Visual perception of planar-rotated 2D objects in goldfish (Carassius auratus)

•We investigated the ability of fish to visually identify planar-rotated 2D objects.•Accuracy on the 2AFC task was affected by whether we rotated one or both stimuli.•Overall performance was equivalent with simple and complex stimuli.•Goldfish did not exhibit viewpoint-invariant performance with 2D...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavioural processes 2018-12, Vol.157, p.263-278
Hauptverfasser: DeLong, Caroline M., Fobe, Irene, O’Leary, Taylor, Wilcox, Kenneth Tyler
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 278
container_issue
container_start_page 263
container_title Behavioural processes
container_volume 157
creator DeLong, Caroline M.
Fobe, Irene
O’Leary, Taylor
Wilcox, Kenneth Tyler
description •We investigated the ability of fish to visually identify planar-rotated 2D objects.•Accuracy on the 2AFC task was affected by whether we rotated one or both stimuli.•Overall performance was equivalent with simple and complex stimuli.•Goldfish did not exhibit viewpoint-invariant performance with 2D objects. This study examined the ability of goldfish to visually identify 2D objects rotated in the picture plane. This ability would be adaptive for fish since they move in three dimensions and frequently view objects from different orientations. Goldfish performed a two-alternative forced choice task in which they were trained to discriminate between two objects at 0°, then tested with novel aspect angles (+/− 45°, +/− 90°, +/− 135°, 180°). Stimuli consisted of an arrow and half circle (Experiment 1) and line drawings of a turtle and frog (Experiments 2 and 3). In the first two experiments, the S+ and S− were presented at the same aspect angle. Performance in these experiments exceeded chance on four of seven novel aspect angles. Overall accuracy was not significantly different with complex stimuli (animal drawings) vs. simple stimuli (geometric shapes). In Experiment 3, when fish were tested with the S+ at varying aspect angles and the S− always presented at 0°, the fish failed to discriminate among the stimuli at all but one aspect angle. These goldfish viewing planar-rotated 2D objects did not display viewpoint-invariant performance, nor did they show a systematic decrement in performance as a function of aspect angle.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2126911455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376635718302225</els_id><sourcerecordid>2157465529</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-10be379350f1d4459057463f4dff3f082291152e04b28f1650bd2d8f06452eb13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhq0K1G4L_6BClriUQ5bxZ5ILUrWlgFTRC3C1nHhcHGXjYCeV-u_xagsHDpxGevXMO6OHkEsGWwZMvx-2Hc4p9lsOrCnRFqA9IRvW1LxqBDQvyAZErSstVH1GznMeAAoJ-pScCRC6bpnckK8_Ql7tSGdMPc5LiBONns6jnWyqUlzsgo7yGxq7Afsl0zDRhzg6H_JPerWzyeYc1kztmuyy5nevyEtvx4yvn-cF-X778dvuc3V3_-nL7vqu6kULS8WgQ1G3QoFnTkrVgqqlFl4674WHhvOWMcURZMcbz7SCznHXeNCypB0TF-Tq2FsM_FoxL2Yfco9j-Rvjmg1nXJcKqVRB3_6DDnFNU_muUIezSvG2UPJI9SnmnNCbOYW9TU-GgTn4NoM5-jYH34e0-C5rb57L126P7u_SH8EF-HAEsNh4DJhM7gNOPbqQilDjYvj_hd_MxpCB</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2157465529</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual perception of planar-rotated 2D objects in goldfish (Carassius auratus)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>DeLong, Caroline M. ; Fobe, Irene ; O’Leary, Taylor ; Wilcox, Kenneth Tyler</creator><creatorcontrib>DeLong, Caroline M. ; Fobe, Irene ; O’Leary, Taylor ; Wilcox, Kenneth Tyler</creatorcontrib><description>•We investigated the ability of fish to visually identify planar-rotated 2D objects.•Accuracy on the 2AFC task was affected by whether we rotated one or both stimuli.•Overall performance was equivalent with simple and complex stimuli.•Goldfish did not exhibit viewpoint-invariant performance with 2D objects. This study examined the ability of goldfish to visually identify 2D objects rotated in the picture plane. This ability would be adaptive for fish since they move in three dimensions and frequently view objects from different orientations. Goldfish performed a two-alternative forced choice task in which they were trained to discriminate between two objects at 0°, then tested with novel aspect angles (+/− 45°, +/− 90°, +/− 135°, 180°). Stimuli consisted of an arrow and half circle (Experiment 1) and line drawings of a turtle and frog (Experiments 2 and 3). In the first two experiments, the S+ and S− were presented at the same aspect angle. Performance in these experiments exceeded chance on four of seven novel aspect angles. Overall accuracy was not significantly different with complex stimuli (animal drawings) vs. simple stimuli (geometric shapes). In Experiment 3, when fish were tested with the S+ at varying aspect angles and the S− always presented at 0°, the fish failed to discriminate among the stimuli at all but one aspect angle. These goldfish viewing planar-rotated 2D objects did not display viewpoint-invariant performance, nor did they show a systematic decrement in performance as a function of aspect angle.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-6357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30367914</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Animals ; Behavior, Animal - physiology ; Carassius auratus ; Female ; Fish ; Goldfish ; Goldfish - physiology ; Male ; Object constancy ; Object discrimination ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Space Perception - physiology ; Visual perception</subject><ispartof>Behavioural processes, 2018-12, Vol.157, p.263-278</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Dec 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-10be379350f1d4459057463f4dff3f082291152e04b28f1650bd2d8f06452eb13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-10be379350f1d4459057463f4dff3f082291152e04b28f1650bd2d8f06452eb13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8728-9975 ; 0000-0003-3969-0427</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376635718302225$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30367914$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>DeLong, Caroline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fobe, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Kenneth Tyler</creatorcontrib><title>Visual perception of planar-rotated 2D objects in goldfish (Carassius auratus)</title><title>Behavioural processes</title><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><description>•We investigated the ability of fish to visually identify planar-rotated 2D objects.•Accuracy on the 2AFC task was affected by whether we rotated one or both stimuli.•Overall performance was equivalent with simple and complex stimuli.•Goldfish did not exhibit viewpoint-invariant performance with 2D objects. This study examined the ability of goldfish to visually identify 2D objects rotated in the picture plane. This ability would be adaptive for fish since they move in three dimensions and frequently view objects from different orientations. Goldfish performed a two-alternative forced choice task in which they were trained to discriminate between two objects at 0°, then tested with novel aspect angles (+/− 45°, +/− 90°, +/− 135°, 180°). Stimuli consisted of an arrow and half circle (Experiment 1) and line drawings of a turtle and frog (Experiments 2 and 3). In the first two experiments, the S+ and S− were presented at the same aspect angle. Performance in these experiments exceeded chance on four of seven novel aspect angles. Overall accuracy was not significantly different with complex stimuli (animal drawings) vs. simple stimuli (geometric shapes). In Experiment 3, when fish were tested with the S+ at varying aspect angles and the S− always presented at 0°, the fish failed to discriminate among the stimuli at all but one aspect angle. These goldfish viewing planar-rotated 2D objects did not display viewpoint-invariant performance, nor did they show a systematic decrement in performance as a function of aspect angle.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Behavior, Animal - physiology</subject><subject>Carassius auratus</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Goldfish</subject><subject>Goldfish - physiology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Object constancy</subject><subject>Object discrimination</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Space Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><issn>0376-6357</issn><issn>1872-8308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhq0K1G4L_6BClriUQ5bxZ5ILUrWlgFTRC3C1nHhcHGXjYCeV-u_xagsHDpxGevXMO6OHkEsGWwZMvx-2Hc4p9lsOrCnRFqA9IRvW1LxqBDQvyAZErSstVH1GznMeAAoJ-pScCRC6bpnckK8_Ql7tSGdMPc5LiBONns6jnWyqUlzsgo7yGxq7Afsl0zDRhzg6H_JPerWzyeYc1kztmuyy5nevyEtvx4yvn-cF-X778dvuc3V3_-nL7vqu6kULS8WgQ1G3QoFnTkrVgqqlFl4674WHhvOWMcURZMcbz7SCznHXeNCypB0TF-Tq2FsM_FoxL2Yfco9j-Rvjmg1nXJcKqVRB3_6DDnFNU_muUIezSvG2UPJI9SnmnNCbOYW9TU-GgTn4NoM5-jYH34e0-C5rb57L126P7u_SH8EF-HAEsNh4DJhM7gNOPbqQilDjYvj_hd_MxpCB</recordid><startdate>201812</startdate><enddate>201812</enddate><creator>DeLong, Caroline M.</creator><creator>Fobe, Irene</creator><creator>O’Leary, Taylor</creator><creator>Wilcox, Kenneth Tyler</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8728-9975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3969-0427</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201812</creationdate><title>Visual perception of planar-rotated 2D objects in goldfish (Carassius auratus)</title><author>DeLong, Caroline M. ; Fobe, Irene ; O’Leary, Taylor ; Wilcox, Kenneth Tyler</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-10be379350f1d4459057463f4dff3f082291152e04b28f1650bd2d8f06452eb13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Behavior, Animal - physiology</topic><topic>Carassius auratus</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Goldfish</topic><topic>Goldfish - physiology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Object constancy</topic><topic>Object discrimination</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Space Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>DeLong, Caroline M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fobe, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Leary, Taylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilcox, Kenneth Tyler</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>DeLong, Caroline M.</au><au>Fobe, Irene</au><au>O’Leary, Taylor</au><au>Wilcox, Kenneth Tyler</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual perception of planar-rotated 2D objects in goldfish (Carassius auratus)</atitle><jtitle>Behavioural processes</jtitle><addtitle>Behav Processes</addtitle><date>2018-12</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>157</volume><spage>263</spage><epage>278</epage><pages>263-278</pages><issn>0376-6357</issn><eissn>1872-8308</eissn><abstract>•We investigated the ability of fish to visually identify planar-rotated 2D objects.•Accuracy on the 2AFC task was affected by whether we rotated one or both stimuli.•Overall performance was equivalent with simple and complex stimuli.•Goldfish did not exhibit viewpoint-invariant performance with 2D objects. This study examined the ability of goldfish to visually identify 2D objects rotated in the picture plane. This ability would be adaptive for fish since they move in three dimensions and frequently view objects from different orientations. Goldfish performed a two-alternative forced choice task in which they were trained to discriminate between two objects at 0°, then tested with novel aspect angles (+/− 45°, +/− 90°, +/− 135°, 180°). Stimuli consisted of an arrow and half circle (Experiment 1) and line drawings of a turtle and frog (Experiments 2 and 3). In the first two experiments, the S+ and S− were presented at the same aspect angle. Performance in these experiments exceeded chance on four of seven novel aspect angles. Overall accuracy was not significantly different with complex stimuli (animal drawings) vs. simple stimuli (geometric shapes). In Experiment 3, when fish were tested with the S+ at varying aspect angles and the S− always presented at 0°, the fish failed to discriminate among the stimuli at all but one aspect angle. These goldfish viewing planar-rotated 2D objects did not display viewpoint-invariant performance, nor did they show a systematic decrement in performance as a function of aspect angle.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>30367914</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.009</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8728-9975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3969-0427</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-6357
ispartof Behavioural processes, 2018-12, Vol.157, p.263-278
issn 0376-6357
1872-8308
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2126911455
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accuracy
Animals
Behavior, Animal - physiology
Carassius auratus
Female
Fish
Goldfish
Goldfish - physiology
Male
Object constancy
Object discrimination
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Space Perception - physiology
Visual perception
title Visual perception of planar-rotated 2D objects in goldfish (Carassius auratus)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T22%3A14%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20perception%20of%20planar-rotated%202D%20objects%20in%20goldfish%20(Carassius%20auratus)&rft.jtitle=Behavioural%20processes&rft.au=DeLong,%20Caroline%20M.&rft.date=2018-12&rft.volume=157&rft.spage=263&rft.epage=278&rft.pages=263-278&rft.issn=0376-6357&rft.eissn=1872-8308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.10.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2157465529%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2157465529&rft_id=info:pmid/30367914&rft_els_id=S0376635718302225&rfr_iscdi=true