Effect of photopolymerized glaze application on bacterial adhesion on ocular acrylic resin surfaces submitted to accelerated ageing
Conditions of the acrylic resin (AR) surface, such as roughness, can promote a favourable environment for the adhesion of micro‐organisms, even on the surface of ocular prostheses. This study evaluated the influence of photopolymerized glaze application on the roughness of ARs and adhesion of Staphy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Letters in applied microbiology 2019-02, Vol.68 (2), p.120-127 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 127 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 120 |
container_title | Letters in applied microbiology |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Nagay, B.E. Goiato, M.C. da Silva, E.V.F. Andreotti, A.M. Bitencourt, S.B. Duque, C. Santos, P.H. Santos, D.M. |
description | Conditions of the acrylic resin (AR) surface, such as roughness, can promote a favourable environment for the adhesion of micro‐organisms, even on the surface of ocular prostheses. This study evaluated the influence of photopolymerized glaze application on the roughness of ARs and adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis on ocular AR surfaces submitted to accelerated ageing. Two hundred and eighty‐eight samples of white colour (N1) and colourless ARs were distributed in eight groups (n = 9), based on surface treatments (glaze or ARs submitted to only a final polishing), accelerated ageing (before and after) and periods of microbial growth (24‐ and 48‐h). The roughness average (Ra) and total height of roughness profile (Rt) values were greater for the groups with glaze and increased for all groups after ageing. The microbial adhesion among the groups with and without glaze did not present a statistically significant difference. The ageing did not statistically affect the adhesion of Staph. epidermidis, but affected the adhesion of Staph. aureus, which presented an increase after 24 h of growth on only N1 AR with glaze. These results demonstrate that the glaze did not contribute to adhesion of Staph. aureus and Staph. epidermidis, which are responsible for most ocular prosthetic infections.
Significance and Impact of the Study
Some recent evidence suggested that the surface finish of ocular prostheses influences the accumulation of deposits that can affect the interaction with pathogenic bacteria, increasing the probability of infections. In addition, surface deterioration over time can increase the roughness and, consequently, biofilm formation. Thus, a better understanding of the influence of surface finish on bacterial adhesion becomes extremely important. In this study, we tested a glaze for surface polishing compared to mechanical polishing, before and after ageing. The results suggest that the glaze did not contribute to microbial adhesion and might be useful in preventing possible prosthetic infections.
Significance and Impact of the Study: Some recent evidence suggested that the surface finish of ocular prostheses influences the accumulation of deposits that can affect the interaction with pathogenic bacteria, increasing the probability of infections. In addition, surface deterioration over time can increase the roughness and, consequently, biofilm formation. Thus, a better understanding of the influence of surface finish on b |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/lam.13094 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132239870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2132239870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-d4033ef8f50357fac717aa5d7e752cd9fc60e1bf96e02b595c723512d0696bdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqwT8gAS_uoXfz0Um6j8uyfsCIFwVvTTqpzPaS7rRJNzJ79Y9b44weBEMgldTDQ5GXkFecXXFc19GOV1yytn5CNrw2ojJafXtKNkxoXTVC1WfkvJQHxljDRfucnElWs0YwsSE_70IAt9AU6HyfljSnuB8hD4_g6S7aR6B2nuPg7DKkieLurVuwbyO1_h7K6TW5NdpMrct7hGnGxkTLmoN1ULDox2FZULkkZBxEyPZwtTsYpt0L8izYWODl6bwgX9_dfbn9UG0_v_94e7OtnFSyrnzNpITQBMWkMmg23FirvAGjhPNtcJoB70OrgYletcoZIRUXnulW997LC_L26J1z-r5CWbpxKDhMtBOktXSCSyFk2xiG6Jt_0Ie05gmnQ0przXkjD9TlkXI5lZIhdHMeRpv3HWfdIZkOk-l-J4Ps65MRPwP8X_JPFAhcH4EfQ4T9_03d9ubTUfkL57GZqg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2166611830</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of photopolymerized glaze application on bacterial adhesion on ocular acrylic resin surfaces submitted to accelerated ageing</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Nagay, B.E. ; Goiato, M.C. ; da Silva, E.V.F. ; Andreotti, A.M. ; Bitencourt, S.B. ; Duque, C. ; Santos, P.H. ; Santos, D.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagay, B.E. ; Goiato, M.C. ; da Silva, E.V.F. ; Andreotti, A.M. ; Bitencourt, S.B. ; Duque, C. ; Santos, P.H. ; Santos, D.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Conditions of the acrylic resin (AR) surface, such as roughness, can promote a favourable environment for the adhesion of micro‐organisms, even on the surface of ocular prostheses. This study evaluated the influence of photopolymerized glaze application on the roughness of ARs and adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis on ocular AR surfaces submitted to accelerated ageing. Two hundred and eighty‐eight samples of white colour (N1) and colourless ARs were distributed in eight groups (n = 9), based on surface treatments (glaze or ARs submitted to only a final polishing), accelerated ageing (before and after) and periods of microbial growth (24‐ and 48‐h). The roughness average (Ra) and total height of roughness profile (Rt) values were greater for the groups with glaze and increased for all groups after ageing. The microbial adhesion among the groups with and without glaze did not present a statistically significant difference. The ageing did not statistically affect the adhesion of Staph. epidermidis, but affected the adhesion of Staph. aureus, which presented an increase after 24 h of growth on only N1 AR with glaze. These results demonstrate that the glaze did not contribute to adhesion of Staph. aureus and Staph. epidermidis, which are responsible for most ocular prosthetic infections.
