Odour-based species recognition in two sympatric species of sac-winged bats (Saccopteryx bilineata, S. leptura): combining chemical analyses, behavioural observations and odour preference tests

Combining chemical analysis and odour preference tests, we asked whether two closely related sympatric species of sac-winged bats use odour for species recognition. Males of the two sister species Saccopteryx bilineata and Saccopteryx leptura have pouches containing an odoriferous liquid in their an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2009-03, Vol.63 (5), p.741-749
Hauptverfasser: Caspers, Barbara A, Schroeder, Frank C, Franke, Stephan, Streich, W. Jürgen, Voigt, Christian C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 749
container_issue 5
container_start_page 741
container_title Behavioral ecology and sociobiology
container_volume 63
creator Caspers, Barbara A
Schroeder, Frank C
Franke, Stephan
Streich, W. Jürgen
Voigt, Christian C
description Combining chemical analysis and odour preference tests, we asked whether two closely related sympatric species of sac-winged bats use odour for species recognition. Males of the two sister species Saccopteryx bilineata and Saccopteryx leptura have pouches containing an odoriferous liquid in their antebrachial wing membrane, which is used in S. bilineata during courtship displays. Although both species occasionally share the same daytime roosts and are morphologically similar, there is no evidence for interbreeding. We compared the production and composition of the wing sac odorant in male S. leptura and S. bilineata and performed odour preference tests with female S. bilineata. Similar to male S. bilineata, male S. leptura cleansed and refilled their wing sacs with secretions, but they spent more time each day in doing so than male S. bilineata. Chemical analysis by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry revealed that male Saccopteryx carried species-specific scents in their wing sacs. Binary choice tests confirmed that female S. bilineata preferred the wing sac scents of male S. bilineata to those of the sister species, suggesting that the species specificity of male wing sac scents maintain the pre-mating isolation barrier between these closely related species.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00265-009-0708-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21338469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40295341</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40295341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4aa63b005812c4fcec18d9f228d8d48443f50ed7b511f7cb07cf6961da3ce0ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEEkvhATggLA4IpKaM_yRxekNVC0iVelh6thxnsvUqGwePt2UfjzfDq6AiceBk2fP7PN_MVxSvOZxxgOYTAYi6KgHaEhrQZfOkWHElRb7V4mmxAqmgrJSSz4sXRFsAqLnWq-LXTR_2sewsYc9oRueRWEQXNpNPPkzMTyw9BEaH3WxT9O4RCgMj68oHP22ytLOJ2Ie1dS7MCePhJ-v86Ce0yZ6y9RkbcU77aD-eMxd2nZ-yirk73HlnR2YnOx4I6ZR1eGfvfXaUX0NHGO_t0QVlpGfhaJXNEQeMODlkCSnRy-LZYEfCV3_Ok-L26vL7xdfy-ubLt4vP16WTrUilsraWHUCluXBqcOi47ttBCN3rXum8maEC7Juu4nxoXAeNG-q25r2VDgFRnhTvl3_nGH7sc2ez8-RwHO2EYU9GcCm1qtsMvvsH3GbfecTMgNSNroTMEF8gFwNRHsnM0e9sPBgO5pioWRI1OVFzTNQ0WSMWDWU2bz3-_fh_ojeLaEspxMcuCkRbScVz_e1SH2wwdhM9mdu1AC6BV21bKZC_AUsnux0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203878523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Odour-based species recognition in two sympatric species of sac-winged bats (Saccopteryx bilineata, S. leptura): combining chemical analyses, behavioural observations and odour preference tests</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Caspers, Barbara A ; Schroeder, Frank C ; Franke, Stephan ; Streich, W. Jürgen ; Voigt, Christian C</creator><creatorcontrib>Caspers, Barbara A ; Schroeder, Frank C ; Franke, Stephan ; Streich, W. Jürgen ; Voigt, Christian C</creatorcontrib><description>Combining chemical analysis and odour preference tests, we asked whether two closely related sympatric species of sac-winged bats use odour for species recognition. Males of the two sister species Saccopteryx bilineata and Saccopteryx leptura have pouches containing an odoriferous liquid in their antebrachial wing membrane, which is used in S. bilineata during courtship displays. Although both species occasionally share the same daytime roosts and are morphologically similar, there is no evidence for interbreeding. We compared the production and composition of the wing sac odorant in male S. leptura and S. bilineata and performed odour preference tests with female S. bilineata. Similar to male S. bilineata, male S. leptura cleansed and refilled their wing sacs with secretions, but they spent more time each day in doing so than male S. bilineata. Chemical analysis by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry revealed that male Saccopteryx carried species-specific scents in their wing sacs. Binary choice tests confirmed that female S. bilineata preferred the wing sac scents of male S. bilineata to those of the sister species, suggesting that the species specificity of male wing sac scents maintain the pre-mating isolation barrier between these closely related species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0708-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Animal glands ; Bats ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Chemical analysis ; Chemicals ; Chiroptera ; Evolution ; Female animals ; Female choice ; Gas chromatography ; Life Sciences ; Male animals ; Mass spectrometry ; Mating behavior ; Odors ; Original Paper ; Saccopteryx bilineata ; Saccopteryx leptura ; Secretion ; Sexual selection ; Species recognition ; Species-specific scents ; Studies ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2009-03, Vol.63 (5), p.741-749</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4aa63b005812c4fcec18d9f228d8d48443f50ed7b511f7cb07cf6961da3ce0ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4aa63b005812c4fcec18d9f228d8d48443f50ed7b511f7cb07cf6961da3ce0ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40295341$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40295341$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Caspers, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Frank C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franke, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streich, W. Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Christian C</creatorcontrib><title>Odour-based species recognition in two sympatric species of sac-winged bats (Saccopteryx bilineata, S. leptura): combining chemical analyses, behavioural observations and odour preference tests</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>Combining chemical analysis and odour preference tests, we asked whether two closely related sympatric species of sac-winged bats use odour for species recognition. Males of the two sister species Saccopteryx bilineata and Saccopteryx leptura have pouches containing an odoriferous liquid in their antebrachial wing membrane, which is used in S. bilineata during courtship displays. Although both species occasionally share the same daytime roosts and are morphologically similar, there is no evidence for interbreeding. We compared the production and composition of the wing sac odorant in male S. leptura and S. bilineata and performed odour preference tests with female S. bilineata. Similar to male S. bilineata, male S. leptura cleansed and refilled their wing sacs with secretions, but they spent more time each day in doing so than male S. bilineata. Chemical analysis by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry revealed that male Saccopteryx carried species-specific scents in their wing sacs. Binary choice tests confirmed that female S. bilineata preferred the wing sac scents of male S. bilineata to those of the sister species, suggesting that the species specificity of male wing sac scents maintain the pre-mating isolation barrier between these closely related species.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal glands</subject><subject>Bats</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Chemical analysis</subject><subject>Chemicals</subject><subject>Chiroptera</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Female choice</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mating behavior</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Saccopteryx bilineata</subject><subject>Saccopteryx leptura</subject><subject>Secretion</subject><subject>Sexual selection</subject><subject>Species recognition</subject><subject>Species-specific scents</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxiMEEkvhATggLA4IpKaM_yRxekNVC0iVelh6thxnsvUqGwePt2UfjzfDq6AiceBk2fP7PN_MVxSvOZxxgOYTAYi6KgHaEhrQZfOkWHElRb7V4mmxAqmgrJSSz4sXRFsAqLnWq-LXTR_2sewsYc9oRueRWEQXNpNPPkzMTyw9BEaH3WxT9O4RCgMj68oHP22ytLOJ2Ie1dS7MCePhJ-v86Ce0yZ6y9RkbcU77aD-eMxd2nZ-yirk73HlnR2YnOx4I6ZR1eGfvfXaUX0NHGO_t0QVlpGfhaJXNEQeMODlkCSnRy-LZYEfCV3_Ok-L26vL7xdfy-ubLt4vP16WTrUilsraWHUCluXBqcOi47ttBCN3rXum8maEC7Juu4nxoXAeNG-q25r2VDgFRnhTvl3_nGH7sc2ez8-RwHO2EYU9GcCm1qtsMvvsH3GbfecTMgNSNroTMEF8gFwNRHsnM0e9sPBgO5pioWRI1OVFzTNQ0WSMWDWU2bz3-_fh_ojeLaEspxMcuCkRbScVz_e1SH2wwdhM9mdu1AC6BV21bKZC_AUsnux0</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Caspers, Barbara A</creator><creator>Schroeder, Frank C</creator><creator>Franke, Stephan</creator><creator>Streich, W. Jürgen</creator><creator>Voigt, Christian C</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Odour-based species recognition in two sympatric species of sac-winged bats (Saccopteryx bilineata, S. leptura): combining chemical analyses, behavioural observations and odour preference tests</title><author>Caspers, Barbara A ; Schroeder, Frank C ; Franke, Stephan ; Streich, W. Jürgen ; Voigt, Christian C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-4aa63b005812c4fcec18d9f228d8d48443f50ed7b511f7cb07cf6961da3ce0ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal glands</topic><topic>Bats</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Chemical analysis</topic><topic>Chemicals</topic><topic>Chiroptera</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Female choice</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mating behavior</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Saccopteryx bilineata</topic><topic>Saccopteryx leptura</topic><topic>Secretion</topic><topic>Sexual selection</topic><topic>Species recognition</topic><topic>Species-specific scents</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Caspers, Barbara A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schroeder, Frank C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franke, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streich, W. Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voigt, Christian C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Caspers, Barbara A</au><au>Schroeder, Frank C</au><au>Franke, Stephan</au><au>Streich, W. Jürgen</au><au>Voigt, Christian C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Odour-based species recognition in two sympatric species of sac-winged bats (Saccopteryx bilineata, S. leptura): combining chemical analyses, behavioural observations and odour preference tests</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>749</epage><pages>741-749</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>Combining chemical analysis and odour preference tests, we asked whether two closely related sympatric species of sac-winged bats use odour for species recognition. Males of the two sister species Saccopteryx bilineata and Saccopteryx leptura have pouches containing an odoriferous liquid in their antebrachial wing membrane, which is used in S. bilineata during courtship displays. Although both species occasionally share the same daytime roosts and are morphologically similar, there is no evidence for interbreeding. We compared the production and composition of the wing sac odorant in male S. leptura and S. bilineata and performed odour preference tests with female S. bilineata. Similar to male S. bilineata, male S. leptura cleansed and refilled their wing sacs with secretions, but they spent more time each day in doing so than male S. bilineata. Chemical analysis by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry revealed that male Saccopteryx carried species-specific scents in their wing sacs. Binary choice tests confirmed that female S. bilineata preferred the wing sac scents of male S. bilineata to those of the sister species, suggesting that the species specificity of male wing sac scents maintain the pre-mating isolation barrier between these closely related species.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-009-0708-7</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0340-5443
ispartof Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2009-03, Vol.63 (5), p.741-749
issn 0340-5443
1432-0762
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21338469
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Animal Ecology
Animal glands
Bats
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Chemical analysis
Chemicals
Chiroptera
Evolution
Female animals
Female choice
Gas chromatography
Life Sciences
Male animals
Mass spectrometry
Mating behavior
Odors
Original Paper
Saccopteryx bilineata
Saccopteryx leptura
Secretion
Sexual selection
Species recognition
Species-specific scents
Studies
Zoology
title Odour-based species recognition in two sympatric species of sac-winged bats (Saccopteryx bilineata, S. leptura): combining chemical analyses, behavioural observations and odour preference tests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T08%3A41%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Odour-based%20species%20recognition%20in%20two%20sympatric%20species%20of%20sac-winged%20bats%20(Saccopteryx%20bilineata,%20S.%20leptura):%20combining%20chemical%20analyses,%20behavioural%20observations%20and%20odour%20preference%20tests&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Caspers,%20Barbara%20A&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=749&rft.pages=741-749&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-009-0708-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40295341%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203878523&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40295341&rfr_iscdi=true