Influence of microalgae wastewater treatment culturing conditions on forward osmosis concentration process
Forward osmosis is envisioned as a technology for microalgae concentration but fouling propensity during dewatering is currently a limiting factor that requires better understanding. The purpose of this study is to define the impact of microalgae culturing conditions on the downstream forward osmosi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2020, Vol.27 (2), p.1234-1245 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1245 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 1234 |
| container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Onyshchenko, Elena Blandin, Gaetan Comas, Joaquim Dvoretsky, Anatoly |
| description | Forward osmosis is envisioned as a technology for microalgae concentration but fouling propensity during dewatering is currently a limiting factor that requires better understanding. The purpose of this study is to define the impact of microalgae culturing conditions on the downstream forward osmosis (FO) separation process—water recovery and microalgae harvesting.
Chlorella vulgaris
was cultivated in an outdoor lab-scale reactor fed with synthetic wastewater mimicking primary settled municipal influent under changing environmental conditions (temperature, solar radiation, nutrient balance) with varying hydraulic retention time. High efficiency of nutrient removal was achieved under all tested conditions but microalgae autoflocculation and lower rate of pollutant removal were observed with batches where culturing temperature (6.5–21
°
C), solar irradiation rate (181 W/m
2
), and nitrogen/phosphorous ratio (2.9) were below the optimal range. Regarding FO concentration, high initial water fluxes (in the range of 18.2 to 19.5 L·m
2
·h
−1
) and water extraction rate (60.1–83.9%) were observed in all subsequent FO concentration tests. Significant membrane fouling (microalgae deposition on surface) associated with poor biomass recovery from the FO cell was found to be dependent on exopolymeric substance accumulation, which was a response to non-optimal environmental culturing conditions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-018-3607-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132229866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2131536436</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-d189203c9218db820e20522c7ad956c1590ee7f19b8de56b4bc1610d3b683f3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcGL1TAQxoMo7nP1D_AiAS9eqjNJmjZHWVZdWPCi55Cm06WPNnkmKQ__e1PeqiB4msP85puZ72PsNcJ7BOg-ZETZ6gawb6SGrmmfsANqVE2njHnKDmCUalAqdcVe5HwEEGBE95xdSVCoQKgDO96FadkoeOJx4uvsU3TLgyN-drnQ2RVKvCRyZaVQuN-WsqU5PHAfwziXOYbMY-BTTGeXRh7zGvOc966vfHI7wU8pesr5JXs2uSXTq8d6zb5_uv1286W5__r57ubjfeMVmNKM2BsB0huB_Tj0AkhAK4Tv3Gha7bE1QNRNaIZ-pFYPavD1ZxjloHs5SSev2buLbt37Y6Nc7DpnT8viAsUtW4FSCGF6rSv69h_0GLcU6nU7ha3USu4UXqhqTs6JJntK8-rST4tg9yDsJQhbg7B7ELatM28elbdhpfHPxG_nKyAuQD7thlL6u_r_qr8A5LeUmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2131536436</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of microalgae wastewater treatment culturing conditions on forward osmosis concentration process</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Onyshchenko, Elena ; Blandin, Gaetan ; Comas, Joaquim ; Dvoretsky, Anatoly</creator><creatorcontrib>Onyshchenko, Elena ; Blandin, Gaetan ; Comas, Joaquim ; Dvoretsky, Anatoly</creatorcontrib><description>Forward osmosis is envisioned as a technology for microalgae concentration but fouling propensity during dewatering is currently a limiting factor that requires better understanding. The purpose of this study is to define the impact of microalgae culturing conditions on the downstream forward osmosis (FO) separation process—water recovery and microalgae harvesting.
