patch use model to separate effects of foraging costs on giving-up densities: an experiment with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)
The giving-up density of food (GUD), the amount of food remaining in a patch when a forager ceases foraging there, can be used to compare the costs of foraging in different food patches. But, to draw inferences from GUDs, specific effects of foraging costs (predation risk, metabolic and missed oppor...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology 2009-04, Vol.63 (6), p.891-897 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 897 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 891 |
| container_title | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology |
| container_volume | 63 |
| creator | Rieucau, Guillaume Vickery, William L Doucet, G. Jean |
| description | The giving-up density of food (GUD), the amount of food remaining in a patch when a forager ceases foraging there, can be used to compare the costs of foraging in different food patches. But, to draw inferences from GUDs, specific effects of foraging costs (predation risk, metabolic and missed opportunities costs) on GUDs have to be identified. As high predation risk, high metabolic costs and abundant food all should produce high GUDs, this does not allow us to infer directly the quality of a habitat. In order to separate the effect of each foraging cost, we developed an optimal foraging model based on food supplementation. We illustrate the use of our model in a study where we assessed the impact of a power line right-of-way in a white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) winter yard by determining whether the negative effects of cover loss outweigh the positive effects of browse regeneration. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00265-009-0732-7 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21335314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40295412</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40295412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-cc9ded458a6ff716f79eeddf9dbf28ea45703d3c15a83639f4c170a4a5e6e033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2OFCEUhYnRxLb1AVwYiQuji9LLTxVV7szEv2SSWTiuCcKlmk51UQI1o8_gS0unjCYuXMHlfudw4RDymMErBqBeZwDetQ3A0IASvFF3yI7JugHV8btkB0JC00op7pMHOR8BoGN9vyM_F1Psga4Z6Sk6nGiJNONikilI0Xu0JdPoqY_JjGEeqY35fDLTMdzUulkX6nDOoQTMb6iZKX5fMIUTzoXehnKgt4dQsCkmTOgqiom-uHLRxlqvmd6EVG2Dmdf88iG5582U8dHvdU-u37-7vvjYXF59-HTx9rKxYuClsXZw6GTbm857xTqvBkTn_OC-et6jka0C4YRlrelFJwYvLVNgpGmxQxBiT55vtkuK31bMRZ9CtjhNZsa4Zs2ZEK2on7cnz_4Bj3FNcx1NcxC96jrWVohtkE0x54ReL_X1Jv3QDPQ5Gr1Fo2s0-hyNVlXDN02u7Dxi-mv8P9GTTXTMJaY_t0jgQysZr_2nW9-bqM2YQtZfPnNgAljH6qC9-AXyzKaD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>203876615</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>patch use model to separate effects of foraging costs on giving-up densities: an experiment with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rieucau, Guillaume ; Vickery, William L ; Doucet, G. Jean</creator><creatorcontrib>Rieucau, Guillaume ; Vickery, William L ; Doucet, G. Jean</creatorcontrib><description>The giving-up density of food (GUD), the amount of food remaining in a patch when a forager ceases foraging there, can be used to compare the costs of foraging in different food patches. But, to draw inferences from GUDs, specific effects of foraging costs (predation risk, metabolic and missed opportunities costs) on GUDs have to be identified. As high predation risk, high metabolic costs and abundant food all should produce high GUDs, this does not allow us to infer directly the quality of a habitat. In order to separate the effect of each foraging cost, we developed an optimal foraging model based on food supplementation. We illustrate the use of our model in a study where we assessed the impact of a power line right-of-way in a white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) winter yard by determining whether the negative effects of cover loss outweigh the positive effects of browse regeneration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0340-5443</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0732-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal behavior ; Animal Ecology ; Animal feeding behavior ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cost efficiency ; Deer ; Food ; Food availability ; Food consumption ; Food supply ; Foraging ; Forest habitats ; Habitats ; Life Sciences ; Odocoileus virginianus ; Original Paper ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2009-04, Vol.63 (6), p.891-897</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-cc9ded458a6ff716f79eeddf9dbf28ea45703d3c15a83639f4c170a4a5e6e033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-cc9ded458a6ff716f79eeddf9dbf28ea45703d3c15a83639f4c170a4a5e6e033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40295412$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40295412$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rieucau, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickery, William L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doucet, G. Jean</creatorcontrib><title>patch use model to separate effects of foraging costs on giving-up densities: an experiment with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)</title><title>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</title><addtitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</addtitle><description>The giving-up density of food (GUD), the amount of food remaining in a patch when a forager ceases foraging there, can be used to compare the costs of foraging in different food patches. But, to draw inferences from GUDs, specific effects of foraging costs (predation risk, metabolic and missed opportunities costs) on GUDs have to be identified. As high predation risk, high metabolic costs and abundant food all should produce high GUDs, this does not allow us to infer directly the quality of a habitat. In order to separate the effect of each foraging cost, we developed an optimal foraging model based on food supplementation. We illustrate the use of our model in a study where we assessed the impact of a power line right-of-way in a white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) winter yard by determining whether the negative effects of cover loss outweigh the positive effects of browse regeneration.