Digital Methods Can Help You . . . If You're Careful, Critical, and Not Historiographically Naïve
This special section on the digital history of psychology includes target articles by Ivan Flis and Nees Jan van Eck and Jeremy Trevelyan Burman, with comments by Melinda Baldwin, Ted Porter, and Chris Green. In his introduction to the section, Burman explains his original motivation in turning to t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | History of psychology 2018-11, Vol.21 (4), p.297-301 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 301 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 297 |
container_title | History of psychology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Burman, Jeremy Trevelyan |
description | This special section on the digital history of psychology includes target articles by Ivan Flis and Nees Jan van Eck and Jeremy Trevelyan Burman, with comments by Melinda Baldwin, Ted Porter, and Chris Green. In his introduction to the section, Burman explains his original motivation in turning to tools borrowed from the digital humanities: helping graduate students to identify dissertation topics more easily, and thereby reduce completion times for the doctorate, while at the same time doing "good history." Since then, a new field-digital history of psychology-has blossomed. John Burnham, especially, is recognized here as an important interlocutor. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/hop0000112 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132724402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2132724402</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-f10abcb9be09463ac8907559aafc730b2f1c9e30625d2db28f1e85f1d5e8aeb83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMlOwzAQhi0EYr_wAMgSBxAQ8JI08RGVpUilXODAyZo4ExqUxsFOkPpUPAQvhktZJMaHmdF8-mf8E7LH2RlnMj2f2paF4FyskE2upIrYgLPVUDMlozjhbINsef8SmCw062RDslhwFQ82SX5ZPVcd1PQOu6ktPB1CQ0dYt_TJ9vTs692Wi-bQYRg6LPv6lA5d1VUGQgVNQSe2o6PKd9ZV9tlBO12M6jmdwMf7G-6QtRJqj7vfeZs8Xl89DEfR-P7mdngxjkBmaReVnEFucpUjC5dJMJliaZIogNKkkuWi5EahZAORFKLIRVZyzJKSFwlmgHkmt8nRUrd19rVH3-lZ5Q3WNTRoe68FlyIVccxEQA_-oS-2d0247ouK1SBsDNTxkjLOeh9-rltXzcDNNWd64bz-cz7A-9-SfT7D4hf9sToAJ0sAWtCtnxtwwcIavemdw6ZbiIXtOtZCpfITzfyL4w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2132496730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Digital Methods Can Help You . . . If You're Careful, Critical, and Not Historiographically Naïve</title><source>APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Burman, Jeremy Trevelyan</creator><contributor>Weidman, Nadine</contributor><creatorcontrib>Burman, Jeremy Trevelyan ; Weidman, Nadine</creatorcontrib><description>This special section on the digital history of psychology includes target articles by Ivan Flis and Nees Jan van Eck and Jeremy Trevelyan Burman, with comments by Melinda Baldwin, Ted Porter, and Chris Green. In his introduction to the section, Burman explains his original motivation in turning to tools borrowed from the digital humanities: helping graduate students to identify dissertation topics more easily, and thereby reduce completion times for the doctorate, while at the same time doing "good history." Since then, a new field-digital history of psychology-has blossomed. John Burnham, especially, is recognized here as an important interlocutor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1093-4510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-0610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/hop0000112</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30421946</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Academic Writing ; Graduate Students ; History of Psychology ; Humanities</subject><ispartof>History of psychology, 2018-11, Vol.21 (4), p.297-301</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-f10abcb9be09463ac8907559aafc730b2f1c9e30625d2db28f1e85f1d5e8aeb83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30421946$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Weidman, Nadine</contributor><creatorcontrib>Burman, Jeremy Trevelyan</creatorcontrib><title>Digital Methods Can Help You . . . If You're Careful, Critical, and Not Historiographically Naïve</title><title>History of psychology</title><addtitle>Hist Psychol</addtitle><description>This special section on the digital history of psychology includes target articles by Ivan Flis and Nees Jan van Eck and Jeremy Trevelyan Burman, with comments by Melinda Baldwin, Ted Porter, and Chris Green. In his introduction to the section, Burman explains his original motivation in turning to tools borrowed from the digital humanities: helping graduate students to identify dissertation topics more easily, and thereby reduce completion times for the doctorate, while at the same time doing "good history." Since then, a new field-digital history of psychology-has blossomed. John Burnham, especially, is recognized here as an important interlocutor.