Neural adaptations after 4 years vs 12 weeks of resistance training vs untrained

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of resistance training (RT) duration, including years of exposure, on agonist and antagonist neuromuscular activation throughout the knee extension voluntary torque range. Fifty‐seven healthy men (untrained [UNT] n = 29, short‐term RT [12WK] n = 14...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2019-03, Vol.29 (3), p.348-359
Hauptverfasser: Balshaw, Thomas G., Massey, Garry J., Maden‐Wilkinson, Thomas M., Lanza, Marcel B., Folland, Jonathan P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 359
container_issue 3
container_start_page 348
container_title Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports
container_volume 29
creator Balshaw, Thomas G.
Massey, Garry J.
Maden‐Wilkinson, Thomas M.
Lanza, Marcel B.
Folland, Jonathan P.
description The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of resistance training (RT) duration, including years of exposure, on agonist and antagonist neuromuscular activation throughout the knee extension voluntary torque range. Fifty‐seven healthy men (untrained [UNT] n = 29, short‐term RT [12WK] n = 14, and long‐term RT [4YR] n = 14) performed maximum and sub‐maximum (20%‐80% maximum voluntary torque [MVT]) unilateral isometric knee extension contractions with torque, agonist and antagonist surface EMG recorded. Agonist EMG, including at MVT, was corrected for the confounding effects of adiposity (ie, muscle‐electrode distance; measured with ultrasonography). Quadriceps maximum anatomical cross‐sectional area (QACSAMAX; via MRI) was also assessed. MVT was distinct for all three groups (4YR +60/+39% vs UNT/12WK; 12WK +15% vs UNT; 0.001 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/sms.13331
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2129529847</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2177106062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4541-3dcc2585e12c955fa6d1737f406d7f95609df386f4040101113f3c4a8e2c981a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VhS8gATe6mDaZJJPMUoo3qBeorkOcOZGpc6nJjKVvb9qpLgSzCTl8_OT8CJ1SMqbhTHzlx5QxRvfQkCaEREQxtY-GJCUiklSpATryfkEIlSkXh2jACFNhLobo-RE6Z0pscrNsTVs0tcfGtuAwx2swzuMvj2mMVwAfHjcWO_CFb02dAW6dKeqift-Qrt6-ID9GB9aUHk529wi93ly_TO-i2dPt_fRqFmVccBqxPMtioQTQOEuFsCbJqWTScpLk0qYiIWlumUrCgBNKwpbMsowbBcEratgIXfS5S9d8duBbXRU-g7I0NTSd1zGNUxGnistAz__QRdO5OvwuKCkpSUgSB3XZq8w13juweumKyri1pkRvatahZr2tOdizXWL3VkH-K396DWDSg1VRwvr_JD1_mPeR3yDhhHQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2177106062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neural adaptations after 4 years vs 12 weeks of resistance training vs untrained</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Balshaw, Thomas G. ; Massey, Garry J. ; Maden‐Wilkinson, Thomas M. ; Lanza, Marcel B. ; Folland, Jonathan P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Balshaw, Thomas G. ; Massey, Garry J. ; Maden‐Wilkinson, Thomas M. ; Lanza, Marcel B. ; Folland, Jonathan P.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of resistance training (RT) duration, including years of exposure, on agonist and antagonist neuromuscular activation throughout the knee extension voluntary torque range. Fifty‐seven healthy men (untrained [UNT] n = 29, short‐term RT [12WK] n = 14, and long‐term RT [4YR] n = 14) performed maximum and sub‐maximum (20%‐80% maximum voluntary torque [MVT]) unilateral isometric knee extension contractions with torque, agonist and antagonist surface EMG recorded. Agonist EMG, including at MVT, was corrected for the confounding effects of adiposity (ie, muscle‐electrode distance; measured with ultrasonography). Quadriceps maximum anatomical cross‐sectional area (QACSAMAX; via MRI) was also assessed. MVT was distinct for all three groups (4YR +60/+39% vs UNT/12WK; 12WK +15% vs UNT; 0.001 < P ≤ 0.021), and QACSAMAX was greater for 4YR (+50/+42% vs UNT/12WK; [both] P < 0.001). Agonist EMG at MVT was +44/+33% greater for 4YR /12WK ([both] P < 0.001) vs. UNT, but did not differ between RT groups. The torque‐agonist EMG relationship of 4YR displayed a right/down shift with lower agonist EMG at the highest common torque (196 Nm) compared to 12WK and UNT (0.005 ≤ P ≤ 0.013; Effect size [ES] 0.90 ≤ ES ≤ 1.28). The torque‐antagonist EMG relationship displayed a lower slope with increasing RT duration (4YR < 12WK < UNT; 0.001 < P ≤ 0.094; 0.56 ≤ ES ≤ 1.31), and antagonist EMG at the highest common torque was also lower for 4YR than UNT (−69%; P < 0.001; ES = 1.18). In conclusion, 4YR and 12WK had similar agonist activation at MVT and this adaptation may be maximized during early months of RT. In contrast, inter‐muscular coordination, specifically antagonist coactivation was progressively lower, and likely continues to adapt, with prolonged RT.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7188</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0838</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sms.13331</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30387185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>agonist muscle ; antagonist muscle ; Knee ; maximum strength ; Strength training ; surface electromyography</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports, 2019-03, Vol.29 (3), p.348-359</ispartof><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2018 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4541-3dcc2585e12c955fa6d1737f406d7f95609df386f4040101113f3c4a8e2c981a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4541-3dcc2585e12c955fa6d1737f406d7f95609df386f4040101113f3c4a8e2c981a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6935-8228 ; 0000-0002-9898-3070 ; 0000-0003-2961-3882</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsms.13331$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsms.13331$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30387185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Balshaw, Thomas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, Garry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maden‐Wilkinson, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanza, Marcel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folland, Jonathan P.</creatorcontrib><title>Neural adaptations after 4 years vs 12 weeks of resistance training vs untrained</title><title>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</title><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><description><![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of resistance training (RT) duration, including years of exposure, on agonist and antagonist neuromuscular activation throughout the knee extension voluntary torque range. Fifty‐seven healthy men (untrained [UNT] n = 29, short‐term RT [12WK] n = 14, and long‐term RT [4YR] n = 14) performed maximum and sub‐maximum (20%‐80% maximum voluntary torque [MVT]) unilateral isometric knee extension contractions with torque, agonist and antagonist surface EMG recorded. Agonist EMG, including at MVT, was corrected for the confounding effects of adiposity (ie, muscle‐electrode distance; measured with ultrasonography). Quadriceps maximum anatomical cross‐sectional area (QACSAMAX; via MRI) was also assessed. MVT was distinct for all three groups (4YR +60/+39% vs UNT/12WK; 12WK +15% vs UNT; 0.001 < P ≤ 0.021), and QACSAMAX was greater for 4YR (+50/+42% vs UNT/12WK; [both] P < 0.001). Agonist EMG at MVT was +44/+33% greater for 4YR /12WK ([both] P < 0.001) vs. UNT, but did not differ between RT groups. The torque‐agonist EMG relationship of 4YR displayed a right/down shift with lower agonist EMG at the highest common torque (196 Nm) compared to 12WK and UNT (0.005 ≤ P ≤ 0.013; Effect size [ES] 0.90 ≤ ES ≤ 1.28). The torque‐antagonist EMG relationship displayed a lower slope with increasing RT duration (4YR < 12WK < UNT; 0.001 < P ≤ 0.094; 0.56 ≤ ES ≤ 1.31), and antagonist EMG at the highest common torque was also lower for 4YR than UNT (−69%; P < 0.001; ES = 1.18). In conclusion, 4YR and 12WK had similar agonist activation at MVT and this adaptation may be maximized during early months of RT. In contrast, inter‐muscular coordination, specifically antagonist coactivation was progressively lower, and likely continues to adapt, with prolonged RT.]]></description><subject>agonist muscle</subject><subject>antagonist muscle</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>maximum strength</subject><subject>Strength training</subject><subject>surface electromyography</subject><issn>0905-7188</issn><issn>1600-0838</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgiq3VhS8gATe6mDaZJJPMUoo3qBeorkOcOZGpc6nJjKVvb9qpLgSzCTl8_OT8CJ1SMqbhTHzlx5QxRvfQkCaEREQxtY-GJCUiklSpATryfkEIlSkXh2jACFNhLobo-RE6Z0pscrNsTVs0tcfGtuAwx2swzuMvj2mMVwAfHjcWO_CFb02dAW6dKeqift-Qrt6-ID9GB9aUHk529wi93ly_TO-i2dPt_fRqFmVccBqxPMtioQTQOEuFsCbJqWTScpLk0qYiIWlumUrCgBNKwpbMsowbBcEratgIXfS5S9d8duBbXRU-g7I0NTSd1zGNUxGnistAz__QRdO5OvwuKCkpSUgSB3XZq8w13juweumKyri1pkRvatahZr2tOdizXWL3VkH-K396DWDSg1VRwvr_JD1_mPeR3yDhhHQ</recordid><startdate>201903</startdate><enddate>201903</enddate><creator>Balshaw, Thomas G.</creator><creator>Massey, Garry J.</creator><creator>Maden‐Wilkinson, Thomas M.</creator><creator>Lanza, Marcel B.