Development and psychometric testing of the Physical Examination Attitudes and Practices Scale
Aim To develop and test a scale that assesses the attitudes and practices of registered nurses toward physical examination (PE) in of (delete) the clinical settings. Methods A cross‐sectional methodological design with a convenience sample of 277 registered nurses was used. A Likert‐type scale was c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Nursing forum (Hillsdale) 2019-01, Vol.54 (1), p.111-120 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 120 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 111 |
| container_title | Nursing forum (Hillsdale) |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Gharaibeh, Besher Al‐Smadi, Ahmed Mohammad Ashour, Ala’ Slater, Paul |
| description | Aim
To develop and test a scale that assesses the attitudes and practices of registered nurses toward physical examination (PE) in of (delete) the clinical settings.
Methods
A cross‐sectional methodological design with a convenience sample of 277 registered nurses was used. A Likert‐type scale was constructed using 55 Likert‐type items that were extracted from the relevant literature. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted using varimax rotation. Factor loading, eigenvalues, and screeplots were used to determine the best fit model.
Results
The final version of the scale consisted of four factors. The determinant score was (0.001) and the total variance explained was 56.26%. All of those four factors had eigenvalue more than 1. The final version of the scale (the 20‐item scale) was tested for reliability and was internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.833). The scale was supported for its validity.
Conclusion
The final version of the scale can be used to determine nurses’ perspective and use of PE, and assist in bridging the gap between what is taught and what is practices regarding PE. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nuf.12304 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2127946123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2177901758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3944-51e83678bd715b57a2f4a4a45a900c8bab848c2b3f72e27ddcf31ec2a68aa0613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1OwzAQhC0EoqVw4AVQJC5c0vovsXOsSgtIFVSCXokcx6GuEifEDpC3x7SFA7sHe-VvrdEMAJcIjpGviemKMcIE0iMwRIzSMEYJPwZDCHESxpSRATizdgt9EcZPwYBAwiGiaAheb9WHKuumUsYFwuRBY3u5qSvlWi0Dp6zT5i2oi8BtVLDa9FZLUQbzL1FpI5yuTTB1TrsuV3a3vmqFdFr66dmD6hycFKK06uJwjsB6MX-Z3YfLp7uH2XQZSpJ4vRFSnMSMZzlDURYxgQsqfEcigVDyTGSccokzUjCsMMtzWRCkJBYxFwLGiIzAzf7fpq3fO686rbSVqiyFUXVnU4wwS2jsTfLo9T90W3et8eo8xVgCEYu4p64OVJdVKk-bVlei7dNf5zww2QOfulT93zuC6U8kqY8k3UWSPq4Xuwv5Bv6efac</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2177901758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Development and psychometric testing of the Physical Examination Attitudes and Practices Scale</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Gharaibeh, Besher ; Al‐Smadi, Ahmed Mohammad ; Ashour, Ala’ ; Slater, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Gharaibeh, Besher ; Al‐Smadi, Ahmed Mohammad ; Ashour, Ala’ ; Slater, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To develop and test a scale that assesses the attitudes and practices of registered nurses toward physical examination (PE) in of (delete) the clinical settings.
Methods
A cross‐sectional methodological design with a convenience sample of 277 registered nurses was used. A Likert‐type scale was constructed using 55 Likert‐type items that were extracted from the relevant literature. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted using varimax rotation. Factor loading, eigenvalues, and screeplots were used to determine the best fit model.
Results
The final version of the scale consisted of four factors. The determinant score was (0.001) and the total variance explained was 56.26%. All of those four factors had eigenvalue more than 1. The final version of the scale (the 20‐item scale) was tested for reliability and was internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.833). The scale was supported for its validity.
Conclusion
The final version of the scale can be used to determine nurses’ perspective and use of PE, and assist in bridging the gap between what is taught and what is practices regarding PE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-6473</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-6198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12304</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30380141</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; barriers to physical examination ; Best practice ; Cronbach's alpha ; Exploratory factor analysis ; factor analysis ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; physical examination ; Physical examinations ; practices ; Quantitative psychology ; Questionnaires ; registered nurses ; Reliability ; Rotation</subject><ispartof>Nursing forum (Hillsdale), 2019-01, Vol.54 (1), p.111-120</ispartof><rights>2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3944-51e83678bd715b57a2f4a4a45a900c8bab848c2b3f72e27ddcf31ec2a68aa0613</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-1886-2568</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fnuf.12304$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fnuf.12304$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,30978,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30380141$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gharaibeh, Besher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Smadi, Ahmed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashour, Ala’</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Development and psychometric testing of the Physical Examination Attitudes and Practices Scale</title><title>Nursing forum (Hillsdale)</title><addtitle>Nurs Forum</addtitle><description>Aim
To develop and test a scale that assesses the attitudes and practices of registered nurses toward physical examination (PE) in of (delete) the clinical settings.
Methods
A cross‐sectional methodological design with a convenience sample of 277 registered nurses was used. A Likert‐type scale was constructed using 55 Likert‐type items that were extracted from the relevant literature. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted using varimax rotation. Factor loading, eigenvalues, and screeplots were used to determine the best fit model.
Results
The final version of the scale consisted of four factors. The determinant score was (0.001) and the total variance explained was 56.26%. All of those four factors had eigenvalue more than 1. The final version of the scale (the 20‐item scale) was tested for reliability and was internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.833). The scale was supported for its validity.
Conclusion
The final version of the scale can be used to determine nurses’ perspective and use of PE, and assist in bridging the gap between what is taught and what is practices regarding PE.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>barriers to physical examination</subject><subject>Best practice</subject><subject>Cronbach's alpha</subject><subject>Exploratory factor analysis</subject><subject>factor analysis</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>physical examination</subject><subject>Physical examinations</subject><subject>practices</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>registered nurses</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><issn>0029-6473</issn><issn>1744-6198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1OwzAQhC0EoqVw4AVQJC5c0vovsXOsSgtIFVSCXokcx6GuEifEDpC3x7SFA7sHe-VvrdEMAJcIjpGviemKMcIE0iMwRIzSMEYJPwZDCHESxpSRATizdgt9EcZPwYBAwiGiaAheb9WHKuumUsYFwuRBY3u5qSvlWi0Dp6zT5i2oi8BtVLDa9FZLUQbzL1FpI5yuTTB1TrsuV3a3vmqFdFr66dmD6hycFKK06uJwjsB6MX-Z3YfLp7uH2XQZSpJ4vRFSnMSMZzlDURYxgQsqfEcigVDyTGSccokzUjCsMMtzWRCkJBYxFwLGiIzAzf7fpq3fO686rbSVqiyFUXVnU4wwS2jsTfLo9T90W3et8eo8xVgCEYu4p64OVJdVKk-bVlei7dNf5zww2QOfulT93zuC6U8kqY8k3UWSPq4Xuwv5Bv6efac</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Gharaibeh, Besher</creator><creator>Al‐Smadi, Ahmed Mohammad</creator><creator>Ashour, Ala’</creator><creator>Slater, Paul</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1886-2568</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Development and psychometric testing of the Physical Examination Attitudes and Practices Scale</title><author>Gharaibeh, Besher ; Al‐Smadi, Ahmed Mohammad ; Ashour, Ala’ ; Slater, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3944-51e83678bd715b57a2f4a4a45a900c8bab848c2b3f72e27ddcf31ec2a68aa0613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>barriers to physical examination</topic><topic>Best practice</topic><topic>Cronbach's alpha</topic><topic>Exploratory factor analysis</topic><topic>factor analysis</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>physical examination</topic><topic>Physical examinations</topic><topic>practices</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>registered nurses</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gharaibeh, Besher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al‐Smadi, Ahmed Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ashour, Ala’</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nursing forum (Hillsdale)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gharaibeh, Besher</au><au>Al‐Smadi, Ahmed Mohammad</au><au>Ashour, Ala’</au><au>Slater, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Development and psychometric testing of the Physical Examination Attitudes and Practices Scale</atitle><jtitle>Nursing forum (Hillsdale)</jtitle><addtitle>Nurs Forum</addtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>111</spage><epage>120</epage><pages>111-120</pages><issn>0029-6473</issn><eissn>1744-6198</eissn><abstract>Aim
To develop and test a scale that assesses the attitudes and practices of registered nurses toward physical examination (PE) in of (delete) the clinical settings.
Methods
A cross‐sectional methodological design with a convenience sample of 277 registered nurses was used. A Likert‐type scale was constructed using 55 Likert‐type items that were extracted from the relevant literature. Exploratory factor analyses were conducted using varimax rotation. Factor loading, eigenvalues, and screeplots were used to determine the best fit model.
Results
The final version of the scale consisted of four factors. The determinant score was (0.001) and the total variance explained was 56.26%. All of those four factors had eigenvalue more than 1. The final version of the scale (the 20‐item scale) was tested for reliability and was internally consistent (Cronbach's α = 0.833). The scale was supported for its validity.
Conclusion
The final version of the scale can be used to determine nurses’ perspective and use of PE, and assist in bridging the gap between what is taught and what is practices regarding PE.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>30380141</pmid><doi>10.1111/nuf.12304</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1886-2568</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0029-6473 |
| ispartof | Nursing forum (Hillsdale), 2019-01, Vol.54 (1), p.111-120 |
| issn | 0029-6473 1744-6198 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2127946123 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Attitudes barriers to physical examination Best practice Cronbach's alpha Exploratory factor analysis factor analysis Nurses Nursing Nursing care physical examination Physical examinations practices Quantitative psychology Questionnaires registered nurses Reliability Rotation |
| title | Development and psychometric testing of the Physical Examination Attitudes and Practices Scale |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T05%3A09%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Development%20and%20psychometric%20testing%20of%20the%20Physical%20Examination%20Attitudes%20and%20Practices%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Nursing%20forum%20(Hillsdale)&rft.au=Gharaibeh,%20Besher&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=111&rft.epage=120&rft.pages=111-120&rft.issn=0029-6473&rft.eissn=1744-6198&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nuf.12304&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2177901758%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2177901758&rft_id=info:pmid/30380141&rfr_iscdi=true |