Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation
Carbon storage in aboveground tree biomass and soil organic matter (in depth of A layer development i.e., up to 20 cm) was studied in 22-32 year-old post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czech Republic. Four replicated sites afforested with different tree species (spruce, pine, larch, oak, lime...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biogeochemistry 2009-06, Vol.94 (2), p.111-121 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 121 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 111 |
container_title | Biogeochemistry |
container_volume | 94 |
creator | Frouz, Jan Pižl, Václav Cienciala, Emil Kalčík, Jiří |
description | Carbon storage in aboveground tree biomass and soil organic matter (in depth of A layer development i.e., up to 20 cm) was studied in 22-32 year-old post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czech Republic. Four replicated sites afforested with different tree species (spruce, pine, larch, oak, lime or alder) were compared with sites left to natural regeneration which were dominated by aspen, birch and willow. No topsoil was applied at the sites; hence carbon accumulation resulted from in situ soil development on alkaline tertiary clays that were dumped on the heaps. In aboveground tree biomass, carbon storage ranged from 17.0 ± 5.9 (mean ± SEM) to 67.6 ± 5.9 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation increased from 0.60 ± 0.09 to 2.31 ± 0.23 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ (natural regeneration < pine < spruce < oak < lime < alder < larch). Carbon storage in soil organic matter varied from 4.5 ± 3.7 to 38.0 ± 7.1 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation in soil organic matter increased from 0.15 ± 0.05 to 1.28 ± 0.34 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ at sites in the order: natural regeneration < spruce < pine, oak < larch < alder < lime. Carbon storage in the soil was positively correlated with aboveground tree biomass. Soil carbon was equivalent to 98.1% of the carbon found in aboveground tree biomass at lime dominated sites, but only 21.8% at sites with natural regeneration. No significant correlation was found between C storage in soil and aboveground litter input. Total soil carbon storage was correlated positively and significantly with earthworm density, and occurrence of earthworm cast in topsoil, which indicated that bioturbation could play an important role in soil carbon storage. Hence, not only restoring of wood production, but also restoring of soil community is critical for C storage in soil and whole ecosystem. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10533-009-9313-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21299485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20519870</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20519870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-91f2aa108d095dd9021468d1992ea4e77d27337f89da6a880c476000fb9cf9583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kTFrHDEQhUWwIWc7PyBFsHCRyuvMSKeVVJojcQIGF7YhqYRuVzrr2JMu0l7hf29t1jiQIpUGzfdmHm8I-YhwhQDyS0EQnDcAutEca_GOLFBI3ggUP4_IArBVDRMtf09OStlCBSXwBfm1snmdIi1jynbjaIh0n8rY7EIMcUN9yq6MtKQwXNLxydGcBkeTp2N2jq5D2tlSqI39H2T6GA95bceQ4hk59nYo7sPre0oev319WH1vbu9ufqyub5uOazY2Gj2zFkH1oEXfa2C4bFWPWjNnl07KnknOpVe6t61VCrqlbKt9v9ad10LxU_J5nrvP6fehujW7UDo3DDa6dCiGIdN6qUQFL_4Bt-mQY_VmGOMgNZcThDPU5VRKdt7sc9jZ_GwQzJS0mZM2NUAzJW2gatisKZWNG5f_Dv6f6NMs2k7Rv21hIFArOfXP5763ydhNDsU83jNAXi_JNRfIXwAwLZKH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>223079375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Frouz, Jan ; Pižl, Václav ; Cienciala, Emil ; Kalčík, Jiří</creator><creatorcontrib>Frouz, Jan ; Pižl, Václav ; Cienciala, Emil ; Kalčík, Jiří</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Carbon storage in aboveground tree biomass and soil organic matter (in depth of A layer development i.e., up to 20 cm) was studied in 22-32 year-old post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czech Republic. Four replicated sites afforested with different tree species (spruce, pine, larch, oak, lime or alder) were compared with sites left to natural regeneration which were dominated by aspen, birch and willow. No topsoil was applied at the sites; hence carbon accumulation resulted from in situ soil development on alkaline tertiary clays that were dumped on the heaps. In aboveground tree biomass, carbon storage ranged from 17.0 ± 5.9 (mean ± SEM) to 67.6 ± 5.9 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation increased from 0.60 ± 0.09 to 2.31 ± 0.23 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ (natural regeneration < pine < spruce < oak < lime < alder < larch). Carbon storage in soil organic matter varied from 4.5 ± 3.7 to 38.0 ± 7.1 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation in soil organic matter increased from 0.15 ± 0.05 to 1.28 ± 0.34 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ at sites in the order: natural regeneration < spruce < pine, oak < larch < alder < lime. Carbon storage in the soil was positively correlated with aboveground tree biomass. Soil carbon was equivalent to 98.1% of the carbon found in aboveground tree biomass at lime dominated sites, but only 21.8% at sites with natural regeneration. No significant correlation was found between C storage in soil and aboveground litter input. Total soil carbon storage was correlated positively and significantly with earthworm density, and occurrence of earthworm cast in topsoil, which indicated that bioturbation could play an important role in soil carbon storage. Hence, not only restoring of wood production, but also restoring of soil community is critical for C storage in soil and whole ecosystem.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-2563</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-515X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10533-009-9313-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Aboveground biomass ; Accumulation ; Agricultural soils ; Biochemistry ; Biogeosciences ; Biomass ; Bioturbation ; Carbon sequestration ; Coniferous trees ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Ecosystems ; Environmental Chemistry ; Forest soils ; Forests ; Larix ; Life Sciences ; Organic matter ; Organic soils ; Plant species ; Soil biochemistry ; Soil ecology ; Soil organic carbon ; Soil organic matter ; Soils ; Topsoil ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Biogeochemistry, 2009-06, Vol.94 (2), p.111-121</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2009 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-91f2aa108d095dd9021468d1992ea4e77d27337f89da6a880c476000fb9cf9583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-91f2aa108d095dd9021468d1992ea4e77d27337f89da6a880c476000fb9cf9583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20519870$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20519870$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27915,27916,41479,42548,51310,58008,58241</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Frouz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pižl, Václav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cienciala, Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalčík, Jiří</creatorcontrib><title>Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation</title><title>Biogeochemistry</title><addtitle>Biogeochemistry</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Carbon storage in aboveground tree biomass and soil organic matter (in depth of A layer development i.e., up to 20 cm) was studied in 22-32 year-old post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czech Republic. Four replicated sites afforested with different tree species (spruce, pine, larch, oak, lime or alder) were compared with sites left to natural regeneration which were dominated by aspen, birch and willow. No topsoil was applied at the sites; hence carbon accumulation resulted from in situ soil development on alkaline tertiary clays that were dumped on the heaps. In aboveground tree biomass, carbon storage ranged from 17.0 ± 5.9 (mean ± SEM) to 67.6 ± 5.9 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation increased from 0.60 ± 0.09 to 2.31 ± 0.23 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ (natural regeneration < pine < spruce < oak < lime < alder < larch). Carbon storage in soil organic matter varied from 4.5 ± 3.7 to 38.0 ± 7.1 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation in soil organic matter increased from 0.15 ± 0.05 to 1.28 ± 0.34 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ at sites in the order: natural regeneration < spruce < pine, oak < larch < alder < lime. Carbon storage in the soil was positively correlated with aboveground tree biomass. Soil carbon was equivalent to 98.1% of the carbon found in aboveground tree biomass at lime dominated sites, but only 21.8% at sites with natural regeneration. No significant correlation was found between C storage in soil and aboveground litter input. Total soil carbon storage was correlated positively and significantly with earthworm density, and occurrence of earthworm cast in topsoil, which indicated that bioturbation could play an important role in soil carbon storage. Hence, not only restoring of wood production, but also restoring of soil community is critical for C storage in soil and whole ecosystem.]]></description><subject>Aboveground biomass</subject><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>Biochemistry</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Bioturbation</subject><subject>Carbon sequestration</subject><subject>Coniferous trees</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Forest soils</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Larix</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Organic matter</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Soil biochemistry</subject><subject>Soil ecology</subject><subject>Soil organic carbon</subject><subject>Soil organic matter</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Topsoil</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0168-2563</issn><issn>1573-515X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kTFrHDEQhUWwIWc7PyBFsHCRyuvMSKeVVJojcQIGF7YhqYRuVzrr2JMu0l7hf29t1jiQIpUGzfdmHm8I-YhwhQDyS0EQnDcAutEca_GOLFBI3ggUP4_IArBVDRMtf09OStlCBSXwBfm1snmdIi1jynbjaIh0n8rY7EIMcUN9yq6MtKQwXNLxydGcBkeTp2N2jq5D2tlSqI39H2T6GA95bceQ4hk59nYo7sPre0oev319WH1vbu9ufqyub5uOazY2Gj2zFkH1oEXfa2C4bFWPWjNnl07KnknOpVe6t61VCrqlbKt9v9ad10LxU_J5nrvP6fehujW7UDo3DDa6dCiGIdN6qUQFL_4Bt-mQY_VmGOMgNZcThDPU5VRKdt7sc9jZ_GwQzJS0mZM2NUAzJW2gatisKZWNG5f_Dv6f6NMs2k7Rv21hIFArOfXP5763ydhNDsU83jNAXi_JNRfIXwAwLZKH</recordid><startdate>20090601</startdate><enddate>20090601</enddate><creator>Frouz, Jan</creator><creator>Pižl, Václav</creator><creator>Cienciala, Emil</creator><creator>Kalčík, Jiří</creator><general>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090601</creationdate><title>Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation</title><author>Frouz, Jan ; Pižl, Václav ; Cienciala, Emil ; Kalčík, Jiří</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392t-91f2aa108d095dd9021468d1992ea4e77d27337f89da6a880c476000fb9cf9583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Aboveground biomass</topic><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>Biochemistry</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Bioturbation</topic><topic>Carbon sequestration</topic><topic>Coniferous trees</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Forest soils</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Larix</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Organic matter</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Soil biochemistry</topic><topic>Soil ecology</topic><topic>Soil organic carbon</topic><topic>Soil organic matter</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Topsoil</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frouz, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pižl, Václav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cienciala, Emil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalčík, Jiří</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frouz, Jan</au><au>Pižl, Václav</au><au>Cienciala, Emil</au><au>Kalčík, Jiří</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation</atitle><jtitle>Biogeochemistry</jtitle><stitle>Biogeochemistry</stitle><date>2009-06-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>121</epage><pages>111-121</pages><issn>0168-2563</issn><eissn>1573-515X</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Carbon storage in aboveground tree biomass and soil organic matter (in depth of A layer development i.e., up to 20 cm) was studied in 22-32 year-old post-mining sites in the northwest of the Czech Republic. Four replicated sites afforested with different tree species (spruce, pine, larch, oak, lime or alder) were compared with sites left to natural regeneration which were dominated by aspen, birch and willow. No topsoil was applied at the sites; hence carbon accumulation resulted from in situ soil development on alkaline tertiary clays that were dumped on the heaps. In aboveground tree biomass, carbon storage ranged from 17.0 ± 5.9 (mean ± SEM) to 67.6 ± 5.9 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation increased from 0.60 ± 0.09 to 2.31 ± 0.23 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ (natural regeneration < pine < spruce < oak < lime < alder < larch). Carbon storage in soil organic matter varied from 4.5 ± 3.7 to 38.0 ± 7.1 t ha⁻¹ and the rate of C accumulation in soil organic matter increased from 0.15 ± 0.05 to 1.28 ± 0.34 t ha⁻¹ year⁻¹ at sites in the order: natural regeneration < spruce < pine, oak < larch < alder < lime. Carbon storage in the soil was positively correlated with aboveground tree biomass. Soil carbon was equivalent to 98.1% of the carbon found in aboveground tree biomass at lime dominated sites, but only 21.8% at sites with natural regeneration. No significant correlation was found between C storage in soil and aboveground litter input. Total soil carbon storage was correlated positively and significantly with earthworm density, and occurrence of earthworm cast in topsoil, which indicated that bioturbation could play an important role in soil carbon storage. Hence, not only restoring of wood production, but also restoring of soil community is critical for C storage in soil and whole ecosystem.]]></abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10533-009-9313-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-2563 |
ispartof | Biogeochemistry, 2009-06, Vol.94 (2), p.111-121 |
issn | 0168-2563 1573-515X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21299485 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Aboveground biomass Accumulation Agricultural soils Biochemistry Biogeosciences Biomass Bioturbation Carbon sequestration Coniferous trees Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Ecosystems Environmental Chemistry Forest soils Forests Larix Life Sciences Organic matter Organic soils Plant species Soil biochemistry Soil ecology Soil organic carbon Soil organic matter Soils Topsoil Trees |
title | Carbon storage in post-mining forest soil, the role of tree biomass and soil bioturbation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A27%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbon%20storage%20in%20post-mining%20forest%20soil,%20the%20role%20of%20tree%20biomass%20and%20soil%20bioturbation&rft.jtitle=Biogeochemistry&rft.au=Frouz,%20Jan&rft.date=2009-06-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=121&rft.pages=111-121&rft.issn=0168-2563&rft.eissn=1573-515X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10533-009-9313-0&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20519870%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=223079375&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20519870&rfr_iscdi=true |