Crop Genotype and Plant Population Density Impact Flowering Phenology and Synchrony between Cropped and Volunteer Spring Wheat
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of many crops into which novel traits have been incorporated using recombinant DNA technology, and thus may require segregation from nontransgenic wheat. Volunteer wheat populations, which cannot be selectively removed from wheat crops, pose a challenge to segrega...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy journal 2009-11, Vol.101 (6), p.1311-1321 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1321 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1311 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Willenborg, Christian J Luschei, Ed C Brûlé-Babel, Anita L Van Acker, Rene C |
description | Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of many crops into which novel traits have been incorporated using recombinant DNA technology, and thus may require segregation from nontransgenic wheat. Volunteer wheat populations, which cannot be selectively removed from wheat crops, pose a challenge to segregation because they may serve to facilitate trait movement. However, diverse flowering phenologies among wheat genotypes planted at various densities may result in flowering asynchrony, thus minimizing pollen-mediated gene flow (PMGF). We tested this theory with a comparative analysis that examined the influence of crop plant population density, genotype, and height on flowering phenology and synchrony between volunteer and cropped wheat populations. We found that time from crop sowing to first flower, peak flowering, and flowering cessation varied significantly among genotypes. Increasing crop plant population density resulted in accelerated crop flowering for all genotypes, but had little effect on flowering synchrony. Although not always significant, the time interval from sowing to 5, 50, and 95% flowering, as well as the flowering duration of the volunteer population, were also greater at low crop plant population densities. Synchronicity of flowering varied among genotypes, with tall genotypes consistently exhibiting more flowering synchrony with volunteer wheat than short genotypes. However, the response of flowering synchrony to height may have been a product of the genotypes tested and further study to confirm these results is needed. The results of this study suggest that, despite a short flowering period, there is considerable potential for flowering synchrony between cropped and volunteer wheat populations. Nevertheless, opportunity exists to reduce flowering synchrony between cropped and volunteer wheat populations by utilizing genotypic variation for flowering phenology to minimize flowering overlap, provided that an adequate crop plant population density is attained. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj2009.0137 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21295280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2040388581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4457-ccfd2580d7a9d2a9e7fced27f9d3ca637845f790e08c1e28c43395a6078935683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2P0zAQxSMEEmXhzBELCW7Z9Wccn1BV2LKrFVtRFo6RcSZtqtTO2o6qXPjbcdoKJC6cLHl-770ZvSx7TfAlJYxf6Y13dkcxVpeYMPkkmxHORI4LLp5mM4wxzYkq6PPsRQg7jAlRnMyyXwvverQE6-LYA9K2RqtO24hWrh86HVtn0UewoY0jutn32kR03bkD-NZu0GqbdJ3bjEfderRmm3YY0U-IBwCLJu8e6uP0u-sGGwE8WvdH8Y8t6Pgye9boLsCr83uRPVx_-rb4nN_dL28W87vccC5kbkxTU1HiWmpVU61ANgZqKhtVM6MLJksuGqkw4NIQoKXhjCmhCyxLxURRsovs_cm39-5xgBCrfRsMdOlUcEOoKKFK0BIn8O0_4M4N3qbdKkY4LhgrZIKuTpDxLgQPTZVO2ms_VgRXUxnV3zKqqYykeHe21cHorvHamjb8kdGUj3lBEvfhxB3aDsb_2Vbz5S2dL7_ef7md_s5Jb04OjXYTn1Ie1jSNMJEpQgj2G-9JqEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>314063367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Crop Genotype and Plant Population Density Impact Flowering Phenology and Synchrony between Cropped and Volunteer Spring Wheat</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Willenborg, Christian J ; Luschei, Ed C ; Brûlé-Babel, Anita L ; Van Acker, Rene C</creator><creatorcontrib>Willenborg, Christian J ; Luschei, Ed C ; Brûlé-Babel, Anita L ; Van Acker, Rene C</creatorcontrib><description>Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of many crops into which novel traits have been incorporated using recombinant DNA technology, and thus may require segregation from nontransgenic wheat. Volunteer wheat populations, which cannot be selectively removed from wheat crops, pose a challenge to segregation because they may serve to facilitate trait movement. However, diverse flowering phenologies among wheat genotypes planted at various densities may result in flowering asynchrony, thus minimizing pollen-mediated gene flow (PMGF). We tested this theory with a comparative analysis that examined the influence of crop plant population density, genotype, and height on flowering phenology and synchrony between volunteer and cropped wheat populations. We found that time from crop sowing to first flower, peak flowering, and flowering cessation varied significantly among genotypes. Increasing crop plant population density resulted in accelerated crop flowering for all genotypes, but had little effect on flowering synchrony. Although not always significant, the time interval from sowing to 5, 50, and 95% flowering, as well as the flowering duration of the volunteer population, were also greater at low crop plant population densities. Synchronicity of flowering varied among genotypes, with tall genotypes consistently exhibiting more flowering synchrony with volunteer wheat than short genotypes. However, the response of flowering synchrony to height may have been a product of the genotypes tested and further study to confirm these results is needed. The results of this study suggest that, despite a short flowering period, there is considerable potential for flowering synchrony between cropped and volunteer wheat populations. Nevertheless, opportunity exists to reduce flowering synchrony between cropped and volunteer wheat populations by utilizing genotypic variation for flowering phenology to minimize flowering overlap, provided that an adequate crop plant population density is attained.