Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support
: media-1vid110.1542/5839992674001PEDS-VA_2018-1485 BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended against routine endotracheal suctioning of meconium-stained nonvigorous newborns but suggested resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation. Our purpose i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Pediatrics (Evanston) 2018-12, Vol.142 (6), p.1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Pediatrics (Evanston) |
container_volume | 142 |
creator | Chiruvolu, Arpitha Miklis, Kimberly K Chen, Elena Petrey, Barbara Desai, Sujata |
description | : media-1vid110.1542/5839992674001PEDS-VA_2018-1485
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended against routine endotracheal suctioning of meconium-stained nonvigorous newborns but suggested resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation. Our purpose is to study the effects of this change in management.
In this multicenter cohort study, we compare 130 nonvigorous newborns born during the retrospective 1-year period before the implementation of new NRP guidelines (October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016) to 101 infants born during the 1-year prospective period after implementation (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017).
Endotracheal suctioning was performed predominantly in the retrospective group compared with the prospective group (70% vs 2%), indicating the change in practice. A significantly higher proportion of newborns were admitted to the NICU for respiratory issues in the prospective group compared with the retrospective group (40% vs 22%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-3.9). Similarly, a significantly higher proportion of infants needed oxygen therapy (37% vs 19%) with an OR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.2-4.5), mechanical ventilation (19% vs 9%) with an OR of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-5.8), and surfactant therapy (10% vs 2%) with an OR of 5.8 (95% CI: 1.5-21.8). There were no differences in the incidence of other outcomes, including meconium aspiration syndrome.
The recent NRP guideline change was not associated with an increased incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome but was associated with an increased incidence of NICU admissions for respiratory issues. Also, the need for mechanical ventilation, oxygen, and surfactant therapy increased. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1542/peds.2018-1485 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2129537523</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A580439353</galeid><sourcerecordid>A580439353</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ca54e107be7d75d73562e5e622c6b1a19847c61af19fc3f1d1a1ae8c486d51213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVJabZprz0WQy69eKuvseRj2DRpINtAPs5CK48XB1tyJbtp_n1kNumhp4HheYd3eAj5wuiageTfR2zSmlOmSyY1vCMrRmtdSq7giKwoFayUlMIx-ZjSI6VUguIfyLGgQkMl6Ypsz7Hv_mB8Lm5DGIqt9XaPA_qpCG2xRRd8Nw_l3WQ7j03xC592IfpUWN8Ut5jGLtop5PDdPI4hTp_I-9b2CT-_zhPycPHjfvOzvL65vNqcXZdOUjaVzoJERtUOVaOgUQIqjoAV567aMctqLZWrmG1Z3TrRsibvLGonddUA40yckG-Hu2MMv2dMkxm65LDvrccwJ8MZr0Eo4CKjp_-hj2GOPrfLFEhFlQKdqfJA7W2PpvP57wn_Ti70Pe7R5PKbG3MGmkpRC1iurg-8iyGliK0ZYzfY-GwYNYsYs4gxixiziMmBr6815t2AzT_8zYR4AeIJh5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2154707758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chiruvolu, Arpitha ; Miklis, Kimberly K ; Chen, Elena ; Petrey, Barbara ; Desai, Sujata</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiruvolu, Arpitha ; Miklis, Kimberly K ; Chen, Elena ; Petrey, Barbara ; Desai, Sujata</creatorcontrib><description>: media-1vid110.1542/5839992674001PEDS-VA_2018-1485
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended against routine endotracheal suctioning of meconium-stained nonvigorous newborns but suggested resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation. Our purpose is to study the effects of this change in management.
In this multicenter cohort study, we compare 130 nonvigorous newborns born during the retrospective 1-year period before the implementation of new NRP guidelines (October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016) to 101 infants born during the 1-year prospective period after implementation (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017).
Endotracheal suctioning was performed predominantly in the retrospective group compared with the prospective group (70% vs 2%), indicating the change in practice. A significantly higher proportion of newborns were admitted to the NICU for respiratory issues in the prospective group compared with the retrospective group (40% vs 22%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-3.9). Similarly, a significantly higher proportion of infants needed oxygen therapy (37% vs 19%) with an OR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.2-4.5), mechanical ventilation (19% vs 9%) with an OR of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-5.8), and surfactant therapy (10% vs 2%) with an OR of 5.8 (95% CI: 1.5-21.8). There were no differences in the incidence of other outcomes, including meconium aspiration syndrome.
