Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support

: media-1vid110.1542/5839992674001PEDS-VA_2018-1485 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended against routine endotracheal suctioning of meconium-stained nonvigorous newborns but suggested resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation. Our purpose i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatrics (Evanston) 2018-12, Vol.142 (6), p.1
Hauptverfasser: Chiruvolu, Arpitha, Miklis, Kimberly K, Chen, Elena, Petrey, Barbara, Desai, Sujata
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1
container_title Pediatrics (Evanston)
container_volume 142
creator Chiruvolu, Arpitha
Miklis, Kimberly K
Chen, Elena
Petrey, Barbara
Desai, Sujata
description : media-1vid110.1542/5839992674001PEDS-VA_2018-1485 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended against routine endotracheal suctioning of meconium-stained nonvigorous newborns but suggested resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation. Our purpose is to study the effects of this change in management. In this multicenter cohort study, we compare 130 nonvigorous newborns born during the retrospective 1-year period before the implementation of new NRP guidelines (October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016) to 101 infants born during the 1-year prospective period after implementation (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017). Endotracheal suctioning was performed predominantly in the retrospective group compared with the prospective group (70% vs 2%), indicating the change in practice. A significantly higher proportion of newborns were admitted to the NICU for respiratory issues in the prospective group compared with the retrospective group (40% vs 22%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-3.9). Similarly, a significantly higher proportion of infants needed oxygen therapy (37% vs 19%) with an OR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.2-4.5), mechanical ventilation (19% vs 9%) with an OR of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-5.8), and surfactant therapy (10% vs 2%) with an OR of 5.8 (95% CI: 1.5-21.8). There were no differences in the incidence of other outcomes, including meconium aspiration syndrome. The recent NRP guideline change was not associated with an increased incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome but was associated with an increased incidence of NICU admissions for respiratory issues. Also, the need for mechanical ventilation, oxygen, and surfactant therapy increased.
doi_str_mv 10.1542/peds.2018-1485
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2129537523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A580439353</galeid><sourcerecordid>A580439353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ca54e107be7d75d73562e5e622c6b1a19847c61af19fc3f1d1a1ae8c486d51213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVJabZprz0WQy69eKuvseRj2DRpINtAPs5CK48XB1tyJbtp_n1kNumhp4HheYd3eAj5wuiageTfR2zSmlOmSyY1vCMrRmtdSq7giKwoFayUlMIx-ZjSI6VUguIfyLGgQkMl6Ypsz7Hv_mB8Lm5DGIqt9XaPA_qpCG2xRRd8Nw_l3WQ7j03xC592IfpUWN8Ut5jGLtop5PDdPI4hTp_I-9b2CT-_zhPycPHjfvOzvL65vNqcXZdOUjaVzoJERtUOVaOgUQIqjoAV567aMctqLZWrmG1Z3TrRsibvLGonddUA40yckG-Hu2MMv2dMkxm65LDvrccwJ8MZr0Eo4CKjp_-hj2GOPrfLFEhFlQKdqfJA7W2PpvP57wn_Ti70Pe7R5PKbG3MGmkpRC1iurg-8iyGliK0ZYzfY-GwYNYsYs4gxixiziMmBr6815t2AzT_8zYR4AeIJh5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2154707758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chiruvolu, Arpitha ; Miklis, Kimberly K ; Chen, Elena ; Petrey, Barbara ; Desai, Sujata</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiruvolu, Arpitha ; Miklis, Kimberly K ; Chen, Elena ; Petrey, Barbara ; Desai, Sujata</creatorcontrib><description>: media-1vid110.1542/5839992674001PEDS-VA_2018-1485 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended against routine endotracheal suctioning of meconium-stained nonvigorous newborns but suggested resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation. Our purpose is to study the effects of this change in management. In this multicenter cohort study, we compare 130 nonvigorous newborns born during the retrospective 1-year period before the implementation of new NRP guidelines (October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016) to 101 infants born during the 1-year prospective period after implementation (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017). Endotracheal suctioning was performed predominantly in the retrospective group compared with the prospective group (70% vs 2%), indicating the change in practice. A significantly higher proportion of newborns were admitted to the NICU for respiratory issues in the prospective group compared with the retrospective group (40% vs 22%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-3.9). Similarly, a significantly higher proportion of infants needed oxygen therapy (37% vs 19%) with an OR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.2-4.5), mechanical ventilation (19% vs 9%) with an OR of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-5.8), and surfactant therapy (10% vs 2%) with an OR of 5.8 (95% CI: 1.5-21.8). There were no differences in the incidence of other outcomes, including meconium aspiration