Evidence that Diaporthe toxica infection of Lupinus albus is an emerging concern for the Australian lupin industry

Lupinus albus has been grown commercially in Australia since the 1970s and has long been regarded as resistant to phomopsis caused by Diaporthe toxica . Isolates capable of infecting L. albus were collected following an outbreak of phomopsis in 2004 in southern New South Wales. Glasshouse screening...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australasian plant pathology 2010-01, Vol.39 (2), p.146-153
Hauptverfasser: Cowley, R. B., Ash, G. J., Harper, J. D. I., Luckett, D. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 153
container_issue 2
container_start_page 146
container_title Australasian plant pathology
container_volume 39
creator Cowley, R. B.
Ash, G. J.
Harper, J. D. I.
Luckett, D. J.
description Lupinus albus has been grown commercially in Australia since the 1970s and has long been regarded as resistant to phomopsis caused by Diaporthe toxica . Isolates capable of infecting L. albus were collected following an outbreak of phomopsis in 2004 in southern New South Wales. Glasshouse screening of L. albus cultivars with the pathogen revealed that genotypes differ in their response to D. toxica with some current cultivars having useful resistances. Several breeding lines and old cultivars were susceptible in either vegetative or reproductive tissue or both. The commonly grown commercial cultivar Kiev Mutant was moderately susceptible in all tissues assessed. A principle component analysis gave weak to moderate correlation ( r = 0.14 to r = 0.54, depending on the two-way comparison) between vegetative and reproductive tissue, which is suggestive that resistance in different tissues may be under distinct genetic control. The germination of infected seed from the outbreak in 2004 was severely compromised, and much of the seed harboured the pathogen. A survey of 171 commercial seed samples from 2004 to 2006 showed that phomopsis discoloured seed was present in only 20 samples, all of them confined to southern New South Wales. While the pathogen presents a risk to L. albus cropping zones in southern New South Wales, it is not widely spread at this stage. However, vigilance is required to prevent infected seed from being sown so that the disease can be kept in check.
doi_str_mv 10.1071/AP09067
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21295243</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2668585031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f77f2fafa9619266e4800aa11f99bb88f58bf07f504ddea097cceb9c4600e54c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kclOwzAQQC0EEqUgfoCDJSTgEhg7iZMcq1IWqRIc4Bw5jt26Su1gJ4j-PY5aFnHg4mX8_EYzg9ApgWsCGbmZPEMBLNtDI5IkecQgpvtoBCRlERQZPURH3q8ASMJiGCE3e9e1NELibsk7fKt5a123DFf7oQXH2igpOm0NtgrP-1ab3mPeVGHV4WCwXEu30GaBhQ0WZ7CyDg-CSe87xxsdmGb4F1T1ENocowPFGy9PdvsYvd7NXqYP0fzp_nE6mUcizkgXqSxTVHHFC0YKyphMcgDOCVFFUVV5rtK8UpCpFJK6ljzUJoSsCpEwAJkmIh6ji623dfatl74r19oL2TTcSNv7khJapDSJA3j1L0iAQp7SPGUBPf-DrmzvTCgjUKHFJPQ-DdTllhLOeu-kKlun19xtAlQOQyp3Q_pJ7QNhFtL99v1Fz3ZSr539Nn49fwKiHpro</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1015610905</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evidence that Diaporthe toxica infection of Lupinus albus is an emerging concern for the Australian lupin industry</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Cowley, R. B. ; Ash, G. J. ; Harper, J. D. I. ; Luckett, D. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cowley, R. B. ; Ash, G. J. ; Harper, J. D. I. ; Luckett, D. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Lupinus albus has been grown commercially in Australia since the 1970s and has long been regarded as resistant to phomopsis caused by Diaporthe toxica . Isolates capable of infecting L. albus were collected following an outbreak of phomopsis in 2004 in southern New South Wales. Glasshouse screening of L. albus cultivars with the pathogen revealed that genotypes differ in their response to D. toxica with some current cultivars having useful resistances. Several breeding lines and old cultivars were susceptible in either vegetative or reproductive tissue or both. The commonly grown commercial cultivar Kiev Mutant was moderately susceptible in all tissues assessed. A principle component analysis gave weak to moderate correlation ( r = 0.14 to r = 0.54, depending on the two-way comparison) between vegetative and reproductive tissue, which is suggestive that resistance in different tissues may be under distinct genetic control. The germination of infected seed from the outbreak in 2004 was severely compromised, and much of the seed harboured the pathogen. A survey of 171 commercial seed samples from 2004 to 2006 showed that phomopsis discoloured seed was present in only 20 samples, all of them confined to southern New South Wales. While the pathogen presents a risk to L. albus cropping zones in southern New South Wales, it is not widely spread at this stage. However, vigilance is required to prevent infected seed from being sown so that the disease can be kept in check.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0156-0972</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0815-3191</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1448-6032</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/AP09067</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Diaporthe ; Ecology ; Entomology ; Life Sciences ; Lupinus albus ; Phomopsis ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Sciences</subject><ispartof>Australasian plant pathology, 2010-01, Vol.39 (2), p.146-153</ispartof><rights>Australasian Plant Pathology Society 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f77f2fafa9619266e4800aa11f99bb88f58bf07f504ddea097cceb9c4600e54c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f77f2fafa9619266e4800aa11f99bb88f58bf07f504ddea097cceb9c4600e54c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1071/AP09067$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1071/AP09067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cowley, R. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ash, G. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, J. D. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luckett, D. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Evidence that Diaporthe toxica infection of Lupinus albus is an emerging concern for the Australian lupin industry</title><title>Australasian plant pathology</title><addtitle>Australasian Plant Pathol</addtitle><description>Lupinus albus has been grown commercially in Australia since the 1970s and has long been regarded as resistant to phomopsis caused by Diaporthe toxica . Isolates capable of infecting L. albus were collected following an outbreak of phomopsis in 2004 in southern New South Wales. Glasshouse screening of L. albus cultivars with the pathogen revealed that genotypes differ in their response to D. toxica with some current cultivars having useful resistances. Several breeding lines and old cultivars were susceptible in either vegetative or reproductive tissue or both. The commonly grown commercial cultivar Kiev Mutant was moderately susceptible in all tissues assessed. A principle component analysis gave weak to moderate correlation ( r = 0.14 to r = 0.54, depending on the two-way comparison) between vegetative and reproductive tissue, which is suggestive that resistance in different tissues may be under distinct genetic control. The germination of infected seed from the outbreak in 2004 was severely compromised, and much of the seed harboured the pathogen. A survey of 171 commercial seed samples from 2004 to 2006 showed that phomopsis discoloured seed was present in only 20 samples, all of them confined to southern New South Wales. While the pathogen presents a risk to L. albus cropping zones in southern New South Wales, it is not widely spread at this stage. However, vigilance is required to prevent infected seed from being sown so that the disease can be kept in check.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Diaporthe</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lupinus albus</subject><subject>Phomopsis</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><issn>0156-0972</issn><issn>0815-3191</issn><issn>1448-6032</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kclOwzAQQC0EEqUgfoCDJSTgEhg7iZMcq1IWqRIc4Bw5jt26Su1gJ4j-PY5aFnHg4mX8_EYzg9ApgWsCGbmZPEMBLNtDI5IkecQgpvtoBCRlERQZPURH3q8ASMJiGCE3e9e1NELibsk7fKt5a123DFf7oQXH2igpOm0NtgrP-1ab3mPeVGHV4WCwXEu30GaBhQ0WZ7CyDg-CSe87xxsdmGb4F1T1ENocowPFGy9PdvsYvd7NXqYP0fzp_nE6mUcizkgXqSxTVHHFC0YKyphMcgDOCVFFUVV5rtK8UpCpFJK6ljzUJoSsCpEwAJkmIh6ji623dfatl74r19oL2TTcSNv7khJapDSJA3j1L0iAQp7SPGUBPf-DrmzvTCgjUKHFJPQ-DdTllhLOeu-kKlun19xtAlQOQyp3Q_pJ7QNhFtL99v1Fz3ZSr539Nn49fwKiHpro</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Cowley, R. B.</creator><creator>Ash, G. J.</creator><creator>Harper, J. D. I.</creator><creator>Luckett, D. J.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>Evidence that Diaporthe toxica infection of Lupinus albus is an emerging concern for the Australian lupin industry</title><author>Cowley, R. B. ; Ash, G. J. ; Harper, J. D. I. ; Luckett, D. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-f77f2fafa9619266e4800aa11f99bb88f58bf07f504ddea097cceb9c4600e54c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Diaporthe</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lupinus albus</topic><topic>Phomopsis</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cowley, R. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ash, G. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harper, J. D. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luckett, D. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Australasian plant pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cowley, R. B.</au><au>Ash, G. J.</au><au>Harper, J. D. I.</au><au>Luckett, D. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evidence that Diaporthe toxica infection of Lupinus albus is an emerging concern for the Australian lupin industry</atitle><jtitle>Australasian plant pathology</jtitle><stitle>Australasian Plant Pathol</stitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>146</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>146-153</pages><issn>0156-0972</issn><issn>0815-3191</issn><eissn>1448-6032</eissn><abstract>Lupinus albus has been grown commercially in Australia since the 1970s and has long been regarded as resistant to phomopsis caused by Diaporthe toxica . Isolates capable of infecting L. albus were collected following an outbreak of phomopsis in 2004 in southern New South Wales. Glasshouse screening of L. albus cultivars with the pathogen revealed that genotypes differ in their response to D. toxica with some current cultivars having useful resistances. Several breeding lines and old cultivars were susceptible in either vegetative or reproductive tissue or both. The commonly grown commercial cultivar Kiev Mutant was moderately susceptible in all tissues assessed. A principle component analysis gave weak to moderate correlation ( r = 0.14 to r = 0.54, depending on the two-way comparison) between vegetative and reproductive tissue, which is suggestive that resistance in different tissues may be under distinct genetic control. The germination of infected seed from the outbreak in 2004 was severely compromised, and much of the seed harboured the pathogen. A survey of 171 commercial seed samples from 2004 to 2006 showed that phomopsis discoloured seed was present in only 20 samples, all of them confined to southern New South Wales. While the pathogen presents a risk to L. albus cropping zones in southern New South Wales, it is not widely spread at this stage. However, vigilance is required to prevent infected seed from being sown so that the disease can be kept in check.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1071/AP09067</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0156-0972
ispartof Australasian plant pathology, 2010-01, Vol.39 (2), p.146-153
issn 0156-0972
0815-3191
1448-6032
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21295243
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agriculture
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Diaporthe
Ecology
Entomology
Life Sciences
Lupinus albus
Phomopsis
Plant Pathology
Plant Sciences
title Evidence that Diaporthe toxica infection of Lupinus albus is an emerging concern for the Australian lupin industry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A46%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evidence%20that%20Diaporthe%20toxica%20infection%20of%20Lupinus%20albus%20is%20an%20emerging%20concern%20for%20the%20Australian%20lupin%20industry&rft.jtitle=Australasian%20plant%20pathology&rft.au=Cowley,%20R.%20B.&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=146&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=146-153&rft.issn=0156-0972&rft.eissn=1448-6032&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/AP09067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2668585031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1015610905&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true