A randomized, double-blind trial of amorolfine 0.25% cream and sertaconazole 2% cream in limited dermatophytosis
Background: Dermatophytosis is becoming increasingly unresponsive to conventional antifungals. Newer topical antifungals may be more effective in these patients. Aims: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of amorolfine 0.25% cream and sertaconazole 2% cream in limited tinea cruris/corpori...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology venereology, and leprology, 2019-05, Vol.85 (3), p.276-281 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 281 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 276 |
container_title | Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Das, Anirban Sil, Amrita Sarkar, Tushar Sen, Arpita Chakravorty, Sriparna Sengupta, Manideepa Das, Anupam Chandra, Somodyuti Pal, Santasmita Bandyopadhyay, Debabrata Das, Nilay |
description | Background: Dermatophytosis is becoming increasingly unresponsive to conventional antifungals. Newer topical antifungals may be more effective in these patients.
Aims: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of amorolfine 0.25% cream and sertaconazole 2% cream in limited tinea cruris/corporis.
Methods: A single-center, randomized (1:1), double-blind, parallel group, active-controlled trial (CTRI/2014/12/005246) was performed. Sixty-six untreated adults with acutely symptomatic tinea cruris/corporis were included in the study. All patients had limited cutaneous involvement and were KOH mount positive. Group A received amorolfine 0.25% cream, and group B received sertaconazole 2% cream twice daily application to the lesions for 4 weeks. After the baseline visit, four follow-up visits were carried out. The outcome measures for effectiveness were clinical and mycological cure. Safety parameters studied were treatment-emergent adverse events and changes in routine laboratory parameters.
Results: Both sertaconazole and amorolfine significantly reduced symptoms (P < 0.001) in both groups. However, improvement in symptoms (pruritus, burning sensation, erythema, scaling and crusting) was significantly greater in the sertaconazole group at every follow-up visit. Sertaconazole cream was also more effective than amorolfine cream in reducing the number of lesions (P = 0.002 at 12 weeks) and improving the Dermatology Life Quality Index (P < 0.001) at all the follow-up visits. Adverse events were similar in the two groups (P = 0.117). Fungal cultures became negative in 92.3% of the sertaconazole group as compared to 80% in the amorolfine group (P = 0.010).
Limitations: Antifungal susceptibility testing could not be done.
Conclusion: Sertaconazole 2% is superior to amorolfine 0.25%, both in terms of effectiveness and tolerability. Improvement can be appreciated from second week onwards. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_907_17 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132278395</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A583349904</galeid><sourcerecordid>A583349904</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574z-a892f446fc4b8833a25a9a44082628d7cac1c8a1c087113f048ea43755e1f0ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90l1v0zAUBuAIgdgY_AEukCUE4oIUf-XDl9VgMFSJG-DWOnVOVneOXeyEav31eHSFDU0oF4mc5z06st6ieM7oTDIq3tl199PNzj-__77QijaaNQ-KY6oaUQrF-cP8LZq2rAUXR8WTlNaUclkL9rg4ElRSpXh9XGzmJILvwmB32L0lXZiWDsuls74jY7TgSOgJDCEG11uPhM549YqYiDCQnCMJ4wgmeNgFh4QffllPnB3siB3pMA4whs3qagzJpqfFox5cwmc375Pi29mHr6efysWXj-en80VpqkbuSmgV76WseyOXbSsE8AoUSElbXvO2awwYZlpghrYNY6KnskWQoqkqZD2FTpwUb_ZzNzH8mDCNerDJoHPgMUxJcyY4b1qhqkxf_kPXYYo-b6d5ZrSuuBJ_1QU41Nb3YYxgrofqeZU3lEpRmVV5j7pAjxFc8NjbfHzHz-7x-elwsObewOtbgRWCG1cpuGm0wae7kO-hiSGliL3eRDtAvNKM6uv-6N_90bf7k0Mvbq5iWg7Y_YkcCpPB2R5sgxsxpks3bTHqbC992P5ntOZNref6UDbxC_Zo148</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2213065293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized, double-blind trial of amorolfine 0.25% cream and sertaconazole 2% cream in limited dermatophytosis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Bioline International</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Das, Anirban ; Sil, Amrita ; Sarkar, Tushar ; Sen, Arpita ; Chakravorty, Sriparna ; Sengupta, Manideepa ; Das, Anupam ; Chandra, Somodyuti ; Pal, Santasmita ; Bandyopadhyay, Debabrata ; Das, Nilay</creator><creatorcontrib>Das, Anirban ; Sil, Amrita ; Sarkar, Tushar ; Sen, Arpita ; Chakravorty, Sriparna ; Sengupta, Manideepa ; Das, Anupam ; Chandra, Somodyuti ; Pal, Santasmita ; Bandyopadhyay, Debabrata ; Das, Nilay</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Dermatophytosis is becoming increasingly unresponsive to conventional antifungals. Newer topical antifungals may be more effective in these patients.
Aims: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of amorolfine 0.25% cream and sertaconazole 2% cream in limited tinea cruris/corporis.
Methods: A single-center, randomized (1:1), double-blind, parallel group, active-controlled trial (CTRI/2014/12/005246) was performed. Sixty-six untreated adults with acutely symptomatic tinea cruris/corporis were included in the study. All patients had limited cutaneous involvement and were KOH mount positive. Group A received amorolfine 0.25% cream, and group B received sertaconazole 2% cream twice daily application to the lesions for 4 weeks. After the baseline visit, four follow-up visits were carried out. The outcome measures for effectiveness were clinical and mycological cure. Safety parameters studied were treatment-emergent adverse events and changes in routine laboratory parameters.
Results: Both sertaconazole and amorolfine significantly reduced symptoms (P < 0.001) in both groups. However, improvement in symptoms (pruritus, burning sensation, erythema, scaling and crusting) was significantly greater in the sertaconazole group at every follow-up visit. Sertaconazole cream was also more effective than amorolfine cream in reducing the number of lesions (P = 0.002 at 12 weeks) and improving the Dermatology Life Quality Index (P < 0.001) at all the follow-up visits. Adverse events were similar in the two groups (P = 0.117). Fungal cultures became negative in 92.3% of the sertaconazole group as compared to 80% in the amorolfine group (P = 0.010).
Limitations: Antifungal susceptibility testing could not be done.
Conclusion: Sertaconazole 2% is superior to amorolfine 0.25%, both in terms of effectiveness and tolerability. Improvement can be appreciated from second week onwards.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-6323</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0973-3922</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1998-3611</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_907_17</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30409926</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Administration, Topical ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Analysis ; Antifungal agents ; Antifungal Agents - administration & dosage ; Butenafine ; Clinical trials ; Consent ; Dermatology ; Dosage and administration ; Double-Blind Method ; Double-blind studies ; Drug Compounding ; Drug therapy ; Evidence-based medicine ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Imidazoles - administration & dosage ; Male ; Manufacturers ; Medical research ; Middle Aged ; Morpholines - administration & dosage ; Mycoses ; Patients ; Pharmaceuticals ; Quality of life ; Sertaconazole ; Thiophenes - administration & dosage ; Tinea ; Tinea - diagnosis ; Tinea - drug therapy ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology, 2019-05, Vol.85 (3), p.276-281</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574z-a892f446fc4b8833a25a9a44082628d7cac1c8a1c087113f048ea43755e1f0ad3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30409926$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Das, Anirban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sil, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Tushar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Arpita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakravorty, Sriparna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sengupta, Manideepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Anupam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandra, Somodyuti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pal, Santasmita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandyopadhyay, Debabrata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Nilay</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized, double-blind trial of amorolfine 0.25% cream and sertaconazole 2% cream in limited dermatophytosis</title><title>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology</title><addtitle>Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol</addtitle><description>Background: Dermatophytosis is becoming increasingly unresponsive to conventional antifungals. Newer topical antifungals may be more effective in these patients.
Aims: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of amorolfine 0.25% cream and sertaconazole 2% cream in limited tinea cruris/corporis.
Methods: A single-center, randomized (1:1), double-blind, parallel group, active-controlled trial (CTRI/2014/12/005246) was performed. Sixty-six untreated adults with acutely symptomatic tinea cruris/corporis were included in the study. All patients had limited cutaneous involvement and were KOH mount positive. Group A received amorolfine 0.25% cream, and group B received sertaconazole 2% cream twice daily application to the lesions for 4 weeks. After the baseline visit, four follow-up visits were carried out. The outcome measures for effectiveness were clinical and mycological cure. Safety parameters studied were treatment-emergent adverse events and changes in routine laboratory parameters.
Results: Both sertaconazole and amorolfine significantly reduced symptoms (P < 0.001) in both groups. However, improvement in symptoms (pruritus, burning sensation, erythema, scaling and crusting) was significantly greater in the sertaconazole group at every follow-up visit. Sertaconazole cream was also more effective than amorolfine cream in reducing the number of lesions (P = 0.002 at 12 weeks) and improving the Dermatology Life Quality Index (P < 0.001) at all the follow-up visits. Adverse events were similar in the two groups (P = 0.117). Fungal cultures became negative in 92.3% of the sertaconazole group as compared to 80% in the amorolfine group (P = 0.010).
Limitations: Antifungal susceptibility testing could not be done.
Conclusion: Sertaconazole 2% is superior to amorolfine 0.25%, both in terms of effectiveness and tolerability. Improvement can be appreciated from second week onwards.</description><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antifungal agents</subject><subject>Antifungal Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Butenafine</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Double-blind studies</subject><subject>Drug Compounding</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Evidence-based medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imidazoles - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morpholines - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Mycoses</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmaceuticals</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Sertaconazole</subject><subject>Thiophenes - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Tinea</subject><subject>Tinea - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tinea - drug therapy</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0378-6323</issn><issn>0973-3922</issn><issn>1998-3611</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp90l1v0zAUBuAIgdgY_AEukCUE4oIUf-XDl9VgMFSJG-DWOnVOVneOXeyEav31eHSFDU0oF4mc5z06st6ieM7oTDIq3tl199PNzj-__77QijaaNQ-KY6oaUQrF-cP8LZq2rAUXR8WTlNaUclkL9rg4ElRSpXh9XGzmJILvwmB32L0lXZiWDsuls74jY7TgSOgJDCEG11uPhM549YqYiDCQnCMJ4wgmeNgFh4QffllPnB3siB3pMA4whs3qagzJpqfFox5cwmc375Pi29mHr6efysWXj-en80VpqkbuSmgV76WseyOXbSsE8AoUSElbXvO2awwYZlpghrYNY6KnskWQoqkqZD2FTpwUb_ZzNzH8mDCNerDJoHPgMUxJcyY4b1qhqkxf_kPXYYo-b6d5ZrSuuBJ_1QU41Nb3YYxgrofqeZU3lEpRmVV5j7pAjxFc8NjbfHzHz-7x-elwsObewOtbgRWCG1cpuGm0wae7kO-hiSGliL3eRDtAvNKM6uv-6N_90bf7k0Mvbq5iWg7Y_YkcCpPB2R5sgxsxpks3bTHqbC992P5ntOZNref6UDbxC_Zo148</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Das, Anirban</creator><creator>Sil, Amrita</creator><creator>Sarkar, Tushar</creator><creator>Sen, Arpita</creator><creator>Chakravorty, Sriparna</creator><creator>Sengupta, Manideepa</creator><creator>Das, Anupam</creator><creator>Chandra, Somodyuti</creator><creator>Pal, Santasmita</creator><creator>Bandyopadhyay, Debabrata</creator><creator>Das, Nilay</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Scientific Scholar</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>A randomized, double-blind trial of amorolfine 0.25% cream and sertaconazole 2% cream in limited dermatophytosis</title><author>Das, Anirban ; Sil, Amrita ; Sarkar, Tushar ; Sen, Arpita ; Chakravorty, Sriparna ; Sengupta, Manideepa ; Das, Anupam ; Chandra, Somodyuti ; Pal, Santasmita ; Bandyopadhyay, Debabrata ; Das, Nilay</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574z-a892f446fc4b8833a25a9a44082628d7cac1c8a1c087113f048ea43755e1f0ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antifungal agents</topic><topic>Antifungal Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Butenafine</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Double-blind studies</topic><topic>Drug Compounding</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Evidence-based medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imidazoles - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morpholines - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Mycoses</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmaceuticals</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Sertaconazole</topic><topic>Thiophenes - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Tinea</topic><topic>Tinea - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tinea - drug therapy</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Das, Anirban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sil, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarkar, Tushar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sen, Arpita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakravorty, Sriparna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sengupta, Manideepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Anupam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chandra, Somodyuti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pal, Santasmita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandyopadhyay, Debabrata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Nilay</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Das, Anirban</au><au>Sil, Amrita</au><au>Sarkar, Tushar</au><au>Sen, Arpita</au><au>Chakravorty, Sriparna</au><au>Sengupta, Manideepa</au><au>Das, Anupam</au><au>Chandra, Somodyuti</au><au>Pal, Santasmita</au><au>Bandyopadhyay, Debabrata</au><au>Das, Nilay</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized, double-blind trial of amorolfine 0.25% cream and sertaconazole 2% cream in limited dermatophytosis</atitle><jtitle>Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology</jtitle><addtitle>Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>276</spage><epage>281</epage><pages>276-281</pages><issn>0378-6323</issn><eissn>0973-3922</eissn><eissn>1998-3611</eissn><abstract>Background: Dermatophytosis is becoming increasingly unresponsive to conventional antifungals. Newer topical antifungals may be more effective in these patients.
Aims: To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of amorolfine 0.25% cream and sertaconazole 2% cream in limited tinea cruris/corporis.
Methods: A single-center, randomized (1:1), double-blind, parallel group, active-controlled trial (CTRI/2014/12/005246) was performed. Sixty-six untreated adults with acutely symptomatic tinea cruris/corporis were included in the study. All patients had limited cutaneous involvement and were KOH mount positive. Group A received amorolfine 0.25% cream, and group B received sertaconazole 2% cream twice daily application to the lesions for 4 weeks. After the baseline visit, four follow-up visits were carried out. The outcome measures for effectiveness were clinical and mycological cure. Safety parameters studied were treatment-emergent adverse events and changes in routine laboratory parameters.
Results: Both sertaconazole and amorolfine significantly reduced symptoms (P < 0.001) in both groups. However, improvement in symptoms (pruritus, burning sensation, erythema, scaling and crusting) was significantly greater in the sertaconazole group at every follow-up visit. Sertaconazole cream was also more effective than amorolfine cream in reducing the number of lesions (P = 0.002 at 12 weeks) and improving the Dermatology Life Quality Index (P < 0.001) at all the follow-up visits. Adverse events were similar in the two groups (P = 0.117). Fungal cultures became negative in 92.3% of the sertaconazole group as compared to 80% in the amorolfine group (P = 0.010).
Limitations: Antifungal susceptibility testing could not be done.
Conclusion: Sertaconazole 2% is superior to amorolfine 0.25%, both in terms of effectiveness and tolerability. Improvement can be appreciated from second week onwards.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><pmid>30409926</pmid><doi>10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_907_17</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-6323 |
ispartof | Indian journal of dermatology, venereology, and leprology, 2019-05, Vol.85 (3), p.276-281 |
issn | 0378-6323 0973-3922 1998-3611 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132278395 |
source | MEDLINE; Bioline International; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Administration, Topical Adolescent Adult Analysis Antifungal agents Antifungal Agents - administration & dosage Butenafine Clinical trials Consent Dermatology Dosage and administration Double-Blind Method Double-blind studies Drug Compounding Drug therapy Evidence-based medicine Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Imidazoles - administration & dosage Male Manufacturers Medical research Middle Aged Morpholines - administration & dosage Mycoses Patients Pharmaceuticals Quality of life Sertaconazole Thiophenes - administration & dosage Tinea Tinea - diagnosis Tinea - drug therapy Young Adult |
title | A randomized, double-blind trial of amorolfine 0.25% cream and sertaconazole 2% cream in limited dermatophytosis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T11%3A50%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized,%20double-blind%20trial%20of%20amorolfine%200.25%25%20cream%20and%20sertaconazole%202%25%20cream%20in%20limited%20dermatophytosis&rft.jtitle=Indian%20journal%20of%20dermatology,%20venereology,%20and%20leprology&rft.au=Das,%20Anirban&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=276&rft.epage=281&rft.pages=276-281&rft.issn=0378-6323&rft.eissn=0973-3922&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_907_17&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA583349904%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2213065293&rft_id=info:pmid/30409926&rft_galeid=A583349904&rfr_iscdi=true |