Examining incentives for adjacent non-industrial private forest landowners to cooperate

Individual landowners may capture non-timber benefits from both their own forested parcels and adjacent parcels owned by different landowners. These benefits may affect incentives for landowners to cooperate in their forest management decisions. Landowner survey data is used to examine incentives to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forest policy and economics 2010-02, Vol.12 (2), p.104-110
Hauptverfasser: Vokoun, Melinda, Amacher, Gregory S., Sullivan, Jay, Wear, Dave
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110
container_issue 2
container_start_page 104
container_title Forest policy and economics
container_volume 12
creator Vokoun, Melinda
Amacher, Gregory S.
Sullivan, Jay
Wear, Dave
description Individual landowners may capture non-timber benefits from both their own forested parcels and adjacent parcels owned by different landowners. These benefits may affect incentives for landowners to cooperate in their forest management decisions. Landowner survey data is used to examine incentives to cooperate concerning joint forest management and coordination of harvesting. We find spatial factors to be particularly important to these incentives. The percentage of neighboring land employed in agriculture or crop uses and the number of bordering landowners are important positive predictors of willingness to cooperate concerning joint forest management, while the latter has a negative effect on willingness to coordinate timing of harvest. We also find that the non-timber values an individual receives from adjacent land are important positive predictors of cooperation incentives in general. Our results confirm, first, that cross parcel externalities modeled in theoretical work do in fact exist, and, second, that there is merit to formulating future policies with the incentives of landowners to participate in cooperative agreements with neighbors in mind. Such information could be important to addressing landscape level threats to forest health and sustainability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21273143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1389934109000963</els_id><sourcerecordid>21273143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-2e0932f2e2b616ef565227cb586686467caaaac8194c8a36652ae427e0afe40f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1r3DAQNSWBfPUfBOpTbnZGHyvLl0IJSdsQ6CFZchRaeZxq8Uqu5N00_75jHHKsYKRh5r3H6E1RXDKoGTB1va37mMY41BygrUHXAPpTccp0w6sGVnBEudBt1QrJToqznLcArAEmTovn279254MPL6UPDsPkD5hLkittt7VzoQwxVD50-zwlb4dyTP5gJ5wxmKdysKGLrwFTLqdYuhhHTNS-KI57O2T8_P6eF-u726ebH9XDr-8_b749VE5yPVUcoRW858g3iinsV2rFeeM2K62UVlI1ztJxmrXSaSsUtS1K3iDYHiX04ry4WnTHFP_saSCz89nhQGNh3GfDGW8Ek4KAcgG6FHNO2Bv6yM6mN8PAzC6arVlcNLOLBrQhF4l2v9ASjug-OIj4Dj4YYRmn642CA4kJ6-eUYpx7IA2j6u9pR2JfFrHeRmNfks9m_UgcQdvgIAQQ4uuCQPLs4DGZ7DzSYjqf0E2mi_7_8_4DZpehBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>21273143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Examining incentives for adjacent non-industrial private forest landowners to cooperate</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Vokoun, Melinda ; Amacher, Gregory S. ; Sullivan, Jay ; Wear, Dave</creator><creatorcontrib>Vokoun, Melinda ; Amacher, Gregory S. ; Sullivan, Jay ; Wear, Dave</creatorcontrib><description>Individual landowners may capture non-timber benefits from both their own forested parcels and adjacent parcels owned by different landowners. These benefits may affect incentives for landowners to cooperate in their forest management decisions. Landowner survey data is used to examine incentives to cooperate concerning joint forest management and coordination of harvesting. We find spatial factors to be particularly important to these incentives. The percentage of neighboring land employed in agriculture or crop uses and the number of bordering landowners are important positive predictors of willingness to cooperate concerning joint forest management, while the latter has a negative effect on willingness to coordinate timing of harvest. We also find that the non-timber values an individual receives from adjacent land are important positive predictors of cooperation incentives in general. Our results confirm, first, that cross parcel externalities modeled in theoretical work do in fact exist, and, second, that there is merit to formulating future policies with the incentives of landowners to participate in cooperative agreements with neighbors in mind. Such information could be important to addressing landscape level threats to forest health and sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-9341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>agricultural land ; Amenity values ; collaborative management ; crops ; decision making ; econometric models ; economic impact ; externalities ; forest health ; Forest management ; forest policy ; forests ; Harvesting ; landowners ; logging ; non-timber benefits ; private lands ; Spatial interdependence ; Spatial interdependence Amenity values Strategic behavior Forest management Harvesting ; spatial variation ; Strategic behavior ; surveys ; sustainable forestry ; temporal variation</subject><ispartof>Forest policy and economics, 2010-02, Vol.12 (2), p.104-110</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-2e0932f2e2b616ef565227cb586686467caaaac8194c8a36652ae427e0afe40f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-2e0932f2e2b616ef565227cb586686467caaaac8194c8a36652ae427e0afe40f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeforpol/v_3a12_3ay_3a2010_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a104-110.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vokoun, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amacher, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wear, Dave</creatorcontrib><title>Examining incentives for adjacent non-industrial private forest landowners to cooperate</title><title>Forest policy and economics</title><description>Individual landowners may capture non-timber benefits from both their own forested parcels and adjacent parcels owned by different landowners. These benefits may affect incentives for landowners to cooperate in their forest management decisions. Landowner survey data is used to examine incentives to cooperate concerning joint forest management and coordination of harvesting. We find spatial factors to be particularly important to these incentives. The percentage of neighboring land employed in agriculture or crop uses and the number of bordering landowners are important positive predictors of willingness to cooperate concerning joint forest management, while the latter has a negative effect on willingness to coordinate timing of harvest. We also find that the non-timber values an individual receives from adjacent land are important positive predictors of cooperation incentives in general. Our results confirm, first, that cross parcel externalities modeled in theoretical work do in fact exist, and, second, that there is merit to formulating future policies with the incentives of landowners to participate in cooperative agreements with neighbors in mind. Such information could be important to addressing landscape level threats to forest health and sustainability.</description><subject>agricultural land</subject><subject>Amenity values</subject><subject>collaborative management</subject><subject>crops</subject><subject>decision making</subject><subject>econometric models</subject><subject>economic impact</subject><subject>externalities</subject><subject>forest health</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>forest policy</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>landowners</subject><subject>logging</subject><subject>non-timber benefits</subject><subject>private lands</subject><subject>Spatial interdependence</subject><subject>Spatial interdependence Amenity values Strategic behavior Forest management Harvesting</subject><subject>spatial variation</subject><subject>Strategic behavior</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>sustainable forestry</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><issn>1389-9341</issn><issn>1872-7050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1r3DAQNSWBfPUfBOpTbnZGHyvLl0IJSdsQ6CFZchRaeZxq8Uqu5N00_75jHHKsYKRh5r3H6E1RXDKoGTB1va37mMY41BygrUHXAPpTccp0w6sGVnBEudBt1QrJToqznLcArAEmTovn279254MPL6UPDsPkD5hLkittt7VzoQwxVD50-zwlb4dyTP5gJ5wxmKdysKGLrwFTLqdYuhhHTNS-KI57O2T8_P6eF-u726ebH9XDr-8_b749VE5yPVUcoRW858g3iinsV2rFeeM2K62UVlI1ztJxmrXSaSsUtS1K3iDYHiX04ry4WnTHFP_saSCz89nhQGNh3GfDGW8Ek4KAcgG6FHNO2Bv6yM6mN8PAzC6arVlcNLOLBrQhF4l2v9ASjug-OIj4Dj4YYRmn642CA4kJ6-eUYpx7IA2j6u9pR2JfFrHeRmNfks9m_UgcQdvgIAQQ4uuCQPLs4DGZ7DzSYjqf0E2mi_7_8_4DZpehBQ</recordid><startdate>20100201</startdate><enddate>20100201</enddate><creator>Vokoun, Melinda</creator><creator>Amacher, Gregory S.</creator><creator>Sullivan, Jay</creator><creator>Wear, Dave</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>[Amsterdam; New York]: Elsevier Science</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100201</creationdate><title>Examining incentives for adjacent non-industrial private forest landowners to cooperate</title><author>Vokoun, Melinda ; Amacher, Gregory S. ; Sullivan, Jay ; Wear, Dave</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-2e0932f2e2b616ef565227cb586686467caaaac8194c8a36652ae427e0afe40f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>agricultural land</topic><topic>Amenity values</topic><topic>collaborative management</topic><topic>crops</topic><topic>decision making</topic><topic>econometric models</topic><topic>economic impact</topic><topic>externalities</topic><topic>forest health</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>forest policy</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>landowners</topic><topic>logging</topic><topic>non-timber benefits</topic><topic>private lands</topic><topic>Spatial interdependence</topic><topic>Spatial interdependence Amenity values Strategic behavior Forest management Harvesting</topic><topic>spatial variation</topic><topic>Strategic behavior</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>sustainable forestry</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vokoun, Melinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amacher, Gregory S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sullivan, Jay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wear, Dave</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vokoun, Melinda</au><au>Amacher, Gregory S.</au><au>Sullivan, Jay</au><au>Wear, Dave</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Examining incentives for adjacent non-industrial private forest landowners to cooperate</atitle><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle><date>2010-02-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>104-110</pages><issn>1389-9341</issn><eissn>1872-7050</eissn><abstract>Individual landowners may capture non-timber benefits from both their own forested parcels and adjacent parcels owned by different landowners. These benefits may affect incentives for landowners to cooperate in their forest management decisions. Landowner survey data is used to examine incentives to cooperate concerning joint forest management and coordination of harvesting. We find spatial factors to be particularly important to these incentives. The percentage of neighboring land employed in agriculture or crop uses and the number of bordering landowners are important positive predictors of willingness to cooperate concerning joint forest management, while the latter has a negative effect on willingness to coordinate timing of harvest. We also find that the non-timber values an individual receives from adjacent land are important positive predictors of cooperation incentives in general. Our results confirm, first, that cross parcel externalities modeled in theoretical work do in fact exist, and, second, that there is merit to formulating future policies with the incentives of landowners to participate in cooperative agreements with neighbors in mind. Such information could be important to addressing landscape level threats to forest health and sustainability.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.008</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1389-9341
ispartof Forest policy and economics, 2010-02, Vol.12 (2), p.104-110
issn 1389-9341
1872-7050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_21273143
source RePEc; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects agricultural land
Amenity values
collaborative management
crops
decision making
econometric models
economic impact
externalities
forest health
Forest management
forest policy
forests
Harvesting
landowners
logging
non-timber benefits
private lands
Spatial interdependence
Spatial interdependence Amenity values Strategic behavior Forest management Harvesting
spatial variation
Strategic behavior
surveys
sustainable forestry
temporal variation
title Examining incentives for adjacent non-industrial private forest landowners to cooperate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T13%3A53%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Examining%20incentives%20for%20adjacent%20non-industrial%20private%20forest%20landowners%20to%20cooperate&rft.jtitle=Forest%20policy%20and%20economics&rft.au=Vokoun,%20Melinda&rft.date=2010-02-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=104-110&rft.issn=1389-9341&rft.eissn=1872-7050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.08.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E21273143%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=21273143&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1389934109000963&rfr_iscdi=true