Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis
The Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis assumes visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination to originate from sensory-automatic temporal processing. Although temporal discrimination of extremely brief intervals in the range of tens-of-milliseconds is predicted to depend mainly on modality...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) 2018-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2364-2377 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2377 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2364 |
container_title | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) |
container_volume | 71 |
creator | Rammsayer, Thomas Pichelmann, Stefan |
description | The Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis assumes visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination to originate from sensory-automatic temporal processing. Although temporal discrimination of extremely brief intervals in the range of tens-of-milliseconds is predicted to depend mainly on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing, duration discrimination of longer intervals is predicted to require more and more amodal, higher order cognitive resources and decreasing input from the sensory-automatic timing system with increasing interval duration. In two duration discrimination experiments with sensory modality as a within- and a between-subjects variable, respectively, we tested two decisive predictions derived from the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis: (1) visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination were expected to be larger for brief intervals in the tens-of-milliseconds range than for longer ones, and (2) visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination of longer intervals should disappear when statistically controlled for modality-specific input from the sensory-automatic timing system. In both experiments, visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination were larger for the brief than for the longer intervals. Furthermore, visual-auditory differences observed with longer intervals disappeared when statistically controlled for modality-specific input from the sensory-automatic timing system. Thus, our findings clearly confirmed the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1747021817741611 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2126901221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1747021817741611</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2126901221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-2e0ba3b135b87d9a41c81d2a662712aa3bbdba4365dff1597d9adbb9383426583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhiNERT_gzglZ4sKhAY-dtbPcqhVtkSr1QOEaOfF4cZXEwU5Wyl_kVzHpLotUiZNf248fjz1Z9hb4RwCtP4EuNBdQUi5AAbzIzpalnAuhXh4zlKfZeUqPnBdSK_0qO5VcKlGAOMt-__BpMm1uJuvHEGdmvXMYsW8wMd8zO0Uz-kDBpyb6zveHKQ7YW0apC9a0fpzzNGDjnW8uWcI-kYukY-iIb9iI3RCiadkQA5mT77ef2Sb0O4xbygx33i53MhciG38i25GTKppZcE_zbwfl1VH5sBSzZbfzEAhIPr3OTpxpE745jBfZ9-svD5vb_O7-5uvm6i5vCgljLpDXRtYgV3Wp7doU0JRghVFKaBCGtmpbm0KqlXUOVuuFsXW9lqUshFqV8iL7sPfSW35NmMaqo7_BtjU9hilVAoRacxACCH3_DH0MU-ypuieqEFrwheJ7qokhpYiuGuinTZwr4NXS5-p5n-nIu4N4qju0xwN_G0tAvgeS2eK_W_8r_AML37UU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2126427201</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Rammsayer, Thomas ; Pichelmann, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Rammsayer, Thomas ; Pichelmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>The Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis assumes visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination to originate from sensory-automatic temporal processing. Although temporal discrimination of extremely brief intervals in the range of tens-of-milliseconds is predicted to depend mainly on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing, duration discrimination of longer intervals is predicted to require more and more amodal, higher order cognitive resources and decreasing input from the sensory-automatic timing system with increasing interval duration. In two duration discrimination experiments with sensory modality as a within- and a between-subjects variable, respectively, we tested two decisive predictions derived from the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis: (1) visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination were expected to be larger for brief intervals in the tens-of-milliseconds range than for longer ones, and (2) visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination of longer intervals should disappear when statistically controlled for modality-specific input from the sensory-automatic timing system. In both experiments, visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination were larger for the brief than for the longer intervals. Furthermore, visual-auditory differences observed with longer intervals disappeared when statistically controlled for modality-specific input from the sensory-automatic timing system. Thus, our findings clearly confirmed the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-0218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-0226</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1747021817741611</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30362412</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation ; Adult ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Hypotheses ; Male ; Photic Stimulation ; Psychophysics ; Regression Analysis ; Time Factors ; Time Perception - physiology ; Visual Perception - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2018-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2364-2377</ispartof><rights>Experimental Psychology Society 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-2e0ba3b135b87d9a41c81d2a662712aa3bbdba4365dff1597d9adbb9383426583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-2e0ba3b135b87d9a41c81d2a662712aa3bbdba4365dff1597d9adbb9383426583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1747021817741611$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1747021817741611$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30362412$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rammsayer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichelmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis</title><title>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</title><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><description>The Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis assumes visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination to originate from sensory-automatic temporal processing. Although temporal discrimination of extremely brief intervals in the range of tens-of-milliseconds is predicted to depend mainly on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing, duration discrimination of longer intervals is predicted to require more and more amodal, higher order cognitive resources and decreasing input from the sensory-automatic timing system with increasing interval duration. In two duration discrimination experiments with sensory modality as a within- and a between-subjects variable, respectively, we tested two decisive predictions derived from the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis: (1) visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination were expected to be larger for brief intervals in the tens-of-milliseconds range than for longer ones, and (2) visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination of longer intervals should disappear when statistically controlled for modality-specific input from the sensory-automatic timing system. In both experiments, visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination were larger for the brief than for the longer intervals. Furthermore, visual-auditory differences observed with longer intervals disappeared when statistically controlled for modality-specific input from the sensory-automatic timing system. Thus, our findings clearly confirmed the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation</subject><subject>Psychophysics</subject><subject>Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Visual Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1747-0218</issn><issn>1747-0226</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhiNERT_gzglZ4sKhAY-dtbPcqhVtkSr1QOEaOfF4cZXEwU5Wyl_kVzHpLotUiZNf248fjz1Z9hb4RwCtP4EuNBdQUi5AAbzIzpalnAuhXh4zlKfZeUqPnBdSK_0qO5VcKlGAOMt-__BpMm1uJuvHEGdmvXMYsW8wMd8zO0Uz-kDBpyb6zveHKQ7YW0apC9a0fpzzNGDjnW8uWcI-kYukY-iIb9iI3RCiadkQA5mT77ef2Sb0O4xbygx33i53MhciG38i25GTKppZcE_zbwfl1VH5sBSzZbfzEAhIPr3OTpxpE745jBfZ9-svD5vb_O7-5uvm6i5vCgljLpDXRtYgV3Wp7doU0JRghVFKaBCGtmpbm0KqlXUOVuuFsXW9lqUshFqV8iL7sPfSW35NmMaqo7_BtjU9hilVAoRacxACCH3_DH0MU-ypuieqEFrwheJ7qokhpYiuGuinTZwr4NXS5-p5n-nIu4N4qju0xwN_G0tAvgeS2eK_W_8r_AML37UU</recordid><startdate>20181101</startdate><enddate>20181101</enddate><creator>Rammsayer, Thomas</creator><creator>Pichelmann, Stefan</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181101</creationdate><title>Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis</title><author>Rammsayer, Thomas ; Pichelmann, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c431t-2e0ba3b135b87d9a41c81d2a662712aa3bbdba4365dff1597d9adbb9383426583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation</topic><topic>Psychophysics</topic><topic>Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Visual Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rammsayer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pichelmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rammsayer, Thomas</au><au>Pichelmann, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis</atitle><jtitle>Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)</jtitle><addtitle>Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)</addtitle><date>2018-11-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>71</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2364</spage><epage>2377</epage><pages>2364-2377</pages><issn>1747-0218</issn><eissn>1747-0226</eissn><abstract>The Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis assumes visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination to originate from sensory-automatic temporal processing. Although temporal discrimination of extremely brief intervals in the range of tens-of-milliseconds is predicted to depend mainly on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing, duration discrimination of longer intervals is predicted to require more and more amodal, higher order cognitive resources and decreasing input from the sensory-automatic timing system with increasing interval duration. In two duration discrimination experiments with sensory modality as a within- and a between-subjects variable, respectively, we tested two decisive predictions derived from the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis: (1) visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination were expected to be larger for brief intervals in the tens-of-milliseconds range than for longer ones, and (2) visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination of longer intervals should disappear when statistically controlled for modality-specific input from the sensory-automatic timing system. In both experiments, visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination were larger for the brief than for the longer intervals. Furthermore, visual-auditory differences observed with longer intervals disappeared when statistically controlled for modality-specific input from the sensory-automatic timing system. Thus, our findings clearly confirmed the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>30362412</pmid><doi>10.1177/1747021817741611</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1747-0218 |
ispartof | Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 2018-11, Vol.71 (11), p.2364-2377 |
issn | 1747-0218 1747-0226 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2126901221 |
source | Access via SAGE; MEDLINE |
subjects | Acoustic Stimulation Adult Auditory Perception - physiology Discrimination (Psychology) - physiology Female Humans Hypotheses Male Photic Stimulation Psychophysics Regression Analysis Time Factors Time Perception - physiology Visual Perception - physiology Young Adult |
title | Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination depend on modality-specific, sensory-automatic temporal processing: Converging evidence for the validity of the Sensory-Automatic Timing Hypothesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T23%3A25%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual-auditory%20differences%20in%20duration%20discrimination%20depend%20on%20modality-specific,%20sensory-automatic%20temporal%20processing:%20Converging%20evidence%20for%20the%20validity%20of%20the%20Sensory-Automatic%20Timing%20Hypothesis&rft.jtitle=Quarterly%20journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology%20(2006)&rft.au=Rammsayer,%20Thomas&rft.date=2018-11-01&rft.volume=71&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2364&rft.epage=2377&rft.pages=2364-2377&rft.issn=1747-0218&rft.eissn=1747-0226&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1747021817741611&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2126901221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2126427201&rft_id=info:pmid/30362412&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1747021817741611&rfr_iscdi=true |