Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review

Many technological innovations have changed the traditional practice of medical education and clinical practice. Whole slide imaging (WSI) technology provided an unique way of viewing conventional glass slides in histology and pathology laboratories. The WSI technology digitalized glass slide images...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Anatomical sciences education 2019-11, Vol.12 (6), p.678-685
Hauptverfasser: Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing, Leo, Joyce M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 685
container_issue 6
container_start_page 678
container_title Anatomical sciences education
container_volume 12
creator Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing
Leo, Joyce M.
description Many technological innovations have changed the traditional practice of medical education and clinical practice. Whole slide imaging (WSI) technology provided an unique way of viewing conventional glass slides in histology and pathology laboratories. The WSI technology digitalized glass slide images and made them readily accessible via the Internet using tablets or computers. Users utilized the pan‐and‐zoom function to view digital images of slides, also referred to as the virtual microscope (VM), simulating use of an optical microscope (OM). Several articles have reported various outcomes on the utility of VM in teaching laboratories. Recently, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification examinations for anatomical pathologists ha completely adopted VM for the national licensing examination. To better inform medical educators, there is an urgent need for more structured reviews to draw evidence‐based conclusions on the effectiveness of VM and learner’s perceptions, in comparison to OM. The current study provides a descriptive summary of published outcomes using the systematic review approach. In conclusion, medical students’ performance was improved with adoption of VM into the curriculum and recognized as a preferred learning modality, compared to OM. On the contrary, resident learners’ performance was comparable between using OM and VM, with OM being the favored slide‐viewing modality.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ase.1844
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132259080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1233364</ericid><sourcerecordid>2132259080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-94200d2b8231babb5d3a276a3fec5da6f04ee1279585894e9ccaec41f480bd333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kElLA0EQhRtRTFzAP6AMePEysXqZzVuQuJEQMJpr09NTAx0mmdg9o-Tf21mMIHiqKurjvapHyAWFHgVgt8phj6ZCHJAuzXgUZkkKh_s-YR1y4twMIAYasWPS4SCoYDHtkuF42RitqmCK1rUumBrbtH4cGW1rp-slBmVtgxEWG2pQtFo1pl7cBf1gsnINzv2og1f8NPh1Ro5KVTk839VT8v4weLt_Cofjx-f7_jDUPKEizAQDKFieMk5zledRwRVLYsVL1FGh4hIEImVJFqVRmgnMtFaoBS1FCnnBOT8lN1vdpa0_WnSNnBunsarUAuvWSUY5Y1EGKXj0-g86q1u78NdJ704hE2kMv4Lrp53FUi6tmSu7khTkOmHpE5brhD16tRNs8zkWe_AnUg9cbgG0Ru_XgxfK_OXxWiDc7r9Mhat_jWR_MtgYfgO2O4xB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2311094860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing ; Leo, Joyce M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing ; Leo, Joyce M.</creatorcontrib><description>Many technological innovations have changed the traditional practice of medical education and clinical practice. Whole slide imaging (WSI) technology provided an unique way of viewing conventional glass slides in histology and pathology laboratories. The WSI technology digitalized glass slide images and made them readily accessible via the Internet using tablets or computers. Users utilized the pan‐and‐zoom function to view digital images of slides, also referred to as the virtual microscope (VM), simulating use of an optical microscope (OM). Several articles have reported various outcomes on the utility of VM in teaching laboratories. Recently, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification examinations for anatomical pathologists ha completely adopted VM for the national licensing examination. To better inform medical educators, there is an urgent need for more structured reviews to draw evidence‐based conclusions on the effectiveness of VM and learner’s perceptions, in comparison to OM. The current study provides a descriptive summary of published outcomes using the systematic review approach. In conclusion, medical students’ performance was improved with adoption of VM into the curriculum and recognized as a preferred learning modality, compared to OM. On the contrary, resident learners’ performance was comparable between using OM and VM, with OM being the favored slide‐viewing modality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-9772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-9780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ase.1844</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30414261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Academic Performance - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Anatomy ; Anatomy - education ; Computer Simulation ; Computer Uses in Education ; Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods ; Curriculum ; Education, Medical - methods ; Graduate Students ; histology education ; histopathology ; Humans ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Laboratories ; Laboratory Equipment ; Learning ; Learning Modalities ; Licensing Examinations (Professions) ; Medical Education ; Medical Students ; Microscopy - methods ; optical microscopy ; pathology education ; Preferences ; review ; Student Attitudes ; students performance ; Students, Medical - psychology ; Students, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Systematic review ; Teaching Methods ; Universities ; User-Computer Interface ; virtual microscopy ; whole slide imaging</subject><ispartof>Anatomical sciences education, 2019-11, Vol.12 (6), p.678-685</ispartof><rights>2018 American Association of Anatomists</rights><rights>2018 American Association of Anatomists.</rights><rights>2019 American Association of Anatomists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-94200d2b8231babb5d3a276a3fec5da6f04ee1279585894e9ccaec41f480bd333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-94200d2b8231babb5d3a276a3fec5da6f04ee1279585894e9ccaec41f480bd333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6187-1163</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fase.1844$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fase.1844$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1233364$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30414261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leo, Joyce M.</creatorcontrib><title>Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review</title><title>Anatomical sciences education</title><addtitle>Anat Sci Educ</addtitle><description>Many technological innovations have changed the traditional practice of medical education and clinical practice. Whole slide imaging (WSI) technology provided an unique way of viewing conventional glass slides in histology and pathology laboratories. The WSI technology digitalized glass slide images and made them readily accessible via the Internet using tablets or computers. Users utilized the pan‐and‐zoom function to view digital images of slides, also referred to as the virtual microscope (VM), simulating use of an optical microscope (OM). Several articles have reported various outcomes on the utility of VM in teaching laboratories. Recently, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification examinations for anatomical pathologists ha completely adopted VM for the national licensing examination. To better inform medical educators, there is an urgent need for more structured reviews to draw evidence‐based conclusions on the effectiveness of VM and learner’s perceptions, in comparison to OM. The current study provides a descriptive summary of published outcomes using the systematic review approach. In conclusion, medical students’ performance was improved with adoption of VM into the curriculum and recognized as a preferred learning modality, compared to OM. On the contrary, resident learners’ performance was comparable between using OM and VM, with OM being the favored slide‐viewing modality.</description><subject>Academic Performance - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Anatomy - education</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Computer Uses in Education</subject><subject>Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education, Medical - methods</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>histology education</subject><subject>histopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratory Equipment</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Modalities</subject><subject>Licensing Examinations (Professions)</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Microscopy - methods</subject><subject>optical microscopy</subject><subject>pathology education</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>review</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>students performance</subject><subject>Students, Medical - psychology</subject><subject>Students, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><subject>virtual microscopy</subject><subject>whole slide imaging</subject><issn>1935-9772</issn><issn>1935-9780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kElLA0EQhRtRTFzAP6AMePEysXqZzVuQuJEQMJpr09NTAx0mmdg9o-Tf21mMIHiqKurjvapHyAWFHgVgt8phj6ZCHJAuzXgUZkkKh_s-YR1y4twMIAYasWPS4SCoYDHtkuF42RitqmCK1rUumBrbtH4cGW1rp-slBmVtgxEWG2pQtFo1pl7cBf1gsnINzv2og1f8NPh1Ro5KVTk839VT8v4weLt_Cofjx-f7_jDUPKEizAQDKFieMk5zledRwRVLYsVL1FGh4hIEImVJFqVRmgnMtFaoBS1FCnnBOT8lN1vdpa0_WnSNnBunsarUAuvWSUY5Y1EGKXj0-g86q1u78NdJ704hE2kMv4Lrp53FUi6tmSu7khTkOmHpE5brhD16tRNs8zkWe_AnUg9cbgG0Ru_XgxfK_OXxWiDc7r9Mhat_jWR_MtgYfgO2O4xB</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing</creator><creator>Leo, Joyce M.</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-1163</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review</title><author>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing ; Leo, Joyce M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-94200d2b8231babb5d3a276a3fec5da6f04ee1279585894e9ccaec41f480bd333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic Performance - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Anatomy - education</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Computer Uses in Education</topic><topic>Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education, Medical - methods</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>histology education</topic><topic>histopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratory Equipment</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Modalities</topic><topic>Licensing Examinations (Professions)</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Microscopy - methods</topic><topic>optical microscopy</topic><topic>pathology education</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>review</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>students performance</topic><topic>Students, Medical - psychology</topic><topic>Students, Medical - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><topic>virtual microscopy</topic><topic>whole slide imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leo, Joyce M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing</au><au>Leo, Joyce M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1233364</ericid><atitle>Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle><addtitle>Anat Sci Educ</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>685</epage><pages>678-685</pages><issn>1935-9772</issn><eissn>1935-9780</eissn><abstract>Many technological innovations have changed the traditional practice of medical education and clinical practice. Whole slide imaging (WSI) technology provided an unique way of viewing conventional glass slides in histology and pathology laboratories. The WSI technology digitalized glass slide images and made them readily accessible via the Internet using tablets or computers. Users utilized the pan‐and‐zoom function to view digital images of slides, also referred to as the virtual microscope (VM), simulating use of an optical microscope (OM). Several articles have reported various outcomes on the utility of VM in teaching laboratories. Recently, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification examinations for anatomical pathologists ha completely adopted VM for the national licensing examination. To better inform medical educators, there is an urgent need for more structured reviews to draw evidence‐based conclusions on the effectiveness of VM and learner’s perceptions, in comparison to OM. The current study provides a descriptive summary of published outcomes using the systematic review approach. In conclusion, medical students’ performance was improved with adoption of VM into the curriculum and recognized as a preferred learning modality, compared to OM. On the contrary, resident learners’ performance was comparable between using OM and VM, with OM being the favored slide‐viewing modality.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>30414261</pmid><doi>10.1002/ase.1844</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-1163</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-9772
ispartof Anatomical sciences education, 2019-11, Vol.12 (6), p.678-685
issn 1935-9772
1935-9780
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132259080
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Academic Performance - statistics & numerical data
Anatomy
Anatomy - education
Computer Simulation
Computer Uses in Education
Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods
Curriculum
Education, Medical - methods
Graduate Students
histology education
histopathology
Humans
Instructional Effectiveness
Laboratories
Laboratory Equipment
Learning
Learning Modalities
Licensing Examinations (Professions)
Medical Education
Medical Students
Microscopy - methods
optical microscopy
pathology education
Preferences
review
Student Attitudes
students performance
Students, Medical - psychology
Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data
Systematic review
Teaching Methods
Universities
User-Computer Interface
virtual microscopy
whole slide imaging
title Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A42%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optical%20Versus%20Virtual%20Microscope%20for%20Medical%20Education:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Anatomical%20sciences%20education&rft.au=Kuo,%20Kuo%E2%80%90Hsing&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=685&rft.pages=678-685&rft.issn=1935-9772&rft.eissn=1935-9780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ase.1844&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2132259080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2311094860&rft_id=info:pmid/30414261&rft_ericid=EJ1233364&rfr_iscdi=true