Humic substances increase the effectiveness of iron sulfate and Vivianite preventing iron chlorosis in white lupin
The main objective of this work was to study the influence of humic substances (HS) on the effectiveness of Fe sulfate and Vivianite in preventing Fe chlorosis in white lupin with a view of performing cost-effective methods to overcome the problem. Two consecutive crops were performed using calcareo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biology and fertility of soils 2008-07, Vol.44 (6), p.875-883 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 883 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 875 |
container_title | Biology and fertility of soils |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | de Santiago, Ana Quintero, José M Carmona, Eusebio Delgado, Antonio |
description | The main objective of this work was to study the influence of humic substances (HS) on the effectiveness of Fe sulfate and Vivianite in preventing Fe chlorosis in white lupin with a view of performing cost-effective methods to overcome the problem. Two consecutive crops were performed using calcareous sand treated with different Fe sources (FeSO₄·7H₂O and Vivianite, at three different rates, and Fe-EDDHA) and five HS rates. Vivianite was more effective and persistent than Fe sulfate in increasing Soils and Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) readings and lupin yield expressed as dry matter (DM), probably due to the type of alteration products formed upon Vivianite oxidation. The effect of Fe sulfate and Vivianite in preventing Fe chlorosis was significantly increased by HS, and the best results were obtained with Vivianite and HS applied at 0.32 g Fe kg⁻¹ and 0.06 g kg⁻¹ growing media, respectively. SPAD readings with this treatment accounted for 85% and 70% of those obtained with Fe-EDDHA in the first and second crop, respectively, whereas DM production was greater with the Vivianite + HS treatment than with Fe-EDDHA. These results showed the potential effectiveness of treatments based on the application of Vivianite and HS in overcoming Fe chlorosis. However, HS applied with Fe sources at rates of 0.5 and 1 g kg⁻¹ growing media decreased SPAD readings and plant yield. These positive and negative effects of HS in preventing Fe chlorosis were more evident with Fe sulfate and Vivianite than with chelated Fe, probably due to the effect of HS on the solubility of Fe forms of the growing medium. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00374-008-0272-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21279350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1896976871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-82d4257d632ea6ee9b3cd03b1273876efcb6661ec009569b9e7f0bc6eb41668c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVoINskD5BTRA-9uR1Ja0k-ltA2hUAPTXIVsna0q-CVNxo7IW9fLS4UeuhpGPj-jxl-xq4EfBIA5jMBKLNuAGwD0sjGnrCVWCvZgLHdO7YCYWwjjZZn7D3RE4BorehWrNzO-xQ4zT1NPgcknnIo6An5tEOOMWKY0gtmJOJj5KmMudJD9BNynzf8Mb0kn1PdDgUrN6W8XaiwG8YyUjoq-evuiAzzIeULdhr9QHj5Z56zh29f729um7uf33_cfLlrgjIwNVZu1rI1G60keo3Y9SpsQPVCGmWNxhh6rbXAANC1uus7NBH6oLFfC61tUOfs4-I9lPF5RprcPlHAYfAZx5mcrKZOtVDBD_-AT-Nccr3NSVXlrWpNhcQChfoTFYzuUNLelzcnwB0rcEsFrlbgjhU4WzNyyVBl8xbLX_H_QtdLKPrR-W1J5B5-SRCq_lkj1qjfCemT_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>230955357</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Humic substances increase the effectiveness of iron sulfate and Vivianite preventing iron chlorosis in white lupin</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>de Santiago, Ana ; Quintero, José M ; Carmona, Eusebio ; Delgado, Antonio</creator><creatorcontrib>de Santiago, Ana ; Quintero, José M ; Carmona, Eusebio ; Delgado, Antonio</creatorcontrib><description>The main objective of this work was to study the influence of humic substances (HS) on the effectiveness of Fe sulfate and Vivianite in preventing Fe chlorosis in white lupin with a view of performing cost-effective methods to overcome the problem. Two consecutive crops were performed using calcareous sand treated with different Fe sources (FeSO₄·7H₂O and Vivianite, at three different rates, and Fe-EDDHA) and five HS rates. Vivianite was more effective and persistent than Fe sulfate in increasing Soils and Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) readings and lupin yield expressed as dry matter (DM), probably due to the type of alteration products formed upon Vivianite oxidation. The effect of Fe sulfate and Vivianite in preventing Fe chlorosis was significantly increased by HS, and the best results were obtained with Vivianite and HS applied at 0.32 g Fe kg⁻¹ and 0.06 g kg⁻¹ growing media, respectively. SPAD