Profiling areas of ground water contamination by pesticides in California : Phase II - Evaluation and modification of a statistical model

A well sampling study was conducted to evaluate an empirical approach to classifying areas of land in California as vulnerable to ground water contamination by pesticides (Troiano et al., 1994). Wells were sampled from sections of land that had no previous detections of pesticide residues. The secti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental monitoring and assessment 1997-05, Vol.45 (3), p.301-318
Hauptverfasser: TROIANO, J, NORDMARK, C, BARRY, T, JOHNSON, B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 318
container_issue 3
container_start_page 301
container_title Environmental monitoring and assessment
container_volume 45
creator TROIANO, J
NORDMARK, C
BARRY, T
JOHNSON, B
description A well sampling study was conducted to evaluate an empirical approach to classifying areas of land in California as vulnerable to ground water contamination by pesticides (Troiano et al., 1994). Wells were sampled from sections of land that had no previous detections of pesticide residues. The sections had been classified into vulnerable soil clusters or into a not-classified group using a procedure based on Principal Components Analysis (PCA). Grape, citrus, and olive growing areas of Fresno and Tulare Counties were targeted, areas where pre-emergence herbicide residues had been detected in well water. Overall, herbicide residues were detected in 75 of 176 sampled wells, a high frequency of detection in relation to results from previous targeted well sampling studies. Since residues were also detected in the not-classified group, the classification procedure was modified using an approach based on Canonical Variates Analysis (CVA). More sections were classified into vulnerable soil clusters with the CVA approach than with the PCA method. Data from two other explanatory variables, depth to ground water and amount of pesticide used per section, were included to illustrate how additional information can be incorporated into this approach of identifying vulnerable areas.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1005778719859
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21340493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>325619</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-a72d62031420f3582ce9f4068df835b12c19cce31eb033493fd1b846e1f11e423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PHDEQhq0oSLkQalorQukWPP5Y23ToxMdJSKFI6tWc1yZGe_Zh7ybiJ_Cvs6ujoqEazczzvq9mCDkFdg6Mi4urS2BMaW00WKPsJ7ICpUXDrbKfyYpBq5tWtPYL-VrrE2PMamlX5PWh5BCHmB4pFo-V5kAfS55ST__h6At1OY24iwnHmBPdvtC9r2N0sfeVxkTXOMSQS4pIL-nDH6yebja0odd_cZgOGpy9drmPIbrDYI5AWse5WZxwWLZ--EaOAg7Vn7zVY_L75vrX-q65_3m7WV_dNyg0jA1q3recCZCcBaEMd94GyVrTByPUFrgD65wX4LdMCGlF6GFrZOshAHjJxTH5cfDdl_w8zcd0u1idHwZMPk-14yAkm3UfgqCWP6v2Y1BKxTlbor-_A5_yVNJ8bacVSGiNWqCzNwjr_JxQMLlYu32JOywvHdfCCG3Ef3YZmQo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751416852</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Profiling areas of ground water contamination by pesticides in California : Phase II - Evaluation and modification of a statistical model</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>TROIANO, J ; NORDMARK, C ; BARRY, T ; JOHNSON, B</creator><creatorcontrib>TROIANO, J ; NORDMARK, C ; BARRY, T ; JOHNSON, B</creatorcontrib><description>A well sampling study was conducted to evaluate an empirical approach to classifying areas of land in California as vulnerable to ground water contamination by pesticides (Troiano et al., 1994). Wells were sampled from sections of land that had no previous detections of pesticide residues. The sections had been classified into vulnerable soil clusters or into a not-classified group using a procedure based on Principal Components Analysis (PCA). Grape, citrus, and olive growing areas of Fresno and Tulare Counties were targeted, areas where pre-emergence herbicide residues had been detected in well water. Overall, herbicide residues were detected in 75 of 176 sampled wells, a high frequency of detection in relation to results from previous targeted well sampling studies. Since residues were also detected in the not-classified group, the classification procedure was modified using an approach based on Canonical Variates Analysis (CVA). More sections were classified into vulnerable soil clusters with the CVA approach than with the PCA method. Data from two other explanatory variables, depth to ground water and amount of pesticide used per section, were included to illustrate how additional information can be incorporated into this approach of identifying vulnerable areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1005778719859</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMASDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrect: Springer</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Contamination ; Environmental monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; Groundwater ; Groundwater pollution ; Groundwaters ; Health care ; Herbicide residues ; Herbicides ; Natural water pollution ; Pesticides ; Pollution ; Principal components analysis ; Sampling ; Statistical models ; Surface waters ; Water depth ; Water pollution ; Water pollution control ; Water treatment and pollution ; Well water</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 1997-05, Vol.45 (3), p.301-318</ispartof><rights>1997 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-a72d62031420f3582ce9f4068df835b12c19cce31eb033493fd1b846e1f11e423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2738378$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>TROIANO, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NORDMARK, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRY, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, B</creatorcontrib><title>Profiling areas of ground water contamination by pesticides in California : Phase II - Evaluation and modification of a statistical model</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><description>A well sampling study was conducted to evaluate an empirical approach to classifying areas of land in California as vulnerable to ground water contamination by pesticides (Troiano et al., 1994). Wells were sampled from sections of land that had no previous detections of pesticide residues. The sections had been classified into vulnerable soil clusters or into a not-classified group using a procedure based on Principal Components Analysis (PCA). Grape, citrus, and olive growing areas of Fresno and Tulare Counties were targeted, areas where pre-emergence herbicide residues had been detected in well water. Overall, herbicide residues were detected in 75 of 176 sampled wells, a high frequency of detection in relation to results from previous targeted well sampling studies. Since residues were also detected in the not-classified group, the classification procedure was modified using an approach based on Canonical Variates Analysis (CVA). More sections were classified into vulnerable soil clusters with the CVA approach than with the PCA method. Data from two other explanatory variables, depth to ground water and amount of pesticide used per section, were included to illustrate how additional information can be incorporated into this approach of identifying vulnerable areas.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Groundwater pollution</subject><subject>Groundwaters</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Herbicide residues</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Statistical models</subject><subject>Surface waters</subject><subject>Water depth</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><subject>Water pollution control</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>Well water</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkD1PHDEQhq0oSLkQalorQukWPP5Y23ToxMdJSKFI6tWc1yZGe_Zh7ybiJ_Cvs6ujoqEazczzvq9mCDkFdg6Mi4urS2BMaW00WKPsJ7ICpUXDrbKfyYpBq5tWtPYL-VrrE2PMamlX5PWh5BCHmB4pFo-V5kAfS55ST__h6At1OY24iwnHmBPdvtC9r2N0sfeVxkTXOMSQS4pIL-nDH6yebja0odd_cZgOGpy9drmPIbrDYI5AWse5WZxwWLZ--EaOAg7Vn7zVY_L75vrX-q65_3m7WV_dNyg0jA1q3recCZCcBaEMd94GyVrTByPUFrgD65wX4LdMCGlF6GFrZOshAHjJxTH5cfDdl_w8zcd0u1idHwZMPk-14yAkm3UfgqCWP6v2Y1BKxTlbor-_A5_yVNJ8bacVSGiNWqCzNwjr_JxQMLlYu32JOywvHdfCCG3Ef3YZmQo</recordid><startdate>19970501</startdate><enddate>19970501</enddate><creator>TROIANO, J</creator><creator>NORDMARK, C</creator><creator>BARRY, T</creator><creator>JOHNSON, B</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970501</creationdate><title>Profiling areas of ground water contamination by pesticides in California : Phase II - Evaluation and modification of a statistical model</title><author>TROIANO, J ; NORDMARK, C ; BARRY, T ; JOHNSON, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a371t-a72d62031420f3582ce9f4068df835b12c19cce31eb033493fd1b846e1f11e423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Groundwater pollution</topic><topic>Groundwaters</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Herbicide residues</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Statistical models</topic><topic>Surface waters</topic><topic>Water depth</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><topic>Water pollution control</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>Well water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>TROIANO, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NORDMARK, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BARRY, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>TROIANO, J</au><au>NORDMARK, C</au><au>BARRY, T</au><au>JOHNSON, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Profiling areas of ground water contamination by pesticides in California : Phase II - Evaluation and modification of a statistical model</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><date>1997-05-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>318</epage><pages>301-318</pages><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><coden>EMASDH</coden><abstract>A well sampling study was conducted to evaluate an empirical approach to classifying areas of land in California as vulnerable to ground water contamination by pesticides (Troiano et al., 1994). Wells were sampled from sections of land that had no previous detections of pesticide residues. The sections had been classified into vulnerable soil clusters or into a not-classified group using a procedure based on Principal Components Analysis (PCA). Grape, citrus, and olive growing areas of Fresno and Tulare Counties were targeted, areas where pre-emergence herbicide residues had been detected in well water. Overall, herbicide residues were detected in 75 of 176 sampled wells, a high frequency of detection in relation to results from previous targeted well sampling studies. Since residues were also detected in the not-classified group, the classification procedure was modified using an approach based on Canonical Variates Analysis (CVA). More sections were classified into vulnerable soil clusters with the CVA approach than with the PCA method. Data from two other explanatory variables, depth to ground water and amount of pesticide used per section, were included to illustrate how additional information can be incorporated into this approach of identifying vulnerable areas.</abstract><cop>Dordrect</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1005778719859</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6369
ispartof Environmental monitoring and assessment, 1997-05, Vol.45 (3), p.301-318
issn 0167-6369
1573-2959
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21340493
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Applied sciences
Contamination
Environmental monitoring
Exact sciences and technology
Groundwater
Groundwater pollution
Groundwaters
Health care
Herbicide residues
Herbicides
Natural water pollution
Pesticides
Pollution
Principal components analysis
Sampling
Statistical models
Surface waters
Water depth
Water pollution
Water pollution control
Water treatment and pollution
Well water
title Profiling areas of ground water contamination by pesticides in California : Phase II - Evaluation and modification of a statistical model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T15%3A12%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Profiling%20areas%20of%20ground%20water%20contamination%20by%20pesticides%20in%20California%20:%20Phase%20II%20-%20Evaluation%20and%20modification%20of%20a%20statistical%20model&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=TROIANO,%20J&rft.date=1997-05-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=318&rft.pages=301-318&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft.coden=EMASDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1005778719859&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E325619%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751416852&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true