reported significant improvement in 2-year event-free survival after myeloablative therapy using isotretinoin with five cycles of ch14.18 with GM-CSF and IL-2 compared with isotretinoin alone, leading to US Food and Drug Administration approval of this immunotherapy regimen. In The Lancet Oncology, Ruth Ladenstein and colleagues report results from the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma (SIOPEN) group randomised trial, which was designed to determine whether IL-2 was necessary for the efficacy of dinutuximab beta given with standard isotretinoin after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplant.6 This international trial of 406 patients, stratified by myeloablative regimen and country, yielded nearly identical 3-year event-free survival of 56% (95% CI 49–63) and 60% (53–66) in the two groups (p=0·76). Furthermore, the overall event-free survival was similar to that of a recent COG immunotherapy safety trial7 that reported a 3-year event-free survival of 67%.7 One important caveat is that only 62% of the patients randomly assigned to the IL-2 group received their assigned therapy, mainly because of toxicity, compared with 87% of patients receiving dinutuximab alone. [...]the absence of improved outcome might be attributed to under-dosing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30627-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2135129960</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1470204518306272</els_id><sourcerecordid>2135129960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-3a7e4bf6d21eb688cccfee9556558adee7d557bddc2fd397b2ee08629af3bf533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMlKxTAUhoMozo-gFNxcF9UkTdrUhSLX6YLgQl2HNDnlRjuZNIJvb-6gCzeuzs_hOwMfQkcEnxFM8vNnwgqcUsz4hIjTDOe0SOkG2o1tlnImxOYyr5AdtOf9G8akIJhvo50MM0ZZKXbR5awbwTUQ3m2X0GRogk9UN9r0_oYmtm1D149zcGr4ukjm0Ax1aJLeJXPl2hivDtBWrRoPh-u6j17vbl-mD-nj0_1sev2Yasb4mGaqAFbVuaEEqlwIrXUNUHKecy6UASgM50VljKa1ycqiogBY5LRUdVbVPMv20WS1d3D9RwA_ytZ6DU2jOuiDl5RknNCyzHFET_6gb31wXfwuUrwQNKeCRYqvKO167x3UcnC2Ve5LEiwXguVSsFzYk0TIpWBJ49zxenuoWjC_Uz9GI3C1AiDq-LTgpNcWOg3GOtCjNL3958Q3-uOJhw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157826284</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interleukin 2 plus anti-GD2 immunotherapy: helpful or harmful?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Matthay, Katherine K</creator><creatorcontrib>Matthay, Katherine K</creatorcontrib><description>Both interleukin 2 (IL-2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) increase antibody-dependent and complement-dependent cytotoxicity with anti-GD2.3 A chimeric anti-GD2 antibody, ch14.18 (dinutuximab), was tested in pilot trials with IL-2 and GM-CSF in the setting of minimal residual disease after autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplant, showing tolerability.4 Subsequently, a Children's Oncology Group (COG) phase 3 trial5 reported significant improvement in 2-year event-free survival after myeloablative therapy using isotretinoin with five cycles of ch14.18 with GM-CSF and IL-2 compared with isotretinoin alone, leading to US Food and Drug Administration approval of this immunotherapy regimen. In The Lancet Oncology, Ruth Ladenstein and colleagues report results from the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma (SIOPEN) group randomised trial, which was designed to determine whether IL-2 was necessary for the efficacy of dinutuximab beta given with standard isotretinoin after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplant.6 This international trial of 406 patients, stratified by myeloablative regimen and country, yielded nearly identical 3-year event-free survival of 56% (95% CI 49–63) and 60% (53–66) in the two groups (p=0·76). Furthermore, the overall event-free survival was similar to that of a recent COG immunotherapy safety trial7 that reported a 3-year event-free survival of 67%.7 One important caveat is that only 62% of the patients randomly assigned to the IL-2 group received their assigned therapy, mainly because of toxicity, compared with 87% of patients receiving dinutuximab alone. [...]the absence of improved outcome might be attributed to under-dosing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-2045</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1474-5488</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30627-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30442498</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Autografts ; Cerebrospinal fluid ; Chemotherapy ; Children ; Clinical trials ; Colony-stimulating factor ; Cytokines ; Cytotoxicity ; Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor ; Immunoglobulins ; Immunotherapy ; Interleukin 2 ; Ligands ; Metastasis ; Minimal residual disease ; Neuroblastoma ; Transplants & implants ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>The lancet oncology, 2018-12, Vol.19 (12), p.1549-1551</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-3a7e4bf6d21eb688cccfee9556558adee7d557bddc2fd397b2ee08629af3bf533</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-3a7e4bf6d21eb688cccfee9556558adee7d557bddc2fd397b2ee08629af3bf533</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2157826284?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994,64384,64386,64388,72340</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30442498$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Matthay, Katherine K</creatorcontrib><title>Interleukin 2 plus anti-GD2 immunotherapy: helpful or harmful?</title><title>The lancet oncology</title><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><description>Both interleukin 2 (IL-2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) increase antibody-dependent and complement-dependent cytotoxicity with anti-GD2.3 A chimeric anti-GD2 antibody, ch14.18 (dinutuximab), was tested in pilot trials with IL-2 and GM-CSF in the setting of minimal residual disease after autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplant, showing tolerability.4 Subsequently, a Children's Oncology Group (COG) phase 3 trial5 reported significant improvement in 2-year event-free survival after myeloablative therapy using isotretinoin with five cycles of ch14.18 with GM-CSF and IL-2 compared with isotretinoin alone, leading to US Food and Drug Administration approval of this immunotherapy regimen. In The Lancet Oncology, Ruth Ladenstein and colleagues report results from the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma (SIOPEN) group randomised trial, which was designed to determine whether IL-2 was necessary for the efficacy of dinutuximab beta given with standard isotretinoin after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplant.6 This international trial of 406 patients, stratified by myeloablative regimen and country, yielded nearly identical 3-year event-free survival of 56% (95% CI 49–63) and 60% (53–66) in the two groups (p=0·76). Furthermore, the overall event-free survival was similar to that of a recent COG immunotherapy safety trial7 that reported a 3-year event-free survival of 67%.7 One important caveat is that only 62% of the patients randomly assigned to the IL-2 group received their assigned therapy, mainly because of toxicity, compared with 87% of patients receiving dinutuximab alone. [...]the absence of improved outcome might be attributed to under-dosing.