</description><subject>Academic Writing</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>History of Psychology</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><issn>1093-4510</issn><issn>1939-0610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMlOwzAQhi0EYr_wAMgSBxAQ8JI08RGVpUilXODAyZo4ExqUxsFOkPpUPAQvhktZJMaHmdF8-mf8E7LH2RlnMj2f2paF4FyskE2upIrYgLPVUDMlozjhbINsef8SmCw062RDslhwFQ82SX5ZPVcd1PQOu6ktPB1CQ0dYt_TJ9vTs692Wi-bQYRg6LPv6lA5d1VUGQgVNQSe2o6PKd9ZV9tlBO12M6jmdwMf7G-6QtRJqj7vfeZs8Xl89DEfR-P7mdngxjkBmaReVnEFucpUjC5dJMJliaZIogNKkkuWi5EahZAORFKLIRVZyzJKSFwlmgHkmt8nRUrd19rVH3-lZ5Q3WNTRoe68FlyIVccxEQA_-oS-2d0247ouK1SBsDNTxkjLOeh9-rltXzcDNNWd64bz-cz7A-9-SfT7D4hf9sToAJ0sAWtCtnxtwwcIavemdw6ZbiIXtOtZCpfITzfyL4w</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Burman, Jeremy Trevelyan</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Digital Methods Can Help You . . . If You're Careful, Critical, and Not Historiographically Naïve</title><author>Burman, Jeremy Trevelyan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-f10abcb9be09463ac8907559aafc730b2f1c9e30625d2db28f1e85f1d5e8aeb83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Academic Writing</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>History of Psychology</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burman, Jeremy Trevelyan</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest PsycARTICLES</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>History of psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burman, Jeremy Trevelyan</au><au>Weidman, Nadine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Digital Methods Can Help You . . . If You're Careful, Critical, and Not Historiographically Naïve</atitle><jtitle>History of psychology</jtitle><addtitle>Hist Psychol</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>297</spage><epage>301</epage><pages>297-301</pages><issn>1093-4510</issn><eissn>1939-0610</eissn><abstract>This special section on the digital history of psychology includes target articles by Ivan Flis and Nees Jan van Eck and Jeremy Trevelyan Burman, with comments by Melinda Baldwin, Ted Porter, and Chris Green. In his introduction to the section, Burman explains his original motivation in turning to tools borrowed from the digital humanities: helping graduate students to identify dissertation topics more easily, and thereby reduce completion times for the doctorate, while at the same time doing "good history." Since then, a new field-digital history of psychology-has blossomed. John Burnham, especially, is recognized here as an important interlocutor.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>30421946</pmid><doi>10.1037/hop0000112</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1093-4510 |
ispartof | History of psychology, 2018-11, Vol.21 (4), p.297-301 |
issn | 1093-4510 1939-0610 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132724402 |
source | APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Academic Writing Graduate Students History of Psychology Humanities |
title | Digital Methods Can Help You . . . If You're Careful, Critical, and Not Historiographically Naïve |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T04%3A26%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Digital%20Methods%20Can%20Help%20You%20.%20.%20.%20If%20You're%20Careful,%20Critical,%20and%20Not%20Historiographically%20Na%C3%AFve&rft.jtitle=History%20of%20psychology&rft.au=Burman,%20Jeremy%20Trevelyan&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=297&rft.epage=301&rft.pages=297-301&rft.issn=1093-4510&rft.eissn=1939-0610&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/hop0000112&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2132724402%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2132496730&rft_id=info:pmid/30421946&rfr_iscdi=true |