Chlorella vulgaris
was cultivated in an outdoor lab-scale reactor fed with synthetic wastewater mimicking primary settled municipal influent under changing environmental conditions (temperature, solar radiation, nutrient balance) with varying hydraulic retention time. High efficiency of nutrient removal was achieved under all tested conditions but microalgae autoflocculation and lower rate of pollutant removal were observed with batches where culturing temperature (6.5–21
°
C), solar irradiation rate (181 W/m
2
), and nitrogen/phosphorous ratio (2.9) were below the optimal range. Regarding FO concentration, high initial water fluxes (in the range of 18.2 to 19.5 L·m
2
·h
−1
) and water extraction rate (60.1–83.9%) were observed in all subsequent FO concentration tests. Significant membrane fouling (microalgae deposition on surface) associated with poor biomass recovery from the FO cell was found to be dependent on exopolymeric substance accumulation, which was a response to non-optimal environmental culturing conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-3607-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30414024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algae ; Aquatic microorganisms ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Biomass ; Chlorella vulgaris ; Dewatering ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental and Sustainable Chemical Engineering ; Environmental changes ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental conditions ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Fluxes ; Fouling ; Harvesting ; Hydraulic retention time ; Irradiation ; Membrane processes ; Microalgae ; Mimicry ; Municipal wastewater ; Nutrient balance ; Nutrient removal ; Nutrient retention ; Osmosis ; Pollutant removal ; Recovery ; Retention time ; Solar radiation ; Waste Water ; Waste Water Technology ; Wastewater treatment ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; Water Purification - methods</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020, Vol.27 (2), p.1234-1245</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018</rights><rights>Environmental Science and Pollution Research is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-d189203c9218db820e20522c7ad956c1590ee7f19b8de56b4bc1610d3b683f3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-d189203c9218db820e20522c7ad956c1590ee7f19b8de56b4bc1610d3b683f3a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0144-1014</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-018-3607-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-018-3607-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30414024$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Onyshchenko, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blandin, Gaetan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comas, Joaquim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvoretsky, Anatoly</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of microalgae wastewater treatment culturing conditions on forward osmosis concentration process</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>Forward osmosis is envisioned as a technology for microalgae concentration but fouling propensity during dewatering is currently a limiting factor that requires better understanding. The purpose of this study is to define the impact of microalgae culturing conditions on the downstream forward osmosis (FO) separation process—water recovery and microalgae harvesting.
Chlorella vulgaris
was cultivated in an outdoor lab-scale reactor fed with synthetic wastewater mimicking primary settled municipal influent under changing environmental conditions (temperature, solar radiation, nutrient balance) with varying hydraulic retention time. High efficiency of nutrient removal was achieved under all tested conditions but microalgae autoflocculation and lower rate of pollutant removal were observed with batches where culturing temperature (6.5–21
°
C), solar irradiation rate (181 W/m
2
), and nitrogen/phosphorous ratio (2.9) were below the optimal range. Regarding FO concentration, high initial water fluxes (in the range of 18.2 to 19.5 L·m
2
·h
−1
) and water extraction rate (60.1–83.9%) were observed in all subsequent FO concentration tests. Significant membrane fouling (microalgae deposition on surface) associated with poor biomass recovery from the FO cell was found to be dependent on exopolymeric substance accumulation, which was a response to non-optimal environmental culturing conditions.</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Aquatic microorganisms</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Chlorella vulgaris</subject><subject>Dewatering</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental and Sustainable Chemical Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental conditions</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Fouling</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Hydraulic retention time</subject><subject>Irradiation</subject><subject>Membrane processes</subject><subject>Microalgae</subject><subject>Mimicry</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Nutrient balance</subject><subject>Nutrient removal</subject><subject>Nutrient retention</subject><subject>Osmosis</subject><subject>Pollutant removal</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Retention time</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><subject>Waste