syndrome. The recent NRP guideline change was not associated with an increased incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome but was associated with an increased incidence of NICU admissions for respiratory issues. Also, the need for mechanical ventilation, oxygen, and surfactant therapy increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1485</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30385640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ; Care and treatment ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Company business management ; CPR ; Delivery Rooms ; Disease Management ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health aspects ; Hospital maternity services ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy ; Infants ; Infants (Newborn) ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Male ; Management ; Mechanical ventilation ; Meconium ; Meconium aspiration syndrome ; Meconium Aspiration Syndrome - therapy ; Medical screening ; Neonatal care ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Newborn infants ; Oxygen ; Pediatrics ; Positive pressure respiration ; Practice guidelines (Medicine) ; Pregnancy ; Respiration, Artificial - methods ; Respiratory therapy ; Resuscitation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Suction - methods ; Surfactants ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 2018-12, Vol.142 (6), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ca54e107be7d75d73562e5e622c6b1a19847c61af19fc3f1d1a1ae8c486d51213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ca54e107be7d75d73562e5e622c6b1a19847c61af19fc3f1d1a1ae8c486d51213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiruvolu, Arpitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miklis, Kimberly K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrey, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Sujata</creatorcontrib><title>Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>: media-1vid110.1542/5839992674001PEDS-VA_2018-1485 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended against routine endotracheal suctioning of meconium-stained nonvigorous newborns but suggested resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation. Our purpose is to study the effects of this change in management. In this multicenter cohort study, we compare 130 nonvigorous newborns born during the retrospective 1-year period before the implementation of new NRP guidelines (October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016) to 101 infants born during the 1-year prospective period after implementation (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017). Endotracheal suctioning was performed predominantly in the retrospective group compared with the prospective group (70% vs 2%), indicating the change in practice. A significantly higher proportion of newborns were admitted to the NICU for respiratory issues in the prospective group compared with the retrospective group (40% vs 22%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-3.9). Similarly, a significantly higher proportion of infants needed oxygen therapy (37% vs 19%) with an OR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.2-4.5), mechanical ventilation (19% vs 9%) with an OR of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-5.8), and surfactant therapy (10% vs 2%) with an OR of 5.8 (95% CI: 1.5-21.8). There were no differences in the incidence of other outcomes, including meconium aspiration syndrome. The recent NRP guideline change was not associated with an increased incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome but was associated with an increased incidence of NICU admissions for respiratory issues. Also, the need for mechanical ventilation, oxygen, and surfactant therapy increased.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>CPR</subject><subject>Delivery Rooms</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospital maternity services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Infants (Newborn)</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Meconium</subject><subject>Meconium aspiration syndrome</subject><subject>Meconium Aspiration Syndrome - therapy</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Neonatal care</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Newborn infants</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Positive pressure respiration</subject><subject>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Respiratory therapy</subject><subject>Resuscitation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Suction - methods</subject><subject>Surfactants</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVJabZprz0WQy69eKuvseRj2DRpINtAPs5CK48XB1tyJbtp_n1kNumhp4HheYd3eAj5wuiageTfR2zSmlOmSyY1vCMrRmtdSq7giKwoFayUlMIx-ZjSI6VUguIfyLGgQkMl6Ypsz7Hv_mB8Lm5DGIqt9XaPA_qpCG2xRRd8Nw_l3WQ7j03xC592IfpUWN8Ut5jGLtop5PDdPI4hTp_I-9b2CT-_zhPycPHjfvOzvL65vNqcXZdOUjaVzoJERtUOVaOgUQIqjoAV567aMctqLZWrmG1Z3TrRsibvLGonddUA40yckG-Hu2MMv2dMkxm65LDvrccwJ8MZr0Eo4CKjp_-hj2GOPrfLFEhFlQKdqfJA7W2PpvP57wn_Ti70Pe7R5PKbG3MGmkpRC1iurg-8iyGliK0ZYzfY-GwYNYsYs4gxixiziMmBr6815t2AzT_8zYR4AeIJh5w</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Chiruvolu, Arpitha</creator><creator>Miklis, Kimberly