Long Term Surveillance of Renal Cell Carcinoma Recurrence Following Ablation using 2D and 3D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

To evaluate efficacy of using 2D and 3D contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for surveillance of RCC recurrence in patients post-ablation and identify imaging hallmarks of recurrence. 53 patients >8 months post ablation of RCC provided informed consent for this IRB approved study. Patients receive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2018-11, Vol.121, p.189-196
Hauptverfasser: Calio, Brian P., Lyshchik, Andrej, Li, Jingzhi, Stanczak, Maria, Shaw, Collette M., Adamo, Robert, Liu, Ji-Bin, Forsberg, Flemming, Lallas, Costas D., Trabulsi, Edouard J., Eisenbrey, John R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 196
container_issue
container_start_page 189
container_title Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)
container_volume 121
creator Calio, Brian P.
Lyshchik, Andrej
Li, Jingzhi
Stanczak, Maria
Shaw, Collette M.
Adamo, Robert
Liu, Ji-Bin
Forsberg, Flemming
Lallas, Costas D.
Trabulsi, Edouard J.
Eisenbrey, John R.
description To evaluate efficacy of using 2D and 3D contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for surveillance of RCC recurrence in patients post-ablation and identify imaging hallmarks of recurrence. 53 patients >8 months post ablation of RCC provided informed consent for this IRB approved study. Patients received 2D and 3D CEUS examinations with Optison (GE Healthcare). Three radiologists of varying CEUS experience described enhancement characteristics, made a diagnosis of recurrence/no-recurrence, and quantified their diagnostic confidence levels. Cases of RCC recurrence showed full ablation cavity enhancement with equal arrival times and intensity compared to the renal cortex. Lack of recurrence was characterized as a complete lack of enhancement within the cavity, or delayed enhancement stemming from the periphery of the ablation cavity. Sensitivity for detecting RCC recurrence was 100% for all readers and specificity was 90%-94%. Reader agreement ranged from 88% to 96%. No significant improvements were achieved with the addition of 3D CEUS, and its inclusion resulted in decreased reader confidence. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound successfully identified all cases of RCC recurrence in this study. Importantly, some patients with complete response to treatment developed delayed enhancement at the periphery of the ablation cavity over time, corresponding to fat necrosis, scarring or granulation tissue within the ablation cavity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.urology.2018.05.053
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2129537187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S009042951830774X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2129537187</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e2c129059b9eaf024375fe1099b7c7abd77e53c1460e71274c54d6554d8134f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFr3DAQhUVoSbZJfkKLjr14O7Isa3UqYZO0hYVCm5yFLI9TLbKUSnbC_vvK7LbXwjBCw3tvmI-Q9wzWDFj7ab-eU_Tx6bCugW3WIErxM7JiopaVUkq8ISsABVVTK3FB3uW8B4C2beU5ueDAN42SckUOuxie6AOmkf6c0ws6702wSONAf2Awnm7Rl2aSdSGOpgztnBIukvvofXx1xX7TeTO5GOicl299S03oKb-l2ximZPJU3YVfS2xPH_0yiHPor8jbwfiM16f3kjze3z1sv1a771--bW92leWtmCqsLasVCNUpNAPUDZdiQAZKddJK0_VSouCWNS2gZLVsrGj6VpS2YbwZgF-Sj8fc5xR_z5gnPbpscbkT45x1XeIFl2wji1QcpTbFnBMO-jm50aSDZqAX6nqvT9T1Ql2DKMWL78NpxdyN2P9z_cVcBJ-PAiyHvjhMOlu3QOxdQjvpPrr_rPgDyhiWTA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2129537187</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long Term Surveillance of Renal Cell Carcinoma Recurrence Following Ablation using 2D and 3D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Calio, Brian P. ; Lyshchik, Andrej ; Li, Jingzhi ; Stanczak, Maria ; Shaw, Collette M. ; Adamo, Robert ; Liu, Ji-Bin ; Forsberg, Flemming ; Lallas, Costas D. ; Trabulsi, Edouard J. ; Eisenbrey, John R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Calio, Brian P. ; Lyshchik, Andrej ; Li, Jingzhi ; Stanczak, Maria ; Shaw, Collette M. ; Adamo, Robert ; Liu, Ji-Bin ; Forsberg, Flemming ; Lallas, Costas D. ; Trabulsi, Edouard J. ; Eisenbrey, John R.</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate efficacy of using 2D and 3D contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for surveillance of RCC recurrence in patients post-ablation and identify imaging hallmarks of recurrence. 53 patients &gt;8 months post ablation of RCC provided informed consent for this IRB approved study. Patients received 2D and 3D CEUS examinations with Optison (GE Healthcare). Three radiologists of varying CEUS experience described enhancement characteristics, made a diagnosis of recurrence/no-recurrence, and quantified their diagnostic confidence levels. Cases of RCC recurrence showed full ablation cavity enhancement with equal arrival times and intensity compared to the renal cortex. Lack of recurrence was characterized as a complete lack of enhancement within the cavity, or delayed enhancement stemming from the periphery of the ablation cavity. Sensitivity for detecting RCC recurrence was 100% for all readers and specificity was 90%-94%. Reader agreement ranged from 88% to 96%. No significant improvements were achieved with the addition of 3D CEUS, and its inclusion resulted in decreased reader confidence. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound successfully identified all cases of RCC recurrence in this study. Importantly, some patients with complete response to treatment developed delayed enhancement at the periphery of the ablation cavity over time, corresponding to fat necrosis, scarring or granulation tissue within the ablation cavity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4295</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1527-9995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.05.053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30384977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation Techniques - adverse effects ; Ablation Techniques - methods ; Aged ; Albumins - pharmacology ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology ; Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery ; Contrast Media - pharmacology ; Female ; Fluorocarbons - pharmacology ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Kidney - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney Neoplasms - pathology ; Kidney Neoplasms - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Ultrasonography - methods</subject><ispartof>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2018-11, Vol.121, p.189-196</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e2c129059b9eaf024375fe1099b7c7abd77e53c1460e71274c54d6554d8134f03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e2c129059b9eaf024375fe1099b7c7abd77e53c1460e71274c54d6554d8134f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009042951830774X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30384977$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calio, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyshchik, Andrej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jingzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanczak, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Collette M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamo, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ji-Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsberg, Flemming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lallas, Costas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trabulsi, Edouard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenbrey, John R.</creatorcontrib><title>Long Term Surveillance of Renal Cell Carcinoma Recurrence Following Ablation using 2D and 3D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound</title><title>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><description>To evaluate efficacy of using 2D and 3D contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for surveillance of RCC recurrence in patients post-ablation and identify imaging hallmarks of recurrence. 53 patients &gt;8 months post ablation of RCC provided informed consent for this IRB approved study. Patients received 2D and 3D CEUS examinations with Optison (GE Healthcare). Three radiologists of varying CEUS experience described enhancement characteristics, made a diagnosis of recurrence/no-recurrence, and quantified their diagnostic confidence levels. Cases of RCC recurrence showed full ablation cavity enhancement with equal arrival times and intensity compared to the renal cortex. Lack of recurrence was characterized as a complete lack of enhancement within the cavity, or delayed enhancement stemming from the periphery of the ablation cavity. Sensitivity for detecting RCC recurrence was 100% for all readers and specificity was 90%-94%. Reader agreement ranged from 88% to 96%. No significant improvements were achieved with the addition of 3D CEUS, and its inclusion resulted in decreased reader confidence. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound successfully identified all cases of RCC recurrence in this study. Importantly, some patients with complete response to treatment developed delayed enhancement at the periphery of the ablation cavity over time, corresponding to fat necrosis, scarring or granulation tissue within the ablation cavity.</description><subject>Ablation Techniques - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ablation Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Albumins - pharmacology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</subject><subject>Contrast Media - pharmacology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluorocarbons - pharmacology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Kidney - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Ultrasonography - methods</subject><issn>0090-4295</issn><issn>1527-9995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFr3DAQhUVoSbZJfkKLjr14O7Isa3UqYZO0hYVCm5yFLI9TLbKUSnbC_vvK7LbXwjBCw3tvmI-Q9wzWDFj7ab-eU_Tx6bCugW3WIErxM7JiopaVUkq8ISsABVVTK3FB3uW8B4C2beU5ueDAN42SckUOuxie6AOmkf6c0ws6702wSONAf2Awnm7Rl2aSdSGOpgztnBIukvvofXx1xX7TeTO5GOicl299S03oKb-l2ximZPJU3YVfS2xPH_0yiHPor8jbwfiM16f3kjze3z1sv1a771--bW92leWtmCqsLasVCNUpNAPUDZdiQAZKddJK0_VSouCWNS2gZLVsrGj6VpS2YbwZgF-Sj8fc5xR_z5gnPbpscbkT45x1XeIFl2wji1QcpTbFnBMO-jm50aSDZqAX6nqvT9T1Ql2DKMWL78NpxdyN2P9z_cVcBJ-PAiyHvjhMOlu3QOxdQjvpPrr_rPgDyhiWTA</recordid><startdate>201811</startdate><enddate>201811</enddate><creator>Calio, Brian P.</creator><creator>Lyshchik, Andrej</creator><creator>Li, Jingzhi</creator><creator>Stanczak, Maria</creator><creator>Shaw, Collette M.</creator><creator>Adamo, Robert</creator><creator>Liu, Ji-Bin</creator><creator>Forsberg, Flemming</creator><creator>Lallas, Costas D.</creator><creator>Trabulsi, Edouard J.</creator><creator>Eisenbrey, John R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201811</creationdate><title>Long Term Surveillance of Renal Cell Carcinoma Recurrence Following Ablation using 2D and 3D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound</title><author>Calio, Brian P. ; Lyshchik, Andrej ; Li, Jingzhi ; Stanczak, Maria ; Shaw, Collette M. ; Adamo, Robert ; Liu, Ji-Bin ; Forsberg, Flemming ; Lallas, Costas D. ; Trabulsi, Edouard J. ; Eisenbrey, John R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-e2c129059b9eaf024375fe1099b7c7abd77e53c1460e71274c54d6554d8134f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Ablation Techniques - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ablation Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Albumins - pharmacology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery</topic><topic>Contrast Media - pharmacology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluorocarbons - pharmacology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Kidney - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Kidney Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Ultrasonography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calio, Brian P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyshchik, Andrej</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jingzhi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanczak, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Collette M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamo, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ji-Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsberg, Flemming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lallas, Costas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trabulsi, Edouard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eisenbrey, John R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calio, Brian P.</au><au>Lyshchik, Andrej</au><au>Li, Jingzhi</au><au>Stanczak, Maria</au><au>Shaw, Collette M.</au><au>Adamo, Robert</au><au>Liu, Ji-Bin</au><au>Forsberg, Flemming</au><au>Lallas, Costas D.</au><au>Trabulsi, Edouard J.</au><au>Eisenbrey, John R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long Term Surveillance of Renal Cell Carcinoma Recurrence Following Ablation using 2D and 3D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound</atitle><jtitle>Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.)</jtitle><addtitle>Urology</addtitle><date>2018-11</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>121</volume><spage>189</spage><epage>196</epage><pages>189-196</pages><issn>0090-4295</issn><eissn>1527-9995</eissn><abstract>To evaluate efficacy of using 2D and 3D contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for surveillance of RCC recurrence in patients post-ablation and identify imaging hallmarks of recurrence. 53 patients &gt;8 months post ablation of RCC provided informed consent for this IRB approved study. Patients received 2D and 3D CEUS examinations with Optison (GE Healthcare). Three radiologists of varying CEUS experience described enhancement characteristics, made a diagnosis of recurrence/no-recurrence, and quantified their diagnostic confidence levels. Cases of RCC recurrence showed full ablation cavity enhancement with equal arrival times and intensity compared to the renal cortex. Lack of recurrence was characterized as a complete lack of enhancement within the cavity, or delayed enhancement stemming from the periphery of the ablation cavity. Sensitivity for detecting RCC recurrence was 100% for all readers and specificity was 90%-94%. Reader agreement ranged from 88% to 96%. No significant improvements were achieved with the addition of 3D CEUS, and its inclusion resulted in decreased reader confidence. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound successfully identified all cases of RCC recurrence in this study. Importantly, some patients with complete response to treatment developed delayed enhancement at the periphery of the ablation cavity over time, corresponding to fat necrosis, scarring or granulation tissue within the ablation cavity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>30384977</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.urology.2018.05.053</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-4295
ispartof Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), 2018-11, Vol.121, p.189-196
issn 0090-4295
1527-9995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2129537187
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Ablation Techniques - adverse effects
Ablation Techniques - methods
Aged
Albumins - pharmacology
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - pathology
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery
Contrast Media - pharmacology
Female
Fluorocarbons - pharmacology
Humans
Image Enhancement - methods
Kidney - diagnostic imaging
Kidney Neoplasms - pathology
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - diagnosis
Reproducibility of Results
Ultrasonography - methods
title Long Term Surveillance of Renal Cell Carcinoma Recurrence Following Ablation using 2D and 3D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T02%3A06%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long%20Term%20Surveillance%20of%20Renal%20Cell%20Carcinoma%20Recurrence%20Following%20Ablation%20using%202D%20and%203D%20Contrast-Enhanced%20Ultrasound&rft.jtitle=Urology%20(Ridgewood,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Calio,%20Brian%20P.&rft.date=2018-11&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=196&rft.pages=189-196&rft.issn=0090-4295&rft.eissn=1527-9995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.urology.2018.05.053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2129537187%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2129537187&rft_id=info:pmid/30384977&rft_els_id=S009042951830774X&rfr_iscdi=true