Effect of Gender, Toe Extension Position, and Plantar Fasciitis on Plantar Fascia Thickness

Background: Ultrasound is a widely used diagnostic tool for patients with plantar fasciitis. However, the lack of standardization during the measurement for plantar fascia thickness has made it challenging to understand the etiology of plantar fasciitis, as well as identify risk factors, such as gen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot & ankle international 2019-04, Vol.40 (4), p.439-446
Hauptverfasser: Granado, Michael J., Lohman, Everett B., Daher, Noha S., Gordon, Keith E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 446
container_issue 4
container_start_page 439
container_title Foot & ankle international
container_volume 40
creator Granado, Michael J.
Lohman, Everett B.
Daher, Noha S.
Gordon, Keith E.
description Background: Ultrasound is a widely used diagnostic tool for patients with plantar fasciitis. However, the lack of standardization during the measurement for plantar fascia thickness has made it challenging to understand the etiology of plantar fasciitis, as well as identify risk factors, such as gender. The purpose of this study was to investigate gender differences regarding plantar fascia thickness while controlling for metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint position in the healthy and those with unilateral plantar fasciitis. Methods: Forty participants (20 with unilateral plantar fasciitis and 20 controls) with plantar fascia thickness (mean age, 44.8 ± 12.2 years) participated in this study. The majority were females (n = 26, 65%). Plantar fascia thickness was measured via ultrasound 3 times at 3 different MTP joint positions: (1) at rest, (2) at 30 degrees of extension, and (3) at maximal extension. Results: When comparing gender differences, the males in the plantar fasciitis group had a significantly thicker plantar fascia than the females (P = .048, η2 = 2.35). However, no significant differences were observed between healthy males and females. The males with unilateral plantar fasciitis also had significantly thicker asymptomatic plantar fasciae collectively compared with controls (P < .05), whereas females with unilateral plantar fasciitis had a similar but not significant change. Conclusion: It appears that healthy males and females have similar plantar fascia thickness. However, as plantar fasciitis develops, males tend to develop thicker plantar fasciae than their female counterparts, which could have future treatment implications. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control comparative study.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1071100718811631
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132223222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1071100718811631</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2132223222</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ab2f924b8334cc5cc9b987e880afc5fe47b43525a7a59cc9dc4097867afc76a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UD1PwzAQtRCIlsLOhDwyNOCLndgZUdUWpEp0KBND5Lg2pLRx8SUS_HtcCgghMdyH7r17unuEnAO7ApDyGpgEYDEpBZBzOCB9KIRIpJL5YewjkuzwHjlBXDEGkkNxTHqcCeDARZ88jp2zpqXe0altljYM6cJbOn5rbYO1b-jcY93GZkh1s6TztW5aHehEo6njHOmO8nuo6eK5Ni-NRTwlR06v0Z591QF5mIwXo9tkdj-9G93MEsO5bJNcV6krUlEpzoUxmTFFVShplWLamcxZISvBszTTUmdFRJdGsEKqXEZY5poPyOVedxv8a2exLTc1GruOZ1nfYZkCT9P0MwaE7akmeMRgXbkN9UaH9xJYubO0_GtpXLn4Uu-qjV3-LHx7GAnJnoD6yZYr34Umfvu_4AfhnXz1</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2132223222</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of Gender, Toe Extension Position, and Plantar Fasciitis on Plantar Fascia Thickness</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Granado, Michael J. ; Lohman, Everett B. ; Daher, Noha S. ; Gordon, Keith E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Granado, Michael J. ; Lohman, Everett B. ; Daher, Noha S. ; Gordon, Keith E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Ultrasound is a widely used diagnostic tool for patients with plantar fasciitis. However, the lack of standardization during the measurement for plantar fascia thickness has made it challenging to understand the etiology of plantar fasciitis, as well as identify risk factors, such as gender. The purpose of this study was to investigate gender differences regarding plantar fascia thickness while controlling for metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint position in the healthy and those with unilateral plantar fasciitis. Methods: Forty participants (20 with unilateral plantar fasciitis and 20 controls) with plantar fascia thickness (mean age, 44.8 ± 12.2 years) participated in this study. The majority were females (n = 26, 65%). Plantar fascia thickness was measured via ultrasound 3 times at 3 different MTP joint positions: (1) at rest, (2) at 30 degrees of extension, and (3) at maximal extension. Results: When comparing gender differences, the males in the plantar fasciitis group had a significantly thicker plantar fascia than the females (P = .048, η2 = 2.35). However, no significant differences were observed between healthy males and females. The males with unilateral plantar fasciitis also had significantly thicker asymptomatic plantar fasciae collectively compared with controls (P &lt; .05), whereas females with unilateral plantar fasciitis had a similar but not significant change. Conclusion: It appears that healthy males and females have similar plantar fascia thickness. However, as plantar fasciitis develops, males tend to develop thicker plantar fasciae than their female counterparts, which could have future treatment implications. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control comparative study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1071100718811631</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30413134</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Case-Control Studies ; Fasciitis, Plantar - diagnostic imaging ; Fasciitis, Plantar - physiopathology ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Metatarsophalangeal Joint - physiopathology ; Middle Aged ; Patient Positioning ; Sex Factors ; Ultrasonography</subject><ispartof>Foot &amp; ankle international, 2019-04, Vol.40 (4), p.439-446</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ab2f924b8334cc5cc9b987e880afc5fe47b43525a7a59cc9dc4097867afc76a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ab2f924b8334cc5cc9b987e880afc5fe47b43525a7a59cc9dc4097867afc76a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8117-3477</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1071100718811631$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1071100718811631$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30413134$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Granado, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Everett B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daher, Noha S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Keith E.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of Gender, Toe Extension Position, and Plantar Fasciitis on Plantar Fascia Thickness</title><title>Foot &amp; ankle international</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Int</addtitle><description>Background: Ultrasound is a widely used diagnostic tool for patients with plantar fasciitis. However, the lack of standardization during the measurement for plantar fascia thickness has made it challenging to understand the etiology of plantar fasciitis, as well as identify risk factors, such as gender. The purpose of this study was to investigate gender differences regarding plantar fascia thickness while controlling for metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint position in the healthy and those with unilateral plantar fasciitis. Methods: Forty participants (20 with unilateral plantar fasciitis and 20 controls) with plantar fascia thickness (mean age, 44.8 ± 12.2 years) participated in this study. The majority were females (n = 26, 65%). Plantar fascia thickness was measured via ultrasound 3 times at 3 different MTP joint positions: (1) at rest, (2) at 30 degrees of extension, and (3) at maximal extension. Results: When comparing gender differences, the males in the plantar fasciitis group had a significantly thicker plantar fascia than the females (P = .048, η2 = 2.35). However, no significant differences were observed between healthy males and females. The males with unilateral plantar fasciitis also had significantly thicker asymptomatic plantar fasciae collectively compared with controls (P &lt; .05), whereas females with unilateral plantar fasciitis had a similar but not significant change. Conclusion: It appears that healthy males and females have similar plantar fascia thickness. However, as plantar fasciitis develops, males tend to develop thicker plantar fasciae than their female counterparts, which could have future treatment implications. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control comparative study.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Fasciitis, Plantar - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Fasciitis, Plantar - physiopathology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Positioning</subject><subject>Sex Factors</subject><subject>Ultrasonography</subject><issn>1071-1007</issn><issn>1944-7876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UD1PwzAQtRCIlsLOhDwyNOCLndgZUdUWpEp0KBND5Lg2pLRx8SUS_HtcCgghMdyH7r17unuEnAO7ApDyGpgEYDEpBZBzOCB9KIRIpJL5YewjkuzwHjlBXDEGkkNxTHqcCeDARZ88jp2zpqXe0altljYM6cJbOn5rbYO1b-jcY93GZkh1s6TztW5aHehEo6njHOmO8nuo6eK5Ni-NRTwlR06v0Z591QF5mIwXo9tkdj-9G93MEsO5bJNcV6krUlEpzoUxmTFFVShplWLamcxZISvBszTTUmdFRJdGsEKqXEZY5poPyOVedxv8a2exLTc1GruOZ1nfYZkCT9P0MwaE7akmeMRgXbkN9UaH9xJYubO0_GtpXLn4Uu-qjV3-LHx7GAnJnoD6yZYr34Umfvu_4AfhnXz1</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Granado, Michael J.</creator><creator>Lohman, Everett B.</creator><creator>Daher, Noha S.</creator><creator>Gordon, Keith E.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8117-3477</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Effect of Gender, Toe Extension Position, and Plantar Fasciitis on Plantar Fascia Thickness</title><author>Granado, Michael J. ; Lohman, Everett B. ; Daher, Noha S. ; Gordon, Keith E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6ab2f924b8334cc5cc9b987e880afc5fe47b43525a7a59cc9dc4097867afc76a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Fasciitis, Plantar - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Fasciitis, Plantar - physiopathology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metatarsophalangeal Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Positioning</topic><topic>Sex Factors</topic><topic>Ultrasonography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Granado, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lohman, Everett B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daher, Noha S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gordon, Keith E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Granado, Michael J.</au><au>Lohman, Everett B.</au><au>Daher, Noha S.</au><au>Gordon, Keith E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of Gender, Toe Extension Position, and Plantar Fasciitis on Plantar Fascia Thickness</atitle><jtitle>Foot &amp; ankle international</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Int</addtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>439</spage><epage>446</epage><pages>439-446</pages><issn>1071-1007</issn><eissn>1944-7876</eissn><abstract>Background: Ultrasound is a widely used diagnostic tool for patients with plantar fasciitis. However, the lack of standardization during the measurement for plantar fascia thickness has made it challenging to understand the etiology of plantar fasciitis, as well as identify risk factors, such as gender. The purpose of this study was to investigate gender differences regarding plantar fascia thickness while controlling for metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint position in the healthy and those with unilateral plantar fasciitis. Methods: Forty participants (20 with unilateral plantar fasciitis and 20 controls) with plantar fascia thickness (mean age, 44.8 ± 12.2 years) participated in this study. The majority were females (n = 26, 65%). Plantar fascia thickness was measured via ultrasound 3 times at 3 different MTP joint positions: (1) at rest, (2) at 30 degrees of extension, and (3) at maximal extension. Results: When comparing gender differences, the males in the plantar fasciitis group had a significantly thicker plantar fascia than the females (P = .048, η2 = 2.35). However, no significant differences were observed between healthy males and females. The males with unilateral plantar fasciitis also had significantly thicker asymptomatic plantar fasciae collectively compared with controls (P &lt; .05), whereas females with unilateral plantar fasciitis had a similar but not significant change. Conclusion: It appears that healthy males and females have similar plantar fascia thickness. However, as plantar fasciitis develops, males tend to develop thicker plantar fasciae than their female counterparts, which could have future treatment implications. Level of Evidence: Level III, case-control comparative study.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30413134</pmid><doi>10.1177/1071100718811631</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8117-3477</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1071-1007
ispartof Foot & ankle international, 2019-04, Vol.40 (4), p.439-446
issn 1071-1007
1944-7876
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2132223222
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Case-Control Studies
Fasciitis, Plantar - diagnostic imaging
Fasciitis, Plantar - physiopathology
Female
Humans
Male
Metatarsophalangeal Joint - physiopathology
Middle Aged
Patient Positioning
Sex Factors
Ultrasonography
title Effect of Gender, Toe Extension Position, and Plantar Fasciitis on Plantar Fascia Thickness
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T23%3A59%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20Gender,%20Toe%20Extension%20Position,%20and%20Plantar%20Fasciitis%20on%20Plantar%20Fascia%20Thickness&rft.jtitle=Foot%20&%20ankle%20international&rft.au=Granado,%20Michael%20J.&rft.date=2019-04&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=446&rft.pages=439-446&rft.issn=1071-1007&rft.eissn=1944-7876&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1071100718811631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2132223222%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2132223222&rft_id=info:pmid/30413134&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1071100718811631&rfr_iscdi=true