Water</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcGL1TAQxoMo7nP1D_AiAS9eqjNJmjZHWVZdWPCi55Cm06WPNnkmKQ__e1PeqiB4msP85puZ72PsNcJ7BOg-ZETZ6gawb6SGrmmfsANqVE2njHnKDmCUalAqdcVe5HwEEGBE95xdSVCoQKgDO96FadkoeOJx4uvsU3TLgyN-drnQ2RVKvCRyZaVQuN-WsqU5PHAfwziXOYbMY-BTTGeXRh7zGvOc966vfHI7wU8pesr5JXs2uSXTq8d6zb5_uv1286W5__r57ubjfeMVmNKM2BsB0huB_Tj0AkhAK4Tv3Gha7bE1QNRNaIZ-pFYPavD1ZxjloHs5SSev2buLbt37Y6Nc7DpnT8viAsUtW4FSCGF6rSv69h_0GLcU6nU7ha3USu4UXqhqTs6JJntK8-rST4tg9yDsJQhbg7B7ELatM28elbdhpfHPxG_nKyAuQD7thlL6u_r_qr8A5LeUmg</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Onyshchenko, Elena</creator><creator>Blandin, Gaetan</creator><creator>Comas, Joaquim</creator><creator>Dvoretsky, Anatoly</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0144-1014</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Influence of microalgae wastewater treatment culturing conditions on forward osmosis concentration process</title><author>Onyshchenko, Elena ; Blandin, Gaetan ; Comas, Joaquim ; Dvoretsky, Anatoly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c409t-d189203c9218db820e20522c7ad956c1590ee7f19b8de56b4bc1610d3b683f3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Aquatic microorganisms</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Chlorella vulgaris</topic><topic>Dewatering</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental and Sustainable Chemical Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental conditions</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Fouling</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Hydraulic retention time</topic><topic>Irradiation</topic><topic>Membrane processes</topic><topic>Microalgae</topic><topic>Mimicry</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Nutrient balance</topic><topic>Nutrient removal</topic><topic>Nutrient retention</topic><topic>Osmosis</topic><topic>Pollutant removal</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Retention time</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><topic>Waste Water</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Onyshchenko, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blandin, Gaetan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comas, Joaquim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvoretsky, Anatoly</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Onyshchenko, Elena</au><au>Blandin, Gaetan</au><au>Comas, Joaquim</au><au>Dvoretsky, Anatoly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of microalgae wastewater treatment culturing conditions on forward osmosis concentration process</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1234</spage><epage>1245</epage><pages>1234-1245</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>Forward osmosis is envisioned as a technology for microalgae concentration but fouling propensity during dewatering is currently a limiting factor that requires better understanding. The purpose of this study is to define the impact of microalgae culturing conditions on the downstream forward osmosis (FO) separation process—water recovery and microalgae harvesting.
Chlorella vulgaris
was cultivated in an outdoor lab-scale reactor fed with synthetic wastewater mimicking primary settled municipal influent under changing environmental conditions (temperature, solar radiation, nutrient balance) with varying hydraulic retention time. High efficiency of nutrient removal was achieved under all tested conditions but microalgae autoflocculation and lower rate of pollutant removal were observed with batches where culturing temperature (6.5–21
°
C), solar irradiation rate (181 W/m
2
), and nitrogen/phosphorous ratio (2.9) were below the optimal range. Regarding FO concentration, high initial water fluxes (in the range of 18.2 to 19.5 L·m
2
·h
−1
) and water extraction rate (60.1–83.9%) were observed in all subsequent FO concentration tests. Significant membrane fouling (microalgae deposition on surface) associated with poor biomass recovery from the FO cell was found to be dependent on exopolymeric substance accumulation, which was a response to non-optimal environmental culturing conditions.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>30414024</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-018-3607-5</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0144-1014</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
| ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020, Vol.27 (2), p.1234-1245 |
| issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132229866 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Algae Aquatic microorganisms Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Biomass Chlorella vulgaris Dewatering Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental and Sustainable Chemical Engineering Environmental changes Environmental Chemistry Environmental conditions Environmental Health Environmental science Fluxes Fouling Harvesting Hydraulic retention time Irradiation Membrane processes Microalgae Mimicry Municipal wastewater Nutrient balance Nutrient removal Nutrient retention Osmosis Pollutant removal Recovery Retention time Solar radiation Waste Water Waste Water Technology Wastewater treatment Water Management Water Pollution Control Water Purification - methods |
| title | Influence of microalgae wastewater treatment culturing conditions on forward osmosis concentration process |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T05%3A49%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20microalgae%20wastewater%20treatment%20culturing%20conditions%20on%20forward%20osmosis%20concentration%20process&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Onyshchenko,%20Elena&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1234&rft.epage=1245&rft.pages=1234-1245&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-018-3607-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2131536436%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2131536436&rft_id=info:pmid/30414024&rfr_iscdi=true |