Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review
Many technological innovations have changed the traditional practice of medical education and clinical practice. Whole slide imaging (WSI) technology provided an unique way of viewing conventional glass slides in histology and pathology laboratories. The WSI technology digitalized glass slide images...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Anatomical sciences education 2019-11, Vol.12 (6), p.678-685 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 685 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 678 |
container_title | Anatomical sciences education |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing Leo, Joyce M. |
description | Many technological innovations have changed the traditional practice of medical education and clinical practice. Whole slide imaging (WSI) technology provided an unique way of viewing conventional glass slides in histology and pathology laboratories. The WSI technology digitalized glass slide images and made them readily accessible via the Internet using tablets or computers. Users utilized the pan‐and‐zoom function to view digital images of slides, also referred to as the virtual microscope (VM), simulating use of an optical microscope (OM). Several articles have reported various outcomes on the utility of VM in teaching laboratories. Recently, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification examinations for anatomical pathologists ha completely adopted VM for the national licensing examination. To better inform medical educators, there is an urgent need for more structured reviews to draw evidence‐based conclusions on the effectiveness of VM and learner’s perceptions, in comparison to OM. The current study provides a descriptive summary of published outcomes using the systematic review approach. In conclusion, medical students’ performance was improved with adoption of VM into the curriculum and recognized as a preferred learning modality, compared to OM. On the contrary, resident learners’ performance was comparable between using OM and VM, with OM being the favored slide‐viewing modality. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ase.1844 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132259080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1233364</ericid><sourcerecordid>2132259080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-94200d2b8231babb5d3a276a3fec5da6f04ee1279585894e9ccaec41f480bd333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kElLA0EQhRtRTFzAP6AMePEysXqZzVuQuJEQMJpr09NTAx0mmdg9o-Tf21mMIHiqKurjvapHyAWFHgVgt8phj6ZCHJAuzXgUZkkKh_s-YR1y4twMIAYasWPS4SCoYDHtkuF42RitqmCK1rUumBrbtH4cGW1rp-slBmVtgxEWG2pQtFo1pl7cBf1gsnINzv2og1f8NPh1Ro5KVTk839VT8v4weLt_Cofjx-f7_jDUPKEizAQDKFieMk5zledRwRVLYsVL1FGh4hIEImVJFqVRmgnMtFaoBS1FCnnBOT8lN1vdpa0_WnSNnBunsarUAuvWSUY5Y1EGKXj0-g86q1u78NdJ704hE2kMv4Lrp53FUi6tmSu7khTkOmHpE5brhD16tRNs8zkWe_AnUg9cbgG0Ru_XgxfK_OXxWiDc7r9Mhat_jWR_MtgYfgO2O4xB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2311094860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing ; Leo, Joyce M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing ; Leo, Joyce M.</creatorcontrib><description>Many technological innovations have changed the traditional practice of medical education and clinical practice. Whole slide imaging (WSI) technology provided an unique way of viewing conventional glass slides in histology and pathology laboratories. The WSI technology digitalized glass slide images and made them readily accessible via the Internet using tablets or computers. Users utilized the pan‐and‐zoom function to view digital images of slides, also referred to as the virtual microscope (VM), simulating use of an optical microscope (OM). Several articles have reported various outcomes on the utility of VM in teaching laboratories. Recently, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification examinations for anatomical pathologists ha completely adopted VM for the national licensing examination. To better inform medical educators, there is an urgent need for more structured reviews to draw evidence‐based conclusions on the effectiveness of VM and learner’s perceptions, in comparison to OM. The current study provides a descriptive summary of published outcomes using the systematic review approach. In conclusion, medical students’ performance was improved with adoption of VM into the curriculum and recognized as a preferred learning modality, compared to OM. On the contrary, resident learners’ performance was comparable between using OM and VM, with OM being the favored slide‐viewing modality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-9772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-9780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ase.1844</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30414261</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher><subject>Academic Performance - statistics & numerical data ; Anatomy ; Anatomy - education ; Computer Simulation ; Computer Uses in Education ; Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods ; Curriculum ; Education, Medical - methods ; Graduate Students ; histology education ; histopathology ; Humans ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Laboratories ; Laboratory Equipment ; Learning ; Learning Modalities ; Licensing Examinations (Professions) ; Medical Education ; Medical Students ; Microscopy - methods ; optical microscopy ; pathology education ; Preferences ; review ; Student Attitudes ; students performance ; Students, Medical - psychology ; Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data ; Systematic review ; Teaching Methods ; Universities ; User-Computer Interface ; virtual microscopy ; whole slide imaging</subject><ispartof>Anatomical sciences education, 2019-11, Vol.12 (6), p.678-685</ispartof><rights>2018 American Association of Anatomists</rights><rights>2018 American Association of Anatomists.</rights><rights>2019 American Association of Anatomists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-94200d2b8231babb5d3a276a3fec5da6f04ee1279585894e9ccaec41f480bd333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-94200d2b8231babb5d3a276a3fec5da6f04ee1279585894e9ccaec41f480bd333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6187-1163</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fase.1844$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fase.1844$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1233364$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30414261$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leo, Joyce M.</creatorcontrib><title>Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review</title><title>Anatomical sciences education</title><addtitle>Anat Sci Educ</addtitle><description>Many technological innovations have changed the traditional practice of medical education and clinical practice. Whole slide imaging (WSI) technology provided an unique way of viewing conventional glass slides in histology and pathology laboratories. The WSI technology digitalized glass slide images and made them readily accessible via the Internet using tablets or computers. Users utilized the pan‐and‐zoom function to view digital images of slides, also referred to as the virtual microscope (VM), simulating use of an optical microscope (OM). Several articles have reported various outcomes on the utility of VM in teaching laboratories. Recently, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification examinations for anatomical pathologists ha completely adopted VM for the national licensing examination. To better inform medical educators, there is an urgent need for more structured reviews to draw evidence‐based conclusions on the effectiveness of VM and learner’s perceptions, in comparison to OM. The current study provides a descriptive summary of published outcomes using the systematic review approach. In conclusion, medical students’ performance was improved with adoption of VM into the curriculum and recognized as a preferred learning modality, compared to OM. On the contrary, resident learners’ performance was comparable between using OM and VM, with OM being the favored slide‐viewing modality.</description><subject>Academic Performance - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Anatomy - education</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Computer Uses in Education</subject><subject>Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education, Medical - methods</subject><subject>Graduate Students</subject><subject>histology education</subject><subject>histopathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Laboratory Equipment</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Modalities</subject><subject>Licensing Examinations (Professions)</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical Students</subject><subject>Microscopy - methods</subject><subject>optical microscopy</subject><subject>pathology education</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>review</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>students performance</subject><subject>Students, Medical - psychology</subject><subject>Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>User-Computer Interface</subject><subject>virtual microscopy</subject><subject>whole slide imaging</subject><issn>1935-9772</issn><issn>1935-9780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kElLA0EQhRtRTFzAP6AMePEysXqZzVuQuJEQMJpr09NTAx0mmdg9o-Tf21mMIHiqKurjvapHyAWFHgVgt8phj6ZCHJAuzXgUZkkKh_s-YR1y4twMIAYasWPS4SCoYDHtkuF42RitqmCK1rUumBrbtH4cGW1rp-slBmVtgxEWG2pQtFo1pl7cBf1gsnINzv2og1f8NPh1Ro5KVTk839VT8v4weLt_Cofjx-f7_jDUPKEizAQDKFieMk5zledRwRVLYsVL1FGh4hIEImVJFqVRmgnMtFaoBS1FCnnBOT8lN1vdpa0_WnSNnBunsarUAuvWSUY5Y1EGKXj0-g86q1u78NdJ704hE2kMv4Lrp53FUi6tmSu7khTkOmHpE5brhD16tRNs8zkWe_AnUg9cbgG0Ru_XgxfK_OXxWiDc7r9Mhat_jWR_MtgYfgO2O4xB</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing</creator><creator>Leo, Joyce M.</creator><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-1163</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review</title><author>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing ; Leo, Joyce M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3714-94200d2b8231babb5d3a276a3fec5da6f04ee1279585894e9ccaec41f480bd333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic Performance - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Anatomy - education</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Computer Uses in Education</topic><topic>Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education, Medical - methods</topic><topic>Graduate Students</topic><topic>histology education</topic><topic>histopathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Laboratory Equipment</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Modalities</topic><topic>Licensing Examinations (Professions)</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical Students</topic><topic>Microscopy - methods</topic><topic>optical microscopy</topic><topic>pathology education</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>review</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>students performance</topic><topic>Students, Medical - psychology</topic><topic>Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>User-Computer Interface</topic><topic>virtual microscopy</topic><topic>whole slide imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leo, Joyce M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuo, Kuo‐Hsing</au><au>Leo, Joyce M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1233364</ericid><atitle>Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review</atitle><jtitle>Anatomical sciences education</jtitle><addtitle>Anat Sci Educ</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>678</spage><epage>685</epage><pages>678-685</pages><issn>1935-9772</issn><eissn>1935-9780</eissn><abstract>Many technological innovations have changed the traditional practice of medical education and clinical practice. Whole slide imaging (WSI) technology provided an unique way of viewing conventional glass slides in histology and pathology laboratories. The WSI technology digitalized glass slide images and made them readily accessible via the Internet using tablets or computers. Users utilized the pan‐and‐zoom function to view digital images of slides, also referred to as the virtual microscope (VM), simulating use of an optical microscope (OM). Several articles have reported various outcomes on the utility of VM in teaching laboratories. Recently, the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada certification examinations for anatomical pathologists ha completely adopted VM for the national licensing examination. To better inform medical educators, there is an urgent need for more structured reviews to draw evidence‐based conclusions on the effectiveness of VM and learner’s perceptions, in comparison to OM. The current study provides a descriptive summary of published outcomes using the systematic review approach. In conclusion, medical students’ performance was improved with adoption of VM into the curriculum and recognized as a preferred learning modality, compared to OM. On the contrary, resident learners’ performance was comparable between using OM and VM, with OM being the favored slide‐viewing modality.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley-Blackwell</pub><pmid>30414261</pmid><doi>10.1002/ase.1844</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6187-1163</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1935-9772 |
ispartof | Anatomical sciences education, 2019-11, Vol.12 (6), p.678-685 |
issn | 1935-9772 1935-9780 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132259080 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Academic Performance - statistics & numerical data Anatomy Anatomy - education Computer Simulation Computer Uses in Education Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods Curriculum Education, Medical - methods Graduate Students histology education histopathology Humans Instructional Effectiveness Laboratories Laboratory Equipment Learning Learning Modalities Licensing Examinations (Professions) Medical Education Medical Students Microscopy - methods optical microscopy pathology education Preferences review Student Attitudes students performance Students, Medical - psychology Students, Medical - statistics & numerical data Systematic review Teaching Methods Universities User-Computer Interface virtual microscopy whole slide imaging |
title | Optical Versus Virtual Microscope for Medical Education: A Systematic Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A42%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optical%20Versus%20Virtual%20Microscope%20for%20Medical%20Education:%20A%20Systematic%20Review&rft.jtitle=Anatomical%20sciences%20education&rft.au=Kuo,%20Kuo%E2%80%90Hsing&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=678&rft.epage=685&rft.pages=678-685&rft.issn=1935-9772&rft.eissn=1935-9780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ase.1844&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2132259080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2311094860&rft_id=info:pmid/30414261&rft_ericid=EJ1233364&rfr_iscdi=true |