Significance and Impact of the Study
Some recent evidence suggested that the surface finish of ocular prostheses influences the accumulation of deposits that can affect the interaction with pathogenic bacteria, increasing the probability of infections. In addition, surface deterioration over time can increase the roughness and, consequently, biofilm formation. Thus, a better understanding of the influence of surface finish on bacterial adhesion becomes extremely important. In this study, we tested a glaze for surface polishing compared to mechanical polishing, before and after ageing. The results suggest that the glaze did not contribute to microbial adhesion and might be useful in preventing possible prosthetic infections.
Significance and Impact of the Study: Some recent evidence suggested that the surface finish of ocular prostheses influences the accumulation of deposits that can affect the interaction with pathogenic bacteria, increasing the probability of infections. In addition, surface deterioration over time can increase the roughness and, consequently, biofilm formation. Thus, a better understanding of the influence of surface finish on bacterial adhesion becomes extremely important. In this study, we tested a glaze for surface polishing compared to mechanical polishing, before and after ageing. The results suggest that the glaze did not contribute to microbial adhesion and might be useful in preventing possible prosthetic infections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0266-8254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-765X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/lam.13094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30408202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Acrylic resins ; Acrylic Resins - chemistry ; Adhesion ; Adhesion tests ; Aging ; Bacteria ; Bacterial Adhesion - physiology ; Biofilms ; Eye, Artificial - microbiology ; Infections ; Mechanical polishing ; Microorganisms ; ocular prosthesis ; Pathogens ; Prostheses ; Prosthetics ; Roughness ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Staphylococcus aureus - metabolism ; Staphylococcus epidermidis ; Staphylococcus epidermidis - metabolism ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods ; Surface finish ; Surface Properties</subject><ispartof>Letters in applied microbiology, 2019-02, Vol.68 (2), p.120-127</ispartof><rights>2018 The Society for Applied Microbiology</rights><rights>2018 The Society for Applied Microbiology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 The Society for Applied Microbiology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-d4033ef8f50357fac717aa5d7e752cd9fc60e1bf96e02b595c723512d0696bdd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-d4033ef8f50357fac717aa5d7e752cd9fc60e1bf96e02b595c723512d0696bdd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6297-6154</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Flam.13094$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Flam.13094$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30408202$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagay, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goiato, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, E.V.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreotti, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bitencourt, S.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duque, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, D.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of photopolymerized glaze application on bacterial adhesion on ocular acrylic resin surfaces submitted to accelerated ageing</title><title>Letters in applied microbiology</title><addtitle>Lett Appl Microbiol</addtitle><description>Conditions of the acrylic resin (AR) surface, such as roughness, can promote a favourable environment for the adhesion of micro‐organisms, even on the surface of ocular prostheses. This study evaluated the influence of photopolymerized glaze application on the roughness of ARs and adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis on ocular AR surfaces submitted to accelerated ageing. Two hundred and eighty‐eight samples of white colour (N1) and colourless ARs were distributed in eight groups (n = 9), based on surface treatments (glaze or ARs submitted to only a final polishing), accelerated ageing (before and after) and periods of microbial growth (24‐ and 48‐h). The roughness average (Ra) and total height of roughness profile (Rt) values were greater for the groups with glaze and increased for all groups after ageing. The microbial adhesion among the groups with and without glaze did not present a statistically significant difference. The ageing did not statistically affect the adhesion of Staph. epidermidis, but affected the adhesion of Staph. aureus, which presented an increase after 24 h of growth on only N1 AR with glaze. These results demonstrate that the glaze did not contribute to adhesion of Staph. aureus and Staph. epidermidis, which are responsible for most ocular prosthetic infections.