K</creator><creator>Chen, Elena</creator><creator>Petrey, Barbara</creator><creator>Desai, Sujata</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support</title><author>Chiruvolu, Arpitha ; Miklis, Kimberly K ; Chen, Elena ; Petrey, Barbara ; Desai, Sujata</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ca54e107be7d75d73562e5e622c6b1a19847c61af19fc3f1d1a1ae8c486d51213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>CPR</topic><topic>Delivery Rooms</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospital maternity services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Infants (Newborn)</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Meconium</topic><topic>Meconium aspiration syndrome</topic><topic>Meconium Aspiration Syndrome - therapy</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Neonatal care</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Newborn infants</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Positive pressure respiration</topic><topic>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Respiratory therapy</topic><topic>Resuscitation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Suction - methods</topic><topic>Surfactants</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiruvolu, Arpitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miklis, Kimberly K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrey, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Sujata</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiruvolu, Arpitha</au><au>Miklis, Kimberly K</au><au>Chen, Elena</au><au>Petrey, Barbara</au><au>Desai, Sujata</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><abstract>: media-1vid110.1542/5839992674001PEDS-VA_2018-1485 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended against routine endotracheal suctioning of meconium-stained nonvigorous newborns but suggested resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation. Our purpose is to study the effects of this change in management. In this multicenter cohort study, we compare 130 nonvigorous newborns born during the retrospective 1-year period before the implementation of new NRP guidelines (October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016) to 101 infants born during the 1-year prospective period after implementation (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017). Endotracheal suctioning was performed predominantly in the retrospective group compared with the prospective group (70% vs 2%), indicating the change in practice. A significantly higher proportion of newborns were admitted to the NICU for respiratory issues in the prospective group compared with the retrospective group (40% vs 22%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-3.9). Similarly, a significantly higher proportion of infants needed oxygen therapy (37% vs 19%) with an OR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.2-4.5), mechanical ventilation (19% vs 9%) with an OR of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-5.8), and surfactant therapy (10% vs 2%) with an OR of 5.8 (95% CI: 1.5-21.8). There were no differences in the incidence of other outcomes, including meconium aspiration syndrome. The recent NRP guideline change was not associated with an increased incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome but was associated with an increased incidence of NICU admissions for respiratory issues. Also, the need for mechanical ventilation, oxygen, and surfactant therapy increased.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><pmid>30385640</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.2018-1485</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-4005
ispartof Pediatrics (Evanston), 2018-12, Vol.142 (6), p.1
issn 0031-4005
1098-4275
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2129537523
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Analysis
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Care and treatment
Childbirth & labor
Company business management
CPR
Delivery Rooms
Disease Management
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Health aspects
Hospital maternity services
Humans
Incidence
Infant, Newborn
Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy
Infants
Infants (Newborn)
Intubation, Intratracheal
Male
Management
Mechanical ventilation
Meconium
Meconium aspiration syndrome
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome - therapy
Medical screening
Neonatal care
Neonates
Newborn babies
Newborn infants
Oxygen
Pediatrics
Positive pressure respiration
Practice guidelines (Medicine)
Pregnancy
Respiration, Artificial - methods
Respiratory therapy
Resuscitation - methods
Retrospective Studies
Suction - methods
Surfactants
Ventilation
title Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A41%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delivery%20Room%20Management%20of%20Meconium-Stained%20Newborns%20and%20Respiratory%20Support&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Chiruvolu,%20Arpitha&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.2018-1485&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA580439353%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2154707758&rft_id=info:pmid/30385640&rft_galeid=A580439353&rfr_iscdi=true