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2009.0137</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; flowering ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; gene flow ; Generalities. Genetics. Plant material ; Genetic resources, diversity ; genetic variation ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; genotype ; phenology ; plant density ; plant growth ; Plant material ; Plant populations ; Planting density ; pollen ; pollination ; Population density ; Spring wheat ; transgenic plants ; Triticum aestivum ; volunteer crops</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2009-11, Vol.101 (6), p.1311-1321</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Nov/Dec 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4457-ccfd2580d7a9d2a9e7fced27f9d3ca637845f790e08c1e28c43395a6078935683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4457-ccfd2580d7a9d2a9e7fced27f9d3ca637845f790e08c1e28c43395a6078935683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2009.0137$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2009.0137$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=22120461$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Willenborg, Christian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luschei, Ed C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brûlé-Babel, Anita L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Acker, Rene C</creatorcontrib><title>Crop Genotype and Plant Population Density Impact Flowering Phenology and Synchrony between Cropped and Volunteer Spring Wheat</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of many crops into which novel traits have been incorporated using recombinant DNA technology, and thus may require segregation from nontransgenic wheat. Volunteer wheat populations, which cannot be selectively removed from wheat crops, pose a challenge to segregation because they may serve to facilitate trait movement. However, diverse flowering phenologies among wheat genotypes planted at various densities may result in flowering asynchrony, thus minimizing pollen-mediated gene flow (PMGF). We tested this theory with a comparative analysis that examined the influence of crop plant population density, genotype, and height on flowering phenology and synchrony between volunteer and cropped wheat populations. We found that time from crop sowing to first flower, peak flowering, and flowering cessation varied significantly among genotypes. Increasing crop plant population density resulted in accelerated crop flowering for all genotypes, but had little effect on flowering synchrony. Although not always significant, the time interval from sowing to 5, 50, and 95% flowering, as well as the flowering duration of the volunteer population, were also greater at low crop plant population densities. Synchronicity of flowering varied among genotypes, with tall genotypes consistently exhibiting more flowering synchrony with volunteer wheat than short genotypes. However, the response of flowering synchrony to height may have been a product of the genotypes tested and further study to confirm these results is needed. The results of this study suggest that, despite a short flowering period, there is considerable potential for flowering synchrony between cropped and volunteer wheat populations. Nevertheless, opportunity exists to reduce flowering synchrony between cropped and volunteer wheat populations by utilizing genotypic variation for flowering phenology to minimize flowering overlap, provided that an adequate crop plant population density is attained.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>flowering</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>gene flow</subject><subject>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</subject><subject>Genetic resources, diversity</subject><subject>genetic variation</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>phenology</subject><subject>plant density</subject><subject>plant growth</subject><subject>Plant material</subject><subject>Plant populations</subject><subject>Planting density</subject><subject>pollen</subject><subject>pollination</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Spring wheat</subject><subject>transgenic plants</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>volunteer crops</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc2P0zAQxSMEEmXhzBELCW7Z9Wccn1BV2LKrFVtRFo6RcSZtqtTO2o6qXPjbcdoKJC6cLHl-770ZvSx7TfAlJYxf6Y13dkcxVpeYMPkkmxHORI4LLp5mM4wxzYkq6PPsRQg7jAlRnMyyXwvverQE6-LYA9K2RqtO24hWrh86HVtn0UewoY0jutn32kR03bkD-NZu0GqbdJ3bjEfderRmm3YY0U-IBwCLJu8e6uP0u-sGGwE8WvdH8Y8t6Pgye9boLsCr83uRPVx_-rb4nN_dL28W87vccC5kbkxTU1HiWmpVU61ANgZqKhtVM6MLJksuGqkw4NIQoKXhjCmhCyxLxURRsovs_cm39-5xgBCrfRsMdOlUcEOoKKFK0BIn8O0_4M4N3qbdKkY4LhgrZIKuTpDxLgQPTZVO2ms_VgRXUxnV3zKqqYykeHe21cHorvHamjb8kdGUj3lBEvfhxB3aDsb_2Vbz5S2dL7_ef7md_s5Jb04OjXYTn1Ie1jSNMJEpQgj2G-9JqEo</recordid><startdate>200911</startdate><enddate>200911</enddate><creator>Willenborg, Christian