Significance and Impact of the Study
Some recent evidence suggested that the surface finish of ocular prostheses influences the accumulation of deposits that can affect the interaction with pathogenic bacteria, increasing the probability of infections. In addition, surface deterioration over time can increase the roughness and, consequently, biofilm formation. Thus, a better understanding of the influence of surface finish on bacterial adhesion becomes extremely important. In this study, we tested a glaze for surface polishing compared to mechanical polishing, before and after ageing. The results suggest that the glaze did not contribute to microbial adhesion and might be useful in preventing possible prosthetic infections.
Significance and Impact of the Study: Some recent evidence suggested that the surface finish of ocular prostheses influences the accumulation of deposits that can affect the interaction with pathogenic bacteria, increasing the probability of infections. In addition, surface deterioration over time can increase the roughness and, consequently, biofilm formation. Thus, a better understanding of the influence of surface finish on bacterial adhesion becomes extremely important. In this study, we tested a glaze for surface polishing compared to mechanical polishing, before and after ageing. The results suggest that the glaze did not contribute to microbial adhesion and might be useful in preventing possible prosthetic infections.</description><subject>Acrylic resins</subject><subject>Acrylic Resins - chemistry</subject><subject>Adhesion</subject><subject>Adhesion tests</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial Adhesion - physiology</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Eye, Artificial - microbiology</subject><subject>Infections</subject><subject>Mechanical polishing</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>ocular prosthesis</subject><subject>Pathogens</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Prosthetics</subject><subject>Roughness</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus - metabolism</subject><subject>Staphylococcus epidermidis</subject><subject>Staphylococcus epidermidis - metabolism</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Surface finish</subject><subject>Surface Properties</subject><issn>0266-8254</issn><issn>1472-765X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqwT8gAS_uoXfz0Um6j8uyfsCIFwVvTTqpzPaS7rRJNzJ79Y9b44weBEMgldTDQ5GXkFecXXFc19GOV1yytn5CNrw2ojJafXtKNkxoXTVC1WfkvJQHxljDRfucnElWs0YwsSE_70IAt9AU6HyfljSnuB8hD4_g6S7aR6B2nuPg7DKkieLurVuwbyO1_h7K6TW5NdpMrct7hGnGxkTLmoN1ULDox2FZULkkZBxEyPZwtTsYpt0L8izYWODl6bwgX9_dfbn9UG0_v_94e7OtnFSyrnzNpITQBMWkMmg23FirvAGjhPNtcJoB70OrgYletcoZIRUXnulW997LC_L26J1z-r5CWbpxKDhMtBOktXSCSyFk2xiG6Jt_0Ie05gmnQ0przXkjD9TlkXI5lZIhdHMeRpv3HWfdIZkOk-l-J4Ps65MRPwP8X_JPFAhcH4EfQ4T9_03d9ubTUfkL57GZqg</recordid><startdate>201902</startdate><enddate>201902</enddate><creator>Nagay, B.E.</creator><creator>Goiato, M.C.</creator><creator>da Silva, E.V.F.</creator><creator>Andreotti, A.M.</creator><creator>Bitencourt, S.B.</creator><creator>Duque, C.</creator><creator>Santos, P.H.</creator><creator>Santos, D.M.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6297-6154</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201902</creationdate><title>Effect of photopolymerized glaze application on bacterial adhesion on ocular acrylic resin surfaces submitted to accelerated ageing</title><author>Nagay, B.E. ; Goiato, M.C. ; da Silva, E.V.F. ; Andreotti, A.M. ; Bitencourt, S.B. ; Duque, C. ; Santos, P.H. ; Santos, D.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-d4033ef8f50357fac717aa5d7e752cd9fc60e1bf96e02b595c723512d0696bdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acrylic resins</topic><topic>Acrylic Resins - chemistry</topic><topic>Adhesion</topic><topic>Adhesion tests</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial Adhesion - physiology</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Eye, Artificial - microbiology</topic><topic>Infections</topic><topic>Mechanical polishing</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>ocular prosthesis</topic><topic>Pathogens</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Prosthetics</topic><topic>Roughness</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus - metabolism</topic><topic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</topic><topic>Staphylococcus epidermidis - metabolism</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Surface finish</topic><topic>Surface Properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagay, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goiato, M.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, E.V.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andreotti, A.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bitencourt, S.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duque, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, P.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, D.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Letters in applied microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagay, B.E.</au><au>Goiato, M.C.</au><au>da Silva, E.V.F.</au><au>Andreotti, A.M.</au><au>Bitencourt, S.B.</au><au>Duque, C.</au><au>Santos, P.H.</au><au>Santos, D.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of photopolymerized glaze application on bacterial adhesion on ocular acrylic resin surfaces submitted to accelerated ageing</atitle><jtitle>Letters in applied microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Lett Appl Microbiol</addtitle><date>2019-02</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>120-127</pages><issn>0266-8254</issn><eissn>1472-765X</eissn><abstract>Conditions of the acrylic resin (AR) surface, such as roughness, can promote a favourable environment for the adhesion of micro‐organisms, even on the surface of ocular prostheses. This study evaluated the influence of photopolymerized glaze application on the roughness of ARs and adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis on ocular AR surfaces submitted to accelerated ageing. Two hundred and eighty‐eight samples of white colour (N1) and colourless ARs were distributed in eight groups (n = 9), based on surface treatments (glaze or ARs submitted to only a final polishing), accelerated ageing (before and after) and periods of microbial growth (24‐ and 48‐h). The roughness average (Ra) and total height of roughness profile (Rt) values were greater for the groups with glaze and increased for all groups after ageing. The microbial adhesion among the groups with and without glaze did not present a statistically significant difference. The ageing did not statistically affect the adhesion of Staph. epidermidis, but affected the adhesion of Staph. aureus, which presented an increase after 24 h of growth on only N1 AR with glaze. These results demonstrate that the glaze did not contribute to adhesion of Staph. aureus and Staph. epidermidis, which are responsible for most ocular prosthetic infections.
Significance and Impact of the Study
Some recent evidence suggested that the surface finish of ocular prostheses influences the accumulation of deposits that can affect the interaction with pathogenic bacteria, increasing the probability of infections. In addition, surface deterioration over time can increase the roughness and, consequently, biofilm formation. Thus, a better understanding of the influence of surface finish on bacterial adhesion becomes extremely important. In this study, we tested a glaze for surface polishing compared to mechanical polishing, before and after ageing. The results suggest that the glaze did not contribute to microbial adhesion and might be useful in preventing possible prosthetic infections.
Significance and Impact of the Study: Some recent evidence suggested that the surface finish of ocular prostheses influences the accumulation of deposits that can affect the interaction with pathogenic bacteria, increasing the probability of infections. In addition, surface deterioration over time can increase the roughness and, consequently, biofilm formation. Thus, a better understanding of the influence of surface finish on bacterial adhesion becomes extremely important. In this study, we tested a glaze for surface polishing compared to mechanical polishing, before and after ageing. The results suggest that the glaze did not contribute to microbial adhesion and might be useful in preventing possible prosthetic infections.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>30408202</pmid><doi>10.1111/lam.13094</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6297-6154</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0266-8254 |
ispartof | Letters in applied microbiology, 2019-02, Vol.68 (2), p.120-127 |
issn | 0266-8254 1472-765X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132239870 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Acrylic resins Acrylic Resins - chemistry Adhesion Adhesion tests Aging Bacteria Bacterial Adhesion - physiology Biofilms Eye, Artificial - microbiology Infections Mechanical polishing Microorganisms ocular prosthesis Pathogens Prostheses Prosthetics Roughness Staphylococcus aureus Staphylococcus aureus - metabolism Staphylococcus epidermidis Staphylococcus epidermidis - metabolism Statistical analysis Statistical methods Surface finish Surface Properties |
title | Effect of photopolymerized glaze application on bacterial adhesion on ocular acrylic resin surfaces submitted to accelerated ageing |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A02%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20photopolymerized%20glaze%20application%20on%20bacterial%20adhesion%20on%20ocular%20acrylic%20resin%20surfaces%20submitted%20to%20accelerated%20ageing&rft.jtitle=Letters%20in%20applied%20microbiology&rft.au=Nagay,%20B.E.&rft.date=2019-02&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=120-127&rft.issn=0266-8254&rft.eissn=1472-765X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/lam.13094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2132239870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2166611830&rft_id=info:pmid/30408202&rfr_iscdi=true |