</description><subject>Autografts</subject><subject>Cerebrospinal fluid</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Colony-stimulating factor</subject><subject>Cytokines</subject><subject>Cytotoxicity</subject><subject>Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Interleukin 2</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Minimal residual disease</subject><subject>Neuroblastoma</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1470-2045</issn><issn>1474-5488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMlKxTAUhoMozo-gFNxcF9UkTdrUhSLX6YLgQl2HNDnlRjuZNIJvb-6gCzeuzs_hOwMfQkcEnxFM8vNnwgqcUsz4hIjTDOe0SOkG2o1tlnImxOYyr5AdtOf9G8akIJhvo50MM0ZZKXbR5awbwTUQ3m2X0GRogk9UN9r0_oYmtm1D149zcGr4ukjm0Ax1aJLeJXPl2hivDtBWrRoPh-u6j17vbl-mD-nj0_1sev2Yasb4mGaqAFbVuaEEqlwIrXUNUHKecy6UASgM50VljKa1ycqiogBY5LRUdVbVPMv20WS1d3D9RwA_ytZ6DU2jOuiDl5RknNCyzHFET_6gb31wXfwuUrwQNKeCRYqvKO167x3UcnC2Ve5LEiwXguVSsFzYk0TIpWBJ49zxenuoWjC_Uz9GI3C1AiDq-LTgpNcWOg3GOtCjNL3958Q3-uOJhw</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Matthay, Katherine K</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0TZ</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8C2</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Interleukin 2 plus anti-GD2 immunotherapy: helpful or harmful?</title><author>Matthay, Katherine K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-3a7e4bf6d21eb688cccfee9556558adee7d557bddc2fd397b2ee08629af3bf533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Autografts</topic><topic>Cerebrospinal fluid</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Colony-stimulating factor</topic><topic>Cytokines</topic><topic>Cytotoxicity</topic><topic>Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Interleukin 2</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Minimal residual disease</topic><topic>Neuroblastoma</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Matthay, Katherine K</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pharma and Biotech Premium PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Lancet Titles</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Matthay, Katherine K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interleukin 2 plus anti-GD2 immunotherapy: helpful or harmful?</atitle><jtitle>The lancet oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Lancet Oncol</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1549</spage><epage>1551</epage><pages>1549-1551</pages><issn>1470-2045</issn><eissn>1474-5488</eissn><abstract>Both interleukin 2 (IL-2) and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) increase antibody-dependent and complement-dependent cytotoxicity with anti-GD2.3 A chimeric anti-GD2 antibody, ch14.18 (dinutuximab), was tested in pilot trials with IL-2 and GM-CSF in the setting of minimal residual disease after autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplant, showing tolerability.4 Subsequently, a Children's Oncology Group (COG) phase 3 trial5 reported significant improvement in 2-year event-free survival after myeloablative therapy using isotretinoin with five cycles of ch14.18 with GM-CSF and IL-2 compared with isotretinoin alone, leading to US Food and Drug Administration approval of this immunotherapy regimen. In The Lancet Oncology, Ruth Ladenstein and colleagues report results from the SIOP Europe Neuroblastoma (SIOPEN) group randomised trial, which was designed to determine whether IL-2 was necessary for the efficacy of dinutuximab beta given with standard isotretinoin after high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplant.6 This international trial of 406 patients, stratified by myeloablative regimen and country, yielded nearly identical 3-year event-free survival of 56% (95% CI 49–63) and 60% (53–66) in the two groups (p=0·76). Furthermore, the overall event-free survival was similar to that of a recent COG immunotherapy safety trial7 that reported a 3-year event-free survival of 67%.7 One important caveat is that only 62% of the patients randomly assigned to the IL-2 group received their assigned therapy, mainly because of toxicity, compared with 87% of patients receiving dinutuximab alone. [...]the absence of improved outcome might be attributed to under-dosing.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>30442498</pmid><doi>10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30627-2</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1470-2045 |
ispartof | The lancet oncology, 2018-12, Vol.19 (12), p.1549-1551 |
issn | 1470-2045 1474-5488 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2135129960 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Autografts Cerebrospinal fluid Chemotherapy Children Clinical trials Colony-stimulating factor Cytokines Cytotoxicity Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor Immunoglobulins Immunotherapy Interleukin 2 Ligands Metastasis Minimal residual disease Neuroblastoma Transplants & implants Tumors |
title | Interleukin 2 plus anti-GD2 immunotherapy: helpful or harmful? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A47%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interleukin%202%20plus%20anti-GD2%20immunotherapy:%20helpful%20or%20harmful?&rft.jtitle=The%20lancet%20oncology&rft.au=Matthay,%20Katherine%20K&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1549&rft.epage=1551&rft.pages=1549-1551&rft.issn=1470-2045&rft.eissn=1474-5488&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30627-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2135129960%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157826284&rft_id=info:pmid/30442498&rft_els_id=S1470204518306272&rfr_iscdi=true |