readings with this treatment accounted for 85% and 70% of those obtained with Fe-EDDHA in the first and second crop, respectively, whereas DM production was greater with the Vivianite + HS treatment than with Fe-EDDHA. These results showed the potential effectiveness of treatments based on the application of Vivianite and HS in overcoming Fe chlorosis. However, HS applied with Fe sources at rates of 0.5 and 1 g kg⁻¹ growing media decreased SPAD readings and plant yield. These positive and negative effects of HS in preventing Fe chlorosis were more evident with Fe sulfate and Vivianite than with chelated Fe, probably due to the effect of HS on the solubility of Fe forms of the growing medium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0178-2762</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0789</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00374-008-0272-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Crops ; Dry matter ; Fe deficiency ; Fe fertilization ; Fe-chelates ; Fertilizers ; Iron ; Life Sciences ; Original Paper ; Peas ; Plant biology ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Studies ; Sulfates</subject><ispartof>Biology and fertility of soils, 2008-07, Vol.44 (6), p.875-883</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-82d4257d632ea6ee9b3cd03b1273876efcb6661ec009569b9e7f0bc6eb41668c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-82d4257d632ea6ee9b3cd03b1273876efcb6661ec009569b9e7f0bc6eb41668c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00374-008-0272-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00374-008-0272-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Santiago, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintero, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Eusebio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Antonio</creatorcontrib><title>Humic substances increase the effectiveness of iron sulfate and Vivianite preventing iron chlorosis in white lupin</title><title>Biology and fertility of soils</title><addtitle>Biol Fertil Soils</addtitle><description>The main objective of this work was to study the influence of humic substances (HS) on the effectiveness of Fe sulfate and Vivianite in preventing Fe chlorosis in white lupin with a view of performing cost-effective methods to overcome the problem. Two consecutive crops were performed using calcareous sand treated with different Fe sources (FeSO₄·7H₂O and Vivianite, at three different rates, and Fe-EDDHA) and five HS rates. Vivianite was more effective and persistent than Fe sulfate in increasing Soils and Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) readings and lupin yield expressed as dry matter (DM), probably due to the type of alteration products formed upon Vivianite oxidation. The effect of Fe sulfate and Vivianite in preventing Fe chlorosis was significantly increased by HS, and the best results were obtained with Vivianite and HS applied at 0.32 g Fe kg⁻¹ and 0.06 g kg⁻¹ growing media, respectively. SPAD readings with this treatment accounted for 85% and 70% of those obtained with Fe-EDDHA in the first and second crop, respectively, whereas DM production was greater with the Vivianite + HS treatment than with Fe-EDDHA. These results showed the potential effectiveness of treatments based on the application of Vivianite and HS in overcoming Fe chlorosis. However, HS applied with Fe sources at rates of 0.5 and 1 g kg⁻¹ growing media decreased SPAD readings and plant yield. These positive and negative effects of HS in preventing Fe chlorosis were more evident with Fe sulfate and Vivianite than with chelated Fe, probably due to the effect of HS on the solubility of Fe forms of the growing medium.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Fe deficiency</subject><subject>Fe fertilization</subject><subject>Fe-chelates</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Peas</subject><subject>Plant biology</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><issn>0178-2762</issn><issn>1432-0789</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVoINskD5BTRA-9uR1Ja0k-ltA2hUAPTXIVsna0q-CVNxo7IW9fLS4UeuhpGPj-jxl-xq4EfBIA5jMBKLNuAGwD0sjGnrCVWCvZgLHdO7YCYWwjjZZn7D3RE4BorehWrNzO-xQ4zT1NPgcknnIo6An5tEOOMWKY0gtmJOJj5KmMudJD9BNynzf8Mb0kn1PdDgUrN6W8XaiwG8YyUjoq-evuiAzzIeULdhr9QHj5Z56zh29f729um7uf33_cfLlrgjIwNVZu1rI1G60keo3Y9SpsQPVCGmWNxhh6rbXAANC1uus7NBH6oLFfC61tUOfs4-I9lPF5RprcPlHAYfAZx5mcrKZOtVDBD_-AT-Nccr3NSVXlrWpNhcQChfoTFYzuUNLelzcnwB0rcEsFrlbgjhU4WzNyyVBl8xbLX_H_QtdLKPrR-W1J5B5-SRCq_lkj1qjfCemT_g</recordid><startdate>20080701</startdate><enddate>20080701</enddate><creator>de Santiago, Ana</creator><creator>Quintero, José M</creator><creator>Carmona, Eusebio</creator><creator>Delgado, Antonio</creator><general>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080701</creationdate><title>Humic substances increase the effectiveness of iron sulfate and Vivianite preventing iron chlorosis in white lupin</title><author>de Santiago, Ana ; Quintero, José M ; Carmona, Eusebio ; Delgado, Antonio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-82d4257d632ea6ee9b3cd03b1273876efcb6661ec009569b9e7f0bc6eb41668c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Fe deficiency</topic><topic>Fe fertilization</topic><topic>Fe-chelates</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Peas</topic><topic>Plant biology</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Santiago, Ana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quintero, José M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carmona, Eusebio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Antonio</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Biology and fertility of soils</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Santiago, Ana</au><au>Quintero, José M</au><au>Carmona, Eusebio</au><au>Delgado, Antonio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Humic substances increase the effectiveness of iron sulfate and Vivianite preventing iron chlorosis in white lupin</atitle><jtitle>Biology and fertility of soils</jtitle><stitle>Biol Fertil Soils</stitle><date>2008-07-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>875</spage><epage>883</epage><pages>875-883</pages><issn>0178-2762</issn><eissn>1432-0789</eissn><abstract>The main objective of this work was to study the influence of humic substances (HS) on the effectiveness of Fe sulfate and Vivianite in preventing Fe chlorosis in white lupin with a view of performing cost-effective methods to overcome the problem. Two consecutive crops were performed using calcareous sand treated with different Fe sources (FeSO₄·7H₂O and Vivianite, at three different rates, and Fe-EDDHA) and five HS rates. Vivianite was more effective and persistent than Fe sulfate in increasing Soils and Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) readings and lupin yield expressed as dry matter (DM), probably due to the type of alteration products formed upon Vivianite oxidation. The effect of Fe sulfate and Vivianite in preventing Fe chlorosis was significantly increased by HS, and the best results were obtained with Vivianite and HS applied at 0.32 g Fe kg⁻¹ and 0.06 g kg⁻¹ growing media, respectively. SPAD readings with this treatment accounted for 85% and 70% of those obtained with Fe-EDDHA in the first and second crop, respectively, whereas DM production was greater with the Vivianite + HS treatment than with Fe-EDDHA. These results showed the potential effectiveness of treatments based on the application of Vivianite and HS in overcoming Fe chlorosis. However, HS applied with Fe sources at rates of 0.5 and 1 g kg⁻¹ growing media decreased SPAD readings and plant yield. These positive and negative effects of HS in preventing Fe chlorosis were more evident with Fe sulfate and Vivianite than with chelated Fe, probably due to the effect of HS on the solubility of Fe forms of the growing medium.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Berlin/Heidelberg : Springer-Verlag</pub><doi>10.1007/s00374-008-0272-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0178-2762 |
ispartof | Biology and fertility of soils, 2008-07, Vol.44 (6), p.875-883 |
issn | 0178-2762 1432-0789 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21279350 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Agriculture Biomedical and Life Sciences Crops Dry matter Fe deficiency Fe fertilization Fe-chelates Fertilizers Iron Life Sciences Original Paper Peas Plant biology Soil Science & Conservation Studies Sulfates |
title | Humic substances increase the effectiveness of iron sulfate and Vivianite preventing iron chlorosis in white lupin |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T08%3A35%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Humic%20substances%20increase%20the%20effectiveness%20of%20iron%20sulfate%20and%20Vivianite%20preventing%20iron%20chlorosis%20in%20white%20lupin&rft.jtitle=Biology%20and%20fertility%20of%20soils&rft.au=de%20Santiago,%20Ana&rft.date=2008-07-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=875&rft.epage=883&rft.pages=875-883&rft.issn=0178-2762&rft.eissn=1432-0789&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00374-008-0272-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1896976871%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=230955357&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |