Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation

Carbon storage in aboveground tree biomass and soil organic matter (in depth of A layer development i.e., up to 20 cm) was studied in 22-32 year-old post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czech Republic. Four replicated sites afforested with different tree species (spruce, pine, larch, oak, lime...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biogeochemistry 2009-06, Vol.94 (2), p.111-121
Hauptverfasser: Frouz, Jan, Pižl, Václav, Cienciala, Emil, Kalčík, Jiří
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121
container_issue 2
container_start_page 111
container_title Biogeochemistry
container_volume 94
creator Frouz, Jan
Pižl, Václav
Cienciala, Emil
Kalčík, Jiří
description Carbon storage in aboveground tree biomass and soil organic matter (in depth of A layer development i.e., up to 20 cm) was studied in 22-32 year-old post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czech Republic. Four replicated sites afforested with different tree species (spruce, pine, larch, oak, lime or alder) were compared with sites left to natural regeneration which were dominated by aspen, birch and willow. No topsoil was applied at the sites; hence carbon accumulation resulted from in situ soil development on alkaline tertiary clays that were dumped on the heaps. In aboveground tree biomass, carbon storage ranged from 17.0 ± 5.9 (mean ± SEM) to 67.6 ± 5.9 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation increased from 0.60 ± 0.09 to 2.31 ± 0.23 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ (natural regeneration < pine < spruce < oak < lime < alder < larch). Carbon storage in soil organic matter varied from 4.5 ± 3.7 to 38.0 ± 7.1 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation in soil organic matter increased from 0.15 ± 0.05 to 1.28 ± 0.34 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ at sites in the order: natural regeneration < spruce < pine, oak < larch < alder < lime. Carbon storage in the soil was positively correlated with aboveground tree biomass. Soil carbon was equivalent to 98.1% of the carbon found in aboveground tree biomass at lime dominated sites, but only 21.8% at sites with natural regeneration. No significant correlation was found between C storage in soil and aboveground litter input. Total soil carbon storage was correlated positively and significantly with earthworm density, and occurrence of earthworm cast in topsoil, which indicated that bioturbation could play an important role in soil carbon storage. Hence, not only restoring of wood production, but also restoring of soil community is critical for C storage in soil and whole ecosystem.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10533-009-9313-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21299485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20519870</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20519870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-91f2aa108d095dd9021468d1992ea4e77d27337f89da6a880c476000fb9cf9583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTFrHDEQhUWwIWc7PyBFsHCRyuvMSKeVVJojcQIGF7YhqYRuVzrr2JMu0l7hf29t1jiQIpUGzfdmHm8I-YhwhQDyS0EQnDcAutEca_GOLFBI3ggUP4_IArBVDRMtf09OStlCBSXwBfm1snmdIi1jynbjaIh0n8rY7EIMcUN9yq6MtKQwXNLxydGcBkeTp2N2jq5D2tlSqI39H2T6GA95bceQ4hk59nYo7sPre0oev319WH1vbu9ufqyub5uOazY2Gj2zFkH1oEXfa2C4bFWPWjNnl07KnknOpVe6t61VCrqlbKt9v9ad10LxU_J5nrvP6fehujW7UDo3DDa6dCiGIdN6qUQFL_4Bt-mQY_VmGOMgNZcThDPU5VRKdt7sc9jZ_GwQzJS0mZM2NUAzJW2gatisKZWNG5f_Dv6f6NMs2k7Rv21hIFArOfXP5763ydhNDsU83jNAXi_JNRfIXwAwLZKH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223079375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Frouz, Jan ; Pižl, Václav ; Cienciala, Emil ; Kalčík, Jiří</creator><creatorcontrib>Frouz, Jan ; Pižl, Václav ; Cienciala, Emil ; Kalčík, Jiří</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Carbon storage in aboveground tree biomass and soil organic matter (in depth of A layer development i.e., up to 20 cm) was studied in 22-32 year-old post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czech Republic. Four replicated sites afforested with different tree species (spruce, pine, larch, oak, lime or alder) were compared with sites left to natural regeneration which were dominated by aspen, birch and willow. No topsoil was applied at the sites; hence carbon accumulation resulted from in situ soil development on alkaline tertiary clays that were dumped on the heaps. In aboveground tree biomass, carbon storage ranged from 17.0 ± 5.9 (mean ± SEM) to 67.6 ± 5.9 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation increased from 0.60 ± 0.09 to 2.31 ± 0.23 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ (natural regeneration < pine < spruce < oak < lime < alder < larch). Carbon storage in soil organic matter varied from 4.5 ± 3.7 to 38.0 ± 7.1 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation in soil organic matter increased from 0.15 ± 0.05 to 1.28 ± 0.34 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ at sites in the order: natural regeneration < spruce < pine, oak < larch < alder < lime. Carbon storage in the soil was positively correlated with aboveground tree biomass. Soil carbon was equivalent to 98.1% of the carbon found in aboveground tree biomass at lime dominated sites, but only 21.8% at sites with natural regeneration. No significant correlation was found between C storage in soil and aboveground litter input. Total soil carbon storage was correlated positively and significantly with earthworm density, and occurrence of earthworm cast in topsoil, which indicated that bioturbation could play an important role in soil carbon storage. Hence, not only restoring of wood production, but also restoring of soil community is critical for C storage in soil and whole ecosystem.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-2563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-515X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10533-009-9313-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aboveground biomass ; Accumulation ; Agricultural soils ; Biochemistry ; Biogeosciences ; Biomass ; Bioturbation ; Carbon sequestration ; Coniferous trees ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Chemistry ; Forest soils ; Forests ; Larix ; Life Sciences ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Plant species ; Soil biochemistry ; Soil ecology ; Soil organic carbon ; Soil organic matter ; Soils ; Topsoil ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Biogeochemistry, 2009-06, Vol.94 (2), p.111-121</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-91f2aa108d095dd9021468d1992ea4e77d27337f89da6a880c476000fb9cf9583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-91f2aa108d095dd9021468d1992ea4e77d27337f89da6a880c476000fb9cf9583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20519870$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20519870$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310,58008,58241</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frouz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pižl, Václav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cienciala, Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalčík, Jiří</creatorcontrib><title>Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation</title><title>Biogeochemistry</title><addtitle>Biogeochemistry</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Carbon storage in aboveground tree biomass and soil organic matter (in depth of A layer development i.e., up to 20 cm) was studied in 22-32 year-old post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czech Republic. Four replicated sites afforested with different tree species (spruce, pine, larch, oak, lime or alder) were compared with sites left to natural regeneration which were dominated by aspen, birch and willow. No topsoil was applied at the sites; hence carbon accumulation resulted from in situ soil development on alkaline tertiary clays that were dumped on the heaps. In aboveground tree biomass, carbon storage ranged from 17.0 ± 5.9 (mean ± SEM) to 67.6 ± 5.9 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation increased from 0.60 ± 0.09 to 2.31 ± 0.23 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ (natural regeneration < pine < spruce < oak < lime < alder < larch). Carbon storage in soil organic matter varied from 4.5 ± 3.7 to 38.0 ± 7.1 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation in soil organic matter increased from 0.15 ± 0.05 to 1.28 ± 0.34 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ at sites in the order: natural regeneration < spruce < pine, oak < larch < alder < lime. Carbon storage in the soil was positively correlated with aboveground tree biomass. Soil carbon was equivalent to 98.1% of the carbon found in aboveground tree biomass at lime dominated sites, but only 21.8% at sites with natural regeneration. No significant correlation was found between C storage in soil and aboveground litter input. Total soil carbon storage was correlated positively and significantly with earthworm density, and occurrence of earthworm cast in topsoil, which indicated that bioturbation could play an important role in soil carbon storage. Hence, not only restoring of wood production, but also restoring of soil community is critical for C storage in soil and whole ecosystem.]]></description><subject>Aboveground biomass</subject><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bioturbation</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Coniferous trees</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Larix</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Soil biochemistry</subject><subject>Soil ecology</subject><subject>Soil organic carbon</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Topsoil</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0168-2563</issn><issn>1573-515X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kTFrHDEQhUWwIWc7PyBFsHCRyuvMSKeVVJojcQIGF7YhqYRuVzrr2JMu0l7hf29t1jiQIpUGzfdmHm8I-YhwhQDyS0EQnDcAutEca_GOLFBI3ggUP4_IArBVDRMtf09OStlCBSXwBfm1snmdIi1jynbjaIh0n8rY7EIMcUN9yq6MtKQwXNLxydGcBkeTp2N2jq5D2tlSqI39H2T6GA95bceQ4hk59nYo7sPre0oev319WH1vbu9ufqyub5uOazY2Gj2zFkH1oEXfa2C4bFWPWjNnl07KnknOpVe6t61VCrqlbKt9v9ad10LxU_J5nrvP6fehujW7UDo3DDa6dCiGIdN6qUQFL_4Bt-mQY_VmGOMgNZcThDPU5VRKdt7sc9jZ_GwQzJS0mZM2NUAzJW2gatisKZWNG5f_Dv6f6NMs2k7Rv21hIFArOfXP5763ydhNDsU83jNAXi_JNRfIXwAwLZKH</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Frouz, Jan</creator><creator>Pižl, Václav</creator><creator>Cienciala, Emil</creator><creator>Kalčík, Jiří</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation</title><author>Frouz, Jan ; Pižl, Václav ; Cienciala, Emil ; Kalčík, Jiří</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-91f2aa108d095dd9021468d1992ea4e77d27337f89da6a880c476000fb9cf9583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aboveground biomass</topic><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bioturbation</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Coniferous trees</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Larix</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Soil biochemistry</topic><topic>Soil ecology</topic><topic>Soil organic carbon</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Topsoil</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frouz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pižl, Václav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cienciala, Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalčík, Jiří</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frouz, Jan</au><au>Pižl, Václav</au><au>Cienciala, Emil</au><au>Kalčík, Jiří</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation</atitle><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle><stitle>Biogeochemistry</stitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>111-121</pages><issn>0168-2563</issn><eissn>1573-515X</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Carbon storage in aboveground tree biomass and soil organic matter (in depth of A layer development i.e., up to 20 cm) was studied in 22-32 year-old post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czech Republic. Four replicated sites afforested with different tree species (spruce, pine, larch, oak, lime or alder) were compared with sites left to natural regeneration which were dominated by aspen, birch and willow. No topsoil was applied at the sites; hence carbon accumulation resulted from in situ soil development on alkaline tertiary clays that were dumped on the heaps. In aboveground tree biomass, carbon storage ranged from 17.0 ± 5.9 (mean ± SEM) to 67.6 ± 5.9 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation increased from 0.60 ± 0.09 to 2.31 ± 0.23 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ (natural regeneration < pine < spruce < oak < lime < alder < larch). Carbon storage in soil organic matter varied from 4.5 ± 3.7 to 38.0 ± 7.1 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation in soil organic matter increased from 0.15 ± 0.05 to 1.28 ± 0.34 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ at sites in the order: natural regeneration < spruce < pine, oak < larch < alder < lime. Carbon storage in the soil was positively correlated with aboveground tree biomass. Soil carbon was equivalent to 98.1% of the carbon found in aboveground tree biomass at lime dominated sites, but only 21.8% at sites with natural regeneration. No significant correlation was found between C storage in soil and aboveground litter input. Total soil carbon storage was correlated positively and significantly with earthworm density, and occurrence of earthworm cast in topsoil, which indicated that bioturbation could play an important role in soil carbon storage. Hence, not only restoring of wood production, but also restoring of soil community is critical for C storage in soil and whole ecosystem.]]></abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10533-009-9313-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-2563
ispartof Biogeochemistry, 2009-06, Vol.94 (2), p.111-121
issn 0168-2563
1573-515X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21299485
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Aboveground biomass
Accumulation
Agricultural soils
Biochemistry
Biogeosciences
Biomass
Bioturbation
Carbon sequestration
Coniferous trees
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Ecosystems
Environmental Chemistry
Forest soils
Forests
Larix
Life Sciences
Organic matter
Organic soils
Plant species
Soil biochemistry
Soil ecology
Soil organic carbon
Soil organic matter
Soils
Topsoil
Trees
title Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A27%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbon%20storage%20in%20post-mining%20forest%20soil,%20the%20role%20of%20tree%20biomass%20and%20soil%20bioturbation&rft.jtitle=Biogeochemistry&rft.au=Frouz,%20Jan&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=111-121&rft.issn=0168-2563&rft.eissn=1573-515X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10533-009-9313-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20519870%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223079375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20519870&rfr_iscdi=true