</description><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Animal feeding behavior</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cost efficiency</subject><subject>Deer</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Odocoileus virginianus</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0340-5443</issn><issn>1432-0762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc2OFCEUhYnRxLb1AVwYiQuji9LLTxVV7szEv2SSWTiuCcKlmk51UQI1o8_gS0unjCYuXMHlfudw4RDymMErBqBeZwDetQ3A0IASvFF3yI7JugHV8btkB0JC00op7pMHOR8BoGN9vyM_F1Psga4Z6Sk6nGiJNONikilI0Xu0JdPoqY_JjGEeqY35fDLTMdzUulkX6nDOoQTMb6iZKX5fMIUTzoXehnKgt4dQsCkmTOgqiom-uHLRxlqvmd6EVG2Dmdf88iG5582U8dHvdU-u37-7vvjYXF59-HTx9rKxYuClsXZw6GTbm857xTqvBkTn_OC-et6jka0C4YRlrelFJwYvLVNgpGmxQxBiT55vtkuK31bMRZ9CtjhNZsa4Zs2ZEK2on7cnz_4Bj3FNcx1NcxC96jrWVohtkE0x54ReL_X1Jv3QDPQ5Gr1Fo2s0-hyNVlXDN02u7Dxi-mv8P9GTTXTMJaY_t0jgQysZr_2nW9-bqM2YQtZfPnNgAljH6qC9-AXyzKaD</recordid><startdate>20090401</startdate><enddate>20090401</enddate><creator>Rieucau, Guillaume</creator><creator>Vickery, William L</creator><creator>Doucet, G. Jean</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090401</creationdate><title>patch use model to separate effects of foraging costs on giving-up densities: an experiment with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)</title><author>Rieucau, Guillaume ; Vickery, William L ; Doucet, G. Jean</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-cc9ded458a6ff716f79eeddf9dbf28ea45703d3c15a83639f4c170a4a5e6e033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Animal feeding behavior</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cost efficiency</topic><topic>Deer</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Odocoileus virginianus</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rieucau, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vickery, William L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doucet, G. Jean</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rieucau, Guillaume</au><au>Vickery, William L</au><au>Doucet, G. Jean</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>patch use model to separate effects of foraging costs on giving-up densities: an experiment with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus)</atitle><jtitle>Behavioral ecology and sociobiology</jtitle><stitle>Behav Ecol Sociobiol</stitle><date>2009-04-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>891</spage><epage>897</epage><pages>891-897</pages><issn>0340-5443</issn><eissn>1432-0762</eissn><abstract>The giving-up density of food (GUD), the amount of food remaining in a patch when a forager ceases foraging there, can be used to compare the costs of foraging in different food patches. But, to draw inferences from GUDs, specific effects of foraging costs (predation risk, metabolic and missed opportunities costs) on GUDs have to be identified. As high predation risk, high metabolic costs and abundant food all should produce high GUDs, this does not allow us to infer directly the quality of a habitat. In order to separate the effect of each foraging cost, we developed an optimal foraging model based on food supplementation. We illustrate the use of our model in a study where we assessed the impact of a power line right-of-way in a white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) winter yard by determining whether the negative effects of cover loss outweigh the positive effects of browse regeneration.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00265-009-0732-7</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0340-5443 |
| ispartof | Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 2009-04, Vol.63 (6), p.891-897 |
| issn | 0340-5443 1432-0762 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21335314 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Animal behavior Animal Ecology Animal feeding behavior Behavioral Sciences Biomedical and Life Sciences Cost efficiency Deer Food Food availability Food consumption Food supply Foraging Forest habitats Habitats Life Sciences Odocoileus virginianus Original Paper Zoology |
| title | patch use model to separate effects of foraging costs on giving-up densities: an experiment with white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T12%3A15%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=patch%20use%20model%20to%20separate%20effects%20of%20foraging%20costs%20on%20giving-up%20densities:%20an%20experiment%20with%20white-tailed%20deer%20(Odocoileus%20virginianus)&rft.jtitle=Behavioral%20ecology%20and%20sociobiology&rft.au=Rieucau,%20Guillaume&rft.date=2009-04-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=891&rft.epage=897&rft.pages=891-897&rft.issn=0340-5443&rft.eissn=1432-0762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00265-009-0732-7&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40295412%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=203876615&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40295412&rfr_iscdi=true |