</creator><creator>Folland, Jonathan P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6935-8228</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9898-3070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2961-3882</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201903</creationdate><title>Neural adaptations after 4 years vs 12 weeks of resistance training vs untrained</title><author>Balshaw, Thomas G. ; Massey, Garry J. ; Maden‐Wilkinson, Thomas M. ; Lanza, Marcel B. ; Folland, Jonathan P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4541-3dcc2585e12c955fa6d1737f406d7f95609df386f4040101113f3c4a8e2c981a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>agonist muscle</topic><topic>antagonist muscle</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>maximum strength</topic><topic>Strength training</topic><topic>surface electromyography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Balshaw, Thomas G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Massey, Garry J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maden‐Wilkinson, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanza, Marcel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Folland, Jonathan P.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Balshaw, Thomas G.</au><au>Massey, Garry J.</au><au>Maden‐Wilkinson, Thomas M.</au><au>Lanza, Marcel B.</au><au>Folland, Jonathan P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neural adaptations after 4 years vs 12 weeks of resistance training vs untrained</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of medicine &amp; science in sports</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Med Sci Sports</addtitle><date>2019-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>348</spage><epage>359</epage><pages>348-359</pages><issn>0905-7188</issn><eissn>1600-0838</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of resistance training (RT) duration, including years of exposure, on agonist and antagonist neuromuscular activation throughout the knee extension voluntary torque range. Fifty‐seven healthy men (untrained [UNT] n = 29, short‐term RT [12WK] n = 14, and long‐term RT [4YR] n = 14) performed maximum and sub‐maximum (20%‐80% maximum voluntary torque [MVT]) unilateral isometric knee extension contractions with torque, agonist and antagonist surface EMG recorded. Agonist EMG, including at MVT, was corrected for the confounding effects of adiposity (ie, muscle‐electrode distance; measured with ultrasonography). Quadriceps maximum anatomical cross‐sectional area (QACSAMAX; via MRI) was also assessed. MVT was distinct for all three groups (4YR +60/+39% vs UNT/12WK; 12WK +15% vs UNT; 0.001 < P ≤ 0.021), and QACSAMAX was greater for 4YR (+50/+42% vs UNT/12WK; [both] P < 0.001). Agonist EMG at MVT was +44/+33% greater for 4YR /12WK ([both] P < 0.001) vs. UNT, but did not differ between RT groups. The torque‐agonist EMG relationship of 4YR displayed a right/down shift with lower agonist EMG at the highest common torque (196 Nm) compared to 12WK and UNT (0.005 ≤ P ≤ 0.013; Effect size [ES] 0.90 ≤ ES ≤ 1.28). The torque‐antagonist EMG relationship displayed a lower slope with increasing RT duration (4YR < 12WK < UNT; 0.001 < P ≤ 0.094; 0.56 ≤ ES ≤ 1.31), and antagonist EMG at the highest common torque was also lower for 4YR than UNT (−69%; P < 0.001; ES = 1.18). In conclusion, 4YR and 12WK had similar agonist activation at MVT and this adaptation may be maximized during early months of RT. In contrast, inter‐muscular coordination, specifically antagonist coactivation was progressively lower, and likely continues to adapt, with prolonged RT.]]></abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>30387185</pmid><doi>10.1111/sms.13331</doi><tpages>0</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6935-8228</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9898-3070</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2961-3882</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7188
ispartof Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports, 2019-03, Vol.29 (3), p.348-359
issn 0905-7188
1600-0838
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2129529847
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects agonist muscle
antagonist muscle
Knee
maximum strength
Strength training
surface electromyography
title Neural adaptations after 4 years vs 12 weeks of resistance training vs untrained
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A09%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neural%20adaptations%20after%204%20years%20vs%2012%20weeks%20of%20resistance%20training%20vs%20untrained&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20medicine%20&%20science%20in%20sports&rft.au=Balshaw,%20Thomas%20G.&rft.date=2019-03&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=348&rft.epage=359&rft.pages=348-359&rft.issn=0905-7188&rft.eissn=1600-0838&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sms.13331&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2177106062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2177106062&rft_id=info:pmid/30387185&rfr_iscdi=true