The recent NRP guideline change was not associated with an increased incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome but was associated with an increased incidence of NICU admissions for respiratory issues. Also, the need for mechanical ventilation, oxygen, and surfactant therapy increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-4005</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-4275</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1542/peds.2018-1485</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30385640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Academy of Pediatrics</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ; Care and treatment ; Childbirth & labor ; Company business management ; CPR ; Delivery Rooms ; Disease Management ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Health aspects ; Hospital maternity services ; Humans ; Incidence ; Infant, Newborn ; Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy ; Infants ; Infants (Newborn) ; Intubation, Intratracheal ; Male ; Management ; Mechanical ventilation ; Meconium ; Meconium aspiration syndrome ; Meconium Aspiration Syndrome - therapy ; Medical screening ; Neonatal care ; Neonates ; Newborn babies ; Newborn infants ; Oxygen ; Pediatrics ; Positive pressure respiration ; Practice guidelines (Medicine) ; Pregnancy ; Respiration, Artificial - methods ; Respiratory therapy ; Resuscitation - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Suction - methods ; Surfactants ; Ventilation</subject><ispartof>Pediatrics (Evanston), 2018-12, Vol.142 (6), p.1</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2018 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.</rights><rights>Copyright American Academy of Pediatrics Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ca54e107be7d75d73562e5e622c6b1a19847c61af19fc3f1d1a1ae8c486d51213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ca54e107be7d75d73562e5e622c6b1a19847c61af19fc3f1d1a1ae8c486d51213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiruvolu, Arpitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miklis, Kimberly K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrey, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Sujata</creatorcontrib><title>Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support</title><title>Pediatrics (Evanston)</title><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><description>: media-1vid110.1542/5839992674001PEDS-VA_2018-1485
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended against routine endotracheal suctioning of meconium-stained nonvigorous newborns but suggested resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation. Our purpose is to study the effects of this change in management.
In this multicenter cohort study, we compare 130 nonvigorous newborns born during the retrospective 1-year period before the implementation of new NRP guidelines (October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016) to 101 infants born during the 1-year prospective period after implementation (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017).
Endotracheal suctioning was performed predominantly in the retrospective group compared with the prospective group (70% vs 2%), indicating the change in practice. A significantly higher proportion of newborns were admitted to the NICU for respiratory issues in the prospective group compared with the retrospective group (40% vs 22%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-3.9). Similarly, a significantly higher proportion of infants needed oxygen therapy (37% vs 19%) with an OR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.2-4.5), mechanical ventilation (19% vs 9%) with an OR of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-5.8), and surfactant therapy (10% vs 2%) with an OR of 5.8 (95% CI: 1.5-21.8). There were no differences in the incidence of other outcomes, including meconium aspiration syndrome.
The recent NRP guideline change was not associated with an increased incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome but was associated with an increased incidence of NICU admissions for respiratory issues. Also, the need for mechanical ventilation, oxygen, and surfactant therapy increased.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Company business management</subject><subject>CPR</subject><subject>Delivery Rooms</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hospital maternity services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Infants (Newborn)</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mechanical ventilation</subject><subject>Meconium</subject><subject>Meconium aspiration syndrome</subject><subject>Meconium Aspiration Syndrome - therapy</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Neonatal care</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Newborn babies</subject><subject>Newborn infants</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Positive pressure respiration</subject><subject>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial - methods</subject><subject>Respiratory therapy</subject><subject>Resuscitation - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Suction - methods</subject><subject>Surfactants</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><issn>0031-4005</issn><issn>1098-4275</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1r3DAQhkVJabZprz0WQy69eKuvseRj2DRpINtAPs5CK48XB1tyJbtp_n1kNumhp4HheYd3eAj5wuiageTfR2zSmlOmSyY1vCMrRmtdSq7giKwoFayUlMIx-ZjSI6VUguIfyLGgQkMl6Ypsz7Hv_mB8Lm5DGIqt9XaPA_qpCG2xRRd8Nw_l3WQ7j03xC592IfpUWN8Ut5jGLtop5PDdPI4hTp_I-9b2CT-_zhPycPHjfvOzvL65vNqcXZdOUjaVzoJERtUOVaOgUQIqjoAV567aMctqLZWrmG1Z3TrRsibvLGonddUA40yckG-Hu2MMv2dMkxm65LDvrccwJ8MZr0Eo4CKjp_-hj2GOPrfLFEhFlQKdqfJA7W2PpvP57wn_Ti70Pe7R5PKbG3MGmkpRC1iurg-8iyGliK0ZYzfY-GwYNYsYs4gxixiziMmBr6815t2AzT_8zYR4AeIJh5w</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>Chiruvolu, Arpitha</creator><creator>Miklis, Kimberly K</creator><creator>Chen, Elena</creator><creator>Petrey, Barbara</creator><creator>Desai, Sujata</creator><general>American Academy of Pediatrics</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support</title><author>Chiruvolu, Arpitha ; Miklis, Kimberly K ; Chen, Elena ; Petrey, Barbara ; Desai, Sujata</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-ca54e107be7d75d73562e5e622c6b1a19847c61af19fc3f1d1a1ae8c486d51213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Company business management</topic><topic>CPR</topic><topic>Delivery Rooms</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hospital maternity services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Infants (Newborn)</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mechanical ventilation</topic><topic>Meconium</topic><topic>Meconium aspiration syndrome</topic><topic>Meconium Aspiration Syndrome - therapy</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Neonatal care</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Newborn babies</topic><topic>Newborn infants</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Positive pressure respiration</topic><topic>Practice guidelines (Medicine)</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial - methods</topic><topic>Respiratory therapy</topic><topic>Resuscitation - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Suction - methods</topic><topic>Surfactants</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiruvolu, Arpitha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miklis, Kimberly K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrey, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Sujata</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiruvolu, Arpitha</au><au>Miklis, Kimberly K</au><au>Chen, Elena</au><au>Petrey, Barbara</au><au>Desai, Sujata</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support</atitle><jtitle>Pediatrics (Evanston)</jtitle><addtitle>Pediatrics</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0031-4005</issn><eissn>1098-4275</eissn><abstract>: media-1vid110.1542/5839992674001PEDS-VA_2018-1485
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recently, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) recommended against routine endotracheal suctioning of meconium-stained nonvigorous newborns but suggested resuscitation with positive pressure ventilation. Our purpose is to study the effects of this change in management.
In this multicenter cohort study, we compare 130 nonvigorous newborns born during the retrospective 1-year period before the implementation of new NRP guidelines (October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016) to 101 infants born during the 1-year prospective period after implementation (October 1, 2016, to September 30, 2017).
Endotracheal suctioning was performed predominantly in the retrospective group compared with the prospective group (70% vs 2%), indicating the change in practice. A significantly higher proportion of newborns were admitted to the NICU for respiratory issues in the prospective group compared with the retrospective group (40% vs 22%) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2-3.9). Similarly, a significantly higher proportion of infants needed oxygen therapy (37% vs 19%) with an OR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.2-4.5), mechanical ventilation (19% vs 9%) with an OR of 2.6 (95% CI: 1.1-5.8), and surfactant therapy (10% vs 2%) with an OR of 5.8 (95% CI: 1.5-21.8). There were no differences in the incidence of other outcomes, including meconium aspiration syndrome.
The recent NRP guideline change was not associated with an increased incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome but was associated with an increased incidence of NICU admissions for respiratory issues. Also, the need for mechanical ventilation, oxygen, and surfactant therapy increased.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Academy of Pediatrics</pub><pmid>30385640</pmid><doi>10.1542/peds.2018-1485</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0031-4005 |
ispartof | Pediatrics (Evanston), 2018-12, Vol.142 (6), p.1 |
issn | 0031-4005 1098-4275 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2129537523 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Analysis Cardiopulmonary resuscitation Care and treatment Childbirth & labor Company business management CPR Delivery Rooms Disease Management Female Follow-Up Studies Health aspects Hospital maternity services Humans Incidence Infant, Newborn Infant, Newborn, Diseases - therapy Infants Infants (Newborn) Intubation, Intratracheal Male Management Mechanical ventilation Meconium Meconium aspiration syndrome Meconium Aspiration Syndrome - therapy Medical screening Neonatal care Neonates Newborn babies Newborn infants Oxygen Pediatrics Positive pressure respiration Practice guidelines (Medicine) Pregnancy Respiration, Artificial - methods Respiratory therapy Resuscitation - methods Retrospective Studies Suction - methods Surfactants Ventilation |
title | Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T15%3A41%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Delivery%20Room%20Management%20of%20Meconium-Stained%20Newborns%20and%20Respiratory%20Support&rft.jtitle=Pediatrics%20(Evanston)&rft.au=Chiruvolu,%20Arpitha&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0031-4005&rft.eissn=1098-4275&rft_id=info:doi/10.1542/peds.2018-1485&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA580439353%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2154707758&rft_id=info:pmid/30385640&rft_galeid=A580439353&rfr_iscdi=true |