J</creator><creator>Luschei, Ed C</creator><creator>Brûlé-Babel, Anita L</creator><creator>Van Acker, Rene C</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200911</creationdate><title>Crop Genotype and Plant Population Density Impact Flowering Phenology and Synchrony between Cropped and Volunteer Spring Wheat</title><author>Willenborg, Christian J ; Luschei, Ed C ; Brûlé-Babel, Anita L ; Van Acker, Rene C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4457-ccfd2580d7a9d2a9e7fced27f9d3ca637845f790e08c1e28c43395a6078935683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>flowering</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>gene flow</topic><topic>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</topic><topic>Genetic resources, diversity</topic><topic>genetic variation</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>phenology</topic><topic>plant density</topic><topic>plant growth</topic><topic>Plant material</topic><topic>Plant populations</topic><topic>Planting density</topic><topic>pollen</topic><topic>pollination</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Spring wheat</topic><topic>transgenic plants</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>volunteer crops</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Willenborg, Christian J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luschei, Ed C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brûlé-Babel, Anita L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Acker, Rene C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Willenborg, Christian J</au><au>Luschei, Ed C</au><au>Brûlé-Babel, Anita L</au><au>Van Acker, Rene C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Crop Genotype and Plant Population Density Impact Flowering Phenology and Synchrony between Cropped and Volunteer Spring Wheat</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2009-11</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1311</spage><epage>1321</epage><pages>1311-1321</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) is one of many crops into which novel traits have been incorporated using recombinant DNA technology, and thus may require segregation from nontransgenic wheat. Volunteer wheat populations, which cannot be selectively removed from wheat crops, pose a challenge to segregation because they may serve to facilitate trait movement. However, diverse flowering phenologies among wheat genotypes planted at various densities may result in flowering asynchrony, thus minimizing pollen-mediated gene flow (PMGF). We tested this theory with a comparative analysis that examined the influence of crop plant population density, genotype, and height on flowering phenology and synchrony between volunteer and cropped wheat populations. We found that time from crop sowing to first flower, peak flowering, and flowering cessation varied significantly among genotypes. Increasing crop plant population density resulted in accelerated crop flowering for all genotypes, but had little effect on flowering synchrony. Although not always significant, the time interval from sowing to 5, 50, and 95% flowering, as well as the flowering duration of the volunteer population, were also greater at low crop plant population densities. Synchronicity of flowering varied among genotypes, with tall genotypes consistently exhibiting more flowering synchrony with volunteer wheat than short genotypes. However, the response of flowering synchrony to height may have been a product of the genotypes tested and further study to confirm these results is needed. The results of this study suggest that, despite a short flowering period, there is considerable potential for flowering synchrony between cropped and volunteer wheat populations. Nevertheless, opportunity exists to reduce flowering synchrony between cropped and volunteer wheat populations by utilizing genotypic variation for flowering phenology to minimize flowering overlap, provided that an adequate crop plant population density is attained.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2009.0137</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 2009-11, Vol.101 (6), p.1311-1321 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21295280 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences flowering Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology gene flow Generalities. Genetics. Plant material Genetic resources, diversity genetic variation Genetics and breeding of economic plants genotype phenology plant density plant growth Plant material Plant populations Planting density pollen pollination Population density Spring wheat transgenic plants Triticum aestivum volunteer crops |
title | Crop Genotype and Plant Population Density Impact Flowering Phenology and Synchrony between Cropped and Volunteer Spring Wheat |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T18%3A14%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Crop%20Genotype%20and%20Plant%20Population%20Density%20Impact%20Flowering%20Phenology%20and%20Synchrony%20between%20Cropped%20and%20Volunteer%20Spring%20Wheat&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Willenborg,%20Christian%20J&rft.date=2009-11&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1311&rft.epage=1321&rft.pages=1311-1321&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2009.0137